Musk may have changed US government forever. Is that a bad thing? You tell us.
USA TODAY Opinion has been covering the 100th day milestone with our usual vigor. Some of you even helped us do it. But while you can expect more of that coverage to roll out this week, we think it's time to give Elon Musk some attention.
He did, after all, take up much of our collective focus these past three months. Whether using DOGE to lay off federal workers, taking the political stage with a literal chainsaw or watching Tesla's stocks plummet, Musk has been very busy trying to help Trump establish and enforce the MAGA vision for America.
Your Turn: Trump is doing an amazing job. America needed an overhaul. | Opinion Forum
And now, it appears Musk's time is winding down as he prepares to refocus on things like Tesla. Early news reports were that Musk would stay away at the 130-day mark at the end of May, but it now appears he might go part-time.
Either way, it seems his role is diminishing. So, today we're asking our readers – that's you – how they feel about Musk.
This might be the last time we ask, so feel free to let your voice be heard. Fill out the form below or email us at forum@usatoday.com with the subject line "Forum Elon Musk." We'll use some of your responses as part of our upcoming Forum roundup.
We'll even get your creative juices flowing. Consider some of these questions:
Do you think Elon Musk has helped the country shrink our federal government?
Do you think everything Elon Musk did on behalf of Trump was all for show?
Are you glad or upset to see Elon Musk step aside from his DOGE work?
How comfortable are you with a private citizen having that much power in our government, regardless of who the president is?
Do you want to take part in our next Forum? Join the conversation by emailing forum@usatoday.com.You can also follow us on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and sign up for our Opinion newsletter to stay updated on future Forum posts.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Is Elon Musk stepping down? Should he? Take our poll | Opinion
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lucid (NASDAQ:LCID) Posts Q2 Sales In Line With Estimates But Stock Drops
Luxury electric car manufacturer Lucid (NASDAQ:LCID) met Wall Street's revenue expectations in Q2 CY2025, with sales up 29.3% year on year to $259.4 million. Its non-GAAP loss of $0.24 per share was 11.1% below analysts' consensus estimates. Is now the time to buy Lucid? Find out in our full research report. Lucid (LCID) Q2 CY2025 Highlights: Revenue: $259.4 million vs analyst estimates of $259.1 million (29.3% year-on-year growth, in line) Adjusted EPS: -$0.24 vs analyst expectations of -$0.22 (11.1% miss) Adjusted EBITDA: -$632.1 million vs analyst estimates of -$624.3 million (-244% margin, 1.2% miss) Operating Margin: -310%, up from -393% in the same quarter last year Free Cash Flow was -$1.01 billion compared to -$741.3 million in the same quarter last year Sales Volumes rose 38.2% year on year (70.5% in the same quarter last year) Market Capitalization: $7.40 billion "We had our sixth consecutive quarter of record deliveries in Q2 and expect to continue this trend as we ramp up Lucid Gravity production in the second half of the year," said Marc Winterhoff, Interim CEO at Lucid. Company Overview Founded by a former Tesla Vice President, Lucid Group (NASDAQ:LCID) designs, manufactures, and sells luxury electric vehicles with long-range capabilities. Revenue Growth A company's long-term sales performance is one signal of its overall quality. Any business can experience short-term success, but top-performing ones enjoy sustained growth for years. Luckily, Lucid's sales grew at an incredible 280% compounded annual growth rate over the last four years. Its growth beat the average industrials company and shows its offerings resonate with customers. Long-term growth is the most important, but within industrials, a stretched historical view may miss new industry trends or demand cycles. Lucid's annualized revenue growth of 11% over the last two years is below its four-year trend, but we still think the results suggest healthy demand. We can dig further into the company's revenue dynamics by analyzing its number of units sold, which reached 3,309 in the latest quarter. Over the last two years, Lucid's units sold grew by 41.5% annually. Because this number is better than its revenue growth, we can see the company's average selling price decreased. This quarter, Lucid's year-on-year revenue growth of 29.3% was excellent, and its $259.4 million of revenue was in line with Wall Street's estimates. Looking ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to grow 121% over the next 12 months, an improvement versus the last two years. This projection is eye-popping and suggests its newer products and services will spur better top-line performance. Here at StockStory, we certainly understand