EU envoys near agreement on lower Russian oil price cap
The sources said all the elements of the package had been agreed, although one member state still has a technical reservation on the new cap.
The sources - speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss confidential talks - said they expect to reach a full agreement on Monday, ahead of a foreign ministers' meeting in Brussels the following day that could formally approve the package.
The sources said they had also agreed to a dynamic price mechanism for the price cap. On Friday, the European Commission proposed a floating price cap on Russian oil of 15% below the average market price of crude in the previous three months.
One of the sources said the initial price would be around $47 a barrel based on the average price of Russian crude for the last 22 weeks minus 15%. Further, the price would be revised based on the average oil price every six months instead of the proposed three months.
Slovakia - which has held up the proposed package - is still seeking reassurances from the European Commission on its concerns about plans to phase out Russian gas supply but it has agreed to the new measures, the sources said.
Sanctions require unanimity among the EU's member countries to be adopted.
The Group of Seven (G7) price cap, aimed at curbing Russia's ability to finance the war in Ukraine, was originally agreed in December 2022. The European Union and Britain have been pushing the G7 to lower the cap for the last two months after a fall in oil futures made the current $60 a barrel level largely irrelevant.
The cap bans trade in Russian crude oil transported by tankers if the price paid was above $60 per barrel and prohibits shipping, insurance and re-insurance companies from handling cargoes of Russian crude around the globe, unless it is sold for less than the price cap.
The Commission proposed the package in early June, aimed at further cutting Moscow's energy revenues, including a ban on transactions with Russia's Nord Stream gas pipelines, and financial network that helps it circumvent sanctions.
Another one of the sources said the new package will list a Russian-owned refinery in India, two Chinese banks, and a flag registry. Russia has used flags of convenience for its shadow fleet of ships and oil tankers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
31 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump is clearly fed up with Putin - but will his shift in tone force Russia to the negotiating table?
As ever, there is confusion and key questions are left unanswered, but Donald Trump's announcement on Ukraine and Russia today remains hugely significant. His shift in tone and policy on Ukraine is stark. And his shift in tone (and perhaps policy) on Russia is huge. Ever since Mr Trump returned to the White House he has flatly refused to side with Ukraine over the Russian invasion. He has blamed Ukraine and Joe Biden for the incursion but has never been willing to accept that Russia is the aggressor and that Kyiv has a legitimate right to defend itself. Today, all that changed. In a clear signal that he is fed up with Vladimir Putin and now fully recognises the need to help Ukraine defend itself, he announced the US will dramatically increase weapons supplies to Kyiv. But, in keeping with his transactional nature and in a reflection of the need to keep his isolationist "America-First" base on side, he has framed this policy shift as a multi-billion dollar "deal" in which America gains financially. American weapons are to be "sold" to NATO partners in Europe who will then either transfer them to Ukraine or use them to bolster their own stockpiles as they transfer their own existing stocks to Kyiv. "We've made a deal today," the president said in the Oval Office. "We are going to be sending them weapons, and they are paying for them. We are manufacturing, they are going to be paying for it. Our meeting last month was very successful... these are wealthy nations." 2:27 This appears to be a clever framing of the "deal". Firstly, America has always benefited financially by supplying weapons to Ukraine because much of the investment has been in American factories, American jobs and American supply chains. While the details are not entirely clear, the difference now appears to be that the weapons would be bought by the Europeans or by NATO as an alliance. The Americans are the biggest contributor to NATO, and so if the alliance is buying the weapons, America too will be paying, in part, for the weapons it is selling. However, if the weapons are being bought by individual NATO members to replenish their own stocks, then it may be the case that the US is not paying. NATO officials referred all questions on this issue to the White House, which has not yet provided clarity to Sky News. It is also not yet clear what type of weapons will be made available and whether it will include offensive, as well defensive, munitions. 1:49 A key element of the package will likely be Patriot missile batteries, 10 to 15 of which are believed to be currently in Europe. Under this deal, it is understood that some of them will be added to the six or so batteries believed to be presently in Ukraine. New ones would then be purchased from US manufacturers to backfill European stocks. A similar arrangement may be used for other weapons. The president also issued the Russian leader with an ultimatum, saying that Putin had 50 days to make a peace deal or else face 100% "secondary tariffs". It's thought this refers to a plan to tariff, or sanction, third countries that supply Russia with weapons and buy Russian oil. This, the Americans hope, will force those countries to apply pressure on Russia. But the 50-day kicking of the can down the road also gives Russia space to prevaricate. So, a few words of caution: first, the Russians are masters of prevarication. Second, Trump tends to let deadlines slip. And third, we all know Trump can flip-flop on his position repeatedly. 2:00 Maybe the most revealing aspect of all this came when a reporter asked Mr Trump: "How far are you willing to go if Putin sends more bombs in the coming days?" "Don't ask me questions like that..." Mr Trump doesn't really know what to do if Mr Putin continues to take him for a ride. Mr Biden, before him, supplied Ukraine with the weapons to continue fighting. If Mr Trump wants to end this, he may need to provide Ukraine with enough weapons to win. But that would prolong, or even escalate, a war he wants to end now.
