Divya Deshmukh's winning moment captured on camera as Nagpur girl defeats Koneru Humpy in Women's Chess World Cup
She is now the 88th Grandmaster of the country and follows Humpy, R. Vaishali, and Harika Dronavalli in taking the prestigious Grandmaster title.
However, after winning the match against Koneru Humpy, Divya could not hold her emotions and the camera caught her in tears.
Even after winning the match, she sat in the chair for a while, trying to recognise what she had achieved. Apart from the coveted trophy, Divya will now receive $50,000 as part of the prize money.
Sharing the moment on social media, the International Chess Federation took to X and wrote, "Divya Deshmukh defeats Humpy Koneru to win the 2025 FIDE Women's World Cup."
Apart from this, the International Chess Federation also shared another video of Divya hugging her mother on X, writing, 'Divya's hug to her mother says everything.'
Earlier on Saturday and Sunday, Divya played two classical games with Koneru, which resulted in a draws. On Monday too, she was again held to a draw in the time-controlled tie-breaker. However, in the reverse game she managed to overcome the two-time world rapid champion 2.5-1.5.
Following the victory against an opponent twice her age, Divya couldn't control her tear and said, as quoted by PTI, "I need time to process it (win). I think it was fate, me getting the Grandmaster title this way because before this (tournament) I didn't even have one (GM) norm, and now I am the Grandmaster."
Divya has now secured a spot in next year's Candidates tournament, which would decide who will take on world champion Ju Wenjun of China in the Women's World Championship.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
England vs India: Lack of trust in No 3 and wicket-keepers behind leaving out Kuldeep Yadav from playing XI
Will Kuldeep Yadav get his first game of the series in the final Test of this long tour? The team management is considering that option but it's not going to be an open-and-shut case. Unfortunately for Kuldeep, according to those in the know, it isn't his skill or talent that the decision-makers doubt. What keeps him out of the team is the unreliability of India's frontline batsmen – namely the No.3 and, surprisingly, also the wicket-keepers. At the start of the tour, it was Rishabh Pant and now it's his replacement Dhruv Jurel. And also the local conditions. More about how The Oval might not be ideal for Kuldeep later. First the wicket-keepers. Pant has been an enigma for the cricketing world, and also for the team. When dealing with him, the Indian decision-makers stick to 'believe in God but lock your car' philosophy. He has been an asset to the team but not quite a steady stock – before this Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy series. At one point, there was a school of thought that plans can't be formed around someone with the habit of leaping down the track in the first over he faces. And certainly not someone who has scored just one fifty in nine innings in Australia, India's last Test outing before the England tour. It's not that those with correct strokes and conventional outlook towards scoring runs don't have bad patches. They also fail but it's human to trust a textbook cricketer playing in a time-tested manner. If a mathematician has to describe the Indian batting line-up, KL Rahul and Shubman Gill will be constants and batsmen like Pant the variables. On this tour, Pant was becoming one of the constants. In his seven innings here, he has two 100s and three 50s. But just when the team management was getting used to the runs coming from down the order, India's most comfortable-looking batsman on the tour was hit on the foot by a full ball – the fracture ruling him out of the remainder of the series. In Pant's place comes Jurel, who has played just one Test outside India. His outing at Perth wasn't too long. The other Virat Kohli-sized hole in the middle order is at the No.3 spot where Sai Sudharsan and Karun Nair haven't yet given confidence to the team management. They have been given chances but have shown a tendency to get out to innocuous balls and not score in crunch situations. They don't seem to be putting a high price on their wicket. In case India had a settled No.3 and a wicket-keeper playing percentage cricket, Kuldeep would have been a sure-shot selection in most Tests in England. That hasn't happened so India faces the old question again: Should they go with the specialist left-arm wrist-spinner or stick to pace all-rounder Shardul Thakur? Batting coach Sitanshu Kotak, like many other Team India coaches who have faced the media, explained the complexity of the Kuldeep call. He was asked a pertinent question about playing four specialist bowlers from 8 to 11 – in other words Kuldeep and three pure pacers. Kotak took his time to say that 'scoring 550 to 600 runs is as important as taking 20 wickets' and it was by scoring runs that they won their only Test of this series at Edgbaston. 