logo
EPA might reverse 'endangerment finding' for greenhouse gas emissions

EPA might reverse 'endangerment finding' for greenhouse gas emissions

UPI6 days ago
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin on Tuesday announced a potential reversal of the EPA's 2009 "endangerment finding" that is the basis of costly emissions regulations and an electric vehicle mandate. File Photo by Samuel Corum/UPI | License Photo
July 29 (UPI) -- Environmental Protection Agency officials might end the agency's prior "endangerment finding" for greenhouse gas emissions and repeal regulations for motor vehicles and engines.
The endangerment finding triggered the creation of $1 trillion in federal regulations, including an electric vehicle mandate, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said during a press event at an Indianapolis auto dealership on Tuesday.
"The Trump EPA is proposing to end 16 years of uncertainty for automakers and American consumers," Zeldin said in a news release.
"Many stakeholders have told me that the Obama and Biden EPAs twisted the law, ignored precedent and warped science to achieve their preferred ends and stick American families with hundreds of billions of dollars in hidden taxes every single year," Zeldin said.
Reversing the endangerment finding would eliminate costly regulations and help consumers save more than $54 billion in annual costs, he added.
"We heard loud and clear the concern that the EPA's GHG emission standards themselves [and] not carbon dioxide ... was the real threat to Americans' livelihoods," Zeldin said.
The EPA's 2009 endangerment finding was not assessed independently and is the basis for costly regulations imposed by the Obama and Biden administrations and others at the state level, he added.
The EPA in 2009 declared greenhouse gases to be a threat to public health and added such gases to those regulated by the Clean Air Act.
The Obama and Biden administrations used the declaration to impose $1 trillion in regulations and mandate two-thirds of light vehicles and 46% of medium-duty vehicles produced by the auto industry be electric vehicles by 2032.
Zeldin said such regulations would "bankrupt the country" in the name of climate change, CBS News reported.
A March 2024 EPA impact report claims limiting vehicular greenhouse gas emissions would net more than $2.1 trillion in benefits over the next 30 years.
The savings would include $829 billion in fuel savings and $1.8 trillion in climate and public health benefits, according to the report.
Removing the greenhouse gas regulations imposed by the Obama and Biden administrations also would "amount to the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States," Zeldin said, as reported by The New York Times.
Former Vice President Al Gore accused Zeldin and the Trump administration of favoring fossil fuels and profits over safety.
"Today's EPA announcement ignores the blindingly obvious reality of the climate crisis and sidelines the EPA's own scientists and lawyers in favor of the interests and profits of the fossil fuel industry," Gore said in a prepared statement.
The EPA's anticipated move would increase air pollution and people's cost of living, Environmental Defense Fund President Fred Krupp predicted in a prepared statement.
"If there are no enforced limits on pollution, you get more of it, making life more expensive and even more dangerous," Krupp said. "The stakes could not be higher for Americans."
Reversing the EPA's endangerment finding would require a period of public comment before taking effect and withstanding likely lawsuits challenging the proposed change.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can you get a mortgage with bad credit?
Can you get a mortgage with bad credit?

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Can you get a mortgage with bad credit?

