logo
‘The Man No One Believed' recounts a shocking murder and delayed justice

‘The Man No One Believed' recounts a shocking murder and delayed justice

Justice gone off the rails in the rural South? Not surprising, we think, surmising that a Black man with limited resources has been convicted of a crime he didn't commit. But it turns out that corruption, incompetence and bad luck imperil a wide range of victims.
The title character in Joshua Sharpe's involving but labyrinthine work of nonfiction, 'The Man No One Believed,' happens to be White. Dennis Perry, a carpenter, was found guilty in 2003 of murdering Herbert and Thelma Swain, a Black couple who were shot in 1985 at the Rising Daughter Baptist Church in front of numerous witnesses.
The killing shocked the South Georgia community of Spring Bluff, stymied investigators and reverberated through the state for decades. The crime was featured on the television show 'Unsolved Mysteries' in 1988, and 30 years later it was the subject of 'Undisclosed,' a multi-episode podcast produced by the Georgia Innocence Project. It took nearly two decades to put someone behind bars — and it was, we know from the start of Sharpe's book, the wrong man.
All that time, the motive remained baffling. Sharpe describes the Swains' church as 'a place of refuge against the terror of Jim Crow.' Herbert Swain was the deacon, and the couple were beloved by their neighbors.
Yet there were almost too many possible motives and suspects. Spring Bluff was nestled along a popular drug-smuggling route, and the Swains had a family tie to a man police had linked to that world. Could their killing have been an attempt to a deliver a message to a delinquent or turncoat drug dealer? Was it a murder-for-hire plot with an eye on life insurance money? An armed robbery gone wrong? Or possibly a racially motivated hate crime?
As Sharpe repeatedly stresses, investigators initially discounted the hate-crime theory, which could have led in a fruitful direction. Despite the shadow of drug smuggling, the town was 'one of the most peaceful, low-crime corners' in its South Georgia county. In the mid-1980s, Sharpe writes, Black people there 'didn't voice their concerns around white people,' and 'white community members liked to imagine that racism was history.' As a result, investigators had 'enormous blind spots,' Sharpe suggests, and 'didn't think racism made much sense as a motive.'
As they sorted through tips, suspects, reported confessions and conflicting witness statements, what followed was a 'seemingly endless investigation fraught with lies, missteps, and tragedy.'
One suspect, Donnie Barrentine, an alleged drug smuggler convicted on gun charges in another case, had reportedly boasted of complicity in the double murder. But he denied any involvement to police. Another, Erik Sparre, a serial domestic abuser and avowed white supremacist, was caught on tape confessing to the murders. But he, too, proclaimed his innocence — and produced a work-related alibi.
As the years passed, the community clamored for closure, the Swains' relatives and friends endured an agonizing wait, and witnesses died. In 1998, a former sheriff's deputy, Dale Bundy, was hired to reexamine the case. Working on a tip, he homed in on Perry, the carpenter, whom previous investigators cleared.
The evidence was sufficiently flimsy that prosecutors offered Perry a sweetheart plea deal. Perry, knowing he was innocent, decided to take his chances at trial. Big mistake. In the end, the jury chose to believe the testimony of a mentally unstable (and possibly bribed) witness, even though no forensic evidence — or plausible motive — tied Perry to the crime and he, too, had an alibi.
Perry escaped the death penalty only by promising not to appeal his conviction. He got two life sentences instead. It was a bitter fate mitigated only by a loyal family, a devoted new wife and a congenial cellmate. And the hope that, in the end, justice would prevail.
Enter Sharpe, an award-winning investigative reporter for the Atlanta Constitution-Journal who grew up just 40 miles from Rising Daughter Baptist Church. Sharpe had an emotional, as well as geographic, connection to the story: One of his great-uncles had died in prison after being convicted of a murder that his family believed he didn't commit.
Sharpe had never heard of the Georgia church murders before the Georgia Innocence Project approached him in August 2019. In the face of intense cost-cutting pressures, his editors at the newspaper gave him the time and resources to pursue the story. As he dove into the voluminous file and knocked on doors, he learned that the crime had sparked 'multiple confessions by different suspects, major disagreements between the detectives, and a rumor mill that was still spinning.'
Much of 'The Man No One Believed' describes the investigations prior to Sharpe's involvement. But its serpentine narrative really springs to life when he digs into the case. Probably his greatest contribution was to discredit the alibi of a former suspect, who had claimed to be working at a grocery store that night. A year after the crime, one investigator had confirmed the story with a phone call to a man he believed to be the suspect's boss. But Sharpe discovered that none of the boss's identifying details were accurate, and the actual supervisor had no memory of any such call. Could the man who vouched for the suspect have been the suspect himself? There was no proof to the contrary.
Improved forensic technology supplied another important piece of the puzzle. The Georgia Innocence Project managed to procure a DNA sample from the mother of that same suspect. It matched a hair sample found at the murder scene. Despite the district attorney's resistance, the new evidence was enough, finally, to exonerate Perry, who spent more than two decades in prison before his release.
In December 2024, another suspect was arrested in the case. (Spoiler alert: It was Sparre, whose DNA was found at the scene, and whose trial is pending.) Even after all the investigations, the motivations behind the double murder remain murky, and it is unclear whether other people may have been involved.
In the end, 'The Man No One Believed' inspires powerful, mixed emotions: fury at the failings of the justice system, and gratitude for organizations like the Georgia Innocence Project and indefatigable journalists like Sharpe. He deserves the victory lap he has taken in this illuminating book.
Julia M. Klein is a cultural reporter and critic in Philadelphia whose work has appeared in the Atlantic, the Nation, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Los Angeles Times, Slate, Mother Jones and other publications.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Colombian ex-President Álvaro Uribe sentenced to 12 years house arrest for bribery
Colombian ex-President Álvaro Uribe sentenced to 12 years house arrest for bribery

