logo
Elon Musk and Donald Trump are fighting again

Elon Musk and Donald Trump are fighting again

CNN —
The truce between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump didn't even last a month.
After the Senate narrowly passed a procedural vote to debate Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' over the weekend, Musk on Monday said he would use his vast resources to launch primary campaigns against Republicans in Congress who voted for the massive domestic policy agenda. Musk spent much of Monday and early Tuesday morning posting and re-posting messages that criticize the tax cut and spending bill — particularly for its sky-high cost.
Trump late Monday night fought back, suggesting his administration may investigate Musk's companies' massive government subsidies.
So far, the feud hasn't grown as personal or as vicious as their public blow-up last month when Musk, without providing evidence, accused Trump of withholding information about disgraced financier and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and claiming that Trump's name was included in the government's so-called Epstein files.
A week after the peak of that feud, Musk said he regretted some of his posts about Trump. Musk deleted some of his most inflammatory X posts, including the one relating to Epstein and another agreeing with the suggestion that Trump should be impeached. Musk had since softened his tone about Trump and the bill, largely shifting his focus on social media and in interviews to his companies.
That shifted dramatically Monday when Musk began posting nonstop about his opposition to Trump's signature legislation. But this time around — at least so far — Musk hasn't mentioned Trump's name in his dozens of posts about the bill.
Still, the fight is costing Musk where it counts: Tesla's (TSLA) stock tumbled nearly five percent in premarket trading Tuesday after losing 2 percent on Monday, missing out on the broader stock market gains that sent the S&P 500 and Nasdaq to record highs. Much of Musk's wealth is tied up in Tesla's publicly traded stock.
Tesla shareholders have been very sensitive to the Musk-Trump spat, nervous that Trump may make good on his threat to dissolve contracts with SpaceX or Tesla. The stock lost about 14 percent on June 4, the day when Musk and Trump's feud over the spending bill erupted into the public.
'This BFF situation has now turned into a soap opera that remains an overhang on Tesla's stock with investors fearing that the Trump Administration will be more hawkish and show scrutiny around Musk-related US government spending,' said Dan Ives, analyst at Wedbush Securities, in a note to investors Tuesday. 'Tesla investors want Musk to focus on driving Tesla and stop this political angle.'
Musk goes off
Musk's renewed attacks on the bill started Monday afternoon, when he threatened members of Congress who voted for the legislation. He said the bill would undermine his efforts at the Department of Government Efficiency, which sought fiscal responsibility by eliminating what he and others viewed as wasteful spending.
But the Senate bill would add nearly $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the next decade, according to a Congressional Budget Office estimate released Sunday. The Senate legislation costs more than the House-approved bill, which would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade.
The White House has argued the bill 'slashes deficits' and the debt, while 'unleashing economic growth.' Musk wasn't having it.
'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' he wrote on X.
He later shared a campaign poster with 'LIAR' written across Pinocchio's face above the text 'Voted to increase America's debt by $5,000,000,000,000.'
'Anyone who campaigned on the PROMISE of REDUCING SPENDING, but continues to vote on the BIGGEST DEBT ceiling increase in HISTORY will see their face on this poster in the primary next year,' Musk wrote.
Musk wrote several posts about creating a third party called 'the America Party,' which would serve as a populist alternative to the Republican and Democratic parties.
'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' Musk said.
He also posted that he would contribute to the re-election campaign for Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, who has been one of the few Republican voices in Congress to take a stand against the bill. Trump has publicly scolded Massie for his opposition.
Trump enters the chat
Trump early Tuesday morning responded with a threat: He could use DOGE, which Musk once led, to probe the government contracts and subsidies Musk's companies receive.
'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!'
Trump made a similar suggestion last month. Although it's not clear that Trump would follow through, Musk's companies are reliant on the federal government as a major source of revenue. And Tesla, SpaceX and Musk's other companies, including social media platform X, artificial intelligence company xAI and brain-computer interface company Neuralink all face regulation from the federal government.
Unlike SpaceX, which makes the bulk of its money from the government, Tesla has relatively few government contracts. But numerous federal policies directly affect Tesla's finances, including a $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicle buyers that allows Tesla and other automakers to raise prices. The tax credit has also has helped boost EV sales. That was likely worth billions to Tesla last year alone.
Tesla also reported more than $8 billion in sales over six years of regulatory credits to other automakers to help them comply with federal and state emission standards. Trump is in favor of rolling back those standards and stripping states of the power to set their own emissions rules, which would destroy the market for those credit sales.
The loss of the EV tax credit could cost Tesla $1.2 billion a year and the loss of regulatory credit sales another $2 billion, according to JPMorgan.
'At the end of the day being on Trump's bad side will not turn out well, and Musk knows this,' Ives wrote.
Trump has argued that Musk's primary opposition to the Big, Beautiful Bill is the loss of EV tax credits. Musk denies that, retweeting a post Monday that said, 'Elon's opposition to the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' has never been about its removal of EV tax credits or the EV mandate, it's simply about his passionate opposition to rising government debt.'
'All I'm asking is that we don't bankrupt America,' Musk posted.
What happens next?
It's unclear whether Musk's threats will kill the bill's chances. Trump has mounted a massive pressure campaign on holdouts, putting members of Congress in a difficult position of choosing Musk and his war chest of cash over Trump and his bully pulpit.
Musk spent more than $275 million to support Trump and other Republican candidates in the 2024 election. According to Federal Election Commission filings, Musk's political action committee, America PAC, last gave money in March to support two Republican candidates running in special elections in Florida — Randy Fine and Jimmy Patronis. In late May he said in an interview he was planning to cut back on political spending, saying he has 'done enough.'
But Musk has the resources to make good on his promises to support a slate of alternate candidates if he chooses.
That doesn't guarantee he'll succeed: Musk spent considerable time and resources in a losing effort to elect a Republican to Wisconsin's supreme court earlier this year. His popularity remains low, and, ultimately, Donald Trump is president, and Musk is not.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside Trump's last 24 hours as he willed his agenda bill over the finish line
Inside Trump's last 24 hours as he willed his agenda bill over the finish line

