FDA to end dozens of 'obsolete' rules for U.S. food items
July 16 (UPI) -- The federal government says its ending a whole slew of "obsolete" U.S. food standards that Trump administration officials say also include "unnecessary" ones.
"I'm eliminating outdated food regulations that no longer serve the interests of American families," stated U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced that it's revoking, or proposing to revoke, 52 federal standards for scores of food products in items such as canned fruit, vegetables, dairy, baked goods and macaroni products.
It will also apply to areas of food safety, packaging, manufacturing and production practices and nutrition information, labeling and claims on American-made products.
A proposal targets 23 types of product -- bakery, noodle and macaroni products, canned fruit juices, fish and shellfish along with flavoring and food dressings.
Kennedy said his new U.S. food policy changes marked a "crucial step in my drive to cut through bureaucratic red tape, increase transparency and remove regulations that have outlived their purpose."
In March he had ordered the FDA to revise its rule allowing food companies to "self-affirm" the safety of its own ingredients.
FDA officials say Wednesday's unveiling is the first round of results in the ongoing review of its portfolio of over 250 "Standards on Identity," with a goal to "make sure they are useful, relevant and serve consumers."
"Antiquated food standards are no longer serving to protect consumers. It is common sense to revoke them and move to a more judicious use of food standards and agency resources," said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary.
The Food and Drug Administration now contends that additional consumer protections mixed with advances in food science, production and agricultural practices have made it "unnecessary" to keep many of the older "recipe standards."
A direct rule, which came with a proposed companion in case of a legal challenge, ends federal guidance and standards on 11 types of canned fruits and vegetables the FDA claimed is "no longer sold in U.S. grocery stores."
It included seven rules for artificially-sweetened fruits with saccharin or sodium saccharin.
The other proposed revocation of standards looks at 18 dairy product types to included certain milk and cream items, frozen desserts, cheese and cheese-related products.
"The removal of these standards is in alignment with broader efforts to ensure that HHS is directing resources to where they're most needed," which federal officials say is in "delivering better outcomes for the American people."
For example, an FDA analysis concluded that "little to no market" existed for dairy products like Goat's milk ice cream, acidified milk and acidified sour cream. It also included a plethora of cheese lines: Caciocavallo siliciano, Low sodium cheddar, Low sodium colby, Cook cheese, koch kaese, Gammelost, High-moisture jack, Nuworld, Samsoe, Mellorine and Sap sago cheese.
In 1939, the U.S. government created food standards for a multitude of consumer and public health-related reasons part of massive social changes that took place under the administration of then-President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Kennedy's FDA under HHS argued that "many" of the "outdated and unnecessary" federal standards predate later requirements on American consumer protections on public issues such as ingredient safety and labeling.
"Because few products covered by these food standards are currently marketed, revoking these 13 food standards would affect few small businesses," according to government officials.
The agency claimed that with these changes, small businesses as a result may see "benefits of additional flexibility in product development."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
2 minutes ago
- UPI
House passes bill cutting $9B in foreign aid, public broadcasting
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., early Friday celebrated the House's passing of a bill to claw back $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting funds. File Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI | License Photo July 18 (UPI) -- The U.S. House of Representatives early Friday passed President Donald Trump's bill to rescind some $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting funds. The bill passed the House in a 216-213 vote held just after midnight. Two Republicans -- Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Michael Turner of Ohio -- crossed the aisle to join their Democratic colleagues in voting against the measure. The bill now goes to the president's desk for his signature. "President Trump and House Republicans promised fiscal responsibility and government efficiency. Today, we're once again delivering on that promise," House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said in a statement following the vote. The House vote comes a day after the Senate passed the bill, also mostly along party lines. Once signed into law by Trump, the bill will cut about $8 billion from foreign aid programs and about $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds local news and radio infrastructure, including NPR and PBS, though only a small portion of their budgets are covered by federal funds. Both government-funded media and foreign aid have been targets of the Trump administration and Republicans who have come to characterize both as so-called liberal agendas. "The woke and weaponized NPR, PBS and USAID have been ELIMINATED," Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tenn., said on X following the vote. "Promises made, promises kept." Trump has been seeking to shrink the government and curb wasteful spending, and he has taken to attacking the Corporation for Public Broadcasting over its connections to NPR and PBS, which he has accused of being biased media. Democrats have protested the cuts on the grounds that doing so hurts the United States' soft power while reducing funds for nonpartisan media especially hurts those in rural areas. The vote also comes after the Trump administration was able to pass its massive tax and spending cuts bill last month, which is projected to add trillions to the deficient. While the Congressional Budget Office said Trump's bill would add $3.3 trillion to the deficit, the Cato Institute states it could be as much as $6 trillion. Trump was able to have the bill passed by a divide Congress despite not only Democrats but some Republicans voicing criticism over the programs it cuts and tax cuts it gives to the wealthy, while adding to the deficit. The $9 billion clawed back early Friday will have little impact on lowering the deficit. "This package eliminates $9 billion in unnecessary and wasteful spending at the State Department, USAID and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. The American people will no longer be forced to fund politically biased media and more than $8 billion in outrageous expenses overseas."
