How the E.U. trade deal wards off more escalation but could raise costs for companies and consumers
The tariffs, or import taxes, paid when Americans buy European products could raise prices for U.S. consumers and dent profits for European companies and their partners who bring goods into the country.
Here are some things to know about the trade deal between the United States and the European Union:
Trump and von der Leyen's announcement, made during Trump's visit to one of his golf courses in Scotland, leaves many details to be filled in.
The headline figure is a 15% tariff rate on about 70% of European goods brought into the U.S., including cars, computer chips and pharmaceuticals. It's lower than the 20% that Trump initially proposed, and lower than his threats of 50% and then 30%.
The remaining 30% is still open to further decisions and negotiations.
Von der Leyen said that the two sides agreed on zero tariffs on both sides for a range of 'strategic' goods: Aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products and some natural resources and critical raw materials. Specifics were lacking.
She said that the two sides 'would keep working' to add more products to the list.
Additionally, EU companies would purchase what Trump said was $750 billion (638 billion euros) worth of natural gas, oil and nuclear fuel over three years to replace Russian energy supplies that Europe is seeking to exit in any case.
Meanwhile, European companies would invest an additional $600 billion (511 billion euros) in the U.S. under a political commitment that isn't legally binding, officials said.
Brussels and Washington will shortly issue a joint statement that frames the deal but isn't yet legally binding, according to senior officials who weren't authorized to be publicly named according to European Commission policy.
The joint statement will have 'some very precise commitments and others which will need to be spelled out in different ways,' a senior European Commission official said.
EU officials said that the zero tariff list would include nuts, pet food, dairy products and seafood.
Trump said that the 50% U.S. tariff on imported steel would remain. Von der Leyen said that the two sides agreed to further negotiations to fight a global steel glut, reduce tariffs and establish import quotas — that is, set amounts that can be imported, often at a lower rate or tariff-free.
Trump said that pharmaceuticals weren't included in the deal. Von der Leyen said that the pharmaceuticals issue was 'on a separate sheet of paper' from Sunday's deal.
And von der Leyen said that when it came to farm products, the EU side made clear that 'there were tariffs that could not be lowered,' without specifying which products.
The 15% rate removes Trump's threat of a 30% tariff. But it effectively raises the tariff on EU goods from 1.2% last year to 17% and would reduce the 27-nation's gross domestic product by 0.5%, said Jack Allen-Reynolds, deputy chief eurozone economist at Capital Economics.
Higher tariffs, or import taxes, on European goods mean sellers in the U.S. would have to either increase prices for consumers — risking loss of market share — or swallow the added cost in terms of lower profits. The higher tariffs are expected to hurt export earnings for European firms and slow the economy.
Von der Leyen said that the 15% rate was 'the best we could do' and credited the deal with maintaining access to the U.S. market, and providing 'stability and predictability for companies on both sides.'
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal which avoided 'an unnecessary escalation in trans-Atlantic trade relations' and said that 'we were able to preserve our core interests,' while adding that 'I would have very much wished for further relief in trans-Atlantic trade.'
Senior French officials on Monday criticized the accord. Strategy Commissioner Clément Beaune said that the deal failed to reflect the bloc's economic strength.
'This is an unequal and unbalanced agreement,' he said. 'Europe didn't wield its strength. We are the world's leading trading power.'
While the rate is lower than threatened, 'the big caveat to today's deal is that there is nothing on paper, yet,' said Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macro at ING bank.
'With this disclaimer in mind and at face value, (the) agreement would clearly bring an end to the uncertainty of recent months. An escalation of the U.S.-EU trade tensions would have been a severe risk for the global economy,' Brzeski said.
'This risk seems to have been avoided.'
Asked if European carmakers could still sell cars at 15%, von der Leyen said the rate was much lower than the current 27.5%. That has been the rate under Trump's 25% tariff on cars from all countries, plus the preexisting U.S. car tariff of 2.5%.
The impact is likely to be substantial on some companies, given that automaker Volkswagen said that it suffered a 1.3 billion-euro ($1.5 billion) hit to profits in the first half of the year from the higher tariffs.
