Air travel, passenger rail among focal points of Ohio transportation budget
'Even if you don't drive a car, you benefit from good roads and bridges and things like that,' Ohio House Speaker Matt Huffman (R-Lima) said.
'I think it was both parties coming together and deciding to focus on Ohioans, what their needs are, not particular parties or controversial items,' ranking member of the Ohio House Finance Committee Bride Rose Sweeney (D-Westlake) said.
Ohio Intel plant construction in New Albany delayed by at least three years
There are still different views on how funds should be spent. Some of it is straight forward, like about $30 million, over two years, to highway safety.
'We're sharpening our pencil and we're trying to say we're not going to spend funds that we don't have to,' Chair of the Ohio House Finance Committee Brian Stewart (R-Ashville) said.
Some of the money is going toward what lawmakers call innovation, including a new Division of Advanced Air Mobility. Representative Bernie Willis (R-Springfield) chairs the Ohio House Transportation Committee. He said a lot of people don't know this, but there are already things like charging stations for electric aircrafts at airports across the state. This division will help build on that momentum.
'These things are happening. They're active,' Willis said. 'And we want to be well ahead of this. And I think this is just a start to try to get the kind of infrastructure support we want for those airports.'
Another new initiative called the Airport Improvement Program will get an estimated $5 million worth of the aircraft fuel sales tax.
'A large amount of dollars toward what are some really large projects at our airports that have been languishing,' Willis.
Bill would create savings accounts for students attending private religious schools
Passenger rail is also back in play. This version of the transportation budget puts $50,000 dollars, between two years, toward any costs that may be associated with Ohio rejoining the Midwest Interstate Passenger Rail Compact.
'There [are] folks like me who are less interested in talking about the train and other members who are not. So, I think, again, we're trying to come to a product that all members can support,' Stewart said. 'Let's at least take a baby step here, let's dip our toe in the water and see what we think.'
The compact does things like advocate for passenger rail funding. Willis said since Ohio left the compact in 2013, attitudes toward mass transit have changed in the state.
'I think everyone's mindset of what does mass transit look like and what are all the modes that we can get and how do we reduce the volume that we already have on our streets and roads? I think it's just another avenue,' he said.
Willis said whether passenger rail is fully included will be a debate, but he is confident it will get to that point.
'I think we're going to get to the point where we will have commercial providers come to us and say, 'the business case is there and we're willing to run that for you,'' Willis said. 'And then it becomes something that's great for those who have disabilities and have limited mobility. I think the passenger rail opens up a lot of opportunities for a lot of people.'
The bill also creates new driver's license requirements. It would change the law for someone applying for a limited term driver's license, which is generally a noncitizen with legal status in Ohio.
'We're going to require them to do what other new drivers have to do in the state of Ohio, which is have in-person experience behind the wheel of 50 hours and also take in-person driver's training,' Stewart said. 'We can't have folks coming here who have no experience with automobiles and walking out in the day behind the wheel.'
While the bill was bipartisan and did not have a single vote against it in the House, Sweeney said they also missed out on something. The Ohio Department of Transportation advocated for a gas tax increase, but Stewart said there is 'no appetite,' for that.
'We're able to meet the needs of Ohio's infrastructure today. But if you talk to the [Ohio Department of Transportation], they say that we are looking at a $300 million hole to meet the transportation needs in the near future,' she said.
