Taco Bell's New Menu Items Turn Heads with Bold Challenge to Chicken Chains
Each dish centers on the brand's new all-white meat chicken strips, marinated in jalapeño buttermilk and breaded with tortilla chips and breadcrumbs for a crunchy, zesty bite.
These strips made waves earlier this year when the brand re-launched its Crispy Chicken Nuggets for eight weeks in April. That re-release followed a 2024 trial run that sold out in under a week.
"The demand for our nuggets was off the charts," said Taylor Montgomery, Taco Bell's Chief Marketing Officer, in a press release. "We're not like every other chicken spot out there—we're doing crispy chicken the only way we know how: full of flavor and unmistakably Taco Bell."
The new items also introduce two sauces into the mix: a spicy ranchero made with Anaheim and jalapeño chiles, tomatoes, and garlic, and an avocado ranch for a creamy, cooling option.
This move marks another step in Taco Bell's bid to stake out territory in the fast food chicken wars. With competitors like McDonald's recently expanding their lineup with McCrispy Strips and specialty dips, Taco Bell's pivot is clear: give fans something crispy, but keep it unexpected.
According to the company, nearly five million Americans tried the crispy nuggets during their debut, and the nuggets were included in almost one in six orders. That success helped fuel the shift toward making crispy chicken a permanent fixture.
"We're a taco place doing chicken our own way," said Montgomery. "And like all our best moments, it's a little unexpected—because we've never been about following the rules."
With summer heating up and fast food menus getting a spicy upgrade, Taco Bell's crispy chicken drop might just be the flavor shake-up fans didn't know they needed.Taco Bell's New Menu Items Turn Heads with Bold Challenge to Chicken Chains first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 12, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
an hour ago
- Black America Web
Documentary On The Legendary Justice Thurgood Marshall Set To Premiere In Fall
Source: Sam Falk / Getty On Sept. 9, fans and history buffs will get an inside look at the extraordinary life of Thurgood Marshall, the first African American Supreme Court justice to take the bench in 1967. Set to premiere on PBS, Becoming Thurgood: America's Social Architect traces the upbringing and legacy of Justice Marshall. The documentary follows his journey from his roots in Baltimore, Maryland, through his education at Lincoln and Howard universities—two premier Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)—to his trailblazing work as a civil rights lawyer and jurist. It will also explore his pivotal role in challenging school segregation and championing justice, culminating in his historic appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court. Viewers are in for a treat as the documentary will feature the iconic justice retelling his own life story using rare footage pulled from an eight-hour oral history recording conducted by the civil rights leader, according to the Chicago Defender. 'For the first time, audiences will hear Thurgood Marshall tell his own story — in his own words,' the documentary's director Alexis Aggrey told the publication on July 2. 'This film is the first to center Marshall's own voice, drawn from a rare eight-hour oral history. It's not just a documentary; it's a conversation with a man whose legal mind reshaped the nation and whose legacy still echoes through our justice system today.' As a lawyer and judge, Thurgood Marshall dedicated his career to defending the constitutional rights of all Americans, a commitment that earned him the nickname 'Mr. Civil Rights.' According to the United States Courts website, after attending the all-Black Lincoln University, Marshall was denied admission to the University of Maryland School of Law due to his race. Undeterred, he enrolled at Howard University School of Law, where he graduated first in his class and studied under Charles Hamilton Houston, the school's vice-dean and a leading civil rights strategist. At Howard, Marshall came to believe that the doctrine of 'separate but equal' established in Plessy v. Ferguson was fundamentally flawed. He recognized that education was key to equality and was deeply moved by the glaring disparities in educational opportunities for Black Americans. Marshall and Houston launched a legal campaign against segregation, beginning with cases like Murray v. Maryland (1936) and Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada (1938). When Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall took the helm of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. He went on to argue pivotal cases such as Sweatt v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma (both 1950), laying the groundwork for the landmark Brown v. Board of Education (1954), in which the Supreme Court struck down school segregation as unconstitutional. After years of fighting for justice, Marshall was appointed U.S. Solicitor General in 1965 by President Lyndon Johnson, becoming the third-highest official in the Justice Department. In 1967, Johnson nominated him to the U.S. Supreme Court, where he served until his retirement in 1991 before his untimely death in 1993. Stanley Nelson, who served as an executive producer behind the forthcoming project, told the Chicago Defender that it was 'an honor' to shed light on Justice Marshall's fearless life. 'It was an honor to work on this film about an American titan whose legacy continues to expand and endure in these turbulent times.' Becoming Thurgood: America's Social Architect will premiere on Sept. 9 at 10 p.m. ET on PBS, and the PBS app. Will you be watching? SEE ALSO: What Was Malcolm X Working On When He Was Assassinated? Civil Rights Activist Medgar Evers' Quest For Racial Equality Still Resonates SEE ALSO Documentary On The Legendary Justice Thurgood Marshall Set To Premiere In Fall was originally published on
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Want more growth? Welcome more immigrants.
