
Civil rights groups sue Trump over anti-DEIA executive orders
A trio of civil rights organizations filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday charging that three of President Donald Trump's executive orders attacking diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility in the federal government violate their free speech rights and hinder their ability to help marginalized communities.
Through Trump's orders barring references to transgender people or support of DEIA programs within the federal government, public funding for several nongovernment organizations, including the three plaintiffs, are at risk of being cut.
As a result, the civil rights organizations — the National Urban League, the National Fair Housing Alliance, and AIDS Foundation Chicago — said in their lawsuit that they will be less able to help "people of color, women, LGBTQ people, and/or people with disabilities overcome systemic barriers to access housing, education, employment, and healthcare stemming from discrimination, biases, and inequalities.'
Lambda Legal and the Legal Defense Fund, which are representing the civil rights organizations, said in a separate statement that the 'orders will severely limit the organizations' ability to provide critical social and health services.'
Two of the orders specified in the lawsuit are the 'Ending Radical and Wasteful DEI Programs and Preferencing' and the 'Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,' which Trump signed on Jan. 20, his first day back in office.
The third executive order cited in the lawsuit, 'Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,' was issued Jan. 21.
The lawsuit names as defendants Trump and more than a dozen key members of his administration including Attorney General Pam Bondi, Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought, and Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
'Protecting the civil rights and expanding opportunities for all Americans is a key priority of the Trump Administration, which is why he took decisive actions to terminate unlawful DEI preferences in the federal government," said Harrison Fields, a White House principal deputy press secretary, told NBC News in a statement on Wednesday. "Every man and woman in this great country should have the opportunity to go as far as their hard work, individual initiative, and competence can take them. In America, grit, excellence, and perseverance are our strengths.'
Previously, Trump's executive orders have labeled DEIA programs to help marginalized groups as 'discriminatory' and his supporters have tried to spin what critics have called attacks on the transgender community as attempts to protect cisgender women.
'While the President may have his viewpoint, as flawed and discriminatory as it may be, the First Amendment bars him from unduly imposing his viewpoint on federal contractors and grantees,' the lawsuit states.
Also, Trump's executive orders 'could prohibit Plaintiffs from engaging in any targeted effort to help a specific group of people facing unfair disadvantages."
Marc Morial, president of the National Urban League, said in the press release announcing the lawsuit that targeting DEIA was 'discriminatory at best and an attempt at institutionalized economic oppression at its worst.'
Janai Nelson, who heads the Legal Defense Fund, agreed.
'The three orders we are challenging today perpetuate false and longstanding stereotypes that Black people and other underrepresented groups lack skills, talent, and merit — willfully ignoring the discriminatory barriers that prevent a true meritocracy from flourishing,' Nelson said.
The lawsuit also noted that the language in Trump's executive orders 'are 'extraordinarily vague.'
In the press release announcing the lawsuit, Lambda Legal and the Legal Defense Fund included testimonials from a Black man with HIV named Will, who was identified as an AIDS Foundation Chicago (AFC) program 'participant and caseworker for another organization.'
'Now, as I work in the HIV field," he said, "I am deeply concerned about the threat these orders represent to AFC's ability to serve our communities if they can't even name the issues our people are facing.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economist
36 minutes ago
- Economist
The War Room newsletter: The daddy of all summits
Sweden is banning OnlyFans content as the lines around sex work blur It is meekly welcoming the new sheriff's vigilante justice The answer matters more than you think Donald Trump prefers deals to regime change After decades of rising secularism, Christianity is holding its ground—and gaining among the young


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Trump administration sues Los Angeles over sanctuary city' immigration policies
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration has sued the city of Los Angeles over its immigration policies, claiming that the city's law discriminates against federal law enforcement by treating them differently from other law enforcement authorities. The lawsuit was filed in the Central District of California, and notes up top that Donald Trump "campaigned and won the presidential election on a platform of deporting the millions of illegal immigrants the previous administration permitted, through its open borders policy, to enter the country unlawfully." The suit claims that Los Angeles' law and policies obstruct the enforcement of immigration laws. "Sanctuary policies were the driving cause of the violence, chaos, and attacks on law enforcement that Americans recently witnessed in Los Angeles," Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. "Jurisdictions like Los Angeles that flout federal law by prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens are undermining law enforcement at every level — it ends under President Trump."


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Harvard University found in 'violent violation' of Civil Rights Act over anti-semitism, Trump admin says
Harvard University is "in violent violation" of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, the federal government's Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism said in a Monday letter threatening to cut all the school's federal funding if changes aren't made. The task force, which formed earlier this year under an executive order by President Donald Trump, wrote a letter to the Ivy League institution saying the Office for Civil Rights at the Department of Health and Human Services concluded a Title VI investigation into anti-Semitism at Harvard. Title VI prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin. The letter outlined several violations the school allegedly committed, including: The majority of Jewish students reported experiencing negative bias or discrimination on campus, a quarter felt physically unsafe, Jewish and Israeli students were assaulted and spat on, and the campus was vandalized with anti-Semitic stickers. It also highlighted campus protests in the wake of the Israel-Palestinian war, noting such demonstrations saw "calls for genocide and murder, and denied Jewish and Israeli students access to campus spaces." The letter accused Harvard of inaction, failing to defend all groups on campus equally, and of conforming to "racial hierarchies." The government warned that if changes aren't made, all federal funding will be cut. "Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources and continue to affect Harvard's relationship with the federal government," the letter said. The government noted, "Harvard may of course continue to operate free of federal privileges, and perhaps such an opportunity will spur a commitment to excellence that will help Harvard thrive once again." Harvard responded to the letter on Monday, saying it "strongly disagrees with the government's findings." "Antisemitism is a serious problem, and no matter the context, it is unacceptable. Harvard has taken substantive, proactive steps to address the root causes of antisemitism in its community," a university spokesperson said. Harvard said in response to the government's probe that it shared its report on antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias and outlined ways it has "strengthened policies, disciplined those who violate them, encouraged civil discourse, and promoted open, respectful dialogue." "Harvard is far from indifferent on this issue," the school said. "Harvard has made significant strides to combat bigotry, hate and bias. We are not alone in confronting this challenge and recognize that this work is ongoing. We remain committed to ensuring members of our Jewish and Israeli community are embraced, respected, and can thrive at Harvard.' In June 2024, Harvard's president announced the school would implement initiatives to combat antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias on campus. Those efforts included updating campus use rules, standardizing investigations and discipline processes, creating new programs to facilitate constructive dialogue and viewpoint diversity, expanding kosher dining options, and offering workshops to incorporate antisemitism training into educational sessions.