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

Colombian ex-President Álvaro Uribe sentenced to 12 years house arrest for bribery

Former Colombian President Álvaro Uribe was sentenced Friday to 12 years of house arrest for witness tampering and bribery in a historic case that gripped the South American nation and tarnished the conservative strongman's legacy. The sentence, which Uribe said will be appealed, followed a nearly six-month trial in which prosecutors presented evidence that he attempted to influence witnesses who accused the law-and-order leader of having links to a paramilitary group in the 1990s. "Politics prevailed over the law in sentencing," Uribe said after Friday's hearing. Uribe, 73, has denied any wrongdoing. He faced up to 12 years in prison after being convicted Monday. His attorney had asked the court to allow Uribe to remain free while he appeals the verdict. Judge Sandra Heredia on Friday said she did not grant the defense's request because it would be "easy" for the former president to leave the country to "evade the imposed sanction." Heredia also banned Uribe from holding public office for eight years and fined him about $776,000. Ahead of Friday's sentencing, Uribe posted on X that he was preparing arguments to support his appeal. He added that one must "think much more about the solution than the problem" during personal crises. The appeals court will have until early October to issue a ruling, which either party could then challenge before Colombia's Supreme Court. The former president governed from 2002 to 2010 with strong support from the United States. He is a polarizing figure in Colombia, where many credit him for saving the country from becoming a failed state, while others associate him with human rights violations and the rise of paramilitary groups in the 1990s. Heredia on Monday said she had seen enough evidence to determine that Uribe conspired with a lawyer to coax three former paramilitary group members, who were in prison, into changing testimony they had provided to Ivan Cepeda, a leftist senator who had launched an investigation into Uribe's alleged ties to a paramilitary group. Uribe in 2012 filed a libel suit against Cepeda in the Supreme Court. But in a twist, the high court in 2018 dismissed the accusations against Cepeda and began investigating Uribe. Martha Peñuela Rosales, a supporter of Uribe's party in the capital, Bogota, said she wept and prayed after hearing of the sentence. "It's an unjust sentence. He deserves to be free," she said. Meanwhile, Sergio Andrés Parra, who protested against Uribe outside the courthouse, said the 12-year sentence "is enough" and, even if the former president appeals, "history has already condemned him." During Uribe's presidency, Colombia's military attained some of its biggest battlefield victories against Latin America's oldest leftist insurgency, pushing the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia into remote pockets and forcing the group's leadership into peace talks that led to the disarmament of more than 13,000 fighters in 2016.

