Cuts to USAID severed longstanding American support for Indigenous people around the world
NEW YORK — Miguel Guimaraes Vasquez fought for years to protect his homeland in the Peruvian Amazon from deforestation related to the cocaine trade, even laboring under death threats from drug traffickers.
A leader in an Indigenous rights group, Vasquez said such efforts were long supported by financial assistance from the U.S. Agency for International Development, which spent billions of dollars starting in the 1980s to help farmers in Peru shift from growing coca for cocaine production to legal crops such as coffee and cacao for chocolate. The agency funded economic and agricultural training and technology, and helped farmers gain access to international markets.
But the Trump administration's recent sweeping cuts to the agency have thrown that tradition of U.S. assistance into doubt, and Indigenous people in the Amazon worry that without American support there will be a resurgence of the cocaine market, increased threats to their land and potentially violent challenges to their human rights.
'We don't have the U.S. government with us anymore. So it can get really dangerous,' said Vásquez, who belongs to the Shipibo-Konibo people and is vice president of the Interethnic Association for the Development of the Peruvian Rainforest. 'We think the situation is going to get worse.'
Several Indigenous human rights defenders have been killed trying to protect their land, Vasquez said, and in some of those cases U.S. foreign aid provided money to help prosecute the slayings. 'We really needed those resources,' he said.
When Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, began dismantling USAID shortly after President Donald Trump began his second term, it all but eliminated U.S. foreign aid spending, including decades of support to Indigenous peoples around the world.
USAID's work with Indigenous peoples sought to address a variety of global issues affecting the U.S., according to former employees. Its economic development efforts created jobs in South America, easing the need for people to work in illicit drug markets and reducing the likelihood they would migrate to America seeking jobs and safety. And its support for the rights of Indigenous peoples to steward their own land offered opportunities to mitigate climate change.
That included Vásquez's organization, which was about to receive a four-year, $2.5 million grant to continue fighting illicit activity that affects Indigenous people in the region. Vásquez said that grant was rescinded by the new administration.
In January, DOGE launched a sweeping effort empowered by Trump to fire government workers and cut trillions in government spending. USAID, which managed about $35 billion in appropriations in fiscal year 2024, was one of his prime targets. Critics say the aid programs are wasteful and promote a liberal agenda. Trump, Musk and Republicans in Congress have accused the agency of advancing liberal social programs.
'Foreign assistance done right can advance our national interests, protect our borders, and strengthen our partnerships with key allies,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement in March. 'Unfortunately, USAID strayed from its original mission long ago. As a result, the gains were too few and the costs were too high.'
Musk last week announced his departure from the Trump administration, marking the end of a turbulent chapter that included thousands of layoffs and reams of litigation.
Former USAID employees said political pressure from the U.S. often kept foreign governments from violating some Indigenous rights.
In the three months since thousands of foreign aid workers were fired and aid contracts canceled, the Peruvian government has moved quickly to strip Indigenous people of their land rights and to tighten controls on international organizations that document human rights abuses. It's now a serious offense for a nonprofit to provide assistance to anyone working to bring lawsuits against the government.
The National Commission for Development and a Drug-Free Lifestyle, the country's agency that fights drug trafficking, did not respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.
'The impact was really, really strong, and we felt it really quickly when the Trump administration changed its stance about USAID,' Vásquez said.
The U.S. spends less than 1% of its budget on foreign assistance. Tim Rieser, a senior foreign policy aide in the Senate who works for Democratic Vermont Sen. Peter Welch, called DOGE's cuts to USAID a 'mindless' setback to years of work.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment.
USAID's work reached Indigenous communities around the world. It sought to mitigate the effects of human rights abuses in South America, created programs in Africa to enable Indigenous people to manage their own communities and led the global U.S. effort to fight hunger.
One of the most recent additions to USAID's work was incorporating international concepts of Indigenous rights into policy.
Rieser, for instance, was responsible for crafting legislation that created an adviser within USAID to protect the rights and address the needs of Indigenous peoples. The adviser advocated for Indigenous rights in foreign assistance programs, including actions by the World Bank.
'That provided Indigenous people everywhere with a way to be heard here in Washington,' Rieser said. 'That has now been silenced.'
That adviser position remains unfilled.