the potential of thematic investing. Diverse winners from Microsoft (MSFT) to Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO) to Monster Beverage (MNST) could all have been identified as promising growth stories with a megatrend driving the growth. So, in that spirit, we've identified a relatively under-the-radar profitable growth stock benefiting from the rise of AI, available to you FREE via this link. Operating Margin Lucid's high expenses have contributed to an average operating margin of negative 477% over the last five years. Unprofitable industrials companies require extra attention because they could get caught swimming naked when the tide goes out. It's hard to trust that the business can endure a full cycle. On the plus side, Lucid's operating margin rose over the last five years, as its sales growth gave it operating leverage. Still, it will take much more for the company to reach long-term profitability. This quarter, Lucid generated a negative 310% operating margin. Earnings Per Share Revenue trends explain a company's historical growth, but the change in earnings per share (EPS) points to the profitability of that growth – for example, a company could inflate its sales through excessive spending on advertising and promotions. Although Lucid's full-year earnings are still negative, it reduced its losses and improved its EPS by 24.2% annually over the last two years. In Q2, Lucid reported adjusted EPS at negative $0.24, up from negative $0.31 in the same quarter last year. Despite growing year on year, this print missed analysts' estimates. We also like to analyze expected EPS growth based on Wall Street analysts' consensus projections, but there is insufficient data. Key Takeaways from Lucid's Q2 Results We struggled to find many positives in these results. Its EPS missed and its sales volume fell short of Wall Street's estimates. Overall, this was a softer quarter. The stock traded down 8.4% to $2.23 immediately following the results. Lucid may have had a tough quarter, but does that actually create an opportunity to invest right now? What happened in the latest quarter matters, but not as much as longer-term business quality and valuation, when deciding whether to invest in this stock. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here, it's free. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Boston Globe
22 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Lawmakers push efforts to ban ICE from wearing masks at Boston legislative summit
ICE officials say agents have been wearing masks to avoid publicly exposing their identities and personal information. Advertisement In a statement to the Globe, a senior official with the Department of Homeland Security said that ICE officers are facing an 830 percent increase in the number of assaults against them, and condemned efforts to prohibit officers from wearing masks. 'These are repulsive messaging bills that stoke dangerous anti-ICE rhetoric for cheap political points and fundraising emails,' the official said. 'Sanctuary politicians are trying to outlaw officers wearing masks to protect themselves from being doxxed and targeted.' In early July, Advertisement 'With transparency, identification, and reason there should be no need for disguises when performing their duties to the communities they serve,' Hawkins said on Tuesday. Lawmakers said such legislation is meant to promote accountability for all law enforcement, and would also reduce the chances of law enforcement officers being impersonated. New York State Senator Patricia Fahy, a Democrat who is sponsoring a similar legislation in New York, said the practice of federal immigration agents arresting and detaining people while wearing masks, plainclothes, and using unmarked cars 'should shock the collective conscience.' 'A dangerous line is being crossed here,' Fahy said. 'Immigration enforcement is really turning into more of a paramilitary type secret police.' A number of Republican lawmakers 'It's meant for the intimidation of the officer and their families,' said Representative Scott Sharp, a Kentucky Republican and retired law enforcement officer. 'I can't see any other reason to do it.' Representative Bob Lewis, a Kansas Republican, echoed the sentiment. '[ICE agents] are acting in an official capacity, not personal,' Lewis said. 'They are doing their jobs.' Amy Carnevale, the chair of the Massachusetts Republican Party said in a statement that the Massachusetts bill put immigration officers' lives at risk. Advertisement 'Far-left activists have doxxed and assaulted ICE officials and agents in the field,' she said. In Massachusetts, mask-wearing ICE officers provoked public outcry earlier this year, when agents wearing face coverings whisked Tufts student Rümeysa Öztürk off a Somerville street in broad daylight in March — 'I didn't think that they were the police because I had never seen police approach and take someone away like this,' Öztürk wrote. Federal officials have said in various public statements that immigration agents When DHS officers conduct operations, they 'clearly identify themselves as law enforcement, while wearing masks to protect themselves' from gangs like Tren de Aragua and MS-13, the DHS official said, as well as from others who have committed crimes. 