Trump says he had productive call with Turkey's Erdogan, visits planned
In a social media post, Trump said the Turkish leader had invited him to Turkey "at a future date" and that he would also be coming to Washington, but did not say when. Erdogan, in a subsequent X post confirmed the mutual invite.
"The phone call that I had today with my friend Donald Trump was very productive, comprehensive and sincere," Erdogan said.
The bilateral ties between Turkey and the US had gradually soured over the past decade over disagreements on key policy issues including Syria and Ankara's closer ties with Moscow.
Under the administration of former President Joe Biden, who kept Erdogan at an arm's length, the nature of US-Turkey ties further evolved into a more transactional one from the values-based partnership that it traditionally had been since Ankara joined NATO decades ago.
With the arrival of Trump, Ankara is hoping for a friendlier Washington, even though it was the Republican president who imposed sanctions on Turkey in late 2020 over its purchase of the Russian S-400 missile defense systems.
Trump, who described as "excellent" his relationship with Erdogan during his first tenure at the White House, said the two countries would cooperate on ending the war in Ukraine.
"I look forward to working with President Erdogan on getting the ridiculous but deadly, War between Russia and Ukraine ended -- NOW!," Trump said in his post. Erdogan welcomed the US efforts to end the war, Turkey's presidency said.
Neither side gave any details what specific role Ankara would play in the process, which has stalled even as the Republican president during his campaign pledged that he would end the war on day one of his tenure.
Since taking office in January, Trump has upended US policy toward the war in Ukraine, pressing Kyiv to agree to a ceasefire while easing pressure on Russia, which launched a full-scale invasion of its neighbor in 2022.
After repeatedly blaming Ukraine over the war even though Moscow invaded its smaller neighbor, Trump has turned some of his ire on Russian President Vladimir Putin recently, questioning his sincerity on making a deal to end the war.
Erdogan also expressed the need for the uninterrupted delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza in the phone call adding that Ankara is ready to provide support for the establishment of a ceasefire and lasting peace, according to the Turkish readout.
The Turkish leader also told Trump that Ankara was working to help preserve Syria's territorial integrity and urged Trump to consider sanctions relief for Damascus.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lutnick says he could hear 'expletives' out of Korea following trade deal with Japan
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Thursday that he could hear "expletives" out of South Korea after Japan reached a trade deal with US President Donald Trump's administration earlier this week. Lutnick made the remarks, apparently suggesting that the tariff deal between the United States and Japan might have created a sense of urgency for South Korea, which seeks to reach a deal to avoid or lower the Trump administration's 25 percent "reciprocal" tariff set to kick in on Aug. 1. "I could hear the expletives out of Korea when they read the Japanese deal because the Koreans and the Japanese ... they stare at each other," he said in a CNBC interview. "So you can imagine what they were thinking when they saw that Japan made that deal ... They were like, 'Oh man!," he added, underscoring that Koreans "very much" want to make a deal. On Tuesday, Trump announced the deal with Tokyo that would lower the threatened 25 percent reciprocal tariff for Japan to 15 percent in return for Japan's agreement to invest US$550 billion in the US, increase US rice imports by 75 percent and buy 100 Boeing aircraft, to name a few. During the interview, Lutnick said that he will engage in a meeting with South Korean negotiators in Washington on the day, after bilateral high-level trade talks, slated for Friday, were postponed. Korea's Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan and Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo are currently in Washington amid Seoul's stepped-up efforts to strike a deal with the US "Of course, they are going to be in my office today talking," the secretary said. Seoul and Washington had planned to hold "two-plus-two" trade talks on Friday, where Seoul's Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol, Trade Minister Yeo, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer were set to get together.