Vy Lam, USAID's adviser on Indigenous peoples, who said he was fired in March as part of the DOGE downsizing, said the idea of Indigenous rights, and the mandate to recognize them in foreign operations, was new to USAID. But it gained momentum under President Joe Biden's administration.
He said concepts such as 'free, prior and informed consent' — the right of Indigenous people to give or withhold approval for any action that would affect their lands or rights — were slowly being implemented in American foreign policy.
One of the ways that happened, Lam said, came in the form of U.S. political pressure on foreign governments or private industry to negotiate mutually beneficial agreements between Indigenous peoples and their governments.
For instance, if an American company wanted to build a hotel in an area that could affect an Indigenous community, the U.S. could push for the deal to require Indigenous approval, or at least consultation.
'We had that convening power, and that is the thing that I grieve the most,' Lam said.
U.S. foreign aid workers were also able to facilitate the reporting of some human rights violations, such as when a human rights or environmental defender is jailed without charges, or Indigenous peoples are forced off their land for the establishment of a protected area.
In some cases, USAID supported travel to the United Nations, where Indigenous leaders and advocates could receive training to navigate international bodies and document abuses.
Last year, under the Biden administration, USAID awarded a five-year grant to support Indigenous LGBTQIA people through the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Indigenous People, an agency that offers financial support to Indigenous peoples to participate in the U.N.
At $350,000 per year, it was the largest grant from any member state in the U.N., fund Secretary Morse Flores said. The money would have paid for attendance at the U.N. and other international bodies to report human rights abuses and to testify on foreign policy.
In February, the fund received notice that the grant would be terminated. The State Department does not plan to fulfill its pledge to fund the remaining four years of the grant.
In most cases, people receiving assistance to attend major meetings 'are actual victims of human rights violations,' Flores said. 'For someone who's unable to come and speak up, I mean, it's really just an injustice.'
Brewer writes for the Associated Press.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
4 minutes ago
- UPI
Senate 'vote-a-rama' session on Trump budget bill enters second day
1 of 2 | Vice President JD Vance arrived at the Capitol on Tuesday, where he may be needed to cast the tiebreaking vote as Senators hold a marathon 'vote-a-rama' session on a sweeping bill containing President Donald Trump's budget and legislative agenda. Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo July 1 (UPI) -- Although Vice President JD Vance's arrived on Capitol Hill Tuesday morning, it is unclear if GOP senators may see some sort of finish line for the ongoing vote-a-rama session in regard to President Donald Trump's legislative agenda. The marathon vote-a-rama, a period when senators can put forth an unlimited stack of amendments and force repeated votes, began Monday morning. As of 8 a.m. EDT Tuesday, the session neared its 23rd straight hour. As vice president, Vance would serve as the tiebreaker vote in the bill's passage, which remains close despite the 53-47 GOP majority present. However, four Republicans remain as no votes, which means even Vance can't push the agenda to Trump's desk for his signature without at least one current 'no' flipping. The Republican who is reportedly the focus of the GOP leadership is Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, whose request for provisos that would protect Medicaid recipients in her home state were ruled out of order by the Senate parliamentarian. Senators Rick Scott, R-Fla., and Mike Lee, R- Utah, are also apparently holdouts over their Medicaid-related amendment, while Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, had her proposed rural hospital relief fund amendment voted down. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., announced Saturday he wouldn't support the Senate's version of the legislation as he purported it contained "significant changes to Medicaid that would be devastating" to his home state, and he has not indicated he has changed his stance. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., has also been viewed as a no due to his stance against how the bill could raise the federal debt limit by $5 trillion, although he does apparently have a related amendment up for a vote that would shrink the increase to only $500 billion. No Democrats in the Senate have expressed any interest in passing the bill. "The Republicans still can't get it together," posted Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., to X Tuesday, who then alleged "It's because they're trying to rip away health care from 17 million Americans."
