Ace Hardware employee files million-dollar suit after alleging manager hung a noose in warehouse on Juneteenth
An Ace Hardware store employee has filed a million-dollar lawsuit in Texas after alleging that his manager hung a noose inside a warehouse on Juneteenth.
Devondrick Hartsfield, who is Black, revealed he lost his job as a delivery driver after complaining that his white manager tied a black backpack from a noose in 2023, which Hartsfield said was an act of racial discrimination, according to a lawsuit seen by the newspaper Fort Worth Star-Telegram.
Hartsfield said his supervisor, a white man, claimed it was 'a prank' because another staff member left it behind.
Despite receiving an apology, Hartsfield has now taken matters further. Juneteenth signifies the emancipation of enslaved African Americans in the U.S.
Hartsfield told CBS News at the time that he had worked at the store for four years and believed he was the only Black employee.
The lawsuit documents, filed Tuesday in Dallas County, Texas, just two days before this year's Juneteenth, named the store as Van Marcke's Ace Hardware in Arlington, Texas.
In the suit, Hartsfield's manager, whom the Star-Telegram has not named, is alleged to have shown Hartsfield the noose as they walked through the warehouse.
Hartsfield returned to the warehouse later that day with a cashier as his witness to take pictures of the offensive display, which he later included in a report to the store's human resources department.
The noose was still hanging in the warehouse the following day, according to the suit.
Hartsfield told CBS Fort Worth that he was afraid of his workplace.
"Before we walked to the door, he told me to look up, and I looked up, and when I looked back at him, he was like, 'It's a joke, Juan left his backpack,'" Hartsfield said.
"And when I looked back up, I saw the noose with the rope, and I was like, 'What the hell?'"
Hartsfield stated that after filing a discrimination complaint, he was suspended and replaced by an employee who was not Black, according to the suit.
His lawyer is now pushing for a compensation payout.
'Mr. Hartsfield raised legitimate concerns about a racially hostile work environment,' Hartsfield's lawyer Jason Smith said.
'Instead of addressing them responsibly, Ace Hardware's management effectively ended his employment.'
At the time of the alleged display, the store posted a statement that read: "Van Marcke's Ace Hardware would like to assure you and the entire community that any allegations of racism or any discrimination are being thoroughly investigated and addressed with the utmost urgency. We take such incidents seriously and are committed to creating a safe and inclusive environment for both our employees and customers."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Bryan Kohberger to plead guilty to murder in Idaho student stabbings to avoid death penalty
Bryan Kohberger has agreed to plead guilty to murdering four University of Idaho students as part of a deal to avoid the death penalty, an attorney for one victim's family said. Shanon Gray, an attorney representing the family of Kaylee Goncalves, confirmed Monday that prosecutors informed the families of the deal by email and letter earlier in the day, and that his clients were upset about it. 'We are beyond furious at the State of Idaho," Goncalves' family wrote in a Facebook post. "They have failed us. Please give us some time. This was very unexpected.' A change of plea hearing was set for Wednesday, but the family has asked prosecutors to delay it to give them more time to travel to Boise, Gray said. Kohberger's trial was set for August in Boise, where it was moved following pretrial publicity in rural northern Idaho. Kohberger, 30, is accused in the stabbing deaths of Goncalves, Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle and Madison Mogen at a rental home near campus in Moscow, Idaho, early on Nov. 13, 2022. Autopsies showed the four were all likely asleep when they were attacked, some had defensive wounds and each was stabbed multiple times. At the time, Kohberger was a criminal justice graduate student at Washington State University, about 9 miles (14.5 kilometers) west of the University of Idaho. He was arrested in Pennsylvania, where his parents lived, weeks later. Investigators said they matched his DNA to genetic material recovered from a knife sheath found at the crime scene. No motive has emerged for the killings, nor is it clear why the attacker spared two roommates who were in the home. Authorities have said cellphone data and surveillance video shows that Kohberger visited the victims' neighborhood at least a dozen times before the killings. The murders shocked the small farming community of about 25,000 people, which hadn't had a homicide in about five years, and prompted a massive hunt for the perpetrator. That included an elaborate effort to track down a