Which means the only way to ensure the population base needed to keep the economy growing is to increase the number of immigrants entering the United States. Much of the public supports President Trump's ferocious crackdown on illegal immigration. The administration is obsessed with rounding up and deporting foreigners who have been living in the country without proper documents. Whatever the wisdom of that policy, it ignores the fact that the vast majority of unlawful migrants who enter the country come here to work in peace. The US economy in recent decades has fueled an unprecedented demand for labor, but there aren't nearly enough legal channels to accommodate that demand. The result has been an influx of migrants crossing the border unlawfully. And that in turn eventually triggered the political backlash that helped send Trump to the White House. Advertisement All the while, however, millions of jobs are going unfilled in this country, because there aren't enough working-age Americans to fill them all. Clearly the best way to solve the problem of illegal immigration is to make it easier for foreigners to immigrate to America legally . That, in turn, is the only way the United States can have the expanding labor force necessary to achieve economic growth and higher living standards in the decades ahead. In The authors show that nearly half of the net growth in the US labor force over the past decade has come from immigrants. That might seem surprising since only about 1 in 7 Americans are foreign born. But immigrants are more likely to work than native-born Americans of working age. In 2023, just under 60 percent of US-born natives age 16 and older were working. Among immigrants, the percentage was almost 65 percent. 'Over the past decade, immigrants have filled nearly 40 percent of the new jobs in America,' Vedder, Moore, and Denhart write. And for most of that time, the unemployment rate has remained at historically low levels — evidence that immigrants are not displacing US-born citizens from jobs that would otherwise have gone to them. With roughly Advertisement But what makes immigrants so valuable to the US economy goes beyond their propensity to work. There is also their extraordinary performance as innovators and entrepreneurs. More than 45 percent of Fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or their children, and immigrants are more than twice as likely as US natives to start a business. In 2023, according to Such statistics are striking, but they also stand to reason. Almost by definition, immigrants have a higher than normal willingness to take chances, to relinquish the familiar, and to try new things. It shouldn't come as a surprise that newcomers from abroad are fired with a passion to dream the American Dream, or that Immigration increases both the labor supply and labor demand, which helps explain why states with the highest immigration inflows, such as Texas and Florida, are associated with lower unemployment than other states. Because immigrants are more likely to work and to start businesses, their presence leads to higher rates of economic growth. 'The parts of the United States with the highest proportion of population coming from other nations have higher levels of total output per capita,' the Unleash Prosperity authors show. Thus, in the 10 states with the highest percentage of immigrants, output per capita is nearly 40 percent higher than in the 10 least immigrant-intensive states. To be sure, correlation may not prove causation, and immigration is not the only factor affecting economic output. But it is hard to dispute that immigration and growth go together. Advertisement What is true nationally is true locally. At a presentation I attended in 2012, Boston's then-mayor Thomas Menino rattled off a slew of numbers that underscored how much foreigners added to the city's prosperity. There were 8,800 immigrant-owned small businesses in Boston, Menino said, producing nearly $3.7 billion in annual sales and employing more than 18,000 people. At the time, immigrants living in Boston were spending $4 billion per year, generating $1.3 billion in state and federal taxes. Since 2012, the To fully understand why robust immigration boosts American prosperity, it is crucial to take into account the contributions of their children . The United States would never have become the world's foremost economic powerhouse if not for the innovations of first-generation Americans — men and women whose parents were immigrants. Steve Jobs, the co-founder of Apple, was the son of an immigrant from Syria. Larry Ellison, creator of the software firm Oracle, was born to a single mother from Ukraine. Jeff Bezos was raised by Miguel Bezos, who immigrated from Cuba. Henry Ford's father came to America from Ireland. Advertisement Needless to say, millions of other first-generation Americans, though not as famous or as rich as the megabillionaires, have contributed to every American industry and field of endeavor. And in the process they have typically risen to greater heights than their foreign-born parents. 'Since immigrants arriving in America are typically poor (particularly these days because of the large recent inflow of relatively unskilled illegal aliens), immigrant poverty rates are higher than that of native-born Americans,' the three authors observe. 'But poverty among their adult children is typically below that of the native born. Moreover, while immigrants themselves are more likely than native-born Americans to receive graduate or professional degrees, their education is modest relative to their own children, who exceed native-born Americans in terms of high-level educational attainment.' In short, without immigrants and their children, the United States would be a poorer, duller, less influential, less desirable nation. That is especially true given the crisis of America's 'birth dearth,' since immigrants tend, on average, to be younger and to have more children than natives. According to Census Bureau calculations, the number of working-age US-born Americans is projected to fall by 5.3 million between now and 2040. Over the same span, the population of working-age immigrants is expected to grow by 1.9 million. Immigration has always been the great growth hormone of American history. More immigrants have always meant more economic development, more innovation, more cultural richness. That is as true today as it has ever been — and it is compounded by the fact that the US economy desperately needs more workers. Border control is not incompatible with a policy of welcoming immigrants with open arms. And the surest way to dissuade illegal immigration is to create more opportunities for would-be Americans to immigrate lawfully. Advertisement Anti-immigrant demagoguery may excite some in the MAGA camp; there has always been an appetite for Expanding legal immigration is a pro-growth, pro-worker, and pro-sovereignty agenda. It is the best way to strengthen the rule of law, suppress mayhem at the border, and maintain America's role as a safe haven for the oppressed — all while attracting the young and dynamic workforce on which US growth depends. We have always needed more immigrants. Now, as the United States is about to enter its second quarter-millennium, we need them more than ever. To open our gates to striving would-be Americans is to turbocharge the economy and enrich the American way of life. Much has changed since This is adapted from the current , Jeff Jacoby's weekly newsletter. To subscribe to Arguable, visit . Jeff Jacoby can be reached at
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Social Security email says policy bill eliminates tax on benefits. Does it?
