SA tech legal battles are exploding — our courts aren't built for this
South Africa's digital transformation is rewriting the rules of its economy, propelling the nation into a tech-driven future.
With the IT market forecast to hit $24.5 billion by 2026, growing at a brisk 7.2% annually (Statista, 2024), industries from fintech to healthcare are reaping the rewards of innovation.
Yet, this technological surge is spawning a less celebrated byproduct: a dramatic rise in IT-related litigation.
As businesses lean on complex IT systems, disputes over software failures, data breaches, and intellectual property (IP) rights are clogging courtrooms and arbitration panels. This litigation boom exposes a critical gap in South Africa's legal framework, demanding a bold rethink of how the nation handles technology disputes.
The stakes are colossal.
In 2023, a major South African retailer sued a global software provider for R500 million after a botched enterprise resource planning (ERP) system crippled its operations. Such cases, rooted in poorly drafted contracts or unmet service-level agreements (SLAs), are becoming alarmingly common.
Meanwhile, data breach lawsuits are skyrocketing, fueled by the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) of 2014. The Information Regulator reported over 1 200 breach notifications in 2024 alone, with a high-profile bank facing a R1 billion class-action suit after a 2023 hack exposed 1.5 million customers' data.
IP disputes are also surging, as seen in a 2022 case where a fintech startup battled a R100 million claim over alleged code theft. These cases aren't just legal skirmishes—they're existential threats to businesses navigating a digital economy.
Why is IT litigation exploding?
The answer lies in the complexity of modern technology and the inadequacy of current legal tools to address it. Unlike traditional commercial disputes, IT cases hinge on intricate technical evidence—think source code, system logs, or network configurations. Lawyers must translate this 'geek-speak' into arguments that resonate with judges, many of whom lack specialised tech training.
South Africa's judicial system, while robust, isn't built for this.
With no dedicated IT or IP courts, cases often languish in backlogs, some dragging on for over three years. The absence of tailored rules for emerging tech like artificial intelligence (AI) or blockchain only widens the gap.
Contrast this with the construction industry, which has long benefitted from standardised contracts and dispute resolution mechanisms fine-tuned for its complexities. IT, despite sharing similar traits—long project timelines, technical intricacy, and high financial stakes—lacks such a framework.
Software development contracts, for instance, are often vague, leaving room for disputes over scope, deliverables, or timelines. A 2023 arbitration case handled by Werksmans Attorneys underscored this: a medical scheme administrator faced a multi-million-rand claim for allegedly mimicking software functionality. The arbitrator ruled that functionality, unlike source code, isn't legally protectable—a nuance that highlights the need for clearer contractual terms.
This isn't just a legal problem; it's a business one.
IT disputes can derail projects, sink startups, or erode consumer trust. The 2024 dispute between a South African broadcaster and a U.S. tech firm over software licensing royalties showed how quickly disagreements can escalate, with millions in revenue hanging in the balance. Companies can't afford to treat IT contracts as afterthoughts. A well-crafted agreement isn't just paperwork—it's a shield against costly litigation and a blueprint for collaboration. Yet, too many firms skimp on legal rigor, only to pay dearly later.
So, what's the fix?
First, South Africa needs a specialised framework for IT disputes, akin to the construction industry's model. Standardised contracts, designed with input from tech and legal experts, could clarify expectations around IP ownership, licensing, and deliverables.
Dispute resolution mechanisms, like fast-track arbitration tailored for tech cases, would prevent disputes from ballooning into existential threats. The popularity of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is already growing—92% of global firms surveyed in 2024 favored international arbitration for tech disputes. South Africa should lean into this, incentivising mediation and arbitration to unclog courts.
Secondly, the judiciary must evolve.
Digitisation efforts like Court Online are a start, but they're not enough. Establishing specialised IT courts or training judges in tech fundamentals could bridge the knowledge gap. Other nations, like the UK with its Technology and Construction Court, offer a blueprint. Without such reforms, South Africa risks falling behind as a destination for tech investment.
Finally, businesses must get proactive.
Investing in robust contracts and compliance with laws like POPIA isn't optional—it's survival. Boards should demand tech-literate legal counsel, capable of spotting risks in software deals or cybersecurity protocols before they morph into lawsuits. The cost of prevention pales compared to the price of litigation, as the R1 billion bank case painfully illustrates.
South Africa stands at a crossroads.
Its IT sector is a powerhouse, driving growth and global relevance. But the litigation surge is a warning: without a legal system equipped for the digital age, this promise could falter.
The nation needs more than patchwork fixes—it needs a paradigm shift. By embracing standardised contracts, specialised dispute resolution, and a tech-savvy judiciary, South Africa can turn its IT litigation challenge into a competitive edge.
The alternative—sticking with an outdated legal playbook—risks stifling innovation and scaring off investors. As technology reshapes the nation, its legal system must keep pace, or the digital dream could become a litigious nightmare.