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Savannah Chrisley Remembers 'Sobbing' Over Donald Trump Winning The 2024 Election: 'Our Only Way Out'
Savannah Chrisley hasn't been shy about her love for President Donald Trump, especially considering he pardoned her parents, Todd and Julie Chrisley, after they had spent more than two years in prison. Now, in a new interview, Savannah Chrisley continues to praise the politician for reuniting her family, and she even recalls her reaction to learning he defeated Kamala Harris in the 2024 general election. In a new interview with Fox News, Savannah sat next to her parents, recounting the moment President Trump called to inform her that her parents would no longer be behind bars. The reality star also discussed watching the 2024 general election with her brother, Grayson Chrisley, and being overwhelmed with emotions by Trump's victory. "Grayson and I watched the election together, and he got to vote in the election for the first time. And when we were watching it and we saw the president win, we both started sobbing," the 27-year-old recalled. "And he just grabbed me and hugged me because we knew that was our only way out." In that same interview, Todd, who was initially sentenced to 12 years in prison for defrauding local banks out of $30 million, said he and the other inmates around him had a similar reaction to Trump's win. "We were all glued to the television," the 56-year-old said. "When they finally announced that he was the winner, everyone there started screaming and yelling because they knew, they felt in their spirit that if President Trump wins this election, there's hope for all of us." Savannah posted a video about the initial phone call she had with President Trump after her parents were pardoned in May 2025. 'The president called me personally as I was walking at the Sam's Club and notified me that he was signing pardon paperwork for both of my parents. So both my parents are coming home tonight or tomorrow, and I'm freaking out,' she said excitedly before saying she'd be "forever be grateful to President Trump [and] his administration" for bringing her parents home. The former pageant queen shared more insight into her conversation with the politician during her family's interview with Fox, first describing a moment she wishes she could take back. "He was like, 'How are you?' I was like, well, in the wise words of you fighting like hell. And I was like, I probably shouldn't have said that to the president, but it is President Trump," she said. Then, Trump dropped the bombshell news on Savannah, which took her completely by surprise. "A big thing was [that] he asked Alice Johnson, 'Is this a commutation? Or is this a full pardon?' And she said, 'As of now, it's just a commutation.' He goes, 'Nope, Nope. We're going to give them a full pardon. These people get their lives back.' And I was just in such shock," said Savannah. On social media, the Chrisley family received an immense amount of support after news of the pardon became public. Kim Zolciak Biermann from "The Real Housewives of Atlanta" wrote, "Prayers answered! So happy for y'all! Love you." Britney Aldean also commented, "Love yall! So excited." Christian singer Danny Gokey weighed in too, writing, "Incredible! God works everything for our good! ... Your family needs to get ready for the greater glory!" Savannah and Todd aren't the only Chrisleys rallying behind Trump, either. Chase Chrisley, 29, also expressed his gratitude in a previous interview, reported by The Blast, saying he was "grateful to God and President Trump." On Instagram, he posted, "God is so good! Our rocks are back!! Thank you to Mr. President @realdonaldtrump @potus for making a remarkable decision and bringing our family back together! We love, support, and thank you, Mr. President! God bless you and your entire family! Continue to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!"


Washington Post
7 minutes ago
- Washington Post
War of words over big bill intensifies between Musk, Trump
The war of words between billionaire Elon Musk and President Donald Trump over the big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts is heating up again, with Musk claiming he may form a new political party and Trump blasting the Tesla CEO over electric vehicle subsidies. The most prominent divide in the relationship between Musk and Trump is the president's big bill . Musk ramped up his criticism of the bill just three days ago, arguing the legislation that Republican senators are scrambling to pass would kill jobs and bog down burgeoning industries. Musk, who is also CEO of SpaceX, posted on X on Saturday that the bill would be 'political suicide for the Republican Party.' With the Senate working its way through a tense overnight session that dragged into Tuesday, Musk suggested he will work to get members of Congress who vote for the bill out of their seats next year. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame,' he wrote on X. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' The post was viewed 26 million times on the social media platform. A few hours later, Musk followed up with a post claiming he will create a new political party if the bill passes. 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' he wrote. 'Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE.' Musk's post about the America Party was viewed 32 million times on X. For his part, Trump focused some of his criticisms of Musk on EV mandates and subsidies. In a post on Truth Social early Tuesday morning, Trump said Musk has known that he's against an EV mandate and that people should not be forced to own electric vehicles. 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,' Trump wrote. The President went on to say that there could be some cost savings for the nation. 'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!' Trump posted. Several hours later, while standing on the White House lawn before heading to Florida, Trump continued to discuss what he believes is Musk's displeasure with potentially losing EV subsidies. 'He's very upset. You know, he can lose a lot more than that, I'll tell you right now,' Trump said. 'Elon can lose a lot more than that.' The President also cautioned Musk on the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE , which the billionaire used to lead. 'DOGE could be the monster that turns around and eats Elon,' Trump said.