'The men and women of ICE put their lives on the line every day to arrest violent criminal illegal aliens to protect and defend the lives of American citizens,' the statement said. ICE's acting director, Todd Lyons, has strongly 'I'm sorry if people are offended by them wearing masks, but I'm not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line and their family on the line because people don't like what immigration enforcement is,' Lyons said during a June press conference in Boston, where the agency announced that federal officials Advertisement During a trial last month in Boston federal court regarding a lawsuit brought by higher education organizations over the Trump administration's policies of arresting and detaining noncitizen students and pro-Palestinian activists, Patrick Cunningham, an assistant special agent in charge at the Homeland Security Investigations office in Boston, which is part of ICE, told the court there was no specific policy on masking that he was aware of within the agency. He said it was up to the 'personal choice' of each agents as to whether or not they want to wear face coverings. 'They might wear them because they want to protect their identity,' Cunningham said, particularly in the 'age of camera phones, and the ability of people to identify those agents.' Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio can be reached at
Los Angeles Times
22 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump names himself chair of L.A. Olympics task force, hinting at wider role
WASHINGTON — In past Olympic Games held on American soil, sitting presidents have served in passive, ceremonial roles. President Trump may have other plans. An executive order signed by Trump on Tuesday names him chair of a White House task force on the 2028 Games in Los Angeles, viewed by the president as 'a premier opportunity to showcase American exceptionalism,' according to a White House statement. Trump, the administration said, 'is taking every opportunity to showcase American greatness on the world stage.' At the White House, speaking in front of banners adding the presidential seal to the logo for LA28, Trump said he would send the military back to Los Angeles if he so chose in order to protect the Games. In June, Trump sent the National Guard and U.S. Marines to the city amid widespread immigration enforcement actions, despite widespread condemnation from Mayor Karen Bass and other local officials. 'We'll do anything necessary to keep the Olympics safe, including using our National Guard or military, OK?' he said. 'I will use the National Guard or the military. This is going to be so safe. If we have to.' Trump's executive order establishes a task force led by him and Vice President JD Vance to steer federal coordination for the Games. The task force will work with federal, state and local partners on security and transportation, according to the White House. Those roles have been fairly standard for the federal government in past U.S.-hosted Olympic Games. But Trump's news conference could present questions about whether a president with a penchant for showmanship might assume an unusually active role in planning the Olympics, set to take place in the twilight of his final term. There is ample precedent for military and National Guard forces providing security support during U.S.-hosted Olympic Games. But coming on the heels of the recent military deployment to Los Angeles, Trump's comments may prove contentious. French president Emmanuel Macron was a key figure in preparations for last year's Paris Games, including expressing his vocal support for the ambitious Olympic opening ceremony plan to parade athletes down the Seine River on boats. Many officials were concerned about potential threats along the 3.7-mile stretch, but authorities responded by increasing security measures that included up to 45,000 police officers and 10,000 soldiers. The task force, to be housed within the Department of Homeland Security, will 'assist in the planning and implementation of visa processing and credentialing programs for foreign athletes, coaches, officials, and media personnel,' the executive order said. City officials have expressed concern that the president's border policies could deter international visitors and complicate visa processing for Olympic teams. More concentrated involvement from Trump could spell further strain with Los Angeles city officials, who sought to make nice in the wake of devastating January fires, but have fiercely bucked Trump's recent immigration offensive. Trump swiped at Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass during his remarks on Tuesday, calling her 'not very competent' and criticizing the pace of city permitting for fire rebuilding. (Bass did not immediately respond to a request for comment.) Known for her coalition-building skills, Bass is not, by nature, a public brawler. In the aftermath of the Palisades fire, she appeared determined to preserve her fragile relationship with the president — and the billions of dollars of federal aid her city was depending on — responding diplomatically even as he publicly attacked her. But that determined cordiality crumbled when masked immigration agents and military personnel descended on the city. With troops stationed in the city and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal authorities arresting undocumented immigrants at courthouses, car washes and Home Depot parking lots, Bass took on Trump forcefully. At news conferences and in interviews, she accused the president of waging 'an all-out assault on Los Angeles, inciting chaos and fear and using the city as 'a test case for an extremist agenda.' Casey Wasserman, chairman of LA28, attended the White House event, thanking Trump for 'leaning in' to planning for an Olympics that was awarded to Los Angeles during his first term. 'You've been supportive and helpful every step of the way,' Wasserman said, noting that the Games would amount to hosting seven Super Bowls a day for 30 days. 'With the creation of this task force, we've unlocked the opportunity to level up our planning and deliver the largest, and yes, greatest Games for our nation, ever.' Wasserman will also have a delicate political balancing act, managing a Games in a deep-blue city with a famously mercurial Republican president in office. A Hollywood scion and sports and entertainment mogul, Wasserman has long been a prominent Democratic donor known for his close relationship with the Clintons. But in recent months he has diversified his giving, with hefty donations to the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the National Republican Congressional Committee and House Speaker Mike Johnson's leadership fund. Wasserman has publicly praised Trump's commitment to the Games and traveled to Mar-a-Lago in January to meet with the incoming president. Presidents have long played a role in the Games. In 1984, Ronald Reagan formally opened the Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, becoming the first American president to do so. Reagan attended several Olympic events, but repeatedly emphasized the federal government's role was focused on security, according to the White House Historical Assn. The Olympic Charter requires the host country's head of state to officially open the Games, but before Reagan, the duty had been fulfilled by local political leaders or vice presidents representing the president. The federal government has historically provided significant funding when the Games are hosted on U.S. soil, with financial support going toward both security and infrastructure. Leading up to the 1996 Games in Atlanta, the federal government spent $227 million on security and transportation, playing 'very much a junior partner' to the Olympic Committee, then-Vice President Al Gore said at the time. Still, a bombing at the Centennial Olympic Park during the games that summer shook the security establishment. The 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City were the first Games to be classified as a 'National Special Security Event,' the government's highest security rating for any event that designates the U.S. Secret Service as the lead agency for implementing security. That standard has remained in place for U.S.-held Olympic Games ever since. The Secret Service will also lead security coordination for the 2028 Games. The federal government was particularly involved in the Salt Lake City games, which were held just months after the 9/11 attacks. Los Angeles leaders are actively involved in the security planning, and are currently in negotiations with LA28 for the use of the city's police, traffic officers, and other employees during the Olympics and Paralympics. Security, trash removal, traffic control, paramedics and more will be needed during the 17-day Olympics and the two-week Paralympics the following month. Under the 2021 Games agreement between LA28 and the city, LA28 must reimburse Los Angeles for any services that go beyond what the city would provide on a normal day. The two parties must agree by Oct. 1, 2025, on 'enhanced services' — additional city services needed for the Games, beyond that normal level — and determine rates, repayment timelines, audit rights and other processes. Overtime for Los Angeles police officers, and any other major expenses, would be acutely felt by a city government that recently closed a nearly $1-billion budget deficit, in part by slowing police hiring. Times staff writer Dakota Smith contributed to this report.
