logo
Why the date of Easter remains divisive four centuries later

Why the date of Easter remains divisive four centuries later

Independent19-04-2025
This Sunday will mark a special moment for Christians, as the Catholic and Orthodox churches celebrate Jesus' resurrection on the same day.
The rare alignment of the churches, which have been divided on the way to determine the date of Easter for more than 400 years, has sparked hopes for a permanently unified date, even drawing support from Pope Francis.
However, beneath the surface of this shared celebration lay lingering tensions and mistrust between the two major Christian communions.
Calendars and calculations differ
The movable date for Easter follows a seemingly straightforward rule: the Sunday following the first full moon on or after the spring equinox. But the two churches started using different calendars after Pope Gregory XIII's adaptation in 1582, when the Western church adopted the Gregorian calendar while the Eastern Orthodox Church kept the older Julian one.
Moreover, each church uses its own ecclesiastical calculations for lunar cycles and the equinox, which don't neatly match scientific projections.
The result is that Easter dates can be as much as five weeks apart. They can coincide in back-to-back years, or a decade can pass without it happening.
Pope Francis' wish
Days before his five-week hospitalisation, Pope Francis referred to this year's Easter celebration while invoking the 1,700th anniversary of the historic Council of Nicaea, when Christian leaders gathered to settle foundational disputes about the faith.
"Once again, I renew my appeal: Let this coincidence serve as a sign — a call to all Christians to take a decisive step toward unity around a common date for Easter,' Francis said while leading prayers at the Basilica of St. Paul in Rome.
Francis' invitation, delivered at the end of a prayer for Christian Unity with Orthodox priests present, wasn't new.
Returning from a trip to Turkey in 2014, he told reporters on the plane that a unified date would be logical.
'It is a bit ridiculous,' he said, then staged a pretend conversation: ''Tell me, your Christ, when is he resurrected? Next week? Mine was resurrected last week.''
He has found an ally in Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, a fellow octogenarian and spiritual leader of the world's Orthodox Christians. The two 'speak to one another like brothers,' Francis has said. For his part, Bartholomew has called Francis 'our elder brother' and described the Easter initiative as 'a real step toward repairing old conflicts.'
Only winners, no losers?
The idea of a common Easter has been discussed since the 1960s, with interest often peaking when celebrations coincide. The key obstacle has always been the implication that one side would need to concede.
Protestants, who follow the same calendar as Catholics, have also been in on the discussions.
The Geneva-based World Council of Churches — a fellowship of Orthodox and Protestant bodies — has proposed a compromise. It suggests using modern astronomy, basing the calculation on Jerusalem time and following the same basic rule set centuries ago.
'It has never been more important than now, because we live in a polarised world and people all over the world yearn for more unity,' Lutheran Bishop Heinrich Bedford-Strohm, a senior WCC official, said from his home outside Berlin. 'All other questions – on calendar, on time, on the moon and the stars and everything – it's not primary; it's secondary."
'Strings attached'
While the pope's wishes may carry powerful influence through the Vatican 's highly centralised authority, Bartholomew's role is largely symbolic over the self-governed national and local churches. And discussions between Russia, the Orthodox world's most populous country, and churches of other Orthodox-majority countries remain stalled due to the war and church divisions in Ukraine.
Further complicating prospects for consensus is a history characterised by centuries of mistrust, largely driven by wariness in the East about the Vatican 's supremacy.
At a Holy Week service on Monday in Athens, Father Anastasios welcomed parishioners into the Church of Saint Dimitrios Loumbardiaris, a restored stone chapel near the Acropolis.
He said he supports forging bonds with Christianity's other branches — but with caution.
'We can try to build bridges, but we cannot distort our faith or the traditions of our ancestors, or the dogmas Christ himself handed down," he said.
"There are deeply rooted differences. From my view and that of many people here, the unity sought in the past by the Roman Catholic Church often wasn't sincere; it came with strings attached, was more about dominance than genuine reconciliation.'
'Great harmony'
As dialogue between the churches slowly unfolds, common Easter celebrations are already a practical reality in a few places. The Orthodox Church in Finland switched dates in the 1920s to align celebrations with the Lutheran majority. And Catholics in Greece — while making no official change to their calendar — have celebrated with the rest of the country since 1970.
Joseph Roussos, a member of a Catholic community on the Greek island of Syros, took his first trip to the Vatican last month.
At age 67, he remembers when Easters in Greece were separate: when schools and shopkeepers on the island closed for different holidays, and the church bells tolled mournfully during two distinct Holy Weeks.
'It wasn't a good situation. But when we did celebrate Easter together, there was great harmony,' he said.
'We live very well (today), and it's truly beautiful. I hope it stays that way.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Could Danny Kruger save the Conservatives?
Could Danny Kruger save the Conservatives?

