Equities still worth a bet, but tread lightly: Richard Harris
Richard Harris
,
Port Shelter Investment
.
Is it the magic of liquidity which is blinding everybody?
Richard Harris:
Well, I am not sure it is blinding everybody, but it is definitely having a big impact on what is happening. Clearly, the big beautiful bill or ugly bill, as you might call it, is going to have quite a big impact. That is going to put trillions of dollars into the economy. And as we know, if you put that sort of money into the economy, it ends up in asset prices. So, I think that equities are taking some strength from that. But one of the biggest reasons why we have seen prices move up recently is because Trump comes in with a scary figure or scary announcement such as the 2nd of April tariff increases. And what have we seen since then are roll backs from them. So, the market has seen each little roll back as a victory, as good news.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World
5minstory.com
Undo
So, bit by bit, it is priced things back up again and that is what we are seeing at the moment that we are actually seeing small pieces of good news. But if you look at the good news, you can sort of say, well,
tariffs
in China were going to be 145%. Now, they are going to be 50%, maybe they will be lower. Vietnam 48% or something, maybe they will be 20%, that all seems to the market to be good news. But in reality, that 20% is still very high. It is a lot of cash to find for American buyers because, of course, they are the ones who are going to be paying at the end of the day. So, you have to think that that is going to have a detrimental effect on trade and a detrimental effect on growth that will counteract all the positive features that the big beautiful bill was intended to have.
So, just wondering, now that 9th July approaches closer and closer, what can we hear on the tariff front?
Richard Harris:
Well, the extraordinary thing if you do a survey of how much people have been searching for the word tariff, it has gone down pretty well solidly from April 2nd. And what we have had over the last couple of weeks, we have had a lot of news about Iran, a lot of news about global politics, what is going to happen to oil we have been talking about.
Most recently, we have been talking in the last week about what has happened to the big beautiful bill. Well, that was strong armed through. Now, the markets are going to start focusing on tariffs. But they have really not paid much attention to it since April the 2nd, thinking that Trump is going to chicken out. Well, we will have to see if that happens. But on those countries that have signed deals with the US already, tariffs are an awful lot higher than they were at the beginning of the year. So, I think that that is really the factor that we should be looking at not the fact that we have had good news coming because some of these very high tariff levels have been reduced.
Live Events
So, what should one do, I mean that is the most important question whatever we are discussing is well known? It is a strategy what you adopt at an all-time high which essentially will differentiate the portfolio return. If you sell now, well you miss on the uptick. If you do not sell now, well, you regret because this market already is looking bloated.
Richard Harris:
Well, what is basically happening is that there is a big delay in numbers. The big factor that has confounded economists, of course, is how is it that we have seen the economy stay fairly strong despite all these potential features of bad news coming around. Well, a lot of the bad news has not hit yet.
Higher tariffs have not necessarily hit. Issues with the deficit have not necessarily hit. But generally, the bad news has not really hit yet, that is further down the line and it is going to be the same with the big beautiful bill. The
tax cuts
are going to happen soon. The benefit cuts are going to happen later and over time. So, initially, the markets will still stay pretty buoyant because they would not have an awful lot of reason to sell off.
So, if you have to, let us say, punch in one trade, only one trade, you allowed only one for rest of the year, what will that trade be?
Richard Harris:
I think equities, maybe less weighted, less highly weighted than they have been previously, but equities will still continue because bull markets die hard.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' will soon become law. Republicans who tore into it now need to hawk it to voters
Trump praised the bill at an event in Iowa, while House Speaker Mike Johnson called it one of the most complex and significant pieces of legislation in US history. President Donald Trump's wide-ranging domestic policy bill, passed by Congress this week, is facing growing criticism over its planned cuts to Medicaid. The bill, which is is now just hours away from becoming law, includes nearly $1 trillion in Medicaid reductions over a decade, a move Democrats are using to launch early attacks ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. For months, some Republican lawmakers had raised concerns. North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis said the cuts were 'inescapable,' while Missouri Senator Josh Hawley said targeting Medicaid was 'a mistake.' Nebraska Representative Don Bacon had earlier said he would not back a bill with over $500 billion in cuts but explained he ended up supporting it due to other tax and defence provisions.
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump's domestic policy bill draws fire over Medicaid cuts, as democrats begin campaign blitz
President Donald Trump's wide-ranging domestic policy bill, passed by Congress this week, is facing growing criticism over its planned cuts to Medicaid. The bill, which is is now just hours away from becoming law, includes nearly $1 trillion in Medicaid reductions over a decade, a move Democrats are using to launch early attacks ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. For months, some Republican lawmakers had raised concerns. North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis said the cuts were 'inescapable,' while Missouri Senator Josh Hawley said targeting Medicaid was 'a mistake.' Nebraska Representative Don Bacon had earlier said he would not back a bill with over $500 billion in cuts but explained he ended up supporting it due to other tax and defence provisions. Democrats are now highlighting those Republican warnings. 'It's 2018 all over again,' said Democratic Representative Jared Golden of Maine, who holds a seat in a pro-Trump district. 'I would never vote for these Medicaid cuts. Never,' Golden told CNN. A June poll by Quinnipiac University found that 53% of voters opposed the bill. While Republicans argue the cuts mostly involve new work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents, Democrats say millions could eventually lose coverage. The Congressional Budget Office estimates around 12 million people could lose health insurance by 2034 due to changes in Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. Trump praised the bill at an event in Iowa, while House Speaker Mike Johnson called it one of the most complex and significant pieces of legislation in US history. Speaking after signing the bill, Johnson said it was among 'the top two or three' bills ever passed in Congress, according to CNN.
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Hefty fees by PSIEC have halted pre-1992 plot deals, rues industry
Ludhiana: Transfers of industrial land under Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC) policy impose a hefty "unearned profit" charge on plots allotted before 1992. The policy mandates a payment of Rs 7,500 per sq yard, up from the older and far lower rates, whenever these plots change hands. The revision, introduced under PSIEC's changed transfer framework, continues to stall transfer of plots. Industry stalwarts say it effectively blocks legitimate sales and transfers. PSIEC had revised the fee schedule, which was ostensibly introduced to capture the "unearned increase" in land values over decades, aiming to curb speculative transfers. However, local business associations argue that the blanket Rs 7,500/sq yard charge, roughly 16 times the older rate, has been burdensome deterring genuine transfers. Industrial plot sales across Punjab have essentially screeched to a halt, with investors freezing activity amid uncertainty. Stakeholders demand a return to a sustainable, graduated fee structure consistent with past norms and economic realities. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Industrialists say the policy threatens MSMEs of the city's core industries, many of whom require smooth transfers for growth, exit planning, or family succession. As most of the focal points, except those under Phase VIII, are of the pre-1992 era, it is affecting most of them. Rahul Ahuja, former CII Punjab chairman and convener of the Apex Chamber of Commerce & Industry, Punjab, said, "This move has virtually stalled all transactions. It must be rolled back to the previous structure, if not something better." Ashpreet Sahni, former chairman of CII Ludhiana, called for a complete withdrawal. "The unearned profit policy must be withdrawn and replaced with a transparent, rational, industry-friendly approach. It was being said that the matter would be looked into and resolved after elections. Hopefully, it will be done now," he said. They said the transfer fees in the 1990s were as low as Rs 450 per sq yard compared to the current demands highlighting the sharp increase. The industry is optimistic that an urgent policy correction would be brought in, now that Sanjeev Arora is Punjab's new industries minister.
