
Landgraf talks ESAs at chamber reception
State Rep. Brooks Landgraf, R-Odessa, was among the group. Landgraf said the legislative session is off to a good start, although it's going to be a tough time for consensus building across the state.
"We have a lot of contentious issues; a big development in the House yesterday, as the committee assignments were finally made. We have a house that's organized; a lot of consolidated committees, so things are going to look a lot different this session. I'm very honored that I've been named, again, to be chairman of the House Environmental Regulation Committee, which is really important for us in the Permian Basin. But with committee assignments made, bills are continuing to be filed. I'm ready to get to work," Landgraf said.
There is currently a bill filed by Rep. Briscoe Cain, HB 2736, which would require a two-thirds (66%) vote to authorize the issuance of bonds or to increase taxes. This issue is also part of Gov. Greg Abbott's Property Tax Relief emergency item.
Landgraf said he shares Abbott's goal of property tax relief and there are bills that would do that without changing majority rule in Texas.
"I think that we can achieve the same goal of having property tax relief for all Texans without having to change the way that we deal with property tax increases at the local level. I know it's a concern for a lot of our local taxing entities. On one hand, we do want property tax relief for all Texas property taxpayers. On the other hand, we want to make sure that institutions like Odessa College have the resources that they need to be able to fulfill their mission. They've done a great job of it over their multi-decade history. With the great leadership that we have in place, (President) Dr. (Gregory) Williams and his board and faculty and staff, I think that they can continue to do that, and that goes for a lot of other local government entities that we have here in the Permian Basin," Landgraf said.
Voter turnout in Ector County is usually low.
Landgraf said majority rule is a foundational principle.
"If you change that threshold too much, then it potentially comes a situation where you can have a very small group of voters" carrying the will of the majority, he said.
"There does seem to be something incompatible with that when it comes to our Constitutional Republic," Landgraf added.
On the subject of Education Savings Accounts, or vouchers, Landgraf said Abbott has made school choice an emergency item.
"The Texas Senate has already passed SB 2, which would provide Education Savings Accounts up to about $10,000 for about 100,000 students," he said.
"There is a lot of momentum behind this. As I mentioned, the Senate has already passed it. The House is probably going to come up with its own proposal that's going to look different, and then there will be some work between the House and the Senate. I do expect that there will be some sort of Education Savings Account legislation that passes. My goal for all of this is for ESAs is to be part of a larger legislative package where we can actually make educational opportunities for every student in Texas better, and that means that we also have to make sure that we are taking care of our K through 12 students in public schools all across the state, including Ector County ISD, including Monahans, including Kermit, Wink, Grandfalls, all of our school districts need to have plenty of support from the state. Our teachers need pay raises. They need to have a competitive advantage.
"I think that we can provide more school choice options, but we also need to make sure that students who are going to continue to rely on public schools have a good, good option within that when it passes," Landgraf said.
Part of SB 2 allows $2,000 for Education Savings Accounts for homeschool children whose families opt into that program. But it's not mandatory.
"It's purely optional, but if the family decides to do that and they want $2,000 to help cover the costs of homeschool education from books, supplies, learning programs, things like that, then they could be eligible for that Education Savings Account under the proposal. But there are also strings that come attached with that, like a testing requirement and some other oversight from the state," Landgraf said.
He added that he has gotten a lot of feedback from homeschool parents who want absolutely nothing to do with an ESA because they like having that autonomy.
They like being able to make all those decisions themselves.
"I've actually heard from a lot of homeschool parents saying we don't want these vouchers. We don't even want you to pass them. That's been an interesting dynamic to see, but I've gotten a lot of feedback from all sides on this issue," Landgraf said.
Out of the 100,000 or so students who could get Education Savings Accounts, 80% are targeted as low-income or learning disabled students. Students who have special needs that require special education. That makes up about 80% of the program now and then the other 20% would be open to everybody, all students in Texas.
"That's a bit of the balance, but it does seem to prioritize private schools. Of course, charter schools are public. They don't have tuition, and so they wouldn't be covered by these Education Savings Accounts just the same way that ISD students wouldn't be," Landgraf said.
The way the SB 2 Education Savings Accounts are set up, it's purely voluntary for students to participate. It's also voluntary for a private school to participate.
"There's nothing that would compel a private school to accept a student the way that state law requires public schools to accept students who live in their designated neighborhoods. ... I do think that (it) could create some opportunities, not necessarily in West Texas. I don't know that it would have a tremendous impact, just because we don't have the volume of students here in the way that inner-city, Houston, does.
"I think it could create some opportunities for students who are in failing school districts in Houston who literally don't have any other options because there just isn't anything there for them without having some sort of financial assistance," he added.
Landgraf said he's talked to a lot of private schools in West Texas who don't want the ESA program because they're already at capacity and have waiting lists.