Spectator

timea day ago

  • Spectator

Could Danny Kruger save the Conservatives?

I've seen signs of life in the Conservative party – unlikely I know, but true. I had thought it a dead thing, dripping its life-blood slowly into Reform. But ten days ago I saw on YouTube a speech that a Tory MP gave in the House of Commons and… I don't know. I felt hope. The MP was Danny Kruger, member for East Wiltshire, and as it happens he's a friend of mine. I'll say straight away then that this is absolutely not an attempt to promote him as next leader, though the post-Kemi era does seem to be approaching fast. For one thing, Kruger is a middle-aged white Etonian, cursed by association with the last two Etonian PMs. For another, from what I've seen of it, high office acts like high altitude on humans. The rarified air gets to them in the end. They go crackers for want of normality, and when they descend their brains have changed. Fundamentally decent men become deluded – Rishi. The others – Boris – live as high-functioning addicts, dreaming of the next power-fix. So it's not that I have ideas about party leadership. It's just that I'd clean forgotten it's even possible for a politician to stick their neck out in public – to state simply what they believe – and how powerful that is. Kruger's speech, addressed to his fellow MPs, made the point that this country is Christian in its bones and in its beginnings and that, like it or not, through the parish system, we are all members of the Church of England. If there's a crisis in this country, he said, which there indisputably is – an epidemic of anxiety and hopelessness in the young, among adults even talk of civil war – then it's to Christianity that we should turn. I know: sky fairies and invisible friends – perhaps you thought we'd outgrown them. There are two religions moving into the space from which Christianity has been ejected, said Kruger. One is Islam; the other is wokery, which has become competitive oppression – victim-signalling, you could call it. 'I don't think that 'woke' does justice to its seriousness,' said Kruger. 'It is a combination of ancient paganism, Christian heresies and the cult of modernism all mashed up into a deeply mistaken and deeply dangerous ideology of power that is hostile to the essential objects of our affections and our loyalties: families, communities and nations… It must simply be destroyed at least as a public doctrine. It must be banished from public life from schools and universities and from businesses in public services.' It was a Thursday afternoon, about 4 p.m. when Kruger addressed the House. Most MPs, having lunched, had drifted back to their constituencies, so you have to picture the MP for East Wiltshire delivering this tub-thumper to an almost entirely empty chamber: row upon row of plump green benches, punctuated with just the odd crumpled suit. 'The fact is that the strong gods are back, and we have to choose which god to worship,' said Kruger, undaunted. 'I suggest we worship the God who came in the weakest form, Jesus Christ.' The room may have been empty but more than three million people have now watched the footage online. The comments keep rolling in, thousands of them: 'Don't worry, we're listening, Danny.' 'We're here even though your colleagues aren't. Bravo!' It's the response, as much as the speech, that has given me hope. For decades now, the Conservative party has considered Christianity embarrassing. And Danny Kruger's faith has cost him. He converted at a time when the only acceptable form of Christian faith in the Conservative party was the David Cameron sort – a faint and flickering radio signal, low vol. Even the friends we share from university will usually preface talk of meeting with a little verbal dance designed to ward off stigma: 'I'm having dinner with Danny, I mean, I can't stand Christians but…' I've often wondered how they'd react if they heard this in the context of another religion: 'I'm off to meet Sadiq. Yeah, I can't stand Muslims but…' Three years ago Kruger gave another speech in the Commons, this one about the importance of not importing American culture wars over abortion. In it, he reminded his peers that 'in the case of abortion' a woman's 'absolute right to bodily autonomy… is qualified by the fact that another body is involved'. He wasn't advocating changing the law, just reminding everyone that somewhere along the journey towards birth the baby acquires rights of its own. It was fascinating to me that as a result of this reasonable speech, Danny became unacceptable to whole swaths of his constituents – and how instinctive their reaction was. Asking reasonable, ethical conservatives to engage with his argument was like asking snakes to wrap themselves around a hot pipe. They'd wince and flail, sidle off. Too embarrassing. Not what People Like Us say. But the point for the party perhaps is that it's People Like Us who are now old hat. The world has changed, young people have changed. It's not the 1990s any more. Look at the growing appetite for Jordan Peterson, who points to the Bible as a store of wisdom. Look at The Spectator's recent 'Recovering the Sacred' event. Damian Thompson, presenter of the Holy Smoke podcast, presided; the editor spoke alongside two priests and a Regius Professor of Divinity. The event was sold out. My Catholic priest friend who has a church in central London says that the size of his congregation has doubled, and it's young people from all over the world filling the pews. Orthodox Christianity is on the rise in America, Catholicism in France. And Danny's right, the old gods are back, too. In Silicon Valley, among the young tech lords who actually shape our future, the talk is about which of the biblical demons they are summoning as AI evolves. I'm serious about this. It's normal in the valley to discuss Moloch and Ba'al over sushi. There's an opportunity here, but only if the Conservatives have the courage to embrace this country's founding faith.