Korea Herald
6 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Securing a fair deal
Korea must secure tariff terms no worse than Tokyo's as investment and export stakes grow As Japan and the United States conclude a high-profile tariff agreement, attention has quickly turned to South Korea. Tokyo's willingness to open its agricultural market, commit to joint energy projects and pledge a record-breaking $550 billion in US-bound investment has earned it a reduction in reciprocal tariffs from 25 percent to 15 percent — a benchmark now hardening into a minimum standard for Washington's other major trading partners. South Korea finds itself in a more compressed timeframe. The bilateral 2+2 ministerial trade talks scheduled for July 25 in Washington were postponed because US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had an urgent scheduling conflict. Seoul's Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol was informed just before departure, though Korean industry and trade officials already in Washington are continuing working-level consultations. Seoul has emphasized that the postponement does not reflect any change in negotiating intent. But with the reciprocal tariffs slated to resume on Aug. 1, time is growing short. The Japan-US deal has raised the stakes. In addition to securing a 10-point tariff cut, Japan agreed to increase US rice imports by 75 percent, purchase 100 Boeing aircraft and participate in the Alaskan liquefied natural gas project. The US government claims the agreement will generate hundreds of thousands of domestic jobs and boost strategic industries. For South Korea, where more than 60 percent of 2024's $66 billion trade surplus with the US came from automobiles, a failure to match Tokyo's deal could erode competitiveness in a key export sector. Automakers like Hyundai and Kia, which compete directly with Japanese peers in the US market, would be particularly exposed. In anticipation of this, Seoul has assembled a proposed investment package exceeding $100 billion, drawing on commitments from major conglomerates such as Samsung, SK, Hyundai and LG. The plan, modeled loosely on Japan's, may expand further as talks progress. Additional participation in LNG development, including through public financial institutions, is also under review. However, Tokyo's massive pledge — roughly double Korea's in proportionate terms — and its acceptance of politically sensitive concessions raise the bar significantly. Washington's pressure tactics remain blunt. US President Donald Trump has warned that only countries that open their markets will be rewarded with lower tariffs, threatening 'much higher' duties otherwise. His administration has also criticized South Korea's non-tariff barriers, from digital platform regulations to agricultural restrictions. While Seoul has ruled out rice and beef as bargaining chips, citing food security, the government is reportedly exploring other forms of market access, including in digital trade and manufacturing partnerships. In parallel, Seoul must navigate additional entanglements. US demands around defense cost sharing, semiconductor collaboration and regulation of Korean digital platforms all intersect with the trade agenda. Meanwhile, reports indicate the European Union may also be nearing a 15 percent tariff agreement with Washington — a sign that may further isolate South Korea unless it can close a deal soon. Tokyo's agreement is not without trade-offs. Much remains unclear about the terms and timelines of Japan's commitments. But the symbolism of its 15 percent tariff outcome is already shaping expectations. For South Korea, the goal must be to avoid terms materially worse than those given to Japan or the EU. Any outcome perceived as inferior would carry real consequences, both economically and diplomatically. Protecting high-employment, high-surplus sectors such as automobiles and steel must be a central priority. To that end, South Korea's negotiators must aim for a calibrated strategy: offering proportionate concessions, targeting returns in industrial cooperation and investment, and securing transition support for exposed sectors. As deadlines near and peer deals take shape, the challenge is no longer just to reach an agreement, but to secure terms that protect South Korea's standing in its most critical export market.
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Russia, Ukraine discuss more prisoner swaps
ISTANBUL (Reuters) -- Russia and Ukraine discussed further prisoner swaps on Wednesday at a brief session of peace talks in Istanbul, but the sides remained far apart on ceasefire terms and a possible meeting of their leaders. "We have progress on the humanitarian track, with no progress on a cessation of hostilities," Ukraine's chief delegate Rustem Umerov said after talks that lasted just 40 minutes. He said Ukraine had proposed a meeting before the end of August between Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin. He added, "By agreeing to this proposal, Russia can clearly demonstrate its constructive approach." Russia's chief delegate Vladimir Medinsky said the point of a leaders' meeting should be to sign an agreement, not to "discuss everything from scratch." He renewed Moscow's call for a series of short ceasefires of 24-48 hours to enable the retrieval of bodies. Ukraine says it wants an immediate and much longer ceasefire. The talks took place just over a week after US President Donald Trump threatened heavy new sanctions on Russia and countries that buy its exports unless a peace deal was reached within 50 days. There was no sign of any progress toward that goal, although both sides said there was discussion of further humanitarian exchanges following a series of prisoner swaps, the latest of which took place on Wednesday. Medinsky said the negotiators agreed to exchange at least 1,200 more prisoners of war from each side, and Russia had offered to hand over another 3,000 Ukrainian bodies. He said Moscow was working through a list of 339 names of Ukrainian children that Kyiv accuses it of abducting. Russia denies that charge and says it has offered protection to children separated from their parents during the war. "Some of the children have already been returned back to Ukraine. Work is under way on the rest. If their legal parents, close relatives, representatives are found, these children will immediately return home," Medinsky said. Umerov said Kyiv was expecting "further progress" on POWs, adding, "We continue to insist on the release of civilians, including children." Ukrainian authorities say at least 19,000 children have been forcibly deported. Before the talks, the Kremlin had played down expectations, describing the two sides' positions as diametrically opposed and saying no one should expect miracles. At 40 minutes, the meeting was even shorter than the two sides' previous encounters on May 16 and June 2, which lasted a combined total of under three hours. Oleksandr Bevz, a member of the Ukrainian delegation, said Kyiv had proposed a Putin-Zelenskyy meeting in August because that would fall within the deadline set by Trump for a deal. Putin turned down a previous challenge from Zelenskyy to meet in person and has said he does not see him as a legitimate leader because Ukraine, which is under martial law, did not hold new elections when Zelenskyy's five-year mandate expired last year. Trump has patched up relations with Zelenskyy after a public row with him at the White House in February, and has lately expressed growing frustration with Putin. Three sources close to the Kremlin told Reuters last week that Putin, unfazed by Trump's ultimatum, would keep fighting in Ukraine until the West engaged on his terms for peace, and that his territorial demands may widen as Russian forces advance.