'Once you play with five bowlers, everyone has to bowl well. In case you play with six bowlers, one of them can be under-bowled. And if that bowler is an all-rounder, you know he will also contribute in batting. But if he happens to be a pure bowler … when you look back at the game, you will think that instead of an extra bowler, if we had a batsman…' he explained the quandary. Kotak indicated that it's always easy to be wise after a game. Before it, the only thing the team management can do is think of playing a balanced side. But he still didn't rule out Kuldeep. 'That also depends on the wicket and what we feel about it .. the captain and coach will take a look at the pitch and decide who they will play.' Now to the pitch and the question of adding Kuldeep to the spin department that has un-droppable all-rounders Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar. Can India play three spinners at The Oval? Historically, the venue helps spinners but this time around, the domestic games here have seen teams scoring in the range of 250-300 with pacers doing most of the damage. This is clear from the new addition to the England squad – homeboy Jamie Overton. With offie Shoaib Basher injured and Liam Dawson not really effective at Manchester, England will focus on their quicks. Overton joins Gus Atkinson, another Surrey boy, who know his way around The Oval. Does that mean India will play Jasprit Bumrah? That looks unlikely but can't be ruled out. If the World No.1 bowler sits out, India in all likelihood will play Mohammed Siraj, Akash Deep and, finally, Arshdeep Singh. Is it worth burdening Bumrah with extra workload? It was something that coach Gautam Gambhir, at one point on this tour, was dead against. But then India's only win on this tour came when Bumrah wasn't in the XI. And has he become less impactful with the new ball and gotten slower as the series has progressed? At The Oval, India need to bring out stone, paper and those sharp scissors.
Hindustan Times
10 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
BCCI medical team tells Jasprit Bumrah not to play fifth Test against England, replacement confirmed: Report
Despite being 1-2 down and the enticing prospect of levelling the series by winning the fifth and final Test at The Oval, knocking at the doors, the BCCI medical has reportedly taken the tough call of resting Jasprit Bumrah from the Oval Test. According to an ESPNCricinfo report, Bumrah, the World's No.1-ranked bowler, will not play in the fifth Test of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy to protect his back, keeping the long-term prospects in mind. A fit-again Akash Deep is set to replace Bumrah in India's XI. India's Jasprit Bumrah(PTI) Even before the start of the series, the Indian team management, led by head coach Gautam Gambhir and Bumrah himself, had announced that he would be available for only three of the five Tests as his body would not allow more than that. The last time Bumrah tried to put his body on the line in Australia, he ended up aggravating his back injury, which could potentially shorten his career. Despite all this, there were murmurs of Bumrah giving it one final rip at the Oval to help India square the series. After all, he hasn't bowled since the morning of Day 4 of the fourth Test in Manchester. But as it turned out, the combination of just a three-day break, a likely lifeless Oval pitch and workload management prompted India not to risk Bumrah. This comes hours after batting coach Sitanshu Kotak did not rule out Jasprit Bumrah's participation in the series decider. "Bumrah is fit now, according to his load. He has bowled one inning in the last match. So that obviously the head coach, our physio and captain will have a discussion and decide. There has been no discussion," Kotak said two days before the game. At Old Trafford, Gambhir had also confirmed that all his pacers were fit, meaning that Arshdeep Singh and Akash Deep have recovered from injuries. Bumrah, India's highest wicket-taker in the series so far, bowled 33 overs – his most in an innings – in Manchester. This came after he had bowled his heart out at Leeds and Lord's. Who will replace Bumrah? What about Siraj? Akash Deep, who missed the fourth Test due to a groin injury, is set to return to the XI after regaining his full fitness. Akash Deep was India's hero with the ball in Edgbaston, where he picked up 10 wickets. Arshdeep Singh is also set to get his Test cap. He will replace Anshul Kamboj while Mohammed Siraj is all but certain to play his fifth Test in a row.
