Afghan women players call for global support as they seek FIFA recognition
Many players from the Afghanistan women's team fled the country for fear of persecution when the Taliban took control of the Afghan government.
The women's team has since been unable to compete internationally as FIFA rules require recognition by a national federation, with the Taliban-controlled Afghan Football Federation banning women's sports.
The Taliban say they respect women's rights in accordance with their interpretation of Islamic law and local customs and that internal matters should be addressed locally.
In a press briefing hosted by the Sports & Rights Alliance on Tuesday, AWNT captain Mursal Sadat highlighted the importance of global unity in the fight for gender equality in sport.
"If there is one thing that I would request from the athletes all around the world, it would be it is time that we unite together. And it's time that women support other women," she said.
"It would give us a lot of inspiration and support because you guys have a voice to use and that platform is there to be used."
Sadat added that even athletes posting a short video on social media would be a sign of solidarity against gender-based violence taking place in Afghanistan.
AWNT founder and former captain Khalida Popal said they were not fighting against global soccer's governing body FIFA, but rather seeking collaboration.
"Our platform is sport. Together with everyone, with the media, with individuals, with organisations, and with governing bodies and including FIFA, because we are not fighting against FIFA or any other organisation," Popal said.
"We want to work together to find the best solutions as using Afghanistan as an example to make sure the other countries, the other nations don't face what we have faced."
In 2020, Afghanistan had 25 contracted women football players, most of whom are now in Australia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil rally pauses as markets weigh Trump's ultimatum to Russia
NEW DELHI, July 30 (Reuters) - Oil prices took a breather in Asian trade on Wednesday after the previous session's spike of more than 3%, as investors awaited developments from U.S. President Donald Trump's tighter deadline for Russia to end the war in Ukraine. Most-active Brent crude futures rose 1 cent, or 0.01%, to $71.69 a barrel by 0633 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude fell 2 cents, or 0.03%, to $69.19 a barrel. The Brent crude September contract expiring on Wednesday was up 5 cents at $72.56 per barrel. Both contracts had settled on Tuesday at their highest since June 20. On Tuesday, Trump said he would start imposing measures on Russia, such as secondary tariffs of 100% on trading partners, if it did not make progress on ending the war within 10 to 12 days, moving up from an earlier 50-day deadline. "The $4 to $5 per barrel of supply-risk premium injected in recent days can be expected to be sustained, unless Putin makes a conciliatory move," said Vandana Hari, founder of oil market analysis provider Vanda Insights. The United States had warned China, the largest buyer of Russian oil, it could face huge tariffs if it kept buying, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told a news conference in Stockholm, where the U.S. was holding trade talks with the EU. JP Morgan analysts said in a note that while China was not likely to comply with U.S. sanctions, India has signalled it would do so, putting at risk 2.3 million barrels per day of Russian oil exports. The United States and the European Union averted a trade war with a deal for 15% U.S. tariffs on European imports, easing concerns about the impact of trade tensions on economic growth and offering support to oil prices. In Venezuela, foreign partners of state oil company PDVSA are still waiting for U.S. authorisation to operate in the sanctioned country after talks last week, which could return some supply to the market, so easing pressure for prices to rise. "The oil market is keeping an eye on the U.S. trade deals and talks, and on the Fed, but those are marginal influences on sentiment," Hari added. Despite President Donald Trump's objections, the U.S. Federal Reserve is expected to hold interest rates steady at its policy meeting later on Wednesday. On Tuesday, the International Monetary Fund raised global growth forecasts slightly for 2025 and 2026, but warned the world economy faced major risks, such as a rebound in tariff rates, geopolitical tension and larger fiscal deficits.
