EU and US aim towards agreement to avoid 50% tariffs by 9 July
'If there is to be an agreement, the most realistic outcome would likely be a general framework or a 'principle agreement' — something that, due to time constraints, would resemble the kind of understanding the US has reached with the UK or even with China,' a senior EU diplomat said.
'This would not be a detailed, comprehensive trade deal, but rather a political understanding laying the groundwork for more concrete arrangements," they added.
The potential agreement was discussed at a behind-closed-doors meeting in Brussels on Monday, with European Commission officials briefing EU ambassadors about the ongoing negotiations between the EU and the US.
Ambassadors were also informed of a new US counterproposal, which offered 'nothing very concrete', one of the diplomats said.
Both sides under pressure
The EU and the US are under pressure from the looming 9 July deadline, after which US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose 50% tariffs on EU imports if negotiations fail.
Since mid-March, Washington has implemented a new policy that calls into question its trade relations with partners across the globe. The US currently imposes tariffs of 50% on EU steel and aluminium, 25% on cars, and 10% on all EU imports.
After weeks of fruitless discussions, negotiations between the European Commission — which holds the mandate to negotiate on behalf of the 27 member states in trade matters — and the Trump administration began in mid-June, but their outcome remains in doubt.
The Commission initially proposed a zero-tariff agreement on industrial products and an offer to purchase strategic goods such as US liquefied natural gas. But it now appears to be coming to terms with a deal that would maintain a baseline 10% tariff on EU imports. Lower tariffs might then be negotiated for strategic sectors such as aircraft, for which transatlantic production lines are interdependent.
However, member states are divided over a potential deal with a baseline 10% tariff. Germany and Italy are reportedly in favour, while countries like Ireland and France remain more sceptical.
'If the US maintain 10% tariffs, there will have to be compensation on goods and products imported from the US,' French president Emmanuel Macron stated on 26 June after an EU summit, adding: 'The levy must be the same — 10% for 10%, or the equivalent of 10%.'
A second EU diplomat told Euronews that the agreement could be deliberately short for the two parties to reach further and more detailed agreements in different sectors.
"It is not excluded that some sectors could be addressed while others are not," an EU official said.
'Asymmetrical agreement' possible
European Commission officials also asked ambassadors to consider several scenarios, including the possibility of an 'asymmetrical agreement' in which the EU would make more concessions than the US, the prospect of no deal, and the option of the EU triggering retaliatory measures.
During the same meeting with the member states, the Commission indicated that a second list of countermeasures proposed on 8 May was still under development, according to a third EU diplomat.
This list was subject to feedback from industry over several weeks, and member states will still need to adopt it formally.
The proposed list targets €95 billion in US products. It would come on top of a first list of retaliation, which covers €21 billion worth of US products and was suspended until July 14 after Donald Trump announced a 90-day truce in the trade dispute.
A team of Commission experts is in Washington this week to advance the negotiation.
The EU's trade commissioner, Maroš Šefčovič, is set to travel there on Wednesday for a meeting on Thursday with his American counterparts, US Secretary of Commerce Howard William Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Lee Greer.
On Monday, Šefčovič confirmed that the bloc had received 'the first draft of the (US) proposals for the eventual agreement in principle.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
38 minutes ago
- France 24
US-Vietnam trade deal sows new China uncertainty
The Southeast Asian nation has the third-biggest trade surplus with the United States of any country after China and Mexico, and was targeted with one of the highest rates in the US president's "Liberation Day" tariff blitz on April 2. The deal announced Wednesday is the first full pact Trump has sealed with an Asian nation, and analysts say it may give a glimpse of the template Washington will use with other countries still scrambling for accords. The 46 percent rate due to take effect next week has been averted, with Vietnam set to face a minimum 20 percent tariff in return for opening its market to US products including cars. But a 40 percent tariff will hit goods passing through the country to circumvent steeper trade barriers -- a practice called "transshipping". Washington has accused Hanoi of relabelling Chinese goods to skirt its tariffs, but raw materials from the world's number two economy are the lifeblood of Vietnam's manufacturing industries. "From a global perspective, perhaps the most interesting point is that this deal again seems in large part to be about China," said Capital Economics. It said the terms on transshipment "will be seen as a provocation in Beijing, particularly if similar conditions are included in any other deals agreed over coming days". 'The looming question' Shares in clothing companies and sport equipment manufacturers -- which have a large footprint in Vietnam -- rose on news of the deal in New York. But they later declined sharply as details were released. "This is a much better outcome than a flat 46 percent tariff, but I wouldn't celebrate just yet," said Hanoi-based Dan Martin of Asian business advisory firm Dezan Shira & Associates. "Everything now depends on how the US decides to interpret and enforce the idea of transshipment," he added. "If the US takes a broader view and starts questioning products that use foreign parts, even when value is genuinely added in Vietnam, it could end up affecting a lot of companies that are playing by the rules." Vietnam's government said in a statement late on Wednesday that under the deal the country had promised "preferential market access for US goods, including large-engine cars". But the statement gave scant detail about the transshipment arrangements in the deal, which Trump announced on his Truth Social platform. Bloomberg Economics forecast Vietnam could lose a quarter of its exports to the United States in the medium term, endangering more than two percent of its gross domestic product as a result of the agreement. Uncertainty over how transshipping will be "defined or enforced" is likely to have diplomatic repercussions, said Bloomberg Economics expert Rana Sajedi. "The looming question now is how China will respond," she said. "Beijing has made clear that it would respond to deals that came at the expense of Chinese interests." "The decision to agree to a higher tariff on goods deemed to be 'transshipped' through Vietnam may fall in that category," added Sajedi.