The asylum hotel crisis will cost Labour
The asylum hotel crisis will cost Labour

Spectator

timea day ago

  • Spectator

The asylum hotel crisis will cost Labour

Yvette Cooper doesn't do holidays, which is probably just as well since she is the minister who, this summer, holds Labour's fate in her hands. During the Easter break, the Home Secretary, her husband Ed Balls and their adult children holidayed in Madrid. Cooper went every day to the British embassy to check emails and make secure phone calls to London. Balls tells a story about a camper van trip to New England in 2015, when Cooper was running for the Labour leadership. 'After a few early mornings spent sailing her into the middle of the lake near their campsite so she had enough signal to call her campaign team in London, he sent her home,' a family friend recalls. 'As much as any politician since Gordon Brown, she treats time off as something to be endured to keep her family happy, rather than something to be enjoyed.' Cooper now needs to deploy Gordon Brown's clunking fist if she is to get to grips with the unrest on Britain's streets over illegal immigrants housed in 'asylum hotels'. Small boat arrivals so far this year exceed 24,000, a 50 per cent rise on last year. This is a disaster for Labour for three reasons. First, each new arrival adds to the pressure on public services and the asylum system. Then there's the fact that the boats highlight government failure, further diminishing public trust in the political class. Finally, migration is cripplingly expensive. Some 110,000 asylum seekers are awaiting a decision while the government pays £5.8 million a day to house 32,000 of them in 210 hotels – down just two since the election, despite a manifesto pledge to 'end asylum hotels'. In 2024-25 the hotel bill was £2.1 billion, down from £3 billion in 2023-24. The average nightly bill also fell to £119 in March this year from £162 in March 2023. Voters view these sums as grotesque. While 35,000 failed asylum seekers, foreign criminals and other immigration offenders have been returned or deported since the election, most of these were not small boat arrivals. The hoteliers are making a killing. Clearsprings, Serco and Mears made profits of £380 million over the past five years. The Home Office has ended a contract with Stay Belvedere hotels, which provided more than 50 sites, but other contracts (which run until 2029) mean efforts to move migrants to cheaper hotels are legally impossible. Cooper is trying instead to trigger clauses on excess profits to claw back cash. Lawyers are also cashing in. Between March and December last year alone, some 45,787 legal aid claims were granted at an average cost of £827 per case. Many MPs gaze enviously at Donald Trump's approach. On his first day in office he declared a 'national emergency' and sent 7,000 troops to the border with Mexico. This year 300,000 undocumented immigrants have been arrested by America's Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE), with 139,000 deported by April. Up to 3,000 are now incarcerated in cages at an abandoned airport in the Florida Everglades, dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz'. Crossings from Mexico, meanwhile, fell to 7,000 in March, compared with 137,000 in March last year. It's easy to see why, on his visit to Turnberry this week, Trump said of Keir Starmer and Nigel Farage: 'The one that's toughest and most competent on immigration is going to win the election.' But it is not as simple as aping Trump's toughness. The President's 'Big Beautiful Bill' earmarked $170 billion for immigration enforcement over the next four years, including $75 billion for ICE. Contrast that with Rachel Reeves's public spending review, when the headline on immigration was an extra £280 million a year by 2028‑29 for the Border Security Command. For every £100 Trump has splurged, the Chancellor is spending 20p. And border security was one of the few 'winners'. Cooper and Home Office Permanent Secretary Antonia Romeo face cutting resources for immigration enforcement teams who process removals and increase the speed of decisions. In Whitehall, the blame is directed at Darren Jones, the chief secretary to the Treasury, and Conrad Smewing, the Treasury's director general of public