The $11.5 billion spending bill passed the Ohio House unanimously on Wednesday and is now in the Ohio Senate for consideration.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
3 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Farmers pleased but anxious after Alberta pauses new on-farm slaughter sale limits
EDMONTON - Alberta animal farmers are pleased but anxious for updates after the provincial government paused new limits on annual on-farm slaughter sales. Under Alberta's on-farm slaughter program, licensed producers can sell cows, pigs, chickens and other animals directly to consumers and avoid going through commercial meat inspection rules. The program gives farms, especially smaller operations, access to markets they wouldn't otherwise have, while giving consumers a way to buy meat in bulk and directly support local producers. Alberta launched the program in 2020 and last week introduced new rules limiting annual sales per farm to roughly 2,250 kilograms — or 5,000 pounds — of live animals. The government's website says that limit could mean roughly four cows, 76 goats or 150 chickens per farm. For Norwin Willis's family farm near Sexsmith in northern Alberta that would mean a roughly 70 per cent cut to his target slaughter sales this year. 'We were quite shocked, let's put it that way,' said Willis, who mainly sells chickens but also some pigs and cows. 'It would take out a huge chunk of what we are currently doing.' Brooke Vanderkley, a farmer near Sylvan Lake, south of Edmonton, is in the same boat. She sells about 600 chickens per year as well as a handful of cows with plans to grow beef operations. 'There's a lot of providers, us included, who have built how we run our business and how we run our farm in accordance with the program as it was currently standing,' Vanderkley said. The limits would have applied to all new on-farm slaughter operations licensed after July 2, while existing operations would operate limit free until they need to renew their licence, which is valid for five years. On Tuesday, Alberta's Agriculture Ministry published a notice saying it had heard concerns from producers about the 'unintended consequences' of the changes and the new rules would be put on ice for more consultation. Both Vanderkley and Willis said they appreciated the province taking their concerns seriously, but they were unsure about celebrating. 'The word pause makes me a little bit hesitant for what's to come,' said Vanderkley. 'It's not a full retraction.' Agriculture Minister R.J. Sigurdson said in a statement Wednesday the intention behind the limit was to protect public health, as it would reduce the amount of uninspected meat circulating in Alberta. 'This change would help to minimize the risk of food-borne illness and outbreaks and maintain Alberta's reputation as a safe source of high-quality meat,' Sigurdson said. In 2023, nearly 450 people were infected after a substantial E. coli outbreak in Calgary, which was traced back to a commercial kitchen company supplying meat to daycares. Thirty-nine children and an adult were hospitalized. Officials said the company only used meat purchased from an inspected source and not directly from an on-farm slaughter operation. RCMP have said the illegal slaughter and sale of uninspected meat has increased in recent years, and in a few cases charges have been laid. Sue King, a farmer in Crooked Creek, northwest of Edmonton, said she thought the government's proposed limit would just punish farmers following the rules. 'A huge portion of us are following the rules, and with anything there's going to be people that don't,' said King, who runs an on-farm slaughter operation while also providing a butcher service to other producers. 'If there are issues specifically to (do with) food safety, if that's what their concern is, they need to address those specific operations.' Vanderkley agreed. She said the government already has rules in place to protect public health, such as prohibiting producers like her from selling meat commercially or from selling more than a certain number of animals to the same person each year. She suggested the province beef up its inspections of on-farm slaughter operations as a licence condition or make licence holders take a food safety course. Sigurdson didn't have a firm deadline for when the new round of consultations would be finished but said it would take the time that's needed. 'We are committed to getting this right to ensure the program supports public safety, as well as the sustainability of Alberta's livestock industry,' Sigurdson said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 10, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Farmers pleased but anxious after Alberta pauses new on-farm slaughter sale limits
EDMONTON — Alberta animal farmers are pleased but anxious for updates after the provincial government paused new limits on annual on-farm slaughter sales. Under Alberta's on-farm slaughter program, licensed producers can sell cows, pigs, chickens and other animals directly to consumers and avoid going through commercial meat inspection rules. The program gives farms, especially smaller operations, access to markets they wouldn't otherwise have, while giving consumers a way to buy meat in bulk and directly support local producers. Alberta launched the program in 2020 and last week introduced new rules limiting annual sales per farm to roughly 2,250 kilograms — or 5,000 pounds — of live animals. The government's website says that limit could mean roughly four cows, 76 goats or 150 chickens per farm. For Norwin Willis's family farm near Sexsmith in northern Alberta that would mean a roughly 70 per cent cut to his target