Business Insider
28 minutes ago
- Business Insider
GE Earnings: GE Aerospace Stock Jumps as Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates
GE Aerospace (GE) stock jumped on Thursday after the American aircraft company reported its Q2 2025 earnings. It started with adjusted earnings per share of $1.66, which beat Wall Street's estimate of $1.43. It also represented a 38% year-over-year increase from $1.20. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. Revenue reported by GE Aerospace was $11.02 billion, compared to analysts' estimate of $9.59 billion. The company's revenue also rose 21% from the $9.09 billion reported in Q2 2024. GE Aerospace Chairman and CEO H. Lawrence Culp, Jr., highlighted 'free cash flow nearly doubling and more than 20% growth in orders, revenue, operating profit, and EPS.' GE stock was up 0.26% in pre-market trading on Thursday, following a 0.57% gain yesterday. This extended the company's 60.12% year-to-date rally and 67.23% climb over the past 12 months. GE Aerospace Outlook GE Aerospace updated its outlook in this earnings report. It now expects 2025 adjusted EPS to range from $5.60 to $5.80, compared to its previous guidance of $5.10 to $5.45. The company also raised its adjusted revenue growth guidance to be in the mid-teens instead of the low double digits. Wall Street's estimates include adjusted EPS of $5.57 and revenue of $39.72 billion in 2025. GE Aerospace also raised its guidance for 2028 in its latest earnings report. It predicts adjusted EPS of approximately $8.40, alongside double-digit CAGR from 2024 to 2028. It hadn't previously provided an EPS estimate for this period, and its prior CAGR guidance was for a high-single-digit increase between 2025 and 2028. Is GE Aerospace Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold? Turning to Wall Street, the analysts' consensus rating for GE Aerospace is Strong Buy, based on 12 Buy and one Hold rating over the past 12 months. With that comes an average GE stock price target of $250.20, representing a potential 5.97% downside for the shares. These ratings and price targets will likely change as analysts update their coverage after today's earnings report.
