Indian fishermen nabbed Sri Lanka because their rights given up during Emergency: EAM Jaishankar
The agreement with Sri Lanka would not have been possible if a genuine Parliament functioned at that time, Jaishankar said at an event organised by the BJP Yuva Morcha to mark the 50th anniversary of the Emergency.
Big decisions were sometimes taken without any parliamentary debate during the time, he said.
Play Video
Pause
Skip Backward
Skip Forward
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
0:00
Loaded
:
0%
0:00
Stream Type
LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
1x
Playback Rate
Chapters
Chapters
Descriptions
descriptions off
, selected
Captions
captions settings
, opens captions settings dialog
captions off
, selected
Audio Track
default
, selected
Picture-in-Picture
Fullscreen
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text
Color
White
Black
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Text Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Transparent
Caption Area Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Transparent
Semi-Transparent
Opaque
Font Size
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
200%
300%
400%
Text Edge Style
None
Raised
Depressed
Uniform
Drop shadow
Font Family
Proportional Sans-Serif
Monospace Sans-Serif
Proportional Serif
Monospace Serif
Casual
Script
Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values
Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
"We hear about our fishermen arrested by Sri Lanka. The reason is that an agreement was entered into during Emergency under which the rights of the fishermen for fishing in some sea waters of Sri Lanka was abandoned," Jaishankar said.
Had a genuine Parliament functioned at the time, there would have been a debate and this decision would not be accepted, the minister said.
Live Events
The consequences of this decision are still visible in Tamil Nadu, he added.
Jaishankar said the image of India as the oldest, largest democracy in the world took a beating when Emergency was imposed on June 25 1975. He also recalled his own experiences of police raids at hostels of the Jawaharlal Nehru University and his family's links with leaders like George Fernandes.
"I heard from my seniors in the foreign service how difficult it was to defend India after the murder of the Constitution and democracy by the imposition of Emergency," he said.
In a broadside against the Gandhis, Jaishankar said an Emergency situation arises when the "family" is kept ahead of the country. "Some people keep the copy of Constitution in their pockets but have other feelings in their hearts," he said in a dig at Congress leader Rahul Gandhi.
He said people should be empowered to avoid any situation in the future because an empowered public would never let it happen.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
18 minutes ago
- India Today
Socialist Mamdani faces backlash over mother Mira Nair's $2-million house
With only four months remaining until New York City elects its new mayor, the race is hotting up. While at least three other candidates are in the fray, Zohran Mamdani, born to parents Mira Nair and Mahmood Mamdani, both of whom have Indian roots, is under particular scrutiny due to his socialist stance, which many deem "radical". Now, critics are pointing to Mamdani and his family's wealth to point out that the politician is too privileged to harp on the latest instance, The New York Post reported that his socialist stance has come under public notice, drawing attention to both his policy proposals and family background. Mamdani's mother, Mira Nair, is an award-winning Indian-American filmmaker, and his father is a renowned author and a professor at Columbia including MAGA activists like Laura Loomer and Meghan McCain, have labelled him a "nepo baby", pointing to his elite education and family wealth, with posts on X estimating his parents' net worth between $2 million and $10 million. The 33-year-old Democratic socialist and New York State Assembly member from Astoria, is a prominent contender in the 2025 New York City mayoral race, and has been in the limelight for advocating for sweeping changes to address economic inequality in the city. Among his radical plans is a hefty tax on the candidacy could mark a milestone: he could be New York City's first Muslim mayor, and one who has roots in PRIVILEGED IS MAMDANI?The scrutiny surrounding Mamdani's socialist stance stems from his privileged background, which critics argue undercuts his working-class mother, acclaimed filmmaker Mira Nair, known for films like Monsoon Wedding and The Namesake, owned a high-end loft at 420 W. 25th St. in Manhattan's West Chelsea from 2008 to 2019, purchased for $1.375 million and sold for $1.45 million, with a current estimated value of $1.9 million, according to realestate firm loft, featuring 12-foot ceilings, a Schiffini-designed kitchen, and a spa-like en-suite bathroom, contrasts with Mamdani's narrative of advocating for the economically disadvantaged, his critics Mamdani owns a 4-acre plot in Uganda, valued at $150,000-$250,000, acquired in 2012, according to his 2024 New York Legislative Ethics Commission perception challenges his authenticity as a socialist advocating for wealth PRIVILEGED UPBRINGING NOW IN FOCUSMamdani's socialist principles may invite scepticism due to the tension between his personal circumstances and his public family's wealth and property ownership, particularly in a high-value Manhattan neighbourhood, could be seen as contradictory to his calls for taxing the rich, prompting accusations of argue that his privileged upbringing, marked by elite schooling and a culturally prominent family, distances him from the working-class struggles he his radical policies, such as fare-free buses and city-run grocery stores, have been criticised as unrealistic by both moderates and conservatives, who view them as pandering to progressive voters rather than offering practical disconnect fuels doubts about whether Mamdani's socialism is a genuine commitment or a strategic political these criticisms, Mamdani's campaign has resonated with younger, progressive, and immigrant communities, particularly New York City's Muslim population, which exceeds 350,000 registered viral social media presence has amplified his message of affordability and who lives in a rent-stabilised one-bedroom apartment in Queens (estimated rent: $2,500/month), positions himself as a champion of the working class, distancing his personal lifestyle from his family's campaign's success, raising $8 million with significant public matching funds, underscores his grassroots ARE MAMDANI'S SOCIALIST PROPOSALS?Mamdani has proposed rent freezes, affordable housing, and a property tax overhaul to shift burdens from lower-income outer-borough homeowners to wealthier Manhattan campaign focusses on rectifying the city's skewed property tax system, which he argues unfairly benefits owners of high-value properties in affluent proposal seeks to lower taxes for homeowners in neighbourhoods like Jamaica and Brownsville while increasing rates for upscale properties, such as those in Manhattan's wealthiest also champions freezing rents on stabilised units and building 200,000 units of publicly owned housing over the next decade, funded by taxing the rich and Mamdani rode his popularity and promises to emerge as the democratic candidate for the NYC mayoral election, he faces a major challenge as his privileged upbringing and his family's wealth are being used to label him a "hypocrite".- Ends