A good to excellent credit score can help you lock in a lower mortgage rate. But if you're one of roughly 28% of Americans who don't meet this threshold, it's understandable to wonder if you can get a mortgage with bad credit. Your options are a bit more limited, and there are potential downsides to be aware of. But in short, the answer is yes: You can get a mortgage and buy a house with bad (or even terrible) credit. This embedded content is not available in your region. In this article: What's considered a bad credit score? Can you get a mortgage with bad credit? How to buy a house with bad credit Mortgage options for borrowers with poor credit FAQs What's considered a bad credit score? Mortgage lenders may not use terms like "bad" or "terrible" credit, but they do follow the language of the two major credit score models: FICO and VantageScore. What FICO says: A credit score ranging from 580 to 669 is fair, which is below the U.S. average. Anything below 580 is considered poor. What VantageScore says: Near-prime credit scores, more susceptible to higher interest rates than prime or superprime scores, range from 601 to 660. A score between 300 and 600 is subprime and could result in a denied loan application. Read more: What credit score do I need to buy a house? Can you get a mortgage with bad credit? It's possible to get a mortgage with a lower credit score. However, finding a loan program — especially with competitive interest rates — may require a bit more effort. 'If you plan on buying a house as a primary residence, lenders have specialized programs to help you build credit while applying for the loan,' said Yuval Golan, founder and CEO of the real estate financing platform Waltz, via email. 'Depending on where you live, there are also state-sponsored programs with incentives for first-time home buyers that can reduce barriers for those with bad credit.' In general, mortgage lenders consider more than just your credit score when determining whether to approve you and at what rates. Having a sizeable down payment, a stable income, and low outstanding debt can strengthen your mortgage application, even if you have a low credit score. Up Next Up Next How to buy a house with bad credit Poor credit doesn't have to stop you from owning a home. These steps can help increase your chances of approval. Double-check your credit report Review your credit report for errors, especially before applying for a mortgage. You may find open accounts that should be closed or ones with incorrect balances. Also, verify that everything listed on your report — credit cards, car loans, student loans — actually belongs to you. Dispute any errors by reaching out to the corresponding credit reporting bureau, TransUnion, Equifax, or Experian. Increase your down payment A larger down payment can signal to lenders that you are a lower-risk borrower. It also means you'll have a smaller monthly mortgage payment and pay less in interest over the life of your loan. You don't need a 20% down payment, but putting down 20% or more usually spares you from paying private mortgage insurance (PMI) on conventional loans. Improve your debt-to-income ratio Your debt-to-income (DTI) ratio shows how much of your gross monthly income is tied up in debt payments. Aim for a DTI ratio of 36% or lower, which is considered healthy debt management by many mortgage lenders and can increase their confidence in your ability to make on-time payments. Improve your DTI ratio by paying down debt or increasing your income with a part-time job or side hustle. Apply with a co-signer or co-borrower If your credit score won't qualify you for a mortgage, adding a trusted co-signer or co-borrower might. A co-signer is responsible for the mortgage if you, the primary borrower, can't make payments. Co-borrowers are a little more involved, having joint ownership of the loan and often the home as well. If you apply with either type of co-applicant, make sure you can keep up with payments so you don't put them in a financial bind. Research online lenders or credit unions Some online mortgage lenders and credit unions have more flexible borrower requirements than traditional banks. This means you may be able to qualify, even with a lower credit score. If you don't have a credit score at all, some mortgage lenders will let you apply with proof of making on-time payments, such as utility bills, instead. Learn more: The best mortgage lenders for bad credit Understand the total cost Lenders tend to view a lower credit score as a higher risk, and they have several ways to offset this risk. Beyond a higher interest rate, they may require a larger down payment or mortgage insurance. The total costs of the loan can add up if you're not paying attention. 'Look at the total loan package,' advised Golan. 'Ask about their loan origination and other fees charged as part of this process. Some lenders use lower interest rates to draw in buyers who don't dig deeper and ask this question. So while their interest rate may be slightly higher, the up-front cost could be far higher.' Mortgage options for borrowers with poor credit There is good news: Mortgage lenders have specific types of home loans that help buyers with lower credit scores buy a home. The options below tend to have looser requirements, helping you qualify without a strong score. FHA loans Mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration have lower minimum credit score requirements: 500 with a 10% down payment and 580 with a 3.5% down payment. FHA loans charge mortgage insurance premiums at closing and annually, regardless of how much money you put down. VA loans The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs doesn't set a minimum credit score for VA loans, which are available to active-duty military members, veterans, and surviving spouses. That means it may be possible to qualify with a low score. However, this is not guaranteed. VA mortgage lenders offering these mortgages set their own requirements. VA loans don't require a down payment or mortgage insurance, but borrowers will pay a one-time VA funding fee of 1.25% to 3.3% of the loan amount. USDA loans Like VA loans, the U.S. Department of Agriculture doesn't have a minimum credit score. However, it's common for USDA loan lenders to look for a score of at least 640. Although there's no down payment requirement for USDA loans, you'll need to purchase a home in an eligible rural area and meet income requirements to qualify. Conventional loans Conventional loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac generally require a minimum credit score of 620. Many ask for a down payment of 3% or 5%. Certain programs for first-time home buyers or households with limited income may have looser credit score requirements. Getting a mortgage with bad credit: FAQs What is the lowest credit score to buy a house? Many conventional loans require a minimum credit score of 620. However, some government-backed home loans may allow scores as low as 500, provided you meet other criteria. You can still qualify for a mortgage with a lower credit score; however, lenders usually charge higher interest rates or fees to compensate for the added risk. What is the easiest mortgage to get with bad credit? Government-backed mortgage loans may be easier to qualify for than conventional loans. FHA loans allow a 500 credit score with a 10% down payment and a 580 score with 3.5% down. USDA and VA loans don't have credit score requirements, but you'll need to find a partner lender with flexible credit qualifications. Are mortgage rates higher with bad credit? Yes, lenders tend to charge higher interest rates to borrowers with lower credit scores. A low credit score can indicate that the borrower has challenges repaying debt, which lenders view as a risk. The higher rate offsets some of this risk. Lenders may also require a larger down payment or mortgage insurance, depending on which type of mortgage you get. Laura Grace Tarpley edited this article.