Egypt Independent

time32 minutes ago

  • Egypt Independent

Inside Trump's last 24 hours as he willed his agenda bill over the finish line

After nearly 20 hours straight of working the phones – using both threats and assurances to cajole Republicans into supporting his sweeping domestic agenda bill – President Donald Trump seemed to grow exasperated while watching coverage of the plodding floor process on television. 'What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove??? MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT'S COSTING YOU VOTES!!!' Trump posted on social media at midnight, as the vote seemed stalled. Fourteen hours later, the bill had passed, with only two Republican defections. Trump is expected to sign it in a major ceremony on Friday afternoon at the White House – punctuated by a fly-over of the B-2 bombers who dropped bunker-buster bombs on Iranian nuclear facilities last month, according to a White House official. The spectacle will only underscore what a consequential stretch of days it has been for the president, who now appears at the height of his political power roughly six months into his second term. Last week's Supreme Court decision paved the way for even more expansive use of executive authority. His strikes on Iran's nuclear sites appear to have created new momentum toward a ceasefire deal in Gaza. A NATO summit last week, tailored to his preferences, resulted in new defense spending commitments after years of pressure from Trump. At home, Trump is presiding over an economy that continues to create jobs, despite continued unease over the threat of tariffs. His hardline immigration enforcement tactics, decried by opponents as inhumane or illegal, have reportedly brought down unlawful crossings at the US southern border to historic lows. 'I think I have more power now, I do,' Trump said outside Air Force One Thursday, hours after his agenda bill passed the House. To Trump's detractors, his unshakeable grip on Republicans and his strong-arming of US allies abroad add up to an authoritarian-in-waiting, unchecked by the systems in place to ensure the country doesn't descend into autocracy. But to his supporters, the last two weeks have amounted to a thrilling culmination of his unlikely return to power and a rapid-pace fulfillment of the promises he made to his voters last year. 'He's getting his agenda passed to a greater extent than he did his first term. He has better control over the apparatus,' said Asa Hutchinson, the former Arkansas governor who challenged Trump for the presidency last year. 'Part of it, I think, is that he's a second-term president, and he knows how to wield that power and use the office of the president. And you got a Supreme Court that's backed him up,' Hutchinson went on. 'It's a very powerful position that he's in. People recognize that. He also recognizes he has a very short amount of time, because he's only got four years now.' No longer restrained by skeptical members of his own party, Trump is free to pursue his agenda and interests in ways that even some Republicans worry will come to haunt them in next year's midterm elections. Both supporters and opponents of Trump's bill seem to agree that — for better or worse — the measure passed Thursday will now form a major part of Trump's domestic legacy. 'The omnipresent force' It passed after intensive involvement from the president himself, who appeared acutely aware of the stakes for his own presidency and took to calling lawmakers into the night to convince them to vote yes. A senior White House official called Trump 'the omnipresent force behind this legislation.' House Speaker Mike Johnson, center, alongside Republican lawmakers, shows the final tally of the vote on US President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill during a press conference at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on July 3. Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images 'Dinner after dinner, engagement after engagement at Mar-a-Lago — you know, those relationships, and the president's focus on relationships, carried us through in kind of a cascade here,' the official said, adding they had lost count of the number of meetings Trump held on the bill. Democrats have already begun formulating plans to tether Trump and Republicans to the new law's changes to Medicaid, singling out individual cases of Americans' deprived of care. Their argument was encapsulated by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries' marathon speech on the House Floor on Thursday. 'Leadership requires courage, conviction, compassion — and yet what we have seen from this administration and co-conspirators on the Republican side of the aisle is cruelty, chaos and corruption,' Jeffries said in his address, which broke a record for the longest floor speech in modern history. Polling shows Americans are broadly skeptical of the bill, creating a task for Trump in the months ahead to change perceptions of the bill he worked assiduously to get passed. He could be aided by the bill's strategic sequencing, which enacts the tax cuts in the near-term but pushes off major changes to Medicaid and food assistance programs until after next year's midterm elections. Yet recent history is littered with presidents who, after using congressional majorities to push through major legislation meant to burnish their legacy, later lamented not doing enough to sell the bill to the American public – after their party members paid the price at the ballot box. Leaving the messaging for later Trump did, at various points over the last week, appear concerned that slashing the social safety net too deeply might pose political challenges for Republicans. 'I don't want to go too crazy with cuts,' he told CNN on Tuesday. 'I don't like cuts.' Even in private, Trump has told Republicans that making changes to Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security would be a losing political message, according to officials. In conversations with Republican lawmakers, White House officials sought to emphasize that changes to Medicaid wouldn't be felt for years, giving states and hospitals time to sort through the changes. Officials also reminded lawmakers that states had a significant role in dictating how Medicaid dollars are spent, and therefore control how and whether individuals lose coverage. Officials said Trump's team had taken lessons from a failed attempt to repeal Obamacare in 2017, working with Republicans on messaging and trying to present them with a clearer view into why the bill would work. Still, Trump's priority has largely been getting his own agenda enacted, not the political fortunes of Republicans in Congress. Any worries about next year's election were mostly put to the side as Trump squeezed GOP holdouts using both charm and threats of political retribution. White House officials privately acknowledged that the Democratic messaging on the bill has been effective, but noted that the focus from their party so far has not been on messaging, but on getting the bill passed. 'We now have to shift to explaining the bill and how it will benefit our voters,' one official said. 'We are confident once we get that messaging across, the public perception of the bill will shift.' Carrots and sticks From the beginning, Trump and his allies framed support for the bill as a loyalty test, advising senators in an official notice last week that failure to pass the measure would amount to an 'ultimate betrayal.' Trump treated Republican holdouts harshly, threatening to support primary challengers to Sen. Thom Tillis and Rep. Thomas Massie after the said they would oppose the bill. Ultimately Tillis announced last week he would retire, opting out of Trump's test of fealty. He warned from the Senate floor afterward that Trump had been 'misinformed' about the effects of his bill, calling it 'inescapable this bill will betray the promise Donald Trump made.' Trump's hardline approach shifted Wednesday, when he hosted House Republicans at the White House. In those sessions, he appeared to adhere to an old adage as he worked to convince lawmakers to vote for his mega-bill: you catch more flies with honey than withvinegar.

