&w=3840&q=100)
Cong's Chidambaram calls INDIA bloc 'frayed'; BJP mocks 'picnic alliance'
Speaking at the launch of the book 'Contesting Democratic Deficit' by Salman Khurshid and Mritunjay Singh Yadav in New Delhi, Chidambaram openly questioned if the INDIA bloc – a coalition of opposition parties formed to counter the BJP – remained united. 'The future [of the INDIA bloc] is not so bright, as Mritunjay Singh Yadav said. He seems to feel that the alliance is still intact, but I am not sure. It is only Salman (Khurshid) who can answer because he was part of the negotiating team for the INDIA bloc. If the alliance is totally intact, I will be very happy. But it seems that it is frayed,' Chidambaram said.
#WATCH | Delhi: Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram says, "The future is not so bright as Mr Mrityunjay Singh Yadav says. He seems to feel that the INDIA alliance is still intact. I am not sure. Maybe Salman (Khurshid) can answer because he was part of the negotiating team of… pic.twitter.com/ZTJA9xsS1L
— ANI (@ANI) May 16, 2025
He said there was still time to bring the alliance together and that events could still unfold to restore its unity. However, he stressed the formidable challenge posed by the BJP, describing it as 'so formidably organised' that the INDIA bloc would need to respond on all fronts if it hoped to compete effectively.
Chidambaram further added, 'In my experience and my reading of history, there has been no political party so formidably organised as the BJP. It's not just another political party.'
BJP responds to P Chidambaram's remarks
Responding to Chidambaram's remarks, BJP national spokesperson Syed Zafar Islam said, 'Chidambaram ji has admitted that this ghamandiya (arrogant) alliance has no basis, no future. We have said time and again that this INDI alliance is a picnic alliance which keeps travelling from place to place seeking to hatch a conspiracy against the BJP'.
BJP leader Amit Malviya pointed out that Chidambaram used the word 'formidable' six times in a short speech to describe the BJP and its election machinery. In a post on X, Malviya said, 'P Chidambaram used the word 'formidable' six times to describe the BJP and its election machinery in a speech that lasted less than three minutes. The successive defeats have left the Congress scarred, much like Pakistan after its bases were destroyed by the Indian Air Force.'
P. Chidambaram used the word 'formidable' six times to describe the BJP and its election machinery in a speech that lasted less than three minutes. The successive defeats have left the Congress scarred, much like Pakistan after its bases were destroyed by the Indian Air Force. https://t.co/gbCYOLUWl7
— Amit Malviya (@amitmalviya) May 16, 2025
BJP leader Shehzad Poonawalla also labeled the INDIA bloc a 'tukde-tukde alliance,' arguing that the coalition was formed out of convenience rather than commitment, and that the public had already rejected it.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, BJP's Kerala unit chief, described the bloc as a 'motley collection' united only by 'love for corruption'.
In a post on X, he said, The @BJP4India is a formidable party bcoz it believes in strong values/principles of IndiaFirst and cares for all Indians - and so has the support of most Indians, INDI alliance is a motley collection of parties - brought together by only their love for corruption & exploitation and fear/hatred of @narendramodi ji.'
The @BJP4India is a formidable party bcoz it believes in strong values/principles of IndiaFirst and cares for all Indians - and so has the support of most Indians INDI alliance is a motley collection of parties - brought together by only their love for corruption & exploitation… https://t.co/FX41GxTkAr
— Rajeev Chandrasekhar ???????? (@RajeevRC_X) May 16, 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Wire
a few seconds ago
- The Wire
Supreme Court Stays Calcutta HC Order Pausing West Bengal's Attempts to Notify New OBC List
Law The high court's order passed last month is 'surprising' and 'prima facie erroneous', the top court has been quoted as saying. New Delhi: The Supreme Court has put on hold a Calcutta high court order staying the West Bengal government's attempts to notify a new list of OBC communities, finding the lower court's reasoning 'surprising' and 'prima facie erroneous'. A bench of the Supreme Court comprising Chief Justice B.R. Gavai as well as Justices K. Vinod Chandran and N.V. Anjaria on Monday (July 28) passed an interim order staying the Calcutta high court's judgment passed last month. 'Reservation is part of the executive functions. This is the settled law right from Indra Sawhney; the position is that the executive can do it … legislation is not necessary,' the bench, which called the high court's order 'surprising', said per LiveLaw. It was also quoted as saying that the high court's reasoning was 'erroneous' at first glance. A copy of the apex court's interim order in the matter is awaited. The high court on June 17 had stayed the West Bengal government's attempts to notify a new list of OBC communities, finding that it had on the face of it 'proceeded in hot haste' to try and bring back the same communities and quotas that the court had struck down in May last year. Justices Rajasekhar Mantha and Tapabrata Chakraborty of the high court added that the government had done so 'by executive orders and not in exercise of state's legislative functions'. The government ought to have placed the relevant reports before the legislature 'for amendment and introduction of classes in the schedule' of the West Bengal Backward Classes Act, 2012, the high court had said, which LiveLaw cited Justice Gavai as disagreeing with on Monday. Last week too the chief justice while listing the case for hearing had indicated that the executive can indeed classify communities for reservation as has been the case since the top court's Indra Sawhney judgment of 1992, which among other things upheld quotas for OBCs. West Bengal's Trinamool Congress-led government decided to prepare a new list of OBC communities after the Calcutta high court in May last year struck down lakhs of OBC certificates it had issued since 2010. In that judgment the high court, which had also struck down some sections of the 2012 Backward Classes Act, said that the government's decision to notify 77 Muslim communities as backward amounted to an 'affront to the Muslim community as a whole'. 'This court's mind is not free from doubt that the said community has been treated as a commodity for political ends … Such reservation is therefore also an affront to democracy and the Constitution of India as a whole,' the bench comprising Justices Mantha and Chakraborty had ruled. The state government challenged this judgment in the Supreme Court and ultimately withdrew it. It later challenged the high court's June 17, 2025 judgment in the top court. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.