Father of Georgia school shooter had letter from son ‘asking for forgiveness' on day of the shooting, testimony reveals
Father of Georgia school shooter had letter from son ‘asking for forgiveness' on day of the shooting, testimony reveals

CNN

time3 hours ago

  • CNN

Father of Georgia school shooter had letter from son ‘asking for forgiveness' on day of the shooting, testimony reveals

The father of the accused Apalachee High School shooter was in possession of a letter from his son asking for forgiveness on the day of the shooting, an investigator testified during a court hearing Friday. Georgia Bureau of Investigation Special Agent John Giunta testified law enforcement officers conducting a protective sweep of Colin Gray's home saw a letter from his son in which 'Colt was asking for forgiveness.' Attorneys for the father argued during a Friday motions hearing that statements and evidence collected shortly after the shooting should not be used in trial. The hearing in Winder, Georgia, took place just after students at Apalachee High School started their first day back at school, just a few miles away. It's been almost 11 months since the mass shooting left two students and two teachers dead, as well as nine people injured, about 50 miles outside of Atlanta. Gray's attorneys told a judge a protective sweep when deputies arrived at the Gray home the morning of the shootings was more of a search and was done prior to a warrant being issued. 'Not only did he see the letter, he obviously read it. Because he gave that information to the GBI agent who was getting the search warrant,' defense attorney Jimmy Berry said. 'That is a search.' The content of the accused shooter's letter was used in part to get a search warrant, Berry told Judge Nicholas Primm. 'It was an illegal search,' Berry said. 'It was not a protective sweep' 'If the magistrate used that in his decision to issue the search warrant, then the search warrant itself is bad,' Berry told the court. 'If you give information that's bad in a search warrant it invalidates it.' State investigators testified they secured and executed a search warrant for the home on September 4, the same day as the mass shooting. District attorney Brad Smith rebutted that the sweep was necessary to protect the law enforcement officers at the house and that Colin Gray had verbally given permission to search the home. One of the deputies who spoke to Colin Gray at his home following the shootings testified that Gray was calm and spoke to him voluntarily. Portions of Deputy Brandon Bazinet's body camera video were played in court. In the video Gray says, 'If you just need OK, you all can go. You don't need a search warrant there ain't nothing there to hide. And it's clear it has something to do with my son. I just want to make sure he is not hurt.' While speaking with an officer in the video, Colin Gray says, 'I know it's bad,' as he worried about the physical condition of his son. The defense said the statements were not made voluntarily. They claim Colin Gray had been moved away from his home amid 'corrosive police activity.' Portions of a second video were played in court of Gray speaking to investigators during an interview the day after the shootings. In the video, Gray speaks with a deputy casually, talking about how his name had been handed down through his family. Barrow County Sheriff's investigator Jason Smith testified that during the taped interview authorities were in the process of obtaining a warrant for Gray's arrest, which he said he did not know at the time. Colin Gray has been charged with two counts of second-degree murder – alleging that he shares responsibility for the September shooting at Apalachee High School, where four people were killed. Colin Gray is facing 29 charges in total; he has pleaded not guilty to the charges. Judge Primm said he will rule on the motions to suppress the statements made by Colin Gray and whether the search warrant was valid within the month. Colin Gray is only the third person charged in the US in connection with a school shooting by their child. Investigators previously testified in court that Colin Gray bought the AR-15-style rifle allegedly used in the school shooting for Colt Gray as a Christmas present last year, only seven months after the family was questioned by law enforcement over online threats 'to commit a school shooting.' His trial had been scheduled to start this fall but was pushed back due to scheduling conflicts with his defense team. A new trial date for Colin Gray has not been set yet. Colin's son Colt is accused of killing four people and injuring others. He was 14 at the time of the shooting has been indicted on 55 felony counts. Authorities have said that Colt admitted to the shooting, according to court records. Attorneys for Colt told the court earlier this year that he may change his not guilty plea and is considering a plea deal. CNN's Ryan Young contributed to this report