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Underbowled and underwhelming: the curious case of India's fourth seamer
India is at sixes and sevens when it comes to properly utilising its fourth seam bowler. Of the 672.1 overs bowled by the visitors against England in the four Tests so far, the fourth pacer has delivered just 55 overs. It is not a secret that the current Indian team is big on having as many all-rounders as possible in the playing XI. The fourth seamer has also been selected bearing in mind the player's batting prowess and that's why Shardul Thakur (first and fourth Tests) and Nitish Kumar (second and third Tests) got the nod. Ideally, the captain should have confidence in the fourth pacer's abilities to keep things tight and provide the strike bowlers a breather. But the number of overs given to the 'fourth man' suggests otherwise. It is not as if India did not require the services of its back-up pacer in the series, given that England has batted for more than 80 overs in five of its seven innings so far. After the second day's play at Old Trafford, Shardul was given the unenviable task of explaining why he was not getting to bowl more. 'Usually, the captain takes the call. The player doesn't have much of a say. If we talk about the first Test, he said there was no chance of bowling, and I said okay. As far as this match is concerned, the way the game has progressed, I could have been given two more overs. But there is a lot of time left in the game. Hopefully, I'll get more bowling,' Shardul had said. And the next day's proceedings started with him bowling the first over! However, that proved to be a false dawn as skipper Shubman Gill employed him just for one over and change ends for Mohammed Siraj and Jasprit Bumrah. Shardul also did not help his case as he had leaked 35 runs in his five overs the previous day. Even with the injury concerns for lead pacers Bumrah and Siraj during the game, Shardul sent down only 11 of the 157.1 overs India bowled in the fourth Test. Intentional Bowling coach Morne Morkel did not shy away from revealing that India relying more on the top speedsters was intentional. 'A bit of a tough fit when you have four seamers... when you're going at five runs an over, I think as a captain, you want to bring the strike bowlers back to try and take the wickets. Unfortunately, it happened for Shardul in the first Test as well,' Morkel said after the third day's play in Manchester. England's marathon first innings had not finished by then and India had to bowl another 22.1 overs to dismiss the hosts. The workload for the fourth pacer on day four of the fourth Test: zero (no overs). Don't put all your eggs in one basket is timeless wisdom; yet, it was almost as if India was happy to pin all its hopes on the main pacers running through the England batting line-up. There's a chance it may work, as it did when Akash Deep and Siraj took 17 of the 20 English wickets to bowl India to a famous victory in the Edgbaston Test. But such a performance should be treated as an outlier and not the norm. As Morkel briefly touched upon during the press conference, the fourth seamer's high economy-rate would have made it difficult for the skipper to depend on the option heavily. The Indian think-tank should have presumed that the Bazballing English batters would target the weak link before turning their attention to the others. Either India was okay with the fourth seamer bowling less, or it was caught blindsided by the Englishmen's aggressive approach to the back-up pacer. Neither option reflected well on the team's decision-making. The Lord's Test was the one occasion where England batted conservatively, and this showed in Nitish's figures. His tally of 17 overs in the first innings of the third Test remains the most by an Indian fourth pacer in the series. Nitish's economy rates in that match (3.64 and 4) read better compared to what the Englishmen plundered off him and Shardul in the series. But to hope that England will use that strategy in every match is not smart thinking. A major part of winning a Test and being a champion side is to have the ability to take 20 wickets consistently. And India will have to be brave in its selection and stop prioritising safety-net runs from the fourth seamer. 'What is coming through for everyone, despite India's heroism with the bat, is that the selections have been quite poor. We saw what Shardul was capable of in the first Test. Despite that, he was picked again. And we saw the repeat of that inclination to have a bowler who can bat a bit. I think that thought has to be dumped,' Sanjay Manjrekar told ESPNcricinfo after the fourth day of the Old Trafford Test. Instead of looking for more runs from its lower-order, what India needs is a crafty bowler who can add depth and variety to the attack. K.L. Rahul, Gill, Washington Sundar, and Ravindra Jadeja's tenacious show in the second innings to earn a memorable draw at Old Trafford has been proof enough that the batting is in good shape and hands. 'It has been hard to understand why India looks to get players who have two skills rather than just go for quality. Kuldeep Yadav not playing so far tells you the approach of this Indian team management. They say that India needs 20 wickets, but it's going to be difficult to convince me, because if that was the case, Kuldeep would have played by now,' Manjrekar added. 'Kuldeep as fourth seamer' Ahead of the fourth Test, former India off-spinner R. Ashwin had suggested that India play left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep 'in the role of the fourth seamer.' As weird as it may sound, there is some merit to the idea. Kuldeep's inclusion would have given another potent weapon for Gill to turn to. It also would have been a safe bet that Kuldeep would bowl more than the 11 overs Shardul did at Old Trafford. 'You should look at Kuldeep as the fourth seamer and play him according to that role. He could come in handy in the second innings and towards the fag end of England's batting. Kuldeep could be a handful even on day one. He can definitely play the role of the fourth seamer,' said Ashwin on his YouTube channel. As Gill's men approach the fifth Test, there are two big questions: will Kuldeep be the 'fourth seamer' and whether the visitors can square the series at The Oval? The answers are just around the corner.