Hans India
a few seconds ago
- Hans India
Mamata Banerjee accuses ECI of starting BLO training in Bengal without informing Trinamool govt
Kolkata: West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, on Monday, accused the Election Commission of India (ECI) of beginning the process of training the booth-level officers (BLOs) in the state without giving prior intimation to the state government. "The training process was started without informing me or the Chief Secretary," the Chief Minister said while addressing an administrative review meeting at Birbhum district. Speaking on the occasion, she also accused a section of the District Magistrates of allotting duties for such BLO training without informing their higher authorities. "I came to know that about 1,000 state government staff were recently sent to Delhi for this training purpose. But I was not aware of it. The district magistrates should have informed their higher authorities and the Chief Secretary," Chief Minister Banerjee said. Thereafter, she also issued a subtle note of caution, reminding that those allotted election duties were state government employees at the end of the day. "The authority of the Election Commission of India starts only after the election dates are announced and not before that. Do not forget that you are all state government employees. You will have to ensure that the name of a single genuine voter is not deleted from the voters' list. Everywhere, Bengali-speaking people are harassed. We must stand by them," the Chief Minister said. Strongly reacting to the Chief Minister's latent caution reminding the BLOs that they were state government employees, BJP's Information Technology Cell Chief and the party's central observer for West Bengal, Amit Malviya, claimed that the Chief Minister had now started to openly threaten ECI officials. "West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee is now openly threatening Election Commission officials, saying they work for the state and shouldn't follow directions from the National Election Commission! Why this desperation? To shield her illegal Bangladeshi and Rohingya vote bank. She's brazenly opposing a clean, verified voter list -- because TMC's survival depends on fake voters," Malviya said in a statement which he posted on his official X account. The BJP leader also claimed that this desperation on the part of Mamata Banerjee was because she knew that without those bogus votes, Trinamool Congress would collapse. "This isn't just political arrogance -- it's a direct assault on India's Constitution and democracy!" Malviya added.


The Hindu
a few seconds ago
- The Hindu
KPCC orders disciplinary committee inquiry into controversial leak of former DCC president Palode Ravi's private conversation
The Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) has instituted an internal enquiry into the circumstances surrounding the 'disconcerting' leak of a private telephone conversation, which resulted in the exit of former Thiruvananthapuram District Congress Committee (DCC) president Palode Ravi, a party veteran, on the charge of broadcasting a bleak view of the Congress' prospects in the upcoming local body elections and the 2026 Assembly polls. Thiruvanchoor Radhakrishnan, KPCC disciplinary committee chairperson, will head the inquiry. A Congress insider said the KPCC was concerned about whether the episode signalled the resurgence of factional feuding with an eye on organisational posts ahead of the party's reorganisation exercise before the local body polls. One-off incident Mr. Radhakrishnan told The Hindu that organisational infighting was at 'an all-time low' in the party. He said that prima facie, the episode, which arguably put the party leadership on the defensive and provided sensational grist to the ruling front to disparage the Opposition, seemed 'a one-off incident and not an entrenched effort.' 'Yet the investigation will cover all aspects. It will focus on strengthening the party and restoring the morale of the rank and file ahead of the crucial polls. It will not be a fault-apportioning exercise targeted at any particular party worker. I have sought explanations from the parties concerned and will be at the KPCC headquarters in Thiruvananthapuram on August 31,' he said. Earlier, the KPCC had expelled Congress block general secretary A. Jaleel in connection with the episode. The KPCC leadership was reportedly of the view that Mr. Ravi had candidly admitted to a few home truths about the party's election preparedness at the grassroots level, including the perceived lack of boots on the ground and the dearth of ward-level election committees. Mr. Ravi had also flagged a perceived erosion of the party's traditional Muslim base, which he stated was benefiting the Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)]. He also signalled that the BJP's ascendancy would come at a steep cost for the Congress, including the loss of workers to poaching by other parties. Former Speaker N. Sakthan, who replaced Mr. Ravi as the DCC president and assumed charge on Monday (July 28, 2025), said the senior leader possibly lost his guard because he was speaking to a party office-bearer. Mr. Ravi apologised to the party for his inadvertent lack of circumspection. He said he merely flagged the political perils that lie ahead as was routine in party committees.