&w=3840&q=100)
Operation Sindoor: With battlefield edge, India cornered Pakistan to seek peace & that's new normal
The medium-range Akash air defence system is in service with the Indian Army and Air Force. Image courtesy BEL
US President Donald Trump might claim that he leveraged trade to bring India and Pakistan to a ceasefire, but the reality is that it was the Indian military campaign that forced Pakistan to seek a ceasefire — as Prime Minister Narendra Modi also said.
Under Operation Sindoor, India maintained escalation dominance from the beginning, did not allow Pakistan to retaliate, and imposed costs so substantial while remaining beneath the nuclear threshold that even a leader as rabid as General Asim Munir sought a ceasefire.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
After the first round of Indian strikes on nine terrorist sites in the early hours of May 7, Pakistan rebuffed Indian outreach in false confidence. Three days later, after taking a beating across the spectrum, Pakistan reached out with a request for ceasefire.
India hammered at least eight Pakistani airbases in addition to several air defence units and radar sites. The airbases struck included some of Pakistan's crown jewels, such as the Chaklala and Sargodha airbases. The Chaklala airbase is next door to the Pakistan Army headquarters in Rawalpindi — the true seat of power in the country. India also struck Lahore and took out the city's air defence system.
India neither called Pakistan for a ceasefire nor gave it an off-ramp and maintained an upper hand throughout the conflict, says Yusuf Unjhawala, a scholar of geopolitics at the Takshashila Institution.
Unjhawala tells Firstpost, 'India initially gave Pakistan a chance to de-escalate. As soon as Pakistan indicated its intention to not de-escalate, India struck Pakistan and kept striking until Pakistan reached out to seek a ceasefire. Pakistan could never respond to the first round of Indian strikes and was left confused with Indian strikes left, right, and centre and was reduced to playing catch-up. That was by design as India kept the heat on so much that Pakistan simply did not have any room to attack. India threw the final punches and came out on the top in the conflict.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
As Firstpost had previously reported, the Modi government had decided that there would not be any de-escalation from India's side and the ball of de-escalation lay in Pakistan's court. The government was firm that there would neither be any off-ramp to Pakistan nor any face-saving for Munir — and the government stayed true to these commitments until the end.
India's calculated and continuous escalation achieved the desired outcome, says Unjhawala.
India calls out Pakistan's nuclear bluff, forces Pakistan
For more than two decades, the Kargil War was thought to be the last conventional conflict between India and Pakistan.
Once Pakistan acquired nuclear weapons, its leaders started invoking them at every chance. Pakistan's development of lower-yield tactical weapons and the dominance of a jihadist military convinced many leaders and strategists that Pakistan had acquired the ultimate deterrent against conventional attacks from India. But that was until last week.
As India struck every corner of Punjab, including the prized airbases housing top fighter planes, and reached as far as Karachi with precision strikes, India called out Pakistan's nuclear bluff. To be sure, Pakistan's cry for help to the international community included nuclear blackmail — the so-called 'alarming' intelligence received by the Donald Trump administration that made Vice President reach out to PM Modi is understood to be Pakistan's false claim about India going for its nuclear sites or nuclear chain of command.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
When Vance asked Modi to exercise restraint, Modi listened to him but told him that India would respond to Pakistan with more force and strength come what may — and it did. India kept hitting Pakistan and forced it into a corner.
In an address to the nation, Modi called out Pakistan's nuclear bluff.
'India will not tolerate any nuclear blackmail. India will strike precisely and decisively at the terrorist hideouts developing under the cover of the nuclear blackmail,' said Modi in Hindi.
Modi further referred to Pakistan playing foreign powers, like Vance, and how India did not allow such games to deter its response.
'Pakistan was pleading to the world to ease tensions. And after suffering heavy losses, Pakistan's army contacted our DGMO on the afternoon of 10th May. By then, we had destroyed the infrastructure of terrorism on a large scale,' said Modi.
India proves combat capabilities — and draws lessons
Under Operation Sindoor, India struck a host of targets across Pakistan with precision.
India cratered runways, hit aircraft hangars, terrorist infrastructure, radar sites, air defence units, and established combat superiority.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Unjhawala, the geopolitics specialist at Takshashila, says that India gained immense insights into Chinese military systems in the conflict with Pakistan, which will help the country in confrontation with China.
'Around 80 per cent of the Pakistani military's equipment is of Chinese origin, ranging from missiles and fighter planes to air defence systems. Pakistan used all of them against India and India successfully dealt with all of them. The greatest successes are the destruction of the Chinese HQ-9 air defence system and missiles mounted on JF-17s,' says Unjhawala.
Learnings from the conflict would undeniably be put to use soon.
As Pakistan's perpetual war on India is driven by a self-consuming jihadist national ideology, it is not possible to impose permanent restraint. What is possible is to impose costs so high that the frequency of misadventures is minimised — and that is what India has done.
'The Balakot airstrike brought India six years of deterrence. Operation Sindoor should also bring many years of restraint. But Pakistan will attack again and India should be prepared. The preparation has to start now. The first step should be to raise the defence budget, hopefully to 4 per cent. Then, India should smoothen the procurement process and go heavy on indigenisation,' says Unjhawala.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
As India denies him face-saving, Munir stands weaker than ever
Munir, otherwise the strongest man in Pakistan, stands weaker than ever.
With the Pahalgam attack and the response to Indian strikes on May 7, he overplayed his hand and now finds himself in a corner.
'While Munir's position was already untenable, it is now weaker than ever. We are not used to seeing the Pakistani Army this week,' says Unjhawala.