Netherlands Approves Stricter Asylum Law
Netherlands Approves Stricter Asylum Law

See - Sada Elbalad

time2 hours ago

  • See - Sada Elbalad

Netherlands Approves Stricter Asylum Law

Israa Farhan The Dutch House of Representatives has passed a controversial bill aimed at tightening asylum policies in the Netherlands, significantly restricting access to asylum and family reunification rights. The legislative package, approved on 3 July 2025, also criminalizes residing in the country without valid documents and offering assistance to undocumented individuals. To come into force, the proposed laws must now pass through the Dutch Senate, where they are expected to be debated in the autumn. The outcome remains uncertain, as opposition to the measures continues to mount. Legal experts, government advisors, asylum authorities, and refugee organisations have raised serious concerns over the legislation, warning that the new rules may be legally questionable and difficult to implement in practice. The bills were spearheaded by far-right populist Geert Wilders, whose anti-immigration Freedom Party (PVV) has pushed for what it calls the strictest asylum policy in Dutch history. Although the PVV was part of the governing coalition for the first time, the alliance collapsed in June 2025 due to deep disagreements over asylum policy. New parliamentary elections are scheduled for late October. Despite the government's fall, Wilders' PVV—currently the largest party in the House—voted in favor of the new asylum restrictions, alongside former coalition partners. Asylum seekers represent around 12% of annual immigration to the Netherlands. In 2024, approximately 32,000 individuals applied for asylum, with an additional 10,000 family members joining them. However, the first quarter of 2025 saw a steep 50% drop in new asylum applications, reflecting similar trends observed across Europe. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News "Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence" Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan

Many Americans want a third party. But where would it fit?
Many Americans want a third party. But where would it fit?

Egypt Independent

time20 hours ago

  • Egypt Independent

Many Americans want a third party. But where would it fit?

