Andhra Pradesh government sets up high-level panel to address concerns on district and mandal boundaries
According to the Government Order dated July 22, 2025, the government has taken this decision in response to numerous petitions and concerns related to the reshuffling of administrative divisions. The newly constituted Group of Ministers will study these matters in depth and offer their recommendations for final approval.
The GoM comprises senior cabinet members, including Revenue Minister Anagani Satya Prasad, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Minister Ponguru Narayana, Home Affairs and Disaster Management Minister Anitha Vangalapudi, Roads and Buildings Minister B.C. Janardhan Reddy, Water Resources Development Minister Nimmala Ramanaidu, Food and Civil Supplies Minister Nadendla Manohar, and Health and Family Welfare Minister Satya Kumar Yadav. The Special Chief Secretary to the Revenue Department will serve as the Convenor of the Committee, coordinating meetings and ensuring the participation of relevant officials when required.
The Committee has been tasked with evaluating the practicality of proposed changes, especially from the perspective of administrative efficiency. It will also take into consideration the resolution of disputes involving boundaries of districts, revenue divisions, and mandals, and will assess accessibility to administrative headquarters for the general public. Another key focus of the GoM will be the preservation of historical and cultural affiliations, the need to ensure balanced socio-economic development across regions, and the equitable distribution of population and geographical area to support effective governance.
In addition, the panel will examine in detail the representations made by citizens and their elected leaders, with regard to proposed changes in district names, boundaries, administrative headquarters, and related governance arrangements.
The Committee will submit a consolidated report with its recommendations to the state government, which will take a final decision based on the findings, said Chief Secretary K. Vijayanand in the GO.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
14 hours ago
- NDTV
Madras High Court Bars Use Of Living Leaders' Names In Government Schemes
Chennai: The Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu government that while launching and operating welfare schemes through various advertisements, the name of any living personality, photograph of any former Chief Minister/ideological leaders or party insignia/emblem/flag shall not be included. The first bench comprising Chief Justice M M Shrivatsava and Justice Sunder Mohan passed the interim order on Thursday on a petition filed by AIADMK MP and advocate Iniyan. In his petition, Shanmugam sought to restrain the state government from introducing/rebranding any scheme in the name of any living personality pending disposal of his Writ Petition. He also sought a direction to the Election Commission of India and the Committee on Content Regulation in Government Advertising to take necessary action against the DMK under Paragraph 16A of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 and consequently forbear the state government from using the name "Stalin" in relation to the activities of the scheme emanating from G.O. (Ms) No. 390, Public (Mudhalvarin Mugavari) Department, dated 19.06.2025 and thus render justice. In its order, the bench made it clear that it has not passed any order against launching, implementation or operation of any welfare scheme of the government. The bench said on prima facie considerations, it finds that the prayer for the interim relief has been made on the apprehension that the state is proceeding to launch many welfare schemes on the same line as the advertisement under challenge in this petition. The bench said the Supreme court has issued successive directives from time to time regulating the content of government advertisements. In a clarificatory order passed in a review, the Supreme Court in the case of Karnataka Vs Common Cause and others permitted certain exceptions to the directive issued in the case of Common Cause Vs Union of India. As per the said order, publication of the photograph of the incumbent Chief Minister was permissible. The use of photographs of ideological leaders or former Chief Minister, prima facie, would be against the directives of the Supreme Court, the bench added. The bench said it would not be permissible to mention the name of the living political personality in the nomenclature of the government scheme. Moreover, using the name of any ruling political party, its insignia/logo/emblem/flag also appears to be prima facie against the directives of the Supreme Court and the Election Commission of India, the bench added. The bench said pendency of this petition shall not come in the way of the Election Commission of India or the authorities in initiating any proceeding on the basis of the complaint made by the petitioner. The bench posted to August 13, further hearing of the case.