spending. After one meeting where London Mayor Sadiq Khan and Met commissioner Mark Rowley warned of policing pressures, Jones told officials: 'The problem with the police is they always want shiny new walkie-talkies.' The Home Office argued that for every additional 100 caseworkers, 1,400 extra foreign criminals per year would be processed and sent back. Smewing said: 'Only an imbecile would believe any of that.' The Chancellor and Prime Minister were preoccupied with trying to find cash for the U-turns on winter fuel and disability benefits cuts. By the time they got involved, they were warned that helping Cooper would mean unpicking the whole spending review. 'Reeves sided with Jones and Starmer refused to interfere,' an official said. There were even more heated clashes over Cooper's immigration white paper which tightened the rules around work and student visas. The Treasury quoted models by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which say migration boosts growth. 'Every last one of them, from Rachel down, is obsessed with the OBR forecasts,' says an aide. The result is that some of those who overstay their visas end up in migrant hotels, a clear economic cost rather than a gain. With Reform and the Tories hammering Labour on immigration and its links with crime, and ministers openly talking about a summer of social unrest, this parsimony looks like a false economy and an even worse political mistake than Reeves's decision to slash winter fuel payments. Cooper, by contrast, has been radicalised in the Home Office. When Kurdish parents in France argued they should be able to come to Britain to be with their children, aged five and nine, who had crossed the Channel in a small boat, Cooper defied human rights campaigners, telling officials: 'I'm not creating a precedent where someone can abandon their kids on a boat and join them on the Eurostar a week later.' France took the children back. Insiders say there is 'no squeamishness' in government about tough measures and Starmer has a 'high risk appetite' to legal challenge. Some suggest even Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, has been a 'problem solver' in trying to plot a path through the legal weeds. But all radical solutions are expensive. Rupert Lowe, the ex-Reform MP, costed his plan for mass detention and deportation at £47.5 billion over five years. Negotiations continue to create 'return hubs' and deals with other countries. But more radical proposals risk blowback. Closing the hotels would, according to government estimates, increase homelessness from 4,600 rough sleepers to more than 30,000. Using the Royal Navy to force the boats back to France, as some on the right have urged, risks an end to limited co-operation by the French. On the day in May when more than 1,100 migrants crossed the Channel, several French units were withdrawn from the coast to deal with rioting in Paris after the Champions League final. Cooper's team hopes a recent pilot deal with France will 'imminently' show that migrants can be returned. While images of French police slashing an inflatable trafficker 'taxi boat' were popular in the UK, they sparked fury in the French media. The solution may have to be legal. Work is under way on legislation to make it harder for the courts to use Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the 'right to a family life', to keep people in the UK. But Labour is being outflanked. Kemi Badenoch is expected to outline how the Tories would leave the ECHR at their party conference in October. A Reform source, reflecting on how the middle ground on immigration is racing to the right, said: 'The Overton window is on rails. It wouldn't surprise me if Labour go into the next election promising to deport hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants.' Even Labour figures close to No. 10 think Starmer will have to challenge the Strasbourg court to change or leave the convention – something Hermer violently opposes. A loyalist MP says: 'Unless Keir stands up and says: 'I'm Mr Human Rights and even I think this doesn't work any more', then I don't see how we win the next election.' If he wants to avoid that scenario, Starmer needs to give Cooper more resources, or both of them will have time for a much longer summer holiday in 2029.