Mercedes-Benz dealers in the U.S. have said they were holding the line on 2025 model year prices 'until further notice.' The German automaker has a partial tariff shield, because it makes 35% of the Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the U.S. in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, but the company said that it expects prices to undergo 'significant increases' in coming years.
Before Trump returned to office, the U.S. and the EU maintained generally low tariff levels in what is the largest bilateral trading relationship in the world, with around 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) in annual trade.
Together the U.S. and the EU have 44% of the global economy. The U.S. rate averaged 1.47% for European goods, while the EU has averaged 1.35% for American products, according to the Bruegel think tank in Brussels.
Trump has complained about the EU's 198 billion-euro ($232.5 billion) trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more from European businesses than the other way around, and has said that the European market isn't open enough for U.S.-made cars.
However, American companies fill some of the trade gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings and legal and financial services. And about 30% of European imports are from American-owned companies, according to the European Central Bank.
McHugh and McNeil write for the Associated Press.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump injects new dose of uncertainty in tariffs as he pushes start date back to Aug. 7
WASHINGTON (AP) — For weeks, President Donald Trump was promising the world economy would change on Friday with his new tariffs in place. It was an ironclad deadline, administration officials assured the public. But when Trump signed the order Thursday night imposing new tariffs on 68 countries and the European Union, the start date of the punishing import taxes was pushed back seven days so that the tariff schedule could be updated. The change — while potentially welcome news to countries that had not yet reached a deal with the U.S. — injected a new dose of uncertainty for consumers and businesses still wondering what's going to happen and when. Trump has promised that his tax hikes on the nearly $3 trillion in goods imported to the United States will usher in newfound wealth, launch a cavalcade of new factory jobs, reduce the budget deficits and, simply, get other countries to treat America with more respect. The vast tariffs risk jeopardizing America's global standing as allies feel forced into unfriendly deals. As taxes on the raw materials used by U.S. factories and basic goods, the tariffs also threaten to create new inflationary pressures and hamper economic growth — concerns the Trump White House has dismissed. Questions swirl around the tariffs despite Trump's eagerness As the clock ticked toward Trump's self-imposed deadline, few things seemed to be settled other than the president's determination to levy the taxes he has talked about for decades. The very legality of the tariffs remains an open question as a U.S. appeals court on Thursday heard arguments on whether Trump had exceeded his authority by declaring an 'emergency' under a 1977 law to charge the tariffs, allowing him to avoid congressional approval. Trump was ebullient as much of the world awaited what he would do. 'Tariffs are making America GREAT & RICH Again,' he said Thursday morning on Truth Social. Others saw a policy carelessly constructed by the U.S. president, one that could impose harms gradually over time that would erode America's power and prosperity. 'The only things we'll know for sure on Friday morning are that growth-sapping U.S. import taxes will be historically high and complex, and that, because these deals are so vague and unfinished, policy uncertainty will remain very elevated,' said Scott Lincicome, a vice president of economics at the Cato Institute. 'The rest is very much TBD.' The new tariffs build off ones announced in the spring Trump initially imposed the Friday deadline after his previous 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April resulted in a stock market panic. His unusually high tariff rates unveiled then led to recession fears, prompting Trump to impose a 90-day negotiating period. When he was unable to create enough trade deals with other countries, he extended the timeline and sent out letters to world leaders that simply listed rates, prompting a slew of hasty agreements. Swiss imports will now be taxed at a higher rate — 39% — than the 31% Trump threatened in April, while Liechtenstein saw its rate slashed from 37% to 15%. Countries not listed in the Thursday night order would be charged a baseline 10% tariff. Trump negotiated trade frameworks over the past few weeks with the EU, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia and the Philippines — allowing the president to claim victories as other nations sought to limit his threat of charging even higher tariff rates. He said on Thursday there were agreements with other countries, but he declined to name them. Thursday began with a palpable sense of tension The EU was awaiting a written agreement on its 15% tariff deal. Switzerland and Norway were among the dozens of countries that did not know what their tariff rate would be, while Trump agreed after a Thursday morning phone call to keep Mexico's tariffs at 25% for a 90-day negotiating period. European leaders face blowback for seeming to cave to Trump, even as they insist that this is merely the start of talks and stress the importance of maintaining America's support of Ukraine's fight against Russia. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has already indicated that his country can no longer rely on the U.S. as an ally, and Trump declined to talk to him on Thursday. India, with its 25% tariff announced Wednesday by Trump, may no longer benefit as much from efforts to pivot manufacturing out of China. While the Trump administration has sought to challenge China's manufacturing dominance, it is separately in extended trade talks with that country, which faces a 30% tariff and is charging a 10% retaliatory rate on the U.S. Major companies came into the week warning that tariffs would begin to squeeze them financially. Ford Motor Co. said it anticipated a net $2 billion hit to earnings this year from tariffs. French skincare company Yon-Ka is warning of job freezes, scaled-back investment and rising prices. It's unclear whether Trump's new tariffs will survive a legal challenge Federal judges sounded skeptical Thursday about Trump's use of a 1977 law to declare the long-standing U.S. trade deficit a national emergency that justifies tariffs on almost every country on Earth. 'You're asking for an unbounded authority,' Judge Todd Hughes of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit told a Justice Department lawyer representing the administration. The judges didn't immediately rule, and the case is expected to eventually reach the Supreme Court. The Trump White House has pointed to the increase in federal revenues as a sign that the tariffs will reduce the budget deficit, with $127 billion in customs and duties collected so far this year — about $70 billion more than last year. New tariffs threaten to raise inflation rates There are not yet signs that tariffs will lead to more domestic manufacturing jobs, and the U.S. economy now has 14,000 fewer manufacturing jobs than it did in April. On Thursday, one crucial measure of inflation, known as the Personal Consumption Expenditures index, showed that prices have climbed 2.6% over the 12 months that ended in June, a sign that inflation may be accelerating as the tariffs flow through the economy. The prospect of higher inflation from the tariffs has caused the Federal Reserve to hold off on additional cuts to its benchmark rates, a point of frustration for Trump, who on Truth Social, called Fed Chair Jerome Powell a 'TOTAL LOSER.' But ahead of Trump's tariffs, Powell seemed to suggest that the tariffs had put the U.S. economy and much of the world into a state of unknowns. 'There are many uncertainties left to resolve,' Powell told reporters Wednesday. 'So, yes, we are learning more and more. It doesn't feel like we're very close to the end of that process. And that's not for us to judge, but it does — it feels like there's much more to come.' __ AP writer Paul Wiseman contributed to this report. Josh Boak, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
Ford posts first quarterly loss in two years after $800 million tariff hit
Automotive giant Ford posted its first quarterly loss in two years on Wednesday after seeing $800 billion in tariff costs. Ford reported $50.2 billion in second-quarter revenue, a 5 percent increase from the second quarter of last year. The Dearborn, Mich., company reported a net loss of $36 million, stemming from 'special charges related to a field service action and expenses related to a previously announced cancellation of an electric vehicle program.' Costs related to tariffs will run the company around $2 billion in annual earnings. Ford's top executives are in touch with the White House to tamp down tariffs on steel and aluminum. They've made it clear that Ford as the most American automaker should not be disadvantaged,' Ford's CFO Sherry House said on Wednesday, according to The Wall Street Journal. 'We are optimistic.' President Trump slapped a 25 percent tariff on imported automobiles and parts in April. Since then, he has adjusted portions of the auto tariffs and reached a deal with the European Union, including a 15 percent tariff on cars. 'We recorded our fourth consecutive quarter of year-over-year cost improvement, excluding the impact of tariffs, building on progress we made last year when we closed roughly $1.5 billion of our competitive cost gap in material cost,' House said. Ford manufactures most of its vehicles in the U.S. The company has raised prices in May on three of its models produced in Mexico due to, in part, the impact of Trump's tariffs. Ford reported having $28.4 billion in cash and $46.6 billion in liquidity at the end of the quarter.