In a celebratory email sent to Americans across the country, the Social Security Administration praised the Trump administration's sprawling budget and tax bill and said it eliminated federal income taxes on most retirees' benefits. But that's not exactly what it does. Many retirees quickly took notice, with several writing The New York Times to question some of the agency's statements, while pointing out what felt to them like unusually partisan language. The agency's embrace of the legislation, which was signed into law by President Donald Trump on Friday, was also at odds with the effect it is expected to have on the program's financial health. The law is projected to further weaken Social Security's revenues at a time when it is already facing a financing shortfall. Eliminating taxes on Social Security, along with taxes on tips and overtime, was one of Trump's often-repeated campaign promises. The email, which went out Thursday, said the new law 'includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries,' and, 'additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older.' But the enhanced deduction will help reduce households' tax bills on their overall income, including Social Security income. 'The SSA statement implies there is a direct tax cut on Social Security benefits,' said Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan think tank, 'which there is not.' Instead, older single filers will get the extra $6,000 deduction ($12,000 for couples), as long as their income falls under a certain ceiling (below $75,000 for single filers or $150,000 for married joint filers). Above those income levels, the deduction begins to decrease, and it goes away once single taxpayers' income reaches $175,000 ($250,000 for couples). Nor will the extra deduction benefit all Social Security recipients. Retirees who are 62 through 64 are ineligible. And since the income of more than half of Social Security recipients is too low to be taxed anyway, lower-income people won't be helped much. The new break is expected to benefit middle- and upper-middle-class households, tax policy experts said. (Recipients who earn less than $63,300 owe an average of 1% of their Social Security benefits in taxes, according to an analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.) 'It is discouraging to see such misrepresentation by the administration and the Social Security Administration,' said Martha Shedden, president of the National Association of Registered Social Security Analysts, a group that offers guidance to consumers and financial professionals on making Social Security decisions. The Tax Policy Center estimates that less than half of older adults, most of whom earn about $50,000 to $200,000, will get some benefit from the new deduction, though most of them will still owe some tax, Gleckman added. Under current law, an estimated 64% of beneficiaries did not owe taxes on their Social Security benefit, and the new deduction would boost that number to 88%, according to an analysis in June from the White House Council of Economic Advisers. Frank Bisignano, the commissioner of the Social Security agency said in the email, 'By significantly reducing the tax burden on benefits, this legislation reaffirms President Trump's promise to protect Social Security and helps ensure that seniors can better enjoy the retirement they've earned.' The email also says that 'nearly 90% of beneficiaries will no longer pay federal taxes on their benefits.' That, too, is misleading because the deduction is temporary, only in effect for tax years 2025 through 2028. The Social Security Administration did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment. The change will also weaken the program's finances. Besides the payroll tax, the program's lifeblood, the taxation of Social Security benefits adds revenue to the program's trust funds. The taxation of benefits began in 1983, in an effort to stabilize Social Security's finances, and is the type of measure that some policymakers say is needed again now. Social Security's retirement trust fund already faced a financing shortfall that, if left unaddressed, would cut millions of retirees' crucial monthly benefits by 23% in 2033. The Trump administration's bill is expected to pull that date into 2032 and deepen benefit cuts by roughly 1 percentage point, according to a recent analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Budget, a nonpartisan group that calls for lower deficits. That's because the new law reduces the amount of revenue deposited in Social Security's trust fund by decreasing the number of older Americans paying taxes on their benefits and cutting the rates at which some of their benefits are taxed. (The law also reduces revenue deposited to Medicare's trust fund.) 'The bill won't end taxation of benefits, but it will cut those taxes and as a result, accelerate the looming insolvency of Social Security and Medicare,' said Marc Goldwein, senior policy director at the Committee for a Responsible Budget. The year '2032 is just around the corner, and we are not ready.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