"And they would rather not have the strings that would be attached to any ESA," he added.
There is a lot of opposition to ESAs, but there is also a lot of support for having an ESA program that provides choice for students who don't have it.
"I think it's more of a principle thing for a lot of people. There's a lot of support on both sides. I will say that the anti-ESA crowd is definitely better organized and speaking a little bit louder. But there's also some misinformation on both sides about what this ESA does do. I want to be very clear that the ESA, even in SB 2 as proposed, would not dismantle public schools. It would only have an impact over 100,000 out of almost 6 million school children in Texas. We're talking about a very small percentage of students. What that means is, if we're only pulling about $1 billion, we're dedicating about $1 billion dollars to an ESA program when we're spending $96 billion on public education throughout the state; $1 billion is not going to defund $96 billion. I do want to be clear that this ESA program is not a silver bullet that's going to fix everything that's wrong with education in Texas. It's also not going to be something that can dismantle public education in Texas as we know it," Landgraf said.
He added that ESAs can be used by public school students for supplemental training, tutoring and for online education programs.
"There are also other opportunities that all students can take advantage of if they have special needs, what they need, after-school tutoring or online tutoring, things like that so there are other ways that even public school students can take ESA program," Landgraf said.
He noted that a lot of people think that there's no accountability that goes with this public money for private schools in SB 2.
"Yes, we do need to have accountability for that public money. The ESAs do not require students to take the STAAR exam, just a nationally norm referenced test, which can be a much more efficient standardized test. I think if that's good enough for ESAs it should be good enough for every student in Texas. I think there is also an opportunity to use this ESA conversation to really get some much needed reform to scrap the STAAR exam in Texas for all students," Landgraf said.
He also said there is nothing that would suggest SB 2 affects teacher retirement.
"I'm a huge proponent of retired teachers. I know that there's a narrative that's floating around out there that this would defund the pensions for retired teachers. That's something that I'm very sensitive about," Landgraf said.
In the last legislative session with the help of Texas voters, a lot of money was allocated to make sure that the Teacher Retirement System is actuarily sound for years to come.
Calculators on social media give figures on how much districts would lose if ESAs passed. Landgraf said he has seen them and said with 100,000 students spread across the state it's not going to take away from, especially rural school districts, where there aren't any private school options.
"The math doesn't actually work out. Again, I respect everybody for having very deeply held views on this issue, but again, from a policymaker's perspective, if we keep this about facts, then it's going to be a much better conversation. The fear tactics don't really resonate with me. I've got to look at the facts, and in a lot of cases, these generators showing how much money would be lost are not accurate," Landgraf said.
While the ESA program would start small, Landgraf said it would be up to future legislators to decide whether it will grow.
"It's always a possibility. It's also a possibility that if it's a dismal failure, it can be scrapped altogether. But if it's a success, then it can grow. I think we should allow it to grow or contract based on its own merits," Landgraf said.
Odessa Chamber of Commerce President/CEO Renee Earls said they have had receptions for elected officials throughout the years.
"We have the pleasure of meeting our elected officials on a regular basis. We can call them. We can talk to them. We meet with them on issues. But many of our members don't have that opportunity so really, this is for our members to get to meet them, visit with them, begin a relationship with them, and then later down the line, if they need something, they know who to call," Earls said.
The officials that are not elected are still a big part of the community.
Earls said they will be hosting a reception for newly minted ECISD Superintendent Keeley Boyer sometime in March.