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India hits back at US over auto tariffs, proposes retaliatory duties at WTO
India has proposed imposing retaliatory tariffs on select US products in response to Washington's safeguard duties on automobile imports from India, according to a notification circulated at the World Trade Organization (WTO). The notification, submitted to the WTO's Council for Trade in Goods, outlines India's plan to suspend concessions or other obligations under the WTO framework. The move follows the US decision to levy a 25 per cent ad valorem tariff on imports of passenger vehicles, light trucks, and certain automobile parts from India, effective May 3, 2025. India has argued that these safeguard measures violate the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 and the WTO Agreement on Safeguards. New Delhi also noted that the United States has not officially notified these measures to the WTO, despite their significant impact on bilateral trade. 'The proposed suspension of concessions or other obligations would take the form of an increase in tariffs on selected products originating in the United States,' the notification of the WTO said, adding: 'This notification is made in connection with safeguard measures extended by the United States of America on imports of automobile parts from India.' As consultations requested by India have not taken place, the country has invoked its right under WTO rules to suspend equivalent concessions. According to the notification, the US tariffs are expected to affect Indian exports worth $2.895 billion annually, resulting in a projected duty collection of $723.75 million. 'Accordingly, India's proposed suspension of concessions would result in an equivalent amount of duty collected from products originating in the United States,' the notice states. India has also reserved the right to modify the list of targeted products and the level of tariffs as necessary, and to issue further notifications if required. 'India reserves the right to withdraw, modify, supplement or replace this notification,and/or make a further notification or notifications as and when required.' The move comes even as India and the United States continue negotiations on an interim trade agreement to strengthen bilateral trade ties. Last month, India had taken similar action in response to US tariffs on steel and aluminium. (With Inputs from PTI)
The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Congress, BJP aid corporate hospitals by vilifying Kerala's public health sector: CPI(M)
The Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] State secretariat has accused the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) of launching a vilification campaign against Kerala's robust public health system to aid the corporate medical-care sector. CPI(M) State secretary M.V. Govindan told a news conference here on Friday that the Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had sought to politicise the tragic building collapse at the Government Medical College Hospital (MCH), Kottayam, to paint a dismal picture of State-funded hospitals to help corporate hospitals corral patients. He said the building collapse occurred when the hospital authorities were moving patients to the newly constructed block. Mr. Govindan said global capital had 'gobbled up' most legacy hospitals in the private sector, which had sacrificed medical ethics at the altar of profit-making. He said the Left Democratic Front (LDF) had sought to protect the working class from predatory medical practices by adding more super-specialty units, including liver and kidney transplant departments, to State-run hospitals. Affordable care He said the Government Medical College Hospitals had successfully conducted organ transplants at minimal rates. The service was provided at no cost to economically disadvantaged individuals. 'In contrast, private corporate hospitals charged not less than ₹40 lakh for the life-saving procedures,' he said. Mr. Govindan said that an almost 50% increase in patient footfall at State-run hospitals had deprived the private sector of business. The Congress and the BJP had come to the aid of the corporate medical industry by seeking to demonise public health care. Mr. Govindan said the private sector was appalled that the LDF had opened outpatient centres at primary health-care centres and created 2,430 new facilities, adding to the existing clinical services to make health care easily accessible and affordable for the public. The private sector had now found a partner in the Congress and the BJP, who were out to malign State-subsidised health care. 'UDF cut allocation' Mr. Govindan said between 2011 and 2016, the Congress government had systematically slashed public health sector allocation from ₹139 crore to ₹116 crore. 'The UDF had planned to privatise State-funded hospitals,' he added. In contrast, since 2021, the second LDF government had increased public health spending to ₹1,600 crore. Kerala's health sector had won at least 21 national and international recognitions. Mr. Govindan said the BJP government at the Centre punished Kerala for its public health achievements by reducing allocations as part of the Centre's 'vengeful politics.' The LDF balanced the books by raising ₹80,000 crore from the global market to modernise State-funded hospitals, which now offered state-of-the-art treatment on a par with developed nations. It also increased the Gross State Domestic Product to catalyse welfare and development, given the Centre's attempt to financially strangulate Kerala.
