Drivers given £100 fine warning for common motorway mistake
Road safety charity IAM RoadSmart, which conducted the study, said it demonstrates the Government must give 'serious thought' about the future of the roads.
Adherence to red X signs is critical to safety on smart motorways which had their hard shoulder converted into a live running lane.
National Highways staff switch on the closed lane signs when stopped vehicles are detected in live lanes to prevent them being hit from behind and to help and protect the emergency services.
Since September 2022, all police forces have been able to use enforcement cameras to prosecute motorists who illegally pass under a red X or enter a lane beyond one of the signs.
This can result in a fine of up to £100 and three penalty points, or more severe penalties and a court appearance in some cases.
Figures obtained by IAM RoadSmart following Freedom of Information requests to police forces last year revealed 4,393 incidents were recorded in 2021, rising to 20,773 in 2022 and 28,231 in 2023.
IAM RoadSmart director of policy and standards Nicholas Lyes said: 'Ignoring a red X sign on a smart motorway is dangerous because it risks a serious collision and, for this reason, we welcome police forces clamping down on those who break the law.
'The majority of drivers have serious reservations about the safety of smart motorways where the hard shoulder has been removed, and these figures are unlikely to persuade them they are safe.
'We know that no new all-lane running smart motorways will be built but it does beg the question of what we do with the existing stretches that are in operation?
'This is something the new Government needs to give some serious thought to.'
A National Highways spokesperson said: 'A Red X signal is there to increase the safety of everyone using the road by highlighting an issue ahead.
'Above 90% of drivers observe Red X signals, but ignoring Red X signals is an offence and puts themselves and others at risk.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Russian transport official drops dead in office on same day as Putin's sacked minister dies in apparent suicide
A RUSSIAN transport official died in office on the same day as Vladimir Putin's transport minister apparently killed himself after being sacked, it has emerged. Roman Starovoit, who had held the post for less than a year, was dismissed earlier on Monday - just hours before he reportedly took his own life in Moscow. 6 6 6 6 On the same day, Andrey Korneichuk, deputy head of the Russian Federal Road Agency's Property Management Department, died at the Transportation Ministry's Moscow headquarters. According to Telegram channels with close ties to Russian law enforcement, the 42-year-old official died either in his office cabin or during a meeting. He is said to have stood up suddenly, collapsed to the floor, and died. Paramedics pronounced him dead at the scene. Russian state media reported that Korneichuk died at his workplace, possibly from 'acute heart failure". Korneichuk reportedly died after news broke that Starovoit had been sacked from his post. There is no indication the deaths are linked. Meanwhile, telegram channels with links to the Russian security forces reported Starovoit's cause of death as suicide - claiming the minister was found dead with gunshot wounds. The firearm, according to Russian media, was an award pistol issued to him in 2023 by the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Trump slams Putin's 'bulls***' and trashes the tyrant's 'meaningless' promises to end Ukraine war in savage attack Putin was 'shocked' over the sudden death of Starovoit. But the Kremlin refused to be drawn on how Roman Starovoit had died, saying it must be left for the investigation. Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: 'This cannot but shock normal people. 'Naturally, it shocked us too.' Versions of Starovoit's death from official sources were constantly changing, with initial reports saying his body had been found at home. But doubts over his apparent suicide emerged after Russian authorities said he was found inside the car. Russian cops then confirmed Starovoit's body was found having shot himself inside his black Tesla. Press reports and photos clearly showed a body being removed from long grass near the electric car. Sources close to the Kremlin revealed he had left his ministry after morning meetings like nothing was wrong. 6 6 The minister's 25-year-old girlfriend Polina Korneeva was seen crying at the scene. She was later driven away in an official Aurus limousine after reportedly identifying his body. Reports said the last time Starovoit communicated with his family was two days ago. Starovoit had divorced his wife in 2021, the mother of his two children, and started a relationship with Korneeva. The dead ex-minister had a daughter 15, and son, 18. According to sources, on July 5, he arrived at the competition to see his daughter, stayed there for less than an hour, hugged her and left. He did not contact his family again. Starovoit's passing is the latest in a string of suspicious deaths of Russian officials, oligarchs and insiders since Putin's invasion of Ukraine began. Many have died in reported suicides, falls from windows or under mysterious circumstances, fuelling speculation about growing instability behind the Kremlin's walls. Trump slams Putin's 'bulls***' and trashes the tyrant's 'meaningless' promises By Sayan Bose, Foreign News Reporter A RAGING Donald Trump has slammed Vladimir Putin for talking "bull****" about the Ukraine war and making "meaningless" promises. The savage attack comes as Trump vowed to send more weapons to Ukraine as he appears to be growing increasingly frustrated with the Russian tyrant. "We get a lot of bull**** thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth," Trump told reporters during a televised cabinet meeting at the White House. "He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless." Trump reiterated that he was "very unhappy" with Putin since their phone call last week made no progress on the Ukraine peace deal - something the US president has pushed for since returning to power. But Putin has snubbed peace and is instead steadily increasing his overnight bombing raids - which could soon hit 1,000 a day. Trump's criticism of Putin came a day after he said he would send more weapons to Ukraine - a sweeping reversal of Washington's announcement last week that it was halting some arms shipments. He said: "We're going to send some more weapons. "We have to. They have to be able to defend hit very hard now." "We're going to have to send more weapons, defensive weapons, primarily." Moscow had no immediate reaction to Trump's strongly worded comments about Putin, but the Kremlin said that sending arms to Ukraine only serves to prolong the conflict.
Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Thugs, thieves and drug dealers could avoid court under radical plans to ease justice system backlog
Jury trials would be scrapped for some drug dealers and sex offenders with a judge and two magistrates presiding instead JUSTICE SHAKE-UP Thugs, thieves and drug dealers could avoid court under radical plans to ease justice system backlog Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THUGS, thieves and drug dealers could avoid going to crown court under plans to overhaul the clogged justice system. Offenders may avoid a criminal record and instead be sentenced to do unpaid work or get rehabilitation, it is proposed. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Criminals could avoid going to crown court under plans to overhaul the clogged justice system Sentences could be cut by 40 per cent, up from a third now, with an early guilty plea. Jury trials would be scrapped for some drug dealers and sex offenders with a judge and two magistrates presiding instead. They could impose sentences of up to three years' jail. The maximum penalty JPs could hand down would double to two years. READ MORE ON CRIME BIN IT Knife amnesty bin installed just yards from Wimbledon as crime warning is issued The shake-up, proposed in a report for the Government by retired judge Sir Brian Leveson, is an attempt to tackle the current backlog of 77,000 crown court cases. It has seen trial dates pushed back as far as 2029. Sir Brian said without the reforms there would be a 'breakdown in law and order' with 'society taking things into their own hands'. Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick said 'criminals like burglars and some killers will serve just a fifth of their sentences. That makes a mockery of our justice system.' Victims' Commissioner Baroness Newlove warned higher guilty plea discounts and out-of-court disposals 'will feel like justice diluted again'. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood has yet to announce which recommendations she will accept. First convicts leave Barlinnie after Scottish Government release 360 prisoners early due to overcrowding
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Jury trials must be limited to save criminal justice system from collapse, inquiry finds
Thousands of defendants in England and Wales could lose the right to a jury trial under plans designed to save the criminal justice system from collapse. Sir Brian Leveson, a former judge asked by the government to come up with proposals to tackle a record courts backlog, said he had been forced to make recommendations he did not 'rejoice in'. Historically, only defendants facing minor offences in a magistrates court have been denied the right to a jury trial, which has long been synonymous in England and Wales with the right to a fair trial. But if Leveson's recommendations are implemented the right could be removed for offences such as sexual assault, racially or religiously aggravated strangulation, harassment and child abduction. Recommendations in the 378-page report published on Wednesday include: The creation of a new division of the crown court in which a judge and two magistrates hear 'either way' offences – those in which the defendant can currently choose to be heard by either a magistrate or a jury in the crown court. Removing the rightto be tried in the crown court for offences that carry a maximum sentence of no more than two years. Reclassifying some either way offences so they can be tried only in a magistrates court. Trial by judge alone for serious and complex fraud cases. The right for all crown court defendants to elect to be tried by a judge alone. The top three of those recommendations would save 9,000 sitting days in the crown courts, out of a current total of 110,000, according to the report – an estimate Leveson said was conservative. He proposed that, to maximise the effectiveness of the proposals, sitting days would increase to 130,000 a year at an overall cost of approximately £1bn between 2025/26 and 2029/30. Leveson said: 'I don't rejoice in these recommendations but I do believe they're absolutely essential. 'Do I want to curtail jury trial? Would I like to? No … But I would ask that the report be judged not on what I am undoing, but on what I am trying to protect.' He said in the report that there was 'a real risk of total system collapse in the near future', with victims and witnesses disengaging because they were waiting years for their case to be heard or forgetting details by the time a case came around. 'Little or no consequences for lawlessness could lead to a breakdown in law and order and society taking things into their own hands,' he wrote. Leveson said the many financial hits suffered by the Ministry of Justice as an unprotected government department had 'come home to roost'. Responding to the report, lawyers said restricting jury trials was not the solution to the crown court backlog, which stands at 77,000 cases. Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: 'Changing the fundamental structure of delivering criminal justice is not a principled response to a crisis which was not caused by that structure in the first place. As Sir Brian recognises, it is the failure to invest properly in the justice system over decades that has led to the crisis we see in the criminal courts today. 'Juries represent society and are a fundamental part of our system. And on a practical level, it remains unclear how the current resources in the system – magistrates, judges, court staff and courtroom capacity – will be able to meet the demands of the proposed new crown court bench division.' Richard Atkinson, the president of the Law Society, said: 'The proposed new division of the crown court on its own will not solve the crown court backlog. The government would have undermined our historic jury system for no effect. 'Only investment in the whole system has any chance of success – from when a criminal prosecution starts in the police station, and at all stages before a crown court case.' However, the Magistrates' Association welcomed the idea of a new crown court division, while stressing that the number of magistrates would need to rise by about a third. Asked about fears that reducing rights to jury trials would disadvantage people of colour and other minorities, Leveson denied that it would lead to more miscarriages of justice. He said that he was seeking to tackle the risk of disproportionate outcomes by including two magistrates sitting alongside a judge in the crown court bench division and calling for an increase in magistrates from under-represented communities. He also said that – while he was aware of alleged racial bias among judges – he had not witnessed it during his 35-year career on the bench. Other recommendations in the report included increased use of out-of-court resolutions, greater use of rehabilitation programmes and health intervention programmes and increasing the maximum reduction for entering a guilty plea at the first opportunity from 33% to 40%. Cutting the courts backlog is seen as vital to delivering the government's tackling violence against women and girls and safer streets strategies. The justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said she would consider the recommendations and respond before legislating in the autumn. 'Swifter justice requires bold reform, and that is what I asked Sir Brian Leveson to propose,' she said.