"We wanted to see how successful it would be. (We) really had no idea what to expect, and so we threw it out there" and it's been successful, Earls said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republicans plan to use threat of third Trump impeachment as key issue to boost their standing in midterm races
Republican strategists say they plan to make a major midterm talking point from the threat of a third impeachment against Donald Trump that could come if Democrats retake the House. 'We know what the stakes are in the midterm elections,' John McLaughlin, a Trump pollster, told NBC News. 'If we don't succeed, Democrats will begin persecuting President Trump again. They would go for impeachment.' Right now, Republicans hold an eight-seat advantage in the House, walling the president off from a third impeachment, but that could change if the Democrats surge in 2026, as the president's party typically suffers during midterm elections. Still, according to Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., who led the party's second impeachment against Trump over the January 6 insurrection, the Democrats themselves plan to focus more on what they see as the president's 'terrible agenda.' 'We've already impeached him twice,' Raskin told NBC. 'So obviously that's not a complete solution, given that he is able to beat the two-thirds constitutional spread. So I don't think anybody thinks that's going to be the utopian solution to our problems.' Both House impeachments — first for an alleged offer of quid pro quo with Ukraine to go after Joe Biden, then for the Capitol riot — did not have enough votes to secure convictions in the Senate. During the second Trump administration, the president has continued to face attempts to initiate new impeachment trials, including from Michigan Democrat Shri Thanedar in the spring and a June effort over the administration's Iran strikes, though none of these have come to pass. Impeachments may not be coming any time soon, but Republicans face a variety of other risks to their three-party majority control of the federal government. The president's job approval rating has dipped to 37 percent, according to Gallup, the lowest of this term and just above Trump's lowest-ever approval rating, driven by hemorrhaging support from independent voters. A majority of Americans also oppose his signature One Big, Beautiful Bill, which contains a series of tax cuts and restrictions on social programs like Medicaid. The party also continues to face fallout and internal division over the White House's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files scandal, in which Trump and his allies campaigned on releasing materials related to the notorious financier's sexual misconduct, only to backtrack as more information concerning Epstein and Trump's long-time friendship came to light. The president has lashed out at his own base for seeking information about the scandal, which he calls a Democratic 'hoax,' while House Speaker Mike Johnson effectively ended business in the lower house until after its upcoming summer recess to avoid Democratic amendments calling for the release of the files. Meanwhile, former White House ally (and GOP mega-donor) Elon Musk has vowed to form his own political party, in the face of disagreements with the Trump administration over spending policy and the Epstein saga. There could also be blowback to economic conditions if the Trump administration's repeatedly delayed double-digit tariffs take full effect on major U.S. trading partners.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mike Johnson says Ghislaine Maxwell coming clean on Epstein case would be ‘a great service to the country'
Speaker Mike Johnson called on Jeffrey Epstein's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, to come clean and told Americans that he "hoped" she could be trusted as he faces the growing uproar around the White House's handling of the investigation. Johnson appeared Sunday on NBC's Meet the Press, where moderator Kristen Welker asked him point-blank if the convicted sex-trafficker girlfriend of Epstein could be trusted to accurately testify about the crimes she and Epstein committed. Epstein was awaiting prosecution for sex trafficking underage girls after a previous conviction on similar charges when he died in federal custody. Maxwell has been thrust back into the spotlight as the MAGA base has grown frustrated with President Donald Trump and his administration's shutting down of the so-called Epstein files release. Last week, a top Department of Justice official met with Maxwell about the case. "Well, I mean, look; it's a good question. I hope so," Johnson told Welker in response. "I hope that she would want to come clean." "I hope she's telling the truth. She is convicted, she's serving a 20-year sentence for child sex trafficking. Her character is in some if she wants to come clean now, that would be a great service to the country. We want to know every bit of information that she has." The House Oversight Committee voted this week to issue a subpoena for Maxwell after the Justice Department announced its own plans to speak with her. Agency officials did so for nine hours between Thursday and Friday, after making a statement seeming to confirm that her testimony hadn't been aggressively sought before. Some have called Maxwell to testify and suggested she should be given a pardon for sharing what she knows about the Epstein case. She was convicted of sexual abuse against minors and sex trafficking for helping Epstein carry out crimes. Johnson touted the Oversight subpoena favorably Sunday, casting it as evidence that GOP leadership supported efforts aimed at transparency. The Trump administration turned speculation about Epstein's death and the so-called 'Client List' of his co-conspirators into a raging wildfire in early July. The Justice Department and FBI published a joint memo explaining that future releases from the files would not take place, and that the list of Epstein's accomplices was not found. Epstein was rumored to have cultivated personal relationships with many powerful men and institutions. Critics of the president have alleged that a cover-up is in the works regarding the Epstein files. Democrats have hammered the president for his reversal, and a pair of scoops from the Wall Street Journal have reported on the president's connections to Epstein, to Trump's fury. The newspaper reported the contents of a message allegedly penned by Trump to Epstein as part of a 50th birthday celebration in 2003, including allusions to a shared 'secret' between them. Trump firmly denied authoring the note, and sued the Journal and its reporters in response. A second article from the Journal days later reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi informed Trump in May that he was mentioned in the Epstein investigation multiple times, but it was not clear in what context. The White House called that story 'fake' and has repeatedly insinuated that Democrats including Joe Biden tampered with evidence while Trump was out of office. Being mentioned in the files does not mean wrongdoing, and hundreds of names are reportedly included. The lead GOP co-sponsor behind a House resolution that would force the Justice Department to release the entirety of its collected evidence related to Epstein said Sunday that his push was to help the convicted pedophile's victims and would only grow stronger in the coming weeks. Earlier on the same network, Rep. Thomas Massie appeared alongside the resolution's lead Democratic co-sponsor, Rep. Ro Khanna, as the two promoted a resolution that would force Attorney General Pam Bondi to release 'all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials' related to the Epstein and Maxwell investigations. Massie told Welker that 'the release of the Epstein files is emblematic of what Trump ran for' and explained that the president's MAGA base expected results. 