Euronews
39 minutes ago
- Euronews
Trump's tax bill struggles to gain GOP support in late-night session
House Republicans were straining past midnight to advance President Donald Trump's tax and spending cuts package, after GOP leaders spent the afternoon and evening working furiously to persuade sceptical holdouts to send it to his desk by the Fourth of July deadline. The roll call vote that started late on Wednesday was held open for hours as several Republicans refused to give their votes. With few to spare from their slim majority, the outcome was in jeopardy. House Speaker Mike Johnson had recalled lawmakers to Washington, eager to seize on the momentum of the bill's passage the day before in the Senate, and he vowed to press ahead. 'Everybody wants to get to yes,' Johnson said during an interview on Fox News as the voting was underway. But as voting stalled Trump lashed out in a midnight post: 'What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove???' He also warned of political fallout from the delay: 'Costing you votes!!!' The idea of quickly convening for a vote on the more than 800-page bill was a risky gambit, one designed to meet Trump's demand for a holiday finish. Republicans have struggled mightily with the bill nearly every step of the way, often succeeding by the narrowest of margins — just one vote. Their slim 220-212 majority leaves little room for defections. Several Republicans are balking at being asked to rubber-stamp the Senate version less than 24 hours after passage. A number of moderate Republicans from competitive districts have objected to the Senate bill's cuts to Medicaid, while conservatives have lambasted the legislation as straying from their fiscal goals. It falls to Johnson and his team to convince them that the time for negotiations is over. They will need assistance from Trump to close the deal, and lawmakers headed to the White House for a two-hour session on Wednesday to talk to the president about their concerns. Republicans are relying on their majority hold of Congress to push the package over a wall of unified Democratic opposition. No Democrats voted for the bill in the Senate and none were expected to do so in the House. 'Hell no!' said House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, flanked by fellow Democrats outside the Capitol. In an early warning sign of Republican resistance, a resolution setting up terms for debating Trump's bill barely cleared the House Rules Committee on Wednesday morning. As soon as it came to the full House, it stalled out as GOP leadership waited for lawmakers who were delayed coming back to Washington and conducted closed-door negotiations with holdouts. By nightfall, as pizzas and other dinners were arriving at the Capitol, the next steps were uncertain. Trump pushes Republicans to do 'the right thing' The bill would extend and make permanent various individual and business tax breaks from Trump's first term, plus temporarily add new ones he promised during the 2024 campaign. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 (€5,000) deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 (€64,000) a year. In all, the legislation contains about $4.5 trillion (€3.8tn) in tax cuts over 10 years. The bill also provides about $350 billion (€297bn) for defence and Trump's immigration crackdown. Republicans partially pay for it all by less spending on Medicaid and food assistance. The Congressional Budget Office projects the bill will add about $3.3 trillion (€1.8tn) to the federal debt over the coming decade. The House passed its version of the bill in May by a single vote, despite worries about spending cuts and the overall price tag. Now it's being asked to give final passage to a version that, in many respects, exacerbates those concerns. The Senate bill's projected impact on the nation's debt, for example, is significantly higher. 'Let's go Republicans and everyone else,' Trump said in a late evening post. Speaker Johnson is intent on meeting Trump's timeline and betting that hesitant Republicans won't cross the president because of the heavy political price they would have to pay. They need only look to Senator Thom Tillis from North Carolina, who announced his intention to vote against the legislation over the weekend. Soon, the president was calling for a primary challenger to the senator and criticising him on social media. Tillis quickly announced he would not seek a third term. Democrats target vulnerable Republicans to join them in opposition Flanked by nearly every member of his caucus, Democratic Leader Jeffries of New York delivered a pointed message: With all Democrats voting 'no', they only need to flip four Republicans to prevent the bill from passing. Jeffries invoked the 'courage' of the late Senator John McCain giving a thumbs-down to the GOP effort to 'repeal and replace' the Affordable Care Act, and singled out Republicans from districts expected to be highly competitive in 2026, including two from Pennsylvania. 