Steps star Ian ‘H' Watkins forced to change name of latest project after he's SUED by festival giant Coachella
Watkins organised a small event including a Harry Styles tribute act and actress Claire Sweeney.
3
But he was stunned to get a complaint about the name from Coachella, the famous festival in California with 250,000 fans.
Watkins' show at his home town of Cowbridge in the Vale of Glamorgan is now called the Moo-La-La Festival.
The Welshman, 49, said: 'I'm taking it as a massive compliment that they feel that our little festival is a little bit of a threat to their ginormous, juggernaut of a machine.
'It's a little bit mindblowing. What we're doing is very, very different to what they do.
'We don't have Beyonce performing.
"We have a Steps tribute act and also they don't have myself, Claire Sweeney and Owain Wyn Evans hosting, which in my book is much better than Beyonce.'
He added: 'We've spent a lot of money on marketing and flyers and posters and banners that are all visible around the town.
'So yes, those will have to go in the bin but let's just do that, rather than have any more people knocking on our door.'
3
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
4 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain's most luxurious new train has been cancelled (again)
For the second time in a month, the luxury train operator Belmond has pulled the plug on the inaugural run of the newest addition to its fleet, the Britannic Explorer. The new train – which costs from £11,000 per double cabin for a three-day trip – had been due to journey to Wales via the west of England and the Cotswolds, departing from London Victoria at 3.45pm today. But late last night passengers were informed that 'with a heavy heart' the company had decided to cancel the journey. Train cancellations and severe delays? In Britain? Well, yes, even for this most well-heeled operator – running a trip which, ironically, was designed to 'showcase the very best' of modern England and Wales. No immediate reasons were given for the latest setback, but the scrapping of the trip to Wales follows a similar decision to cancel what had originally been planned as the launch of the train: a three-day journey to Cornwall scheduled to depart on July 4. At that time, it was said that the train needed further maintenance checks before being cleared for departure, with the date of the inaugural journey put back to July 21 and the route changed to the Welsh itinerary. Of the original delay, a company spokesman said: 'The adjustment to the schedule was due to final refinements being made to ensure the train operates at the highest possible standard.' The company had hoped that the maintenance issues with the train would have been smoothed out in time for the Wales departure but in the end pulled the plug on it with just hours to go. 'This decision was not taken lightly,' the email to passengers late Sunday night stated. 'We deeply regret any inconvenience caused.' At the time of the first cancelled trip, Belmond said passengers were offered a full refund 'including associated travel costs'. With passengers expected to be drawn from, in addition to Britain, a range of countries in Europe, Asia and North America, the cancellation costs could be high. Over the past 40 years, Belmond has acquired a well-earned reputation for providing train journeys at the most luxurious end of the spectrum, particularly with its flagship Venice Simplon-Orient-Express (VSOE). This reputation was cemented in the 2025 Telegraph Travel Awards when the company – which is owned by the French luxury goods giant LVMH – was named best rail holiday company. In addition to the VSOE, Belmond operates the Eastern & Oriental Express in Malaysia, the Hiram Bingham and Andean Explorer in Peru and the Royal Scotsman in Scotland. What the Britannic Explorer will offer (when it finally leaves the station) Feeding on the growth in demand for slower, more mindful but also extremely luxurious train travel, the company decided to branch out this year with a new train – the Britannic Explorer – which for the first time would offer this kind of top-end experience on routes in England and Wales. Three routes were devised aimed at celebrating some of the countries' most scenic regions: Pembrokeshire and Snowdonia National Park (Eryri) in Wales; the Cornish Riviera; and the Lake District (including the glorious stretch of track between Settle and Carlisle). The train itself represents a brand new departure, a totally revamped version of the Grand Hibernian train operated by Belmond in Ireland between 2016 and 2021. Rather than recreating the classic look and feel of the Hercule Poirot-style VSOE, the new train, largely a creation of the London-based Albion Nord designers, combines a modern feel with vintage elements drawing on the natural world and the creative forces (and materials) of the areas it travels through. The aim has been to create a feeling of 'contemporary nostalgia' in expansive suites and grand suites (all with private bathroom) and dining spaces inspired by the herbs and flowers used in British cooking. The meals themselves have been masterminded by Michelin-accoladed British chef Simon Rogan drawing heavily on his farm-to-fork culinary ethos and reflecting local specialities and artisan suppliers en route. The social hub of the train is the Observation Car, an expansive, stylish space which comes complete with armchairs, banquettes and a bar backlit with amber glass discs inspired by the 'timeless charm of Victorian apothecaries'. Off-train, the trips have been designed to incorporate visits to galleries, rugged hikes and wild swims, yoga sessions by the sea and a range of gastronomic experiences coupled with the opportunity to learn how to pull a pint in a Cotswolds pub. 'We're offering some unique experiences, things people can't do themselves just driving up to these places,' said Gary Franklin, Belmond's senior vice-president, trains & cruises. 'We are showcasing a modern England with incredible artisans, artists and produce.' A modern England with severe train delays too...