slaughter sales this year. "We were quite shocked, let's put it that way," said Willis, who mainly sells chickens but also some pigs and cows. "It would take out a huge chunk of what we are currently doing." Brooke Vanderkley, a farmer near Sylvan Lake, south of Edmonton, is in the same boat. She sells about 600 chickens per year as well as a handful of cows with plans to grow beef operations. "There's a lot of providers, us included, who have built how we run our business and how we run our farm in accordance with the program as it was currently standing," Vanderkley said. The limits would have applied to all new on-farm slaughter operations licensed after July 2, while existing operations would operate limit free until they need to renew their licence, which is valid for five years. On Tuesday, Alberta's Agriculture Ministry published a notice saying it had heard concerns from producers about the "unintended consequences" of the changes and the new rules would be put on ice for more consultation. Both Vanderkley and Willis said they appreciated the province taking their concerns seriously, but they were unsure about celebrating. "The word pause makes me a little bit hesitant for what's to come," said Vanderkley. "It's not a full retraction." Agriculture Minister R.J. Sigurdson said in a statement Wednesday the intention behind the limit was to protect public health, as it would reduce the amount of uninspected meat circulating in Alberta. "This change would help to minimize the risk of food-borne illness and outbreaks and maintain Alberta's reputation as a safe source of high-quality meat," Sigurdson said. In 2023, nearly 450 people were infected after a substantial E. coli outbreak in Calgary, which was traced back to a commercial kitchen company supplying meat to daycares. Thirty-nine children and an adult were hospitalized. Officials said the company only used meat purchased from an inspected source and not directly from an on-farm slaughter operation. RCMP have said the illegal slaughter and sale of uninspected meat has increased in recent years, and in a few cases charges have been laid. Sue King, a farmer in Crooked Creek, northwest of Edmonton, said she thought the government's proposed limit would just punish farmers following the rules. "A huge portion of us are following the rules, and with anything there's going to be people that don't," said King, who runs an on-farm slaughter operation while also providing a butcher service to other producers. "If there are issues specifically to (do with) food safety, if that's what their concern is, they need to address those specific operations." Vanderkley agreed. She said the government already has rules in place to protect public health, such as prohibiting producers like her from selling meat commercially or from selling more than a certain number of animals to the same person each year. She suggested the province beef up its inspections of on-farm slaughter operations as a licence condition or make licence holders take a food safety course. Sigurdson didn't have a firm deadline for when the new round of consultations would be finished but said it would take the time that's needed. "We are committed to getting this right to ensure the program supports public safety, as well as the sustainability of Alberta's livestock industry," Sigurdson said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 10, 2025. Jack Farrell, The Canadian Press
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Chapman's Eat Market in German Village to close after five years
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Chapman's Eat Market, a German Village eatery from the Columbus restaurateur couple behind Ginger Rabbit Jazz Lounge, is closing after five years in business. Husband-and-wife duo B.J. Lieberman and Bronwyn Haines announced on social media last week that Chapman's at 739 S. Third St., which opened in 2020, is permanently shuttering at the end of August. The couple said, as the restaurant nears its fifth birthday and the end of the lease, they 'were faced with the difficult decision on whether or not to continue.' Ohio horror museum featuring 'last meal' restaurant reveals opening date 'Inevitably, we chose to finish our story on a high note, celebrating all that we have accomplished and created over the years and within these walls, including the team that we've built and the memories we made,' the social media post said. Watch a NBC4 report from Chapman's 2020 opening in the video player above. Lieberman was one of two Columbus chefs named among the semifinalists for last year's James Beard Awards, prestigious national honors that recognize talent in the culinary and food media industries. He and Haines also launched Ginger Rabbit at 17 Buttles Ave. in 2022, and most recently opened Metsi's Wood-Fired Italian at 36 E. Lincoln St. last month. Chapman's, named among the New York Times' best U.S. restaurants in 2021, is home to a curated menu of appetizers, salads, pastas and entrees, like Levantine cod, smoked Cornish game hen, and a 6-ounce beef tenderloin. Sides, like beef fat fries and wilted green beans, round out the menu. Granville's historic Buxton Inn listed for $5.85 million Lieberman and Haines said Chapman's final day of service will be announced in August. Until then, the restaurant is open 5 to 9 p.m. Sunday through Thursday, and 5 to 10 p.m. Friday and Saturday. 'We hope each and every one of you will join us for a final meal before we say goodbye — whether it's your last general tsos cauliflower, khao soi or maple budino, we look forward to serving and celebrating with you,' the social media post said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