The Hindu
16 hours ago
- The Hindu
Madras High Court restrains T.N. government from naming new schemes after living personalities
The Madras High Court has restrained the Tamil Nadu government from using the name of any living personality in the nomenclature of new or re-branded public schemes to be introduced in the future. It has also prohibited the use of portraits of any former Chief Minister/ideological leaders or Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) insignia/emblem/flag in the advertisements issued for popularising those schemes. First Division Bench of Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan passed the interim order on a public interest litigation (PIL) petition filed by All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) Member of Parliament Shanmugam against the use of Chief Minister M.K. Stalin's name in the public outreach programme, 'Ungaludan Stalin.' Making it clear that the they had not passed any order against the launch, implementation, or operation of any welfare scheme of the government, the judges said, their order was confined only to the nomenclature of such schemes and the publicity materials to be prepared by the government. They also said that the interim orders were being passed only on the basis of prima facie materials. The judges ordered notices to the Tamil Nadu government as well as the DMK on the main PIL petition filed against the nomenclature of 'Ungaludan Stalin' scheme, and granted time for them to file their counter affidavits. The Bench decided to hear the MP's PIL petition, along with a similar case filed by another individual, next on August 13 after the filing of counter affidavits and rejoinders. In the meantime, since senior counsel Vijay Narayan, assisted by K. Gowtham Kumar, representing the MP, claimed that the State government was planning to name a few other public schemes too after living personalities; the Division Bench said, such nomenclature prima facie appeared to be impermissible as per the orders passed by the Supreme Court in the famous Common Cause case. 'Therefore, we are inclined to pass an interim order to the effect that while launching and operating government welfare schemes through various advertisements, the name of any living personality, photograph of any former Chief Minister/ideological leaders or party insignia/emblem/flag of Respondent number 4 (DMK) shall not be included,' the interim order of the Bench read. The judges further clarified that the pendency of the present PIL petition before the High Court would preclude the Election Commission of India (ECI) from taking an appropriate decision on a representation made by the AIADMK MP seeking necessary action against the DMK under paragraph 16A of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968.
The Hindu
16 hours ago
- The Hindu
Don't use names of living personalities in nomenclature of new government schemes, orders Madras High Court
The Madras High Court has restrained the Tamil Nadu government from using the name of any living personality in the nomenclature of new or re-branded public schemes to be introduced in the future. It has also prohibited the use of portraits of any former Chief Minister/ideological leaders or Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) insignia/emblem/flag in the advertisements issued for popularising those schemes. First Division Bench of Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan passed the interim order on a public interest litigation (PIL) petition filed by All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) Member of Parliament Shanmugam against the use of Chief Minister M.K. Stalin's name in the public outreach programme, 'Ungaludan Stalin.' Making it clear that the they had not passed any order against the launch, implementation, or operation of any welfare scheme of the government, the judges said, their order was confined only to the nomenclature of such schemes and the publicity materials to be prepared by the government. They also said that the interim orders were being passed only on the basis of prima facie materials. The judges ordered notices to the Tamil Nadu government as well as the DMK on the main PIL petition filed against the nomenclature of 'Ungaludan Stalin' scheme, and granted time for them to file their counter affidavits. The Bench decided to hear the MP's PIL petition, along with a similar case filed by another individual, next on August 13 after the filing of counter affidavits and rejoinders. In the meantime, since senior counsel Vijay Narayan, assisted by K. Gowtham Kumar, representing the MP, claimed that the State government was planning to name a few other public schemes too after living personalities; the Division Bench said, such nomenclature prima facie appeared to be impermissible as per the orders passed by the Supreme Court in the famous Common Cause case. 'Therefore, we are inclined to pass an interim order to the effect that while launching and operating government welfare schemes through various advertisements, the name of any living personality, photograph of any former Chief Minister/ideological leaders or party insignia/emblem/flag of Respondent number 4 (DMK) shall not be included,' the interim order of the Bench read. The judges further clarified that the pendency of the present PIL petition before the High Court would preclude the Election Commission of India (ECI) from taking an appropriate decision on a representation made by the AIADMK MP seeking necessary action against the DMK under paragraph 16A of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968.
