
Najib gets nod to attend addendum hearing
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court has allowed Datuk Seri Najib Razak's application to attend the court hearing of his judicial review challenging the existence of his house arrest order.
A three-member bench led by Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim made the ruling after allowing Najib's lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah's application today.
Other members of the bench were Federal Court judges Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof and Datuk Hanipah Farikullah.
Federal Counsel Ainna Sherina Saipolamin, who appeared for the Attorney-General's Chambers, did not object to the former prime minister's application.
The A-GC filed the appeal after the Court of Appeal granted Najib permission to initiate a legal bid to review the existence of an addendum order and to adduce additional affidavits in support of his application.
On April 28, the same court unanimously granted the A-GC's leave (permission) application to present its arguments to overturn the Court of Appeal's ruling.
The top court said the proposed questions raised by Attorney-General (A-G) Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar had passed the threshold requirements for leave to be granted under Section 96 of the Courts of Judicature Act (CJA) 1964.
"The questions posed are novel and raise issues of public importance, which should be further ventilated before this court.
"The questions are of public importance and can provide guidance to the courts on the correct approach to adopt when dealing with the admission of or the addition of evidence.
"The questions also pertain to the role of the A-G in judicial review proceedings, particularly whether the A-G is duty-bound under the law to confirm the existence of and supply copies of the impugned documents.
"The applicant also seeks to argue whether the A-G has an obligation to defend or verify the evidence at the leave stage of judicial review proceedings, in light of the provisions of Order 53 of the Rules of Court 2012," said the court.
The hearing is scheduled to begin on July 1.
On Jan 6, a three-bench Court of Appeal panel led by Datuk Azizah Nawawi, in a split decision, also allowed Najib to adduce additional affidavits to support his application.
Other members of the bench were Datuk Azhahari Kamal Ramli and Datuk Seri Mohd Firuz Jaffril.
Firuz, when reading the majority decision, said the evidence concerned was not available when they (the appellant) initially filed the leave to initiate a judicial review before the High Court last year.
Meanwhile, Azizah, in her minority decision, said there was no appealable error made by the lower court in ruling that the evidence presented in the hearing was hearsay.
Najib claims that a royal addendum allows him to serve the remainder of his jail term under house arrest.
He is seeking a mandamus order compelling the respondents to confirm and disclose the existence of the alleged additional document dated Jan 29, 2024.
Najib is currently serving a six-year prison sentence after being convicted of misappropriating RM42 million from SRC International Sdn Bhd.
The High Court had sentenced him to 12 years in prison with a fine of RM210 million, and the verdict was subsequently upheld by the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court.
However, his prison sentence was halved to six years and his fine was reduced to RM50 million following his petition for a royal pardon.
Najib later filed an application on an alleged addendum order signed by the 16th Yang di-Pertuan Agong, allowing him to serve the remainder of his prison sentence under house arrest.
Previously, the High Court had dismissed his application.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Express
11 hours ago
- Daily Express
Peter Anthony's judicial review verdict on July 9
Published on: Saturday, June 28, 2025 Published on: Sat, Jun 28, 2025 Text Size: KOTA KINABALU: The Court of Appeal will decide on July 9 whether to allow Datuk Peter Anthony's judicial review against his conviction and three-year jail sentence for forging a UMS contract. The date was set during online case management on May 16. Peter, who has paid a RM50,000 fine, was found guilty by the Sessions Court in 2022, and his appeal was dismissed on March 4. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia


Free Malaysia Today
a day ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Ex-civil servant jailed 30 years for murdering infant daughter
Maidin Ibnuhashim was spared the minimum 12 strokes of the rotan as it was only imposed on male offenders aged 50 and below. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : A former civil servant has been sentenced to 30 years in jail for killing his nine-month-old daughter after the Federal Court allowed the prosecution's appeal to reinstate the murder charge. The three-member bench, sitting in Kota Kinabalu and chaired by Chief Judge of Malaya Hasnah Hashim, yesterday ruled that the prosecution had proven all the ingredients for murder during the trial. Hasnah said that Maidin Ibnuhashim had intended to inflict injuries on the infant, which ultimately caused her tragic death in 2018. Justices Hanipah Farikullah and Azizah Nawawi also heard the appeal. However, the bench opted to sentence Maidin, 60, to the minimum jail term of 30 years. He was spared the minimum 12 strokes of the rotan as it was only imposed on male offenders aged 50 and below. The court had the discretion to impose either the death penalty or a jail term ranging from 30 to 40 years. Maidin was initially charged with murdering his daughter, Nurul Shafika, at his rented home in Kampung Gersik Lama, Labuan, between Aug 10 and Aug 13, 2018. In 2022, the trial judge reduced the charge to culpable homicide not amounting to murder and sentenced Maidin to 18 years' imprisonment from the date of his arrest. Last year, the prosecution failed in its appeal to reinstate the murder charge, while Maidin's appeal for acquittal from the culpable homicide conviction was also dismissed. Both parties then filed fresh appeals to the Federal Court, with the prosecution succeeding this time. During the trial in the High Court, a child eyewitness testified that she saw Maidin dip his daughter's fingers and toes into hot water from a rice cooker, and hold her under a running tap, letting the water flow over her head and face. The witness also said Maidin slapped the baby's cheeks repeatedly whenever she cried, threw her onto a mattress – causing head injuries – and placed her in a baby swing that struck a cupboard several times. An autopsy conducted by pathologist Dr N Murali concluded that the cause of death was 'severe head injury in a child with soft tissue injuries to the face, mixed superficial and deep dermal burns over the fingers and toes, and underlying bronchopneumonia'. Deputy public prosecutor Eyu Ghim Siang appeared for the prosecution while David Tan represented Maidin.


Malay Mail
a day ago
- Malay Mail
It ain't over 'til it's over — Hafiz Hassan
JUNE 27 — An appeal is a creature of statute and will only lie if a statute gives such a right and then only within the limits which the statute giving the right stipulates. Accordingly, by reason of Section 87(1) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, an appeal lies to the country's apex court -- that is, the Federal Court -- from any decision of the Court of Appeal in its appellate jurisdiction in respect of a criminal matter decided by the High Court in its original jurisdiction. This means that the criminal trial must commence in the High Court, as the case was in the corruption case of former youth and sports minister Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman. Lawyer Hisyam Teh Poh Teik speaks to the press on behalf of Muar MP Syed Saddiq Abd Rahman as they walks out of the courtroom after facing the decision of his 4 charges here at the Palace of Justice. — Picture by Sayuti Zainudin Syed Saddiq was convicted by the High Court in 2023. On Wednesday (June 25), the Court of Appeal quashed the conviction, ruling unanimously that the High Court judge had erred in several decisions, and that there was no element of dishonesty when the former minister instructed his staff to remove money from Bersatu's youth branch Armada's bank accounts. The Public Prosecutor has not waited long to appeal against the acquittal having filed a notice of appeal the very next day (June 26). Syed Saddiq faces another court battle for his freedom. As the song goes, it ain't over 'til it's over. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.