Miami Herald
14 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Federal judge postpones termination of TPS for Nicaragua, Honduras and Nepal
A California federal judge has ruled to postpone the termination of Temporary Protected Status for approximately 61,000 immigrants from Nicaragua, Honduras and Nepal, many of whom have been living in the United States for decades. The Trump administration in June had terminated the TPS status for Nepal and in July for Honduras and Nicaragua, saying the conditions in those countries no longer support the designation for deportation protection. The administration, in its efforts to revamp the program and align it with its mass deportation policy, had terminated the status for countries like Cameroon, Afghanistan and Venezuela, emphasizing TPS was meant to be temporary, not long-term. The National TPS Alliance and seven TPS holders challenged the decision in a lawsuit in July, arguing that the administration failed to conduct a full review of current conditions in those countries and that the 60-day timeline provided for the termination is unlawful. With the termination dates fast approaching, they had requested that the judge postpone the effective dates until the court makes a final judgment on whether the administration's decisions to terminate were lawful. U.S. District Judge Trini L. Thompson's ruling on Thursday means the temporary protection status for Nepal, which was set to end on Aug. 5, and for Honduras and Nicaragua on Sept. 6, will remain in place and be extended to Nov. 18, the next scheduled hearing on the case. 'The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty, and the American dream. That is all Plaintiffs seek. Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names, and purify their blood. The Court disagrees,' Thompson said in her ruling. TPS grants humanitarian relief, such as deportation protection and work permits, to people from countries experiencing political turmoil or natural disasters. Nicaragua and Honduras were given the status in 1999 after Hurricane Mitch caused extensive destruction in the countries. The designation had continually been extended until the first Trump administration decided to terminate it. That decision was also challenged in a lawsuit, and the first Trump administration chose not to enforce the termination. The extension continued until the decision by the second Trump administration to terminate the status. Nepal, the other country in the lawsuit, was designated for TPS status in 2015 after a 7.8 magnitude earthquake caused massive destruction and displaced millions. In its response to the lawsuit, the Trump administration argued the court did not have jurisdiction in reviewing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's determination to terminate TPS for the three countries. The administration also cited national security concerns. The judge asked the administration to clarify why those covered under TPS would be national security concerns when they had been living in the U.S. for a significant period. The administration emphasized it had reviewed the conditions of those countries and it was safe for TPS recipients to return. And it argued that the influx of migrants coming through the southern border over the past four years had strained resources that would have been used for proper vetting of those coming into the country. The administration, in its response, did not clarify how that risk related to those who had already been the U.S. for decades. 'Indeed, not all TPS beneficiaries are security concerns. However, aliens can be a security concern and be present in the United States,' the administration stated its responses to Thompson's question. In her decision, the judge also pointed out that the Department of Homeland Security was not responsive to the argument presented by the National TPS Alliance that barring court reviews of TPS decisions would allow the Trump administration to use TPS as a lever for negotiations with other countries. 'The Court shares this concern and does not forget that this country has bartered with human lives. Nor does the Court shut its eyes to the country's shifting attitudes towards immigrants,' the ruling said, agreeing with the National TPS Alliance that the decision to terminate the TPS designation was not entirely based on the respective country's conditions. Harold Rocha, president of the Nicaraguan American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, had been optimistically awaiting the judge's decision. His organization had printed our summaries of the case in Spanish and English and distributed them to its members earlier this week in anticipation of the decision. 'Judge Thompson's order to postpone provides temporary relief for the close to 60,000 beneficiaries from Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua. Legal reasoning suggests there's a likelihood plaintiffs will succeed on the merits, and that is also a source of encouragement for a vulnerable group,' Rocha said. The ruling by Thomson to postpone the TPS termination date comes almost a month after a federal judge in New York ruled in favor of Haitians with temporary status, finding that Noem exceeded her authority when she shortened the 18-month extension granted under the Biden administration. In that case, the administration had made similar arguments that conditions in Haiti had improved, and terminating that status was in the national interest of the United States. The Trump administration could appeal Thursday's decision. It does, however, bring some solace for many Nicaraguans in South Florida, many of whom live in Sweetwater in Miami-Dade County and is sometimes referred to as 'Little Managua.'