white sedan that was seen on surveillance cameras repeatedly driving by the rental home, to identify Kohberger as a possible suspect through the use of genetic genealogy and to pinpoint his movements the night of the killings through cellphone data. In a court filing, Kohberger's lawyers said he was on a long drive by himself around the time the four were killed. In the letter to families, obtained by ABC News, prosecutors said Kohberger's lawyers approached them seeking to reach a plea deal. The defense team had previously made unsuccessful efforts to have the death penalty stricken as a possible punishment, including arguing that Kohberger's autism diagnosis made him less culpable. The prosecutors said they met with available family members last week before deciding to make Kohberger an offer. 'This resolution is our sincere attempt to seek justice for your family,' the letter said. 'This agreement ensures that the defendant will be convicted, will spend the rest of his life in prison, and will not be able to put you and the other families through the uncertainty of decades of post-conviction, appeals. Your viewpoints weighed heavily in our decision-making process, and we hope that you may come to appreciate why we believe this resolution is in the best interest of justice.' In a Facebook post, the Goncalves family wrote that Kaylee's 18-year-old sister, Aubrie, had been unable to attend the meeting with prosecutors. But she shared her concerns in a written statement. 'Bryan Kohberger facing a life in prison means he would still get to speak, form relationships, and engage with the world,' Aubrie Goncalves wrote. 'Meanwhile, our loved ones have been silenced forever. That reality stings more deeply when it feels like the system is protecting his future more than honoring the victims' pasts.' In Idaho, judges may reject plea agreements, though such moves are rare. If a judge rejects a plea agreement, the defendant is allowed to withdraw the guilty plea. Earlier Monday, a Pennsylvania judge had ordered that three people whose testimony was requested by defense attorneys would have to travel to Idaho to appear at Kohberger's trial. The defense subpoenas were granted regarding a boxing trainer who knew Kohberger as a teenager, a childhood acquaintance of Kohberger's and a third man whose significance was not explained. A gag order has largely kept attorneys, investigators and others from speaking publicly about the investigation or trial. ___
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE FIVE horrifying Idaho murder questions that may never be answered: Agonizing final blow for victims' families after Bryan Kohberger plea deal
For more than two years the families of four murdered University of Idaho students have wrestled with questions about their loved ones' brutal deaths. On Monday, it appeared one of the most urgent had been answered by reports prime suspect Bryan Kohberger was to accept a plea deal.
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Jurors in Sean ‘Diddy' Combs's sex-trafficking trial begin deliberations
After seven weeks of testimony from more than 30 witnesses, jurors in the high-profile federal sex-trafficking and racketeering conspiracy trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs have begun deliberations, but ended their day with no verdict. The 12-member jury – made up of eight men and four women – began deliberating on Monday, following closing arguments from both sides that concluded on Friday and lengthy instructions from the judge. After approximately 70 minutes of deliberation, the jury sent a note to the court expressing concern that one juror – Juror 25 – 'cannot follow your honor's instructions'. Judge Arun Subramanian, who is overseeing the case, responded with a note instructing the jury to continue deliberating, and reminded them of their obligation to follow his instructions. He also told them to refrain from sharing any details about their discussions in any future notes. Earlier on Monday, Subramanian told jurors that they were the 'sole and exclusive judges of the facts' who are to determine a verdict without bias or prejudice to either of the parties involved. He emphasized that prosecutors had the burden of proving Combs is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, not proof beyond any possible doubt. Combs, 55, was arrested in September and faces felony charges: one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. He has pleaded not guilty to all of the charges and denied the accusations against him. If convicted, Combs could spend the rest of his life in prison. He has been held without bail at a federal detention center in Brooklyn since his arrest. Prosecutors allege that for over two decades, Combs led a criminal enterprise, aided by employees and associates, that engaged in, attempted to engage in and worked to cover up crimes including sex