'There seems to be a class of people beyond the law, beyond the judicial all thought that when Trump was elected, he would be the bull in the china shop and break that all up,' said Massie. Massie went on to say that the Trump administration had lost his trust on the issue after publicly supporting transparency around the investigation, then doing an abrupt about-face. The administration is now calling on its supporters to move on from the issue and focus on hashing out issues with the 2016 'Russiagate' investigation instead of Epstein. Top administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, also spent months calling for the very releases the Justice Department says it won't authorize. 'People who were allegedly working on this weren't sincere in their efforts,' Massie said. 'Somebody should ask Speaker Mike Johnson, why did he recess Congress early so that he didn't have to deal with the Epstein issue?' 'Politics is the art of the doable. There's enough public pressure right now that we can get 218 votes and force this to a vote on the floor,' said Massie. He also firmly rejected a DOJ memo explaining the administration's position against further releases of information from the Epstein files, despite the very public promises of Bondi and others to do the opposite. In the memo, agency officials said that explicit imagery involving children was 'intertwined' throughout the files collected by the Justice Department. Some have said the files should not be released to protect sex-abuse victims of both Maxwell and Epstein. 'That's a straw man [argument],' Massie responded on Sunday, after Welker read part of the memo. 'Ro [Khanna] and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names would be redacted, and that no child pornography will be released.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jasmine Crockett unleashes on Ghislaine Maxwell talking to Trump DOJ before Congress: ‘Out of jail for free'
Rep. Jasmime Crockett wants Ghislaine Maxwell — who is serving a 20-year sentence for aiding sex trafficking financier Jeffrey Epstein — to testify before Congress before she speaks under oath to the Trump Justice Department. US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, President Donald Trump's former personal attorney, will meet with Maxwell on Thursday in Florida, where she is serving out her two-decade sentence for scheming with the late pedophile power-player to sexually exploit and abuse young women and girls. The meeting comes just a day after the House Oversight Committee, on which Crockett sits, voted to subpoena Maxwell. On Wednesday, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer issued a subpoena and set Maxwell's deposition date for Aug. 11. 'I don't know that we'll get anywhere, but I know if there's anybody that I want to talk to her, it is us — and not the administration — because at least if she comes before the committee, even if it's behind closed doors, it will be bipartisan,' Crockett, a frequent Trump antagonist, told The Independent. 'It won't just be one side able to ask questions, it'd be both sides, whereas the administration, they're a bunch of thugs,' she railed. 'And frankly, if it means that she can engage in a coverup, he'll most likely let her out of jail free. He's let people out of jail for far less.' This comes after the Department of Justice released a two-page memo on July 6 saying that Epstein, the convicted pedophile, had no 'client list' and died of suicide in his New York City jail cell, where he was found hanged by bed sheets. But Crockett, who spoke to The Independent before Comer issued his subpoena, also cautioned that she did not know if they would actually hear testimony from the once high-flying former socialite Maxwell. 'I don't know if she has appeals that are pending, and I'm sure that her attorneys will have some issues, some questions surrounding so it's more complicated than just subpoenaing her,' the Democrat said. 'We can subpoena all we want to. We have had a number of transcribed interviews as well as depositions over the last two weeks, and frankly, a lot of them ended with nothing because people invoked privilege and things like that.' Crockett has become a fundraising dynamo because of her combative style of questioning on the Oversight Committee and her willingness to joust with Republicans in the majority. But she recently lost her bid to replace the late Gerry Connolly (D-VA) as the top Democrat on the committee to Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA). Garcia told The Independent that subpoenaing Maxwell does not mean the committee trusts her to be truthful. 'She's a documented liar, she's obviously done an enormous amount to harm young girls and and and has an interest, of course, in, in being free,' Garcia said. 'We should still want to have her come testify in front of oversight in the Congress, but, but we should just be very we should understand that this is a very complex witness and someone that has caused great harm and not a good person to a lot of people.' The House of Representatives broke a day early after the House Rules Committee ground itself to a halt because Democrats continued offering amendments to release files related to Epstein. In an attempt to mollify Democrats and some conservatives, Republicans proposed a non-binding House resolution to get the Department of Justice to release files. In addition, Rep. Thomas (R-KY) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) have a discharge petition, which would force a vote and circumvent Speaker Mike Johnson, to release files related to Epstein. Massie, a critic of Trump, accused Johnson of covering for the president. 'He doesn't want a paper-thin sliver of daylight between him and the president, and so that's why he's avoided taking even the symbolic vote on the non-binding resolution,' Massie told The Independent. Trump, a friend of Epstein's for many years before a falling out that appears to have come before it was publicly known the financier was being investigated over his sex trafficking, has criticized his supporters and others for focusing on the Epstein case. He also vehemently denied a story in The Wall Street Journal that he sent Epstein a note for the disgraced financier and predator's 50th birthday party and also filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the newspaper and its owners News Corp and Rupert Murdoch, among others.