A version of this story appeared in CNN's What Matters newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here. CNN — Americans are entrenched into their partisan corners, but the party lines keep moving in weird new ways. Republicans who grew up in the Grand Old Party might not recognize a party overtaken by the Make America Great Again movement. Democrats who cheered when President Bill Clinton declared the era of big government to be over might wonder how it is that a democratic socialist is their party's candidate for mayor of New York City. Others have followed Democratic expat and scion of Camelot Robert F. Kennedy Jr., with his Make America Healthy Again mantra, to vote for Trump. Two options aren't enough for multitudes For a variety of structural reasons, two options is what most Americans get, even though poll after poll suggests few are happy with either party. Against that backdrop, it's interesting to consider Elon Musk's pledge to form an 'America Party,' an alternative to Republicans and Democrats, if President Donald Trump's megabill becomes law. 'Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE,' he wrote on his social media platform. Musk's primary concern is that the megabill adds to the national debt, he said – and not, as Trump alleges, that he's sore about the end of tax credits to encourage Americans to buy electric vehicles. The third-party pledge follows Musk's musings last month that the US needs a party 'that actually represents the 80% in the middle.' Which middle? It's an interesting thought experiment to consider what the political middle might look like to a space and computer nerd and technocrat like Musk. He cares deeply about climate change and wants desperately for humans to be interplanetary and to live on Mars, but he opposes the megabill for all its government spending. He has strong thoughts about encouraging more American women to have babies, but thinks the addition of people to the country through illegal immigration is an existential threat to the US. The same thought experiment crossed my mind last month when Karine Jean-Pierre, who was White House press secretary under former President Joe Biden, announced in the run-up to the publication of her memoir that she's leaving the Democratic Party. 'We need to be clear-eyed and questioning, rather than blindly loyal and obedient as we may have been in the past,' she said in a statement to CNN. But it doesn't seem like Jean-Pierre's version of independence will be in the same galaxy as Musk's. Three varieties of Democrat One of the more interesting political campaigns of the coming months is likely to be the New York City mayor's race, in which the upstart Democrat (and democratic socialist) Zohran Mamdani will take on Eric Adams, the sitting mayor who is also a Democrat but is running as an independent. Also on the ballot as a 'Fight and Deliver' independent will be former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, another Democrat, although it's not clear if he'll seriously campaign between now and November. That's a lot of different versions of Democrats New Yorkers will be able to sort through. Zohran Mamdani gestures as he speaks during a watch party for his primary election in New York on June 25. David Delgado/Reuters There are already multiple third parties There are, of course, existing third parties in the US. The Green and Libertarian parties appear on most ballots for president, which means they have dedicated followings across the country, but they lack the power to get anyone elected to either the House or Senate. Former Rep. Ron Paul of Texas mounted presidential campaigns as both a Libertarian and a Republican, but he got the most traction as a libertarian-minded Republican. His son, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, is one of the few Republicans now willing to cross Trump and oppose the megabill. Paul, like Musk, is worried about the national debt. 'You're roadkill in the middle' A senator closer to the middle, Alaska's Lisa Murkowski, did vote for the bill, but only after securing carveouts that will help her state – but could aggravate every other American. Murkowski is that rare moderate who can survive without party backing. She won a write-in reelection campaign – the triple lindy of politics – after losing the Republican primary in 2010. That was before her party veered even more toward Trump, but Murkowski recently told CNN's Audie Cornish there are more quiet centrist Americans than people realize. She's representing them, she said, even if Washington is a dangerous place to be a moderate. 'You're roadkill in the middle,' Murkowski told Cornish for her 'The Assignment' podcast. 'Endangered species' Another Republican who opposed the megabill is Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina. He said cuts to Medicaid would cost too many North Carolinians their health insurance. But prioritizing the people you represent rather than the national party is anathema in today's political environment. 'In Washington over the last few years, it's become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise, and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species,' Tillis said in a statement Sunday. Fearing a primary and Trump's wrath, or maybe just tired of defending the shrinking middle ground in the Senate, Tillis also announced he would not seek reelection next year, which immediately made his North Carolina seat Democrats' top pickup priority. Democrats must hope that a moderate like former Gov. Roy Cooper will jump in the race and defy Democrats' national branding. Majority makers Perhaps Cooper would play the same kind of role as former Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia. Manchin voted with Democrats most of the time, but his tendency to buck the party leadership made him a thorn in the side of progressives. Coincidentally, when Manchin left office, Democrats lost their majority in the Senate. On his way out the door, Manchin said it was time for a third-party alternative, but he opted not to run for president. Middle fringes Kennedy did run for president after leaving the Democratic Party and his ultimate support for Trump likely brought in some new support for the president, who is now letting Kennedy rethink US vaccine policy to the consternation of the scientific community. Kennedy is also trying to take on the food industry. Help from Kennedy's independents probably helped Trump win, but maybe not as much as the nearly $300 million Musk is known to have spent, mostly on Trump's behalf. Musk's political ventures may have now turned off Tesla's natural climate-concerned consumer base as well as the MAGA faithful. Regardless of the wealth he could spend, what middle would his America party fit into?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store