
Putin's chilling plot to march 10,000 troops into ANOTHER European nation revealed by its PM… & it could spiral into WW3
Moldova's Prime Minister has warned the Kremlin wants to march troops into Transnistria - a Moscow-friendly enclave that's internationally recognised as part of Moldova.
Advertisement
7
Cars wait in line at the crossing point between the self-proclaimed republic of Transnistria and Moldova
Credit: AFP
7
Moldovan Prime Minister Dorin Recean speaks during a press conference
Credit: EPA
7
Russian troops have been based in Transnistria since 1992
Credit: Reuters
7
Russian servicemen walking along at an area in the Kursk region, Russia
Credit: EPA
7
The small landlocked region, sandwiched between Ukraine and the rest of Moldova, has been
Transnistria receives significant economic and military support from Moscow, and the region's politicians have voiced their intent for it to become part of Russia.
The region's location between the pro-Europe governments in Moldova and
Ukraine
make it impossible for Putin to get soldiers in at present.
While Moldova currently has an EU-friendly government, its PM has said
Russia
is meddling in its upcoming election this September.
Advertisement
read more on russia
Prime Minister Dorin Recean told the FT this is likely in the hope that a more pro-Kremlin government might allow for Russian troops to be sent to Transnistria.
"This is a huge effort to undermine Moldovan democracy," he told the paper.
"They want to consolidate their military presence in the Transnistrian region."
Russian troops have been based in Transnistria since 1992, when the Kremlin supported the region in its war of independence from Moldova.
Advertisement
Most read in The US Sun
However, the numbers have substantially wound down over the years, with there currently only being about 1,500 soldiers fighting under the Russian banner.
But only a few of these will have actually been sent by Moscow, with most being locals who signed up.
Deranged Putin lays out wish list of 'surrender demands' for Ukraine… despite being humbled by Russia's 'Pearl Harbour'
Transnistria isn't internationally recognised as an independent state, and is not a member of the UN.
Think tank The Institute for the Study of War forecast last October that Russia might use its ties to Transnistria "to establish long-term influence over Moldovan domestic and foreign policies".
Advertisement
Recean further highlighted the ominous military threats to Ukraine and NATO that could arise from extra Russian troops in the region.
Its location to Ukraine's southwest could raise fresh headaches for Kyiv if Russia used Transnistria to open up a new front in the war.
"You can imagine with 10,000 troops, what the leverage and pressure would be on the southwestern part of Ukraine," he said.
But Recean also noted the area's proximity to
Romania
, which is a NATO country.
Advertisement
If Russian forces threatened or attacked Romania - or any other NATO member - then the entire alliance would be obliged to come to its aid.
NATO Article 5 sets out that an attack on one member state is an attack on all, meaning Russian attacks against a NATO country could quickly spiral into all-out war.
Transnistria's history
Transnistria is a tiny slither of land along Moldova's border with Ukraine
The region has been controlled by Russian backed separatists for decades following the collapse of the Soviet Union.
It declared independence in 1990, which was followed by a war that saw Russia support Transnistria's independence.
Moscow has maintained a strong military presence in the territory since 1992.
Many of Transnistria's political leaders have long voiced their intent for the region to become a part of Russia.
But it still remains internationally recognised as part of Moldova - a country that seeks closer co-operation with the EU.
Transnistria has a population of around 465,000.
Fears of a war between the West and Russia over Transnistria have been amplified by the separatist region's leader Vadim Krasnoselsky.
He told the Russian TASS
news
agency: "A war in Transnistria would mean a direct conflict between Russia and NATO.
Advertisement
"I don't have the slightest doubt about it. Everything is closely intertwined here.
"Both Romania, a NATO member, and the Russian Federation have interests here."
Recean added that the 10,000-troop figure was based on intelligence assessments.
"Currently, their forces there are almost meaningless," he said.
Advertisement
"But with a higher military presence in Transnistria that a Russia-leaning government can allow for, they can consolidate."
Moldova was part of the Soviet Union before its collapse in 1991.
In recent years, it has sought to pursue closer ties with the European Union, and became an official candidate to join the EU in 2022.
A referendum held last year committing Moldova on its path to EU membership passed by just 0.7% of the vote amid what was widely believed to be a Russian interference campaign.
Advertisement
Recean told the FT that Russia spent the equivalent of 1% of Moldova's GDP on influence campaigns in 2024.