Reuters
34 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK to create new water regulator amid crisis at Thames Water
LONDON, July 21 (Reuters) - Britain will create a new powerful regulator for its water industry following public fury over sewage spills, accepting the key proposal of an independent report that also suggested easing up on pollution fines to prevent companies from collapsing. The Labour government, which promised major reforms for the debt-laden industry when it was elected last year, said the new system combining several different regulators in one would better protect the environment, investors and consumers. The privatised water sector in England and Wales has sparked a public outcry by dumping record levels of sewage into rivers and lakes following years of under-investment, at the same time as paying big executive bonuses and dividends. But the government faces a tricky task in turning round an industry where high debts have left some companies struggling for survival. Symbolising the failure of the sector, Thames Water, the country's biggest water supplier with 16 million customers and 17 billion pounds ($23 billion) of debt, is teetering on the brink of nationalisation, and warning that it cannot pay the sewage fines it is facing. Former Bank of England Deputy Governor Jon Cunliffe, who led a review of the sector published on Monday, said a new powerful regulator should replace several bodies and that a formal turnaround regime should be established to give struggling companies space to recover under "regulatory forbearance". Environment minister Steve Reed said he had agreed to abolish financial watchdog Ofwat as part of the regulatory overhaul, with a new consultation and legislation to be proposed later this year. But asked if Thames Water could be given breathing space on fines - a key demand of its bondholders who have proposed taking over the company in a last ditch effort to avoid nationalisation - Reed said the current legislation did not allow for that. "We're going to publish a white paper in the autumn, which will be our response to Jon's report today, and then consult, but as things stand, Thames need to resolve the situation themselves as a stand-alone, private company." Thames Water has warned it could collapse next year without new investment, as it faces 1.4 billion pounds in pollution fines and penalties over the next five years. While Cunliffe's proposals are the biggest shake-up of the sector since it was privatised in 1989, critics said they did not go far enough. Environmental campaigners want more radical change, such as the whole industry nationalised. "Abolishing Ofwat and replacing it with a shinier regulator won't stop sewage dumping or profiteering," said Giles Bristow, the CEO of campaign group Surfers Against Sewage. Cunliffe's remit did not allow him to consider nationalising the water sector. Reed said that would cost 100 billion pounds, take money away from health and education, and lead to legal battles that would delay any improvements. Under plans already set out by Ofwat, British water companies will get more than 100 billion pounds of investment in the next five years to respond to population growth and climate change, funded by an average 36% increase in customer bills - a huge rise that Reed told reporters was a one-off. On Thames, Reed said the government was prepared for special administration - a form of temporary nationalisation - but that would put Thames's debt on the national balance sheet, a situation it can ill afford. "My hope and expectation is that the creditors will come to an agreement themselves," he added. A source close to a Thames bondholder welcomed the recognition that regulatory support was required. ($1 = 0.7460 pounds)
The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Water review in England and Wales: seven key takeways
