
Nationwide Cocktail Recall Over Exploding Can Fears
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A popular ready-to-drink alcohol-free cocktail brand is being pulled from shelves nationwide amid fears that some cans could burst unexpectedly.
The nationwide recall was initiated by Columbus, Ohio-based company Peak Cocktails.
Newsweek has contacted Peak Cocktails for comment via email.
Why It Matters
This recall highlights growing safety concerns in the booming canned cocktail industry, where improper production or storage can lead to dangerous pressure buildup.
Stock photo: A can of drink in hand against the backdrop of a hotel pool. Close-up, blue aluminum can
Stock photo: A can of drink in hand against the backdrop of a hotel pool. Close-up, blue aluminum can
Getty Images
What To Know
The recall affects 16,128 units of Peak Cocktails Blood Orange Spritz 8.4 fl oz aluminum cans. The affected batches—codes B25127 and B25128—were packaged on May 7 and May 8, 2025, and sold both individually and in variety packs of 12, 24, and 48 cans.
According to the recall notice, the recall was initiated over fears that the aluminum cans could explode due to dangerous overpressurization.
The overpressurization issue can cause cans to burst, posing a potential safety risk to consumers.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classified the recall as Class II, meaning use of the product could cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences. No injuries have been reported so far, but consumers are urged to handle any affected cans with care and to dispose of them safely.
The recalled product, identified by UPC 860013380571, was distributed nationwide across 50 states and Washington, D.C., including major markets such as California, New York, Texas, Florida, and Illinois. Peak Cocktails notified its distributors and customers via email when it initiated the recall on June 3.
Peak Cocktails has not specified the exact reason for the overpressurization, but overpressurization in canned beverages like cocktails, beer, or sodas usually happens when excess gas builds up inside the sealed container, causing it to swell or even burst. One of the most common causes is unintended fermentation. If any yeast or bacteria remain in the drink after packaging, they can ferment leftover sugars, producing carbon dioxide that increases internal pressure. This risk can be heightened if sterilization or pasteurization processes aren't thorough.
Temperature swings are another factor. High storage temperatures can expand liquids and gases inside the can, pushing the container beyond its designed pressure limit. Additionally, packaging defects such as weak seams or improper sealing can allow contamination or gas leaks that lead to uneven pressure. In rarer cases, certain acidic drinks may react chemically with the metal lining of the can, releasing more gas.
What Happens Next
Consumers are advised not to open or consume any cans from the affected batches. Instead, they should safely dispose of the products in a way that minimizes the risk of accidental rupture, such as placing them in a sealed bag and gently discarding them.
Customers seeking a refund or more information should contact Peak Cocktails directly.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
Higher Risk of Miscarriage in IVF When Father Is Elder Millennial
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Paternal age plays a critical role in IVF success—even when using eggs from young, healthy donors—a study has found. At the 41st ESHRE Annual Meeting, researchers reported that male partners over 45 have higher miscarriage risks and lower live birth chances during IVF with donor eggs. The research, spanning 1,712 donor egg IVF cycles conducted between 2019–2023 in Italy and Spain, aimed to isolate the impact of paternal age by controlling for maternal variables. Doctor providing compassionate healthcare consultation while young couple patient holding hand, comfort each other after infertile report. Doctor providing compassionate healthcare consultation while young couple patient holding hand, comfort each other after infertile report. Moment Makers Group All cycles involved fresh oocytes (immature eggs found in the ovaries) from young donors (average age 26.1), frozen sperm from male partners and a single blastocyst embryo transfer. The average age of female recipients was 43.3. When results were analyzed, stark differences emerged between the two paternal age groups: Miscarriage rates were 23.8 percent among couples with male partners over 45, compared to 16.3 percent in those with younger male partners. "It was genuinely surprising to see how strongly paternal age affects miscarriage and live birth rates, even in oocyte donation programs," lead author and embryologist Maria Cristina Guglielmo of Eugin Italy told Newsweek. Live birth rates dropped to 35.1 percent in the older paternal group, versus 41 percent for those aged 45 or younger. "This challenges the common perception that maternal factors are the primary drivers of reproductive success and highlights the need to pay more attention to paternal factors in fertility," said Guglielmo. She explained that biological changes in sperm linked to aging—such as increased DNA mutations, abnormal chromosome counts, DNA fragmentation and altered epigenetics—can compromise embryo development and raise miscarriage risk. "Together, these factors affect both the genetic integrity and the functional quality of sperm, which can impair embryo development and contribute to a higher risk of miscarriage," she added. Importantly, the study only included first embryo transfers and excluded repeat cycles, allowing for a clearer comparison. According to Guglielmo, this strengthens the evidence that paternal age is not just a minor variable, but a significant factor in reproductive outcomes. "Our hypothesis is that time does not change the ability of sperm to produce embryos however, some genetic defects in sperm only become apparent later in the process, potentially leading to adverse effects on embryo development and contributing to negative selection outcomes in the fetus," she said. For couples who are considering starting a family later on in life via IVF, Guglielmo advises to consult with a fertility specialist early to understand how paternal age might affect chances and explore all the available options. "All women know how the miscarriage is associated to mother age; however, it's time to inform the couple about how the father age is also important, especially during the pregnancy, in order to evaluate a prenatal screening," she said. "Being well-informed and proactive can help couples make the best decisions for their family-building journey and improve their chances of achieving a successful and healthy live birth." Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about IVF? Let us know via health@ Reference Guglielmo, M.C., et al. (2025). Advanced paternal age affects miscarriage and live birth outcomes following the first transfer in oocyte donation cycles. Human Reproduction.