Missionaries secretly evangelizing uncontacted Amazonian tribes with Bible-reciting audio devices
Missionaries secretly evangelizing uncontacted Amazonian tribes with Bible-reciting audio devices

Daily Mail​

time2 days ago

  • Daily Mail​

Missionaries secretly evangelizing uncontacted Amazonian tribes with Bible-reciting audio devices

Bible-preaching devices have been found in a remote indigenous village, sparking fears that Christian missionary groups are targeting uncontacted and isolated tribes, despite strict bans. According to reports, solar-powered devices with audio recitals of Biblical passages in Portuguese and Spanish have been discovered among the Korubo people. The tribe, who live in the Javari valley, near the Brazil-Peru border, are under strict protection by the Brazilian government. Military police stationed near the protected region have also reported mysterious drones flying overhead, according to a joint investigation by The Guardian and Brazilian newspaper O Globo. Sgt Cardovan da Silva Soeiro said he was ordered to shoot them down but was unable to. He said: 'I aimed my rifle, but the drone fled at high speed. It seemed very sophisticated.' He also reported the presence of missionaries he believes to be associated with Jehovah's Witnesses who live in nearby towns. Before the pandemic, a group of American and Brazilian evangelicals were accused of plotting to reach the Korubo using seaplanes to map trails and locate their settlements. A court order barred them from entering Indigenous land. The small yellow and black devices found near the tribe are distributed by In Touch Ministries. One recites a line from Philippians that encourages listeners to reflect on the death of Apostle Paul. The evangelical group's head, Seth Grey, has confirmed that the devices are intended for indigenous groups and are loud enough to be heard by up to 20 people. They feature inspirational talks by an American Baptist and can even work off-grid, due to their solar-powered nature. Locals say seven devices, called Messenger, have been discovered so far. But only one has been photographed. A message on the device says: 'Let's see what Paul says as he considers his own life in Philippians chapter 3, verse 4: "If someone else thinks they have reasons to put confidence in the flesh, I have more".' Grey has claimed to have delivered 48 of the devices to another tribe, but says his organization do not enter areas where contact is forbidden. Grey added that he is aware of missionaries who wander into places where they are prohibited. The Brazilian government prohibits any form of proselytizing in Indigenous territories unless the community themselves initiates contact. The Korubo are considered a recently contacted group and remain highly vulnerable to outside influence and disease, against which they have no immunity. As a result of their recently contacted status, missionary groups are keen to make contact and preach the gospel to them. The device is now in the possession of Maya, the matriarch of the Kurobo community, who has refused to hand over the device to authorities. For years, missionary groups have tried to convert indigenous people to Christianity. One of the most infamous cases of this is that of John Allen Chau, who in 2018 was killed by the Sentinelese people after going into the territory in an attempt to preach to them. In April, Mykhailo Viktorovych Polyakov, an American tourist, was arrested for trying to make contact with the same group that killed Chau.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store