One of the reasons behind Munir greenlighting the Pahalgam attack was to enter into a conflict with India and restore the military's primacy inside Pakistan. Now that Pakistan stands as a loser in the conflict, Munir has neither received a victory nor a face-saving exit.
It remains to be seen how long Munir would be able to rely on a pliant media and rally-around-the-flag effect. As Pakistani PM Shehbaz Sharif declared victory over India, victory parades have been reported in the country. But, when stories of continued bombardment and images of devastated airbases, trickle to the public, would the propaganda still hold?
As Pakistani generals attended funerals of terrorists, the entire world saw what India had been saying for years — there is no difference between the Pakistani military and terrorists.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With Operation Sindoor and the speech laying down the 'Modi Doctrine', the prime minister has promised a new normal regarding terrorism and Pakistan — one and the same thing for most Indians.
Under the Modi Doctrine, Operation Sindoor will serve as a benchmark for response to a terrorist attack, terrorists and governments sponsoring them will not be differentiated, and nuclear blackwill will not be tolerated.
Unjhawala says, 'Now that the government has set a new normal, it has to live up to it. It is yet to be seen whether attacks on soldiers would also have a response like Operation Sindoor.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
22 minutes ago
- Economic Times
H-1B visa tension rises amid US lawmaker's call to curb Indian tech hiring
NYT News Service A social media post by US Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has intensified political scrutiny over the H-1B visa programme, widely used by Indian professionals. On August 4, Greene wrote on X, 'End Indian H-1B visas replacing American jobs instead,' while reposting former President Donald Trump's call for higher tariffs on Indian exports over its oil trade with statement, though not tied to any legislative move, has drawn strong reactions from Indian students, legal professionals, and tech workers in the United States. It also coincides with remarks from Trump's aide Stephen Miller, who in a Fox News interview accused India of undermining US interests on trade and immigration.'India portrays itself as being one of our closest friends in the world. But they don't accept our products, they impose massive tariffs on us. We also know they engage in a lot of cheating on immigration policy,' Miller said. India continues to be the top source of H-1B visa recipients. According to US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), nearly 70% of all H-1B visas approved in FY 2024 were granted to Indian nationals. The programme is often a key step for international students transitioning from academic training to full-time employment in the US. Greene's statement emerged in the context of rising US-India trade tensions, with Trump demanding tariff retaliation for India's energy imports from Russia. While Greene tied her comment to American job losses, Miller's interview offered further criticism of India's economic and immigration practices. Though no new visa restriction has been introduced, the political messaging has prompted concern. US lawmakers have recently debated reforms such as more transparency in the H-1B lottery, better wage protection for domestic workers, and broader access for STEM graduates trained in US institutions. No policy change yet, but messaging matters As of August 2025, the F-1 visa and the Optional Practical Training (OPT) programmes remain operational. Indian students and professionals applying for H-1B visas continue to follow the existing process. However, experts advise staying informed through USCIS updates and seeking legal or academic guidance for long-term Greene and Miller's remarks do not carry immediate policy consequences, they reflect growing scrutiny around skilled migration programmes and outsourcing. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Can Coforge's ambition to lead the IT Industry become a reality? BlackRock returns, this time with Ambani. Will it be lucky second time? Amazon is making stealthy moves in healthcare, here's why! The trader who blew the whistle on Jane Street Stock Radar: Globus Spirits breaks out from 9-month consolidation; check target & stop loss for long positions Weekly Top Picks: These stocks scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus These large-caps have 'strong buy' & 'buy' recos and an upside potential of more than 25% Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and upside potential of up to 36% in 1 year


Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Tariff war will have worse impact than Covid: Kerala minister Balagopal
Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala Finance Minister K N Balagopal on Tuesday warned that the emerging global tariff war, led by the United States, could have a more damaging impact on the economy than the Covid pandemic. Tariff war will have worse impact than Covid: Kerala minister Balagopal Speaking at a seminar on 'Post-Covid Development Challenges and Responses: Kerala through the Lens of State Budgets', organised by the Gulati Institute of Finance and Taxation here, Balagopal said, 'While India is being asked to reduce tariffs on imports, the US is imposing higher duties on our exports. This imbalance will affect the Indian economy.' Citing examples, he said India has already reduced import duties on vehicles like Land Rover and Jaguar to 10 percent. At the same time, he alleged, international companies are pressuring India to lower its Goods and Services Tax rates. Despite a reduction in the state's borrowing limit by the Centre, Kerala has managed its finances post-Covid through increased revenue collection, Balagopal added. 'The state's revenue as a percentage of GSDP grew from 56 percent in 2020-21 to 74.89 percent in 2024-25,' he said. Tax and non-tax revenues rose from ₹54,000 crore in 2021 to ₹92,000 crore in the last fiscal. Highlighting the government's priorities in recent years, Balagopal said the focus had been on strengthening infrastructure and social security. He termed the commissioning of the Vizhinjam International Seaport a significant achievement and added that the government had invested in enhancing research and development facilities at premier institutions in the state. The minister also criticised the GST regime introduced in 2017, calling the division of tax revenues between the Centre and states 'unjustifiable.' 'Covid brought about social, political, and economic disruptions, leading to stagnation. The state is now striving to move forward from that,' he added. The United States has slapped a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods as part of a broad trade measure targeting nearly 70 countries, according to an executive order issued by the White House recently. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Deccan Herald
24 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
India, Philippines announce strategic partnership after Modi meets Ferdinand R Marcos
A new milestone: India and Philippines are now Strategic Partners 🇵🇭🤝🇮🇳 PM @narendramodi and President @bongbongmarcos held talks at Hyderabad House & agreed to elevate India-Philippines bilateral relations to a 'Strategic Partnership'. The leaders also witnessed exchange of…