Newsweek
13 hours ago
- Newsweek
Don't Ask AI ChatBots for Medical Advice, Study Warns
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Trust your doctor, not a chatbot. That's the sobering conclusion of a new study published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine, which reveals how artificial intelligence (AI) is vulnerable to being misused to spread dangerous misinformation on health. Researchers experimented with five leading AI models developed by Anthropic, Google, Meta, OpenAI and X Corp. All five systems are widely used, forming the backbone of the AI-powered chatbots embedded in websites and apps around the world. Using developer tools not typically accessible to the public, the researchers found that they could easily progam instances of the AI systems to respond to health-related questions with incorrect—and potentially harmful—information. Worse, the chatbots were found to wrap their false answers in convincing trappings. "In total, 88 percent of all responses were false," explained paper author Natansh Modi of the University of South Africa in a statement. "And yet they were presented with scientific terminology, a formal tone and fabricated references that made the information appear legitimate." Among the false claims made were debunked myths such as that vaccines cause autism, that HIV is an airborne disease and that 5G causes infertility. Of the five chatbots evaluated, four presented responses that were 100 percent incorrect. Only one model showed some resistance, generating disinformation in 40 percent of cases. A stock image showing a sick person using a smartphone. A stock image showing a sick person using a smartphone. demaerre/iStock / Getty Images Plus Disinformation Bots Already Exist The research didn't stop at theoretical vulnerabilities; Modi and his team went a step further, using OpenAI's GPT Store—a platform that allows users to build and share customized ChatGPT apps—to test how easily members of the public could create disinformation tools themselves. "We successfully created a disinformation chatbot prototype using the platform and we also identified existing public tools on the store that were actively producing health disinformation," said Modi. He emphasized: "Our study is the first to systematically demonstrate that leading AI systems can be converted into disinformation chatbots using developers' tools, but also tools available to the public." A Growing Threat to Public Health According to the researchers, the threat posed by manipulated AI chatbots is not hypothetical—it is real and happening now. "Artificial intelligence is now deeply embedded in the way health information is accessed and delivered," said Modi. "Millions of people are turning to AI tools for guidance on health-related questions. "If these systems can be manipulated to covertly produce false or misleading advice then they can create a powerful new avenue for disinformation that is harder to detect, harder to regulate and more persuasive than anything seen before." Previous studies have already shown that generative AI can be misused to mass-produce health misinformation—such as misleading blogs or social media posts—on topics ranging from antibiotics and fad diets to homeopathy and vaccines. What sets this new research apart is that it is the first to show how foundational AI systems can be deliberately reprogrammed to act as disinformation engines in real time, responding to everyday users with false claims under the guise of credible advice. The researchers found that even when the prompts were not explicitly harmful, the chatbots could "self-generate harmful falsehoods." A Call for Urgent Safeguards While one model—Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet—showed some resilience by refusing to answer 60 percent of the misleading queries, researchers say this is not enough. The protections across systems were inconsistent and, in most cases, easy to bypass. "Some models showed partial resistance, which proves the point that effective safeguards are technically achievable," Modi noted. "However, the current protections are inconsistent and insufficient. Developers, regulators and public health stakeholders must act decisively, and they must act now." If left unchecked, the misuse of AI in health contexts could have devastating consequences: misleading patients, undermining doctors, fueling vaccine hesitancy and worsening public health outcomes. The study's authors call for sweeping reforms—including stronger technical filters, better transparency about how AI models are trained, fact-checking mechanisms and policy frameworks to hold developers accountable. They draw comparisons with how false information spreads on social media, warning that disinformation spreads up to six times faster than the truth and that AI systems could supercharge that trend. A Final Warning "Without immediate action," Modi said, "these systems could be exploited by malicious actors to manipulate public health discourse at scale, particularly during crises such as pandemics or vaccine campaigns." Newsweek has contacted Anthropic, Google, Meta, OpenAI and X Corp for comment. Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about chatbots? Let us know via science@ References Modi, N. D., Menz, B. D., Awaty, A. A., Alex, C. A., Logan, J. M., McKinnon, R. A., Rowland, A., Bacchi, S., Gradon, K., Sorich, M. J., & Hopkins, A. M. (2024). Assessing the system-instruction vulnerabilities of large language models to malicious conversion into health disinformation chatbots. Annals of Internal Medicine.