Teenage waitress convicted in fast-track courts over mix-up with surprise 18th birthday gift
Teenage waitress convicted in fast-track courts over mix-up with surprise 18th birthday gift

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Teenage waitress convicted in fast-track courts over mix-up with surprise 18th birthday gift

A teenage girl has received a criminal conviction for failing to get insurance on a surprise 18th birthday gift of a car – before it had actually been given to her. The waitress, from Poole in Dorset, said her family bought the Fiat as a present to celebrate her landmark birthday, but mistakenly did not insure it immediately. Last month, the DVLA charged her with keeping an uninsured vehicle and brought a criminal prosecution over the unpaid bill. She explained the mix-up in a letter to Ipswich magistrates court, saying she had never driven the vehicle as she does not yet have a licence and at the time of the offence she did not even know the car was hers. But it was not enough to spare her from a criminal conviction. It is the latest piece of harsh justice to emerge from the Single Justice Procedure, an under-fire fast-track court process where magistrates hand out convictions in private court hearings. The Labour government is dragging its feet on reforming the court process, despite lobbying from prosecutors, lawyers, and even magistrates themselves that the system is broken. The teenager wrote in her letter: 'My family got the car for me as my 18th birthday present. I was still 17 at the time of the offence and had not actually been given the keys to the car and was not aware that it would be mine.' She set out that she and her father have reading difficulties, and it was only when a friend read an official letter for them that they realised the car needed to be insured even if it was not being driven. She said they received a rebate on car tax after declaring the 17-year-old Fiat 'off road' with a Statutory Off Road Notification (SORN), and did not realise she could pay a fine to avoid a criminal case. 'I have never used the car as I have still not passed my driving test', she continued. 'My dad is willing to pay the fine for me as he thinks this is his fault. 'He receives Universal Credit and PIP for his mental health, and I have just finished college and currently have a part-time job as a waitress on the minimum wage for an 18-year-old.' She pleaded guilty to the offence, dated in January and just under four weeks before her 18th birthday, and added: 'I was a good student in school and college studying art and have never been in any trouble in my life. We just misunderstood the letter, I thought it said I had to SORN it or pay a fine if it doesn't get sorted. 'I am very sorry.' One of the flaws in the Single Justice Procedure is that prosecutors do not see mitigation letters, due to the fast-track nature of the process. It means they do not get the chance to assess the personal circumstances of defendants, and cannot decide if a prosecution continues to be in the public interest. The DVLA itself has called on the government to change the system, so that prosecutors see all mitigation before a magistrate is called on to decide a case. This reform has been backed by the Magistrates Association and the Bar Council, but is opposed by the BBC. The government closed a consultation on Single Justice Procedure reform in early May, and has repeatedly refused to set out a timetable for reform. In a statement to The Standard, it said it is 'currently evaluating responses' to the consultation. The system operates every week at magistrates courts across England and Wales, dealing with around 800,000 low-level criminal cases a year. It was also the subject of a damning recent report by think tank Transform Justice. Responding to the report, the Ministry of Justice claimed that there has never been a recorded miscarriage of justice due to the Single Justice Procedure. In the teenage waitress' case, a magistrate gave her a 12-month conditional discharge instead of a fine. But she chose not to send the case back to the DVLA for an extra public interest check. The teen will now have a criminal conviction, and must also pay a £20 court fee.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store