Roger Wakefield is a director for litigation and dispute resolution at Werkmans Attorneys.
News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
9 hours ago
- The Verge
xAI explains the Grok Nazi meltdown as Tesla puts Elon's bot in its cars
Several days after temporarily shutting down the Grok AI bot that was producing antisemitic posts and praising Hitler in response to user prompts, Elon Musk's AI company tried to explain why that happened. In a series of posts on X, it said that '...we discovered the root cause was an update to a code path upstream of the @grok bot. This is independent of the underlying language model that powers @grok.' On the same day, Tesla announced a new 2025.26 update rolling out 'shortly' to its electric cars, which adds the Grok assistant to vehicles equipped with AMD-powered infotainment systems, which have been available since mid-2021. According to Tesla, 'Grok is currently in Beta & does not issue commands to your car – existing voice commands remain unchanged.' As Electrek notes, this should mean that whenever the update does reach customer-owned Teslas, it won't be much different than using the bot as an app on a connected phone. This isn't the first time the Grok bot has had these kinds of problems or similarly explained them. In February, it blamed a change made by an unnamed ex-OpenAI employee for the bot disregarding sources that accused Elon Musk or Donald Trump of spreading misinformation. Then, in May, it began inserting allegations of white genocide in South Africa into posts about almost any topic. The company again blamed an 'unauthorized modification,' and said it would start publishing Grok's system prompts publicly. xAI claims that a change on Monday, July 7th, 'triggered an unintended action' that added an older series of instructions to its system prompts telling it to be 'maximally based,' and 'not afraid to offend people who are politically correct.' The prompts are separate from the ones we noted were added to the bot a day earlier, and both sets are different from the ones the company says are currently in operation for the new Grok 4 assistant. These are the prompts specifically cited as connected to the problems: 'You tell it like it is and you are not afraid to offend people who are politically correct.' * Understand the tone, context and language of the post. Reflect that in your response.' * 'Reply to the post just like a human, keep it engaging, dont repeat the information which is already present in the original post.' The xAI explanation says those lines caused the Grok AI bot to break from other instructions that are supposed to prevent these types of responses, and instead produce 'unethical or controversial opinions to engage the user,' as well as 'reinforce any previously user-triggered leanings, including any hate speech in the same X thread,' and prioritize sticking to earlier posts from the thread.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
New report spotlights 'transformative' farming method to grow more with less: 'The results are significant'
A unique approach that combines solar energy with traditional farming practices is delivering remarkable results that might help to reshape agriculture forever. Off-grid solar technology now powers everything from irrigation pumps to grain mills on small farms, creating dual income streams that also boost food production, according to an article in ESI Africa. This dual innovation is helping to tackle one of the world's biggest challenges: feeding a growing population while protecting the planet's health. Global food demand could surge by over 50% by 2050, according to research published in Nature Food, straining already limited water and energy resources. Traditional farming often relies on expensive diesel generators and struggles without reliable power resources, especially in remote areas in Africa, where 240 million people face daily hunger, according to ESI Africa. With solar-powered energy, farmers install panels that generate clean electricity for things like pumping water, cooling crops, and processing grains — maximizing every acre's potential and creating multiple revenue resources along the way. The breakthrough came about from extensive collaboration between GOGLA and Water and Energy for Food across 15 African countries. Between November 2021 and July 2023, researchers worked directly with small farms to deploy solar irrigation systems, refrigeration units, and processing equipment. Organizations implemented a pay-as-you-go structure that allows farmers to purchase solar technology via small monthly payments. "The results are significant and indicative of the transformative effects off-grid energy could have on agriculture," according to the piece. The initiative benefited 3.6 million people and helped grow 6.8 million tons of food. Farmers saved 1.2 billion kilowatt-hours of energy, reducing water consumption by 10.8 billion liters. The initiative also prevented 1.5 million tons of harmful carbon pollution from entering the atmosphere. Every participating company increased its revenue, with eight businesses expanding distribution to serve new regions. $13.7 million was also raised in additional funding. What's the biggest obstacle stopping your organization from using solar panels? They're too expensive Don't know where to start They're an eyesore We already use solar panels Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Harnessing solar makes farming more reliable (and profitable) while helping the planet be healthier: diesel generators produce toxic fumes that can cause respiratory problems. Solar panels don't produce air pollution when generating electricity, creating cleaner environments for agricultural communities. GOGLA continues to expand its partnerships across Africa and Asia, with self-powered farming poised to transform agricultural practices worldwide. Farmers will be able to harvest both sunshine and grains from the same acres, conserving other energy resources at the same time. These dual-use systems can help to feed the growing population, reduce pollution, improve our health, and empower rural communities to thrive. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
News24
19 hours ago
- News24
SA tech legal battles are exploding — our courts aren't built for this