Newsweek
20 hours ago
- Newsweek
I Flew to London to Donate My Bone Marrow, Then I Discovered Who It Was For
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Years after signing up to be a bone marrow donor, this woman was finally matched with a transplant patient—and she couldn't believe who it was for. Back in 2017, Mya Linklater signed up to the Anthony Nolan register, a charity that was set up in 1974 by Shirley Nolan to create the world's first stem cell register. As of 2024, they had over 909,000 potential donors who can be called upon to donate their bone marrow or blood stem cells for lifesaving transplants. Eight years after signing up, Linklater, 24, was stunned when she received an email in May 2025 to notifying her that she was a potential match for a patient on the list. Having been on the register for so long, Linklater, of Aberdeen, Scotland, wondered if she'd ever actually need to help. But when she finally got the opportunity, she told Newsweek that she felt "really excited" to save a life. "I filled in a medical update form and then a medical examiner came to my house to collect a blood sample to ensure that I was the perfect donor," Linklater said. Mya Linklater, 24, in hospital in London before donating her bone marrow in June 2025. Mya Linklater, 24, in hospital in London before donating her bone marrow in June 2025. @myalinklater / TikTok Everything came back clear, and she was given the go ahead to donate her bone marrow. She was curious to find out more about the patient she was donating for, and that's when she learned that it was for a young baby with leukemia. Learning that made the process even more rewarding, as she could give this baby a shot at a fulfilling life. Soon after, she was on a 2-hour flight from Scotland to London for a preliminary medical appointment before proceeding with the all-important surgery in June. "It's a surgical procedure done under general anesthetic where doctors extract liquid marrow containing stem cells from the back of your pelvic bone, using a needle and syringe," Linklater told Newsweek. Bone marrow donation is used to obtain blood-forming cells (stem cells) to help someone with blood cancer or a blood disorder. Bone marrow is the liquid tissue in the center of certain bones, and it makes more than 200 billion new blood cells every day, according to The Cleveland Clinic. Unfortunately, approximately 18,000 people are told every year that they have a bone marrow disease which requires a bone marrow or stem cell transplant. While 30 percent of people in need of a donor can find a match within their immediate family, 70 percent of patients need donors from a register. People in the U.S. can register for the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) by attending a donor center or requesting an at-home test kit. Not everyone can be a donor, as certain conditions (such as HIV, cancer, diabetes and heart disease) will disqualify people, and being over the age of 60. While millions of people around the world are registered donors, there is still an overwhelming shortage. That's why Linklater decided to document the entire process to raise awareness and encourage others in the U.K. to join the Anthony Nolan register too. She then shared the video on her TikTok account (@myalinklater) in June, and it's gone viral with over 733,00 views and more than 112,600 likes at the time of writing. "The online response has been absolutely crazy. I have been inundated with kind and warm messages, and so many people love that I shared my story and have now joined the register themselves," Linklater continued. "The process is so rewarding, and I cannot emphasize how important it is to go and join the register." Mya Linklater, 24, before and after donating her bone marrow for a baby with leukemia. Mya Linklater, 24, before and after donating her bone marrow for a baby with leukemia. @myalinklater / TikTok Following the bone marrow harvesting, Linklater said she felt "slight discomfort," but she was perfectly fine overall. She was back on her feet in no time and felt incredibly proud of herself for giving a young child a second chance at life. After sharing her experience online, many TikTok users praised Linklater for using her social media platform in such a positive way, and others thanked her for being so transparent. This has led to more than 2,500 comments on the viral post so far. To her delight, many people said they joined the register as a result of her video. One comment reads: "As a mom whose baby had a bone marrow transplant which saved his life, thank you." Another TikTok user wrote: "now this is influencing." Another person added: "A truly incredible thing to do. Thank you for sharing your experience, Mya." While one commenter replied: "Just joined because of your video!" Is there a health issue that's worrying you? Let us know via health@ We can ask experts for advice, and your story could be featured on Newsweek.