Moscow urges everyone, including Trump, to be 'very, very cautious' with nuclear rhetoric
Moscow urges everyone, including Trump, to be 'very, very cautious' with nuclear rhetoric

USA Today

time25 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Moscow urges everyone, including Trump, to be 'very, very cautious' with nuclear rhetoric

Moscow downplayed President Trump's announcement that he'd ordered two nuclear submarines to "the appropriate regions" after doomsday Russian rhetoric. Moscow broke its silence on President Donald Trump's comments ordering two nuclear submarines to "the appropriate regions" in response to "provocative" remarks by a former Russian president. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told Russian state media on Aug. 4 that the country was "very attentive" to the topic of nuclear non-proliferation and believed "everyone should be very, very cautious with nuclear rhetoric." Peskov also played down the significance of Trump's comments, saying it was clear to Russia that U.S. submarines were already on combat duty. He said Russia had no appetite for getting into a prolonged argument with Trump. Still, Trump's deployment of the nuclear submarines appears to be the first time social media rhetoric has led an American president to apparently reposition parts of the United States' nuclear arsenal. (Trump did not specify whether he was referring to nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines.) Trump said the move was in response to statements from Dmitry Medvedev, who was the Russian president from 2008 to 2012 and prime minister from 2012 to 2020. He is now the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council. Medvedev, who in recent years has taken to social media to post spiky, rabble-rousing comments aimed at the United States, said in a post on X, formerly Twitter, that Trump's recent threats to sanction Russia, including a tariffs ultimatum, were "a step towards war." Seeking a ceasefire Since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Putin himself has frequently resorted to nuclear threats. The Kremlin has repeatedly suggested that Moscow could use nuclear weapons under certain circumstances. The latest spat follows Trump's trip to Scotland, where he said he was reducing his 50-day deadline for Russia to make moves toward trying to end its war with Ukraine – down to a new deadline of 10 or 12 days. That deadline is Aug. 8. Trump warned of "very severe" sanctions on Russia if it does not commit to a ceasefire. Ahead of the deadline, Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff, a real estate mogul and cryptocurrency trader who has turned into Trump's de facto roaming emissary, is expected to visit Russia on Aug. 6. Peskov said Russia views Witkoff's visit as "important, substantial and helpful," and he raised the possibility that Witkoff might see President Vladimir Putin for talks. Witkoff has made multiple trips to Moscow at Trump's behest. After one of his trips, he returned with a portrait of Trump gifted by Putin. During another visit, Witkoff, who does not speak Russian, arrived without a translator and relied on one supplied by the Kremlin. His last trip was in April. Trump told reporters that if his Aug. 8 deadline arrives and Russia has not agreed to a Ukraine ceasefire, "there'll be sanctions. But they seem to be pretty good at avoiding sanctions," he added. "You know, they're wily characters. … So we'll see what happens."