'Why would Rob Bresnahan vote for this bill? Why would Scott Perry vote for this bill?' Jeffries asked. Democrats have described the bill in dire terms, warning that Medicaid cuts would result in lives lost and food stamp cuts would be 'literally ripping the food out of the mouths of children, veterans and seniors,' Jeffries said Monday. Republicans say they are trying to right-size the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and applies existing work requirements in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, to more beneficiaries. States will also pick up more of the cost for food benefits. The driving force behind the bill, however, is the tax cuts. Many expire at the end of this year if Congress doesn't act. The Tax Policy Center, which provides nonpartisan analysis of tax and budget policy, projected the bill would result next year in a $150 (€127) tax break for the lowest quintile of Americans, a $1,750 (€1,480) tax cut for the middle quintile and a $10,950 (€9,290) tax cut for the top quintile. That's compared with what they would face if the 2017 tax cuts expired.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Fake Charlie Hebdo cover attacking Moldova Pride circulates online
French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo has once again been targeted by pro-Russian actors, who this time have used its likeness to attack the LGBT movement in Moldova. This image, posted on Telegram and other social media networks, states that "Moldova has chosen a new religion". It depicts people at Moldova's pride march, brandishing the LGBT rainbow and Moldovan flags, chasing away an Orthodox priest. Comments from some users sharing the image read that the priest is being hounded by a "crowd of crazed perverts", while others say Moldova is being pulled towards Europe, "whose religion is sodomy". However, the statements are all based on disinformation. The fake front cover contains the edition number 1716 and a publication date of 10 June. A search on Charlie Hebdo's official website reveals that the magazine didn't actually publish an issue on 10 June. The closest publishing date is 11 June, which has the issue number 1716. We can see that this front cover is completely different to the one being shared online. This issue doesn't deal with Moldova's pride celebrations at all. Instead, it is mocking France's interior minister, Bruno Retailleau, who is also the leader of the conservative Les Républicains party, for his stance on the fishing industry. Retailleau has often been a vocal critic of LGBT rights, including opposing the 2013 "Mariage pour tous" law that legalised same-sex marriage in France. So, instead of mocking the LGBT community in the fake front cover, as people claim, Charlie Hebdo is in fact satirising someone who has previously been an opponent in the real edition. Moldova's pride march took place on 15 June and was subject to other false reports at the time, such as incorrect claims that a counter-protest against supposed "LGBT propaganda" was met with police brutality. A Spanish-language news report said that a peaceful march for "traditional family values" in Chișinău was interrupted by the "brutal intervention" of security forces. It added that President Maia Sandu, with backing from Brussels, ordered the pride march to go ahead "at any cost", to the detriment of "Christian family values". But ultimately, this turned out to be false, with EUvsDisinfo reporting that pro-Russian actors harassed the pride march and that police were firm but fair in keeping them apart. The anti-disinformation task force, which sits under the European External Action Service (EEAS), said that contrary to misleading reports, demonstrators gathered by the pro-Russian Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova tried to break the cordon separating them from the pride march, despite authorities having designed different routes to avoid confrontation. "The allegation made in this disinformation story appeals to homophobic views among the audience, falsely framing local pro-LGBTQ activities as an EU imposition against 'national' or 'Christian' values," EUvsDisinfo said. "The exploitation of homophobia is a well-established pro-Kremlin disinformation technique." Indeed, some try to whip up hysteria over a narrative that LGBT rights fly in the face of traditional, Christian, European values. However, in reality, many LGBT Europeans have reconciled their sexuality with their faith and see no opposition between the two. What other fake Charlie Hebdo issues are out there and why? Fake Charlie Hebdo front covers are so common that the magazine has put a statement on its website that pro-Russian actors are using its likeness to spread propaganda. EuroVerify has previously debunked other false issues attributed to Charlie Hebdo, most of which focused on Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy. In one, he was falsely accused of taking advantage of the late Pope Francis' death, while in another, he was mocked for trying to use the reopening of the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris to boost support for Ukraine against Russia's war. Both Ukraine and Moldova are two of the most recurring targets of pro-Russian propaganda. In the case of the former, the objective appears to be to damage Zelenskyy's public opinion and destabilise Western support for Ukraine. In the case of the latter, those spreading disinformation seemingly want to derail Moldova's path to developing closer ties with the rest of Europe and ultimately joining the EU.