San Francisco Chronicle
31 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's tariff pressure pushes Asia toward American LNG, but at the cost of climate goals
HANOI, Vietnam (AP) — Asian countries are offering to buy more U.S. liquefied natural gas in negotiations with the Trump administration as a way to alleviate tensions over U.S. trade deficits and forestall higher tariffs. Analysts warn that strategy could undermine those countries' long-term climate ambitions and energy security. Buying more U.S. LNG has topped the list of concessions Asian countries have offered in talks with Washington over President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs on foreign goods. Vietnam's Prime Minister underlined the need to buy more of the super-chilled fuel in a government meeting, and the government signed a deal in May with an American company to develop a gas import hub. JERA, Japan's largest power generator, signed new 20-year contracts last month to purchase up to 5.5 million metric tons of U.S. gas annually starting around 2030. Liquefied natural gas, or LNG, is natural gas cooled to a liquid form for easy storage and transport that is used as a fuel for transport, residential cooking and heating and industrial processes. Trump discussed cooperation on a $44 billion Alaska LNG project with South Korea, prompting a visit by officials to the site in June. The U.S. president has promoted the project as a way to supply gas from Alaska's vast North Slope to a liquefication plant at Nikiski in south-central Alaska, with an eye largely on exports to Asian countries while bypassing the Panama Canal Thailand has offered to commit to a long-term deal for American fuel and shown interest in the same Alaska project to build a nearly 810-mile (1,300-kilometer) pipeline that would funnel gas from The Philippines is also considering importing gas from Alaska while India is mulling a plan to scrap import taxes on U.S. energy shipments to help narrow its trade surplus with Washington. 'Trump has put pressure on a seeming plethora of Asian trading partners to buy more U.S. LNG,' said Tim Daiss, at the APAC Energy Consultancy, pointing out that Japan had agreed to buy more despite being so 'awash in the fuel' that it was being forced to cancel projects and contracts to offload the excess to Asia's growing economies. 'Not good for Southeast Asia's sustainability goals,' he said. LNG deals could derail renewable ambitions Experts say LNG purchasing agreements can slow adoption of renewable energy in Asia. Locking into long-term deals could leave countries with outdated infrastructure as the world shifts rapidly toward cleaner energy sources like solar or wind that offer faster, more affordable ways to meet growing power demand, said Indra Overland, head of the Center for Energy Research at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. Building pipelines, terminals, and even household gas stoves creates systems that are expensive and difficult to replace—making it harder to switch to renewables later. 'And you're more likely then to get stuck for longer,' he said. Energy companies that profit from gas or coal are powerful vested interests, swaying policy to favor their business models, he said. LNG burns cleaner than coal, but it's still a fossil fuel that emits greenhouse gases and contributes to climate change. Many LNG contracts include 'take-or-pay' clauses, obliging governments to pay even if they don't use the fuel. Christopher Doleman of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis warns that if renewable energy grows fast, reducing the need for LNG, countries may still have to pay for gas they no longer need. Pakistan is an example. Soaring LNG costs drove up electricity prices, pushing consumers to install rooftop solar panels. As demand for power drops and gas supply surges, the country is deferring LNG shipments and trying to resell excess fuel. The LNG math doesn't add up Experts said that although countries are signaling a willingness to import more U.S. LNG, they're unlikely to import enough to have a meaningful impact on U.S. trade deficits. South Korea would need to import 121 million metric tons of LNG in a year — 50% more than the total amount of LNG the U.S. exported globally last year and triple what South Korea imported, said Doleman. Vietnam — with a trade surplus with the U.S. twice the size of Korea's — would need to import 181 million metric tons annually, more than double what the U.S. exported last year. Other obstacles stand in the way. The Alaska LNG project is widely considered uneconomic. Both coal and renewable energy in Asia are so much cheaper that U.S. gas would need to cost less than half its current price to compete. Tariffs on Chinese steel could make building building gas pipelines and LNG terminals more expensive, while longstanding delays to build new gas turbines mean new gas power projects may not come online until 2032. Meanwhile, a global glut in LNG will likely drive prices lower, making it even harder for countries to justify locking into long-term deals with the United States at current higher prices. LNG deals raise energy security concerns Committing to long-term U.S. LNG contracts could impact regional energy security at a time of growing geopolitical and market uncertainties, analysts said. A core concern is over the longterm stability of the U.S. as a trading partner, said Overland. 'The U.S. is not a very predictable entity. And to rely on energy from there is a very risky proposition,' he said. LNG only contributes to energy security when it's available and affordable, says Dario Kenner of Zero Carbon Analytics. 'That's the bit that they leave out ... But it's pretty important,' he said. This was the concern during the recent potential disruptions to fuel shipments through the Strait of Hormuz and earlier during the war in Ukraine, when LNG cargoes originally destined for Asia were rerouted to Europe. Despite having contracts, Asian countries like Bangladesh and Sri Lanka were outbid by European buyers. 'Events in Europe, which can seem very far away, can have an impact on availability and prices in Asia,' Kenner said. Asian countries can improve their energy security and make progress toward cutting carbon emissions by building more renewable energy, he said, noting there is vast room for that given that only about 1% of Southeast Asia's solar and wind potential is being used. 'There are genuine choices to meet rising electricity demand. It is not just having to build LNG,' he said. Jintamas Saksornchai in Bangkok contributed to this report. ___ Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receive support from several private foundations. See more about AP's climate initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