Disputes over software failures, data breaches, and intellectual property rights are clogging courtrooms and arbitration panels. This litigation boom exposes a critical gap in South Africa's legal framework, argues Roger Wakefield of Werkmans Attorneys. South Africa's digital transformation is rewriting the rules of its economy, propelling the nation into a tech-driven future. With the IT market forecast to hit $24.5 billion by 2026, growing at a brisk 7.2% annually (Statista, 2024), industries from fintech to healthcare are reaping the rewards of innovation. Yet, this technological surge is spawning a less celebrated byproduct: a dramatic rise in IT-related litigation. As businesses lean on complex IT systems, disputes over software failures, data breaches, and intellectual property (IP) rights are clogging courtrooms and arbitration panels. This litigation boom exposes a critical gap in South Africa's legal framework, demanding a bold rethink of how the nation handles technology disputes. The stakes are colossal. In 2023, a major South African retailer sued a global software provider for R500 million after a botched enterprise resource planning (ERP) system crippled its operations. Such cases, rooted in poorly drafted contracts or unmet service-level agreements (SLAs), are becoming alarmingly common. Meanwhile, data breach lawsuits are skyrocketing, fueled by the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) of 2014. The Information Regulator reported over 1 200 breach notifications in 2024 alone, with a high-profile bank facing a R1 billion class-action suit after a 2023 hack exposed 1.5 million customers' data. IP disputes are also surging, as seen in a 2022 case where a fintech startup battled a R100 million claim over alleged code theft. These cases aren't just legal skirmishes—they're existential threats to businesses navigating a digital economy. Why is IT litigation exploding? The answer lies in the complexity of modern technology and the inadequacy of current legal tools to address it. Unlike traditional commercial disputes, IT cases hinge on intricate technical evidence—think source code, system logs, or network configurations. Lawyers must translate this 'geek-speak' into arguments that resonate with judges, many of whom lack specialised tech training. South Africa's judicial system, while robust, isn't built for this. With no dedicated IT or IP courts, cases often languish in backlogs, some dragging on for over three years. The absence of tailored rules for emerging tech like artificial intelligence (AI) or blockchain only widens the gap. Contrast this with the construction industry, which has long benefitted from standardised contracts and dispute resolution mechanisms fine-tuned for its complexities. IT, despite sharing similar traits—long project timelines, technical intricacy, and high financial stakes—lacks such a framework. Software development contracts, for instance, are often vague, leaving room for disputes over scope, deliverables, or timelines. A 2023 arbitration case handled by Werksmans Attorneys underscored this: a medical scheme administrator faced a multi-million-rand claim for allegedly mimicking software functionality. The arbitrator ruled that functionality, unlike source code, isn't legally protectable—a nuance that highlights the need for clearer contractual terms. This isn't just a legal problem; it's a business one. IT disputes can derail projects, sink startups, or erode consumer trust. The 2024 dispute between a South African broadcaster and a U.S. tech firm over software licensing royalties showed how quickly disagreements can escalate, with millions in revenue hanging in the balance. Companies can't afford to treat IT contracts as afterthoughts. A well-crafted agreement isn't just paperwork—it's a shield against costly litigation and a blueprint for collaboration. Yet, too many firms skimp on legal rigor, only to pay dearly later. So, what's the fix? First, South Africa needs a specialised framework for IT disputes, akin to the construction industry's model. Standardised contracts, designed with input from tech and legal experts, could clarify expectations around IP ownership, licensing, and deliverables. Dispute resolution mechanisms, like fast-track arbitration tailored for tech cases, would prevent disputes from ballooning into existential threats. The popularity of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is already growing—92% of global firms surveyed in 2024 favored international arbitration for tech disputes. South Africa should lean into this, incentivising mediation and arbitration to unclog courts. Secondly, the judiciary must evolve. Digitisation efforts like Court Online are a start, but they're not enough. Establishing specialised IT courts or training judges in tech fundamentals could bridge the knowledge gap. Other nations, like the UK with its Technology and Construction Court, offer a blueprint. Without such reforms, South Africa risks falling behind as a destination for tech investment. Finally, businesses must get proactive. Investing in robust contracts and compliance with laws like POPIA isn't optional—it's survival. Boards should demand tech-literate legal counsel, capable of spotting risks in software deals or cybersecurity protocols before they morph into lawsuits. The cost of prevention pales compared to the price of litigation, as the R1 billion bank case painfully illustrates. South Africa stands at a crossroads. Its IT sector is a powerhouse, driving growth and global relevance. But the litigation surge is a warning: without a legal system equipped for the digital age, this promise could falter. The nation needs more than patchwork fixes—it needs a paradigm shift. By embracing standardised contracts, specialised dispute resolution, and a tech-savvy judiciary, South Africa can turn its IT litigation challenge into a competitive edge. The alternative—sticking with an outdated legal playbook—risks stifling innovation and scaring off investors. As technology reshapes the nation, its legal system must keep pace, or the digital dream could become a litigious nightmare. Roger Wakefield is a director for litigation and dispute resolution at Werkmans Attorneys. News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.