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
FTSE eyes 9,000 as UK named trade war winner - but European shares sink after Trump threatens 30% tariffs hit
The FTSE 100 rose to within a whisker of 9000 for the first time yesterday as Brexit Britain was branded a 'clear winner' in Donald Trump's trade war. In a boost for investors with money tied up in shares through their pensions and other savings, the blue-chip index climbed to a record high of 8999.22 before closing up 0.6 per cent at 8998.06. That topped last week's previous record close of 8975.66 and leaves the blue-chip index just shy of the 9000 mark. The gains in London came as shares in Europe fell with the Dax down 0.4 per cent in Frankfurt and the Cac off 0.3 per cent in Paris after the US president threatened to slap 30 per cent tariffs on goods imported from the EU. This compares with a 10 per cent tariff on most imports to the US from the UK – with British cars and aerospace goods getting no extra levies at all thanks to a trade deal with Trump. Analysts said UK stocks should outperform those in Europe thanks to the deal which has been hailed a 'Brexit dividend'. Meanwhile, European leaders warned trade between the EU and US will be 'almost impossible' if 30 per cent tariffs are imposed on August 1 as planned. German and French bond yields rose as investors fretted over the prospect of a transatlantic trade war between the US and EU. 'Trump's tariffs on the EU have one clear winner: the UK,' wrote Panmure Liberum research analyst Joachim Klement in a report. And in a message to investors, he added: 'As the world stands today, there is one clear recommendation: Buy UK.' The report noted 'a significant arbitrage opportunity' for European firms to 'ship goods from the EU to the UK, slightly alter them in the UK to turn them into 'Made in the UK' goods and then ship them to the US'. It said this 'could boost the UK economy' as firms invest in factories and warehouses. Klement said: 'It could turn the UK into a long-term winner from the trade war.' Accountancy and business advisory group Lubbock Fine also said Britain's 'substantial tariff advantage' could see European manufacturers relocating to the UK to avoid the 30 per cent levy. 'The UK could be a big indirect winner,' said Lubbock Fine partner Alex Altmann, who is also vice president of the British Chamber of Commerce in Germany. He added: 'If the tariff rate for the EU finally ends up anywhere near this 30 per cent level then the UK's much lower US tariffs would offer a major incentive for EU companies to shift some of their manufacturing to the UK or to expand their existing UK facilities.' European trade ministers held crisis talks yesterday as they scramble to secure an agreement with Trump to avoid the punishing levies. EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic said: 'If you're talking about 30 per cent or 30 per cent-plus, there will be a huge impact on trade. It will be almost impossible to continue trading as we are used to in a transatlantic relationship.' The bloc is preparing a fresh round of retaliatory tariffs on US goods worth more than £60billion if a trade deal cannot be salvaged.
Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
Cuban economy continues five-year decline, economy minister says
HAVANA, July 14 (Reuters) - Cash-strapped Cuba's grueling crisis shows no signs of improvement, Cuban Economy Minister Joaquin Alonso said on Monday, announcing growth fell 1.1% last year on top of a 10% decline since 2019, official media reported. Alonso was speaking to the Cuban parliament's economic commission where he also indicated there was little hope for improvement this year, given toughening U.S. sanctions and a complicated international situation. The import-dependent Caribbean island nation has seen foreign currency revenues fall by around 30% in recent years, causing shortages of food, fuel, medicine and inputs for agriculture and manufacturing. A lack of fuel and equipment has crippled the energy grid, leading to daily blackouts in the Communist-run country of as much as 16 hours or more. Agriculture, livestock farming, and mining have fallen 53.4% over the last five years, and manufacturing 23%, Alonso reported. The minister was quoted as saying that this year and last had been marked "by the intensified impact of the blockade, the fierce persecution of financial flows, and barriers to international transactions that have hindered payments to suppliers." Alonso said hard currency earnings this year were 9% below the same period last year while imports were running 7% above last year's rate. "Cuba is importing more than it exports, which increases the debt," he was quoted as stating. The country last reported its foreign debt as $19.7 billion in 2020.