Marjorie Taylor Greene says she's not sure if GOP is ‘leaving me'
Marjorie Taylor Greene says she's not sure if GOP is ‘leaving me'

The Hill

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Marjorie Taylor Greene says she's not sure if GOP is ‘leaving me'

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) is questioning her place in the Republican Party after finding herself at odds with others in the GOP — including President Trump — over several issues. The remarks — made during an interview with the Daily Mail — comes after Greene said a 'genocide' is taking place in Gaza; vocally pushed for the release of the documents related to the late-convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, despite Trump pressing to move on from the story; and criticized the U.S.'s strike on nuclear facilities in Iran, among other positions. Her contrast with many in the GOP is prompting her to question her perch in the party. 'I don't know if the Republican Party is leaving me, or if I'm kind of not relating to Republican Party as much anymore,' Greene said. 'I don't know which one it is.' 'I think the Republican Party has turned its back on America First and the workers and just regular Americans,' she added. The comments from Greene are the latest flashpoint in her timeline in Washington, which has seen her go from a pariah in the GOP to a close ally of the president, while at times being a thorn in the side of House GOP leadership. Greene said she believes the Republican Party is drifting back to its 'neocon' ways, with the people at the top of the group, the 'good ole boys,' pushing against the MAGA agenda. During her conversation with the Daily Mail, Greene advocated for stopping foreign aid, continuing using the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to slash the federal government, cease increasing the national debt and being aware of rising inflation. 'Like what happened all those issues? You know that I don't know what the hell happened with the Republican Party. I really don't,' she said. 'But I'll tell you one thing, the course that it's on, I don't want to have anything to do with it, and I, I just don't care anymore,' she added. Perhaps one of the most striking breaks between Greene and Trump was over the release of the Epstein files, a debate that has inundated the party for weeks. When the president was trying to turn the page on the Epstein saga, Greene kept sounding the drum, at one point warning that not doing so would risk his support among the base. 'If you tell the base of people, who support you, of deep state treasonous crimes, election interference, blackmail, and rich powerful elite evil cabals, then you must take down every enemy of The People,' Greene wrote on X. 'If not. The base will turn and there's no going back. Dangling bits of red meat no longer satisfies. They want the whole steak dinner and will accept nothing else.' The pair was also at odds over the U.S.'s strike on Iran, which the president touted as a success and Greene reacted to by saying there was: 'a complete bait and switch to please the neocons, warmongers, military industrial complex contracts, and neocon tv personalities that MAGA hates and who were NEVER TRUMPERS!' On foreign policy, Greene said 'genocide,' a 'humanitarian crisis' and 'starvation' were occurring in Gaza — Trump also said starvation was happening — and she was one of two House Republicans to vote to cut off some aid to Israel. Greene told the Daily Mail she believed there are 'other women in our party that are really sick and tired of the way men treat Republican women,' naming Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), who Trump nominated to be U.S. ambassador to the United Nations before pulling the pick amid fears about the House GOP's slim majority. Greene accused Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) of being to blame for the situation. 'I think there's other women — Republican women — and I'm just giving my opinion here, who are really sick and tired of them,' she said. 'And the one that really got shafted was Elise Stefanik.' 'I mean, she got screwed by Mike Johnson, and she got screwed by the White House. I'm not blaming Trump, particularly. I'm blaming the people in the White House,' she added. Greene recognized the island she is on when it comes to some of the positions she has staked out, telling the Daily Mail: 'I'm going alone right now on the issues that I'm speaking about.' But she suggested that she does not mind plowing ahead solo, arguing that her re-election in her district has been because of her efforts and nobody else. 'I had to beat eight men and had to really whoop one in the primary, and I did, and the primary is everything in my district, and I did that by myself,' Greene said. 'I didn't do that with anybody's help, not President Trump, Mike Johnson.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store