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump says India deal not finalised, higher tariffs possible
NEW DELHI, July 29 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said a trade deal with India has yet to be finalised and warned of possible higher tariffs ahead of an August 1 deadline to seal an agreement. His comments followed a Reuters report that India was preparing to accept higher tariffs of 20%-25% on its exports to the U.S. in the absence of a trade deal, as it holds off on offering fresh concessions ahead of Friday's deadline. "India has been a good friend, but India has charged basically more tariffs, almost more than any other country," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Tuesday, adding that would come to an end. Asked about the Reuters report, Trump said a trade deal had not been finalised and India could face steeper tariffs. India plans to resume broader trade talks with the U.S. in mid-August when a U.S. delegation is due to visit, hoping to seal a comprehensive bilateral trade agreement by October, Indian officials said. "Talks are progressing well," an official said, adding Trump could issue a tariff order in a "worst-case scenario". The official declined to be identified without authorisation to speak to the media. "But, we assume it would be temporary measure, considering the five rounds of trade talks that have taken place. A deal will soon be worked out,' the official said. Trump also reiterated his claim that he helped broker a ceasefire to a conflict between India and Pakistan earlier this year, saying both sides accepted his request. "That was great," he said describing his friendship with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. India disputes Trump's claims that he brokered the ceasefire. Analysts say Trump's remarks on the India-Pakistan conflict have cast a shadow on trade negotiations. On Monday, Trump said most partners that do not negotiate separate trade deals would soon face tariffs of 15% to 20% on their exports to the United States, well above the broad 10% tariff he imposed in April. His administration will notify some 200 countries soon of their new "world tariff" rate. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CNBC the India talks require more time, noting Trump wants good deals, not fast ones. India has shown "strong interest in opening portions of its market" though its trade policy had long focused on protecting domestic interests, Greer said. Piyush Goyal, India's trade minister, told Reuters last week India was making "fantastic" progress in U.S. trade talks. Indian officials said New Delhi had offered tariff cuts on a wide range of goods and was working to ease non-tariff barriers. However, agriculture and dairy remain 'no-go' areas, with India unwilling to allow U.S. imports of genetically modified soybean or corn, or to open its dairy sector. Total bilateral goods trade reached about $129 billion in 2024, with India posting a surplus of nearly $46 billion. Officials said India was calibrating its strategy amid broader U.S. tariff threats targeting BRICS nations, including India, over issues such as de-dollarisation and Russian oil purchases. "We remain hopeful of securing a deal that gives Indian exporters preferential access compared to our peers," a second Indian government official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
The Herald Scotland
14 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump's EPA to repeal climate regulation, tailpipe emissions rule
In 2009, the EPA under former Democratic President Barack Obama issued a finding that emissions from new motor vehicles contribute to pollution and endanger public health and welfare. It was upheld in several legal challenges and underpinned subsequent greenhouse gas regulations. "With regard to the endangerment finding, they'll say carbon dioxide is a pollutant and that's the end of it. They'll never acknowledge any type of benefit or need for carbon dioxide," Zeldin told the podcast. "It's important to note, and they don't, how important it is for the planet." Reuters reported last week that the EPA plans to repeal all greenhouse gas emission standards for light-duty, medium-duty, and heavy-duty vehicles and engines in the coming days after it removes the scientific finding that justified those rules, according to a summary. It is also expected to justify rescinding the endangerment finding by casting doubt on the scientific record used to make the finding, saying that "developments cast significant doubt on the reliability of the findings," the summary seen by Reuters says. The U.S. Supreme Court, in its landmark Massachusetts v. EPA case in 2007, said the EPA has authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and required the agency to make a scientific finding on whether they endanger public health. If finalized, this action will devastate the EPA's ability to carry out its primary authority to limit climate pollution under the federal Clean Air Act. Environmental activists immediately condemned the announcement. "As if any doubt remained, the Trump Administration has formalized climate denial as the official policy of the United States government," said Sierra Club Acting Executive Director Loren Blackford in a statement. "If approved, rescinding the endangerment finding would strike a decisive blow to the EPA's authority to limit deadly greenhouse gas emissions and protect our people and our planet from the very worst of the climate crisis. Nearly every single day we see increased incidents of extreme weather, record heatwaves, deadly floods and droughts all threatening our lives and communities--all of which are the undeniable result of greenhouse gas emissions. "The Trump administration is again taking a sledgehammer to the very foundation of our government and settled law, and doing so only to the benefit of corporate polluters while we pay the price." Zeldin said he will make the formal announcement on Tuesday afternoon in Indiana. Contributing: Ben Adler