trafficking, kidnapping, forced labor, drug distribution, arson and bribery, enticement to engage in prostitution and obstruction of justice. The government has sought to prove that Combs used violence, threats, money, drugs, intimidation and power to abuse and coerce two of his former girlfriends into participating in 'freak-offs', which were described as drug-fueled sex marathons with hired male escorts. The defense has insisted throughout the trial that all sexual encounters were consensual and part of a 'swingers lifestyle'. They have argued that no criminal conspiracy exists and that Combs is being wrongly prosecuted for his 'private' and 'personal sex life'. Throughout the trial, Combs's lawyers acknowledged past instances of domestic violence, but denied that Combs committed sex trafficking and that any coercion took place. Since the trial began on 12 May, the jury has reviewed dozens of text messages, videos and receipts. The government called 34 witnesses to the stand, including two of Combs's former girlfriends, multiple former employees and assistants, several male escorts, stylists, hotel workers, law enforcement agents and well-known figures such as the rapper Kid Cudi and singer Dawn Richard, among others. Key testimony came from two of Combs's former girlfriends and alleged victims, the singer Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura and a woman identified as 'Jane', both of whom described the alleged 'freak-offs' in graphic detail and alleged that they were coerced into participating. They both testified that Combs directed, watched, masturbated to and sometimes filmed the sexual encounters. The women described times when they said Combs was violent with them and they alleged that Combs would threaten to release explicit videos of them or cut off financial support if they didn't meet his demands. During cross-examination, Combs's lawyers sought to cast Ventura and Jane as willing and consenting participants in the 'freak-offs'. Combs's team presented loving and at times explicit text messages exchanged with Combs – some of which showed the women expressing enthusiasm for the encounters. His lawyers also frequently brought up the role that jealousy and drug use played in their relationships. Another woman, a former personal assistant who testified under the pseudonym 'Mia', alleged that Combs physically and sexually assaulted her during her employment. Defense attorneys suggested that she fabricated the allegations, and highlighted social media posts and messages from after the alleged assaults in which Mia praised Combs, calling him a 'mentor' and an 'inspiration'. The government rested its case last week. Shortly after, Combs confirmed that he would not be testifying. His legal team also rested its case, but opted not to call any witnesses of its own. Instead, his team submitted evidence to the court and relied on its extensive cross-examinations throughout the trial. During closing arguments, the prosecution spent nearly five hours outlining the government's case against Combs, revisiting testimony from several witnesses, and broke down each allegation against Combs. The prosecution described him as 'the leader of a criminal enterprise' who refused to 'take no for an answer' and alleged that he was someone who wielded 'power, violence and fear to get what he wanted'. 'The defendant was a very powerful man,' she said. 'But he became more powerful and more dangerous because of the support of his inner circle and his businesses – the enterprise.' The defense offered its closing argument on Friday, and told the jurors that the government's case against Combs was 'false' and 'exaggerated'. Combs's lawyer urged the jury to reject the prosecution's case against Combs and pushed back against the government's accusations, disputed various pieces of witness testimony, and challenged the prosecution's portrayal of Ventura and Jane as sex-trafficking victims. Combs's lead lawyer, Marc Agnifilo, cast Ventura, the government's star witness, as a woman with agency, rather than a victim, who willingly participated in the sexual encounters. The lawyer also pointed to the $20m settlement she received from Combs in 2023 after filing a civil lawsuit accusing him of abuse, which triggered the federal investigation, as well as the $10m Ventura is expected to receive from the owner of a hotel in Los Angeles where she was assaulted by Combs in 2016. 'If you had to pick a winner in this whole thing, it's hard not to pick Cassie,' Agnifilo said. 'This isn't about a crime, this is about money.' Though he did not take the stand, throughout the entire trial, Combs has been engaged and active in his defense, often seen whispering to his lawyers and reacting visibly to testimony. Earlier this month, the judge warned that Combs could be removed from the courtroom for looking at and 'nodding vigorously' at the jury during a cross-examination.