The biggest review into the water industry in England and Wales since firms were privatised in 1989 has said that the sector is 'broken' and requires fundamental reform. Sir John Cunliffe, the former Bank of England deputy governor who led the Independent Water Commission (IWC) review, has published a 465-page report to attempt to address an industry beset by underinvestment, rising pollution incidents, soaring customers bills and meaty shareholder payouts. The report makes 88 recommendations to government with significant ramifications for the industry and consumers. Here are some of the key takeaways. The report has said that a fundamental 'reset' of the water sector is needed with the proposed scrapping of existing regulators and replacing them with one body for England and one body for Wales. In England, this would lead to Ofwat and the Drinking Water Inspectorate being scrapped, and the removal of the environmental regulation functions for the Environment Agency and Natural England. Under the proposal a new combined, integrated regulator that would be 'less desk-based' would be set up. In Wales, Ofwat's economic responsibilities would be integrated into Natural Resources Wales. The government said on Monday it would adopt the plan. The IWC recommends that meters should be made compulsory for a 'wide range of circumstances', in a drive to force consumers to reduce household water consumption. That includes installing them for households in areas where there is not 'water stress'. It suggests that the water industry could look to the energy sector, where suppliers must install a smart meter if they are replacing a meter or installing a meter for the first time – unless there is a good reason not to. Proponents of smart meters argue they encourage households to use less water. However, larger households with high water usage would be at risk of paying more than a standard flat rate tariff. Water companies could be let off fines if the government accepts a recommendation to allow them 'regulatory forbearance'. The report argues that a regulatory regime should be established to improve the performance of struggling water companies, including tightening oversight of ownership and governance. However, as well as this 'enhanced power of direction' the regime should allow 'regulatory forbearance', which would see companies dodge some financial penalties potentially further enraging campaigners already furious about the rise in pollution incidents. In March, the Guardian revealed that troubled Thames Water – which could collapse into a temporary nationalisation – was asking to be spared billions of pounds of costs and fines over the next five years, claiming that potential investors would be scared off otherwise. The government will also adopt a recommendation to upgrade the existing Consumer Council for Water (CCW) to a fully fledged ombudsman for customers. It currently runs a voluntary ombudsman scheme. The report suggests a nationwide social tariff to help consumers who cannot afford their bills, which the CCW has campaigned for. The change would give customers a clearer route to resolving complaints, such as issues including sewage floods in their gardens and taps running dry because of burst pipes. The report says that the new water regulator would need to be able to offer 'suitable' remuneration, which would mean it would not have to follow 'public sector pay controls'. The argument runs that to be effective the regulator will need to be able to hire and develop 'high-calibre' engineers and staff with financial expertise to provide proper oversight of the infrastructure and funding operations of water companies. 'Attracting skilled staff will require the regulator to offer suitable remuneration, outside public sector pay controls,' the report says. The high pay of water company executives has long been a source of anger among critics of the industry, most recently reignited by Southern Water's chief executive receiving a doubled pay package. However, Cunliffe, said: 'We are not proposing the regulator should set pay scales for the industry. They do need to recruit, and you have to attract the best people. What really makes the public angry is when the pay is there but the performance is not.' The report said that the current metrics Ofwat uses to measure infrastructure resilience, such as sewer collapses, mains repairs and leaky pipes, is short-termist and 'backward-looking'. The report calls for new national resilience standards for infrastructure to help guarantee the maintenance of underground pipes and other water and water waste assets. It also says that the requirements for companies to map their assets should be strengthened. The commission suggests the new regulator should have the power to set minimum capital levels for water companies. That system could mirror the regime in the banking industry, where financial cushions meant to shock-proof the banking system from another 2008-style crash were introduced.