7
A billboard reading 'Russia in our hearts' sits on the side of a road in the town of Tiraspol, the capital of Transnistria
Credit: AFP
7
Russian servicemen riding atop a self-propelled gun at an area in the Kursk region, Russia
Credit: EPA
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
44 minutes ago
- The Irish Sun
Investigators quiz jailed Ghislaine Maxwell about Prince Andrew, claim reports
INVESTIGATORS quizzed jailed madam Ghislaine Maxwell about Prince Andrew, it is reported. She answered 'honestly and truthfully' during nine hours of questions. Advertisement 3 A source, quoted by The Mail on Sunday, said: 'She was asked about a list of people including Prince Andrew' Credit: Getty 3 Andrew with Virginia Roberts, 17, and Ghislaine Maxwell at her London townhouse Credit: AFP US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche asked her about more than 100 people linked to her paedophile ex-boyfriend Jeffrey Epstein. Brit socialite The meeting came after President Donald Trump faced questions over his own links to Epstein, who killed himself in jail awaiting trial in 2019. A source, quoted by The Mail on Sunday, said: 'Ghislaine has never told her story to anyone in government before. Advertisement 'At times it was very emotional but she answered every question asked of her. 'She was asked about a list of people including Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz and powerful Wall Street financiers. 'It's ironic that Elon Musk kicked this whole thing off when he fell out with Trump and then made that post on X about Trump allegedly preventing the release of the full Epstein documents as some sort of 'cover-up'. 'Well, Elon is in there, as is his brother. Advertisement Most read in The Sun Live Blog "It was a monumental moment for Ghislaine to finally be asked about these people and to tell the truth.' Jeffrey Epstein's brother insists he was 'most likely murdered' amid mystery around 'missing minute' of 'suicide' video 3 Investigators quizzed jailed madam Ghislaine Maxwell about Prince Andrew, it is reported Credit: EPA

The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
Four dead after passenger train derails in southern Germany
FOUR PEOPLE HAVE died after a regional train carrying about 100 passengers derailed in southwestern Germany, police said. 'The accident occurred at around 6:10 pm (5:10pm Irish time) near the town of Riedlingen in Baden-Wuerttemberg state,' a police spokesperson told news agency AFP. Advertisement According to German daily Bild, the passenger train was travelling from the German town of Sigmaringen to the city of Ulm when at least two train carriages derailed in a wooded area. Footage from the scene of the accident showed yellow-and-grey-coloured train carriages lying on their sides, as firefighters and emergency services were trying to gain access to the passengers. It was not immediately clear what had caused the accident.


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the EU/US trade deal: a step towards economic stability
The agreement of an outline trade deal between the EU and the US is positive, to the extent that it avoids the risk of a full-scale tariffs war between the two sides. For Ireland, the EU state most exposed to US trade and investment, this could have been particularly damaging. What the EU has been dealing with here is damage limitation. Average tariffs of 15 per cent on EU imports into the US - a central part of the deal - are roughly three times the rate that applied when Donald Trump came to office. This will cause economic damage on both sides of the Atlantic. Whatever Trump's objections are to the way the EU treats US imports, dealing with them this way ensures US consumers will pay more for their goods, as well as damaging Europe. Trump is claiming the deal, which also includes promises of EU purchases of US energy and military equipment, as a triumph. And he did get a lot of what he wanted. Perhaps driven in large part by the desire to see continued US support for Nato and Ukraine, the EU has been on the back foot. It has been faced by a US president pursuing a relentless tariff agenda, partly driven by economic nationalism and partly by the need to raise cash for the US exchequer. The main gain for the EU – and for Ireland - of the outline deal is that it avoids the risk of a trade war, which would have had unpredictable and dangerous consequences. Trump had threatened a general tariff level of 30 per cent to apply from next week on EU imports and, had there not been a deal, the EU had a list of US goods ready on which it planned to impose tariffs. This could have escalated quickly, potentially drawing in US digital tech companies, many with international bases in Ireland. READ MORE Details have still to be spelled out on how the 15 per cent tariffs will be applied and these will be important. The impact will vary across different sectors of exporters from Ireland to the US and will be difficult in some areas. It may be some weeks before this is clear. Importantly for Ireland, Trump has said a separate process examining what should happen to the pharma sector will continue and he again underlined that he wanted key drugs and ingredients made in the US. While there was some uncertainty on this in the immediate wake of the deal, the risk of higher tariffs in this area, or other action to try to get pharma companies to relocate production to the US, appears to remain. And while European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said that in general the deal would bring 'stability', the final details have still to be agreed and published. With Trump in office, uncertainty will remain. However, it is still better to have a basic deal which, provided it holds, will now start to restore some level of certainty to trade between the US and EU.