Shoddy that Donald Trump can't address MPs, says Nigel Farage
Last week France's President Emmanuel Macron gave an address to both Houses of Parliament during his three-day state visit to the UK.However, such speeches are not automatic. Only around one in four state visits since 1952 have included a formal address to Parliament. Trump did not address Parliament during his first state visit in 2019.In April, Labour MP Kate Osborne reportedly wrote to Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle asking him to stop Trump from addressing Parliament.A parliamentary motion urging the same thing had also been signed by some MPs, mostly from Labour and including some Greens.Speaking to the BBC, Farage, a prominent British supporter of the US president, acknowledged it would be controversial for Trump to address MPs and peers, as "anything to do with Donald Trump results in a row".But he said Trump was "more pro-British" than Macron, and the UK's alliance with the United States was key to trade and the Nato military alliance.Drawing a contrast with the "full ceremonial visit" offered to President Macron, he added: "This just tells you what this government's real priorities are."It's European Union above everything else, including America - who of course are not only our most important ally, but without whom we are defenceless. So I think the whole thing is shoddy".
The government is not planning to change the parliamentary schedule to allow Trump to speak to MPs and peers.Sir Keir Starmer's official spokesperson told reporters: "Questions on the timings and dates are for the Palace. They've obviously agreed dates with the President"."I would firmly steer you away from the idea the timings of a visit are anything to do with Parliament recess dates," he added.Meanwhile, Downing Street has confirmed Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer will meet Trump when the US president visits his golf resort at Menie in Aberdeenshire later this month.Number 10 said Sir Keir had accepted an invitation to meet during the "private" trip to Scotland.
State visits
Invitations for state visits are formally issued by the monarch, but on the advice of government - normally organised through the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO). Dates are set jointly by the government, the Palace and visiting dignitaries.The House of Lords will still be sitting during Trump's visit, but under long-standing parliamentary rules, a joint address to both houses can only take place when both are in session. The final decision rests with the Speakers of the Commons and Lords, though in reality any speeches are agreed with the government of the day. The Royal Family confirmed that Trump's visit will be based at Windsor Castle, with Buckingham Palace unavailable due to ongoing refurbishment. The ceremonial elements of the visit, including a state banquet and Guard of Honour, are expected to go ahead as planned.
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
Bank of England's Bailey backs IMF to help fix problems in global economy
LONDON, July 15 (Reuters) - Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey said on Tuesday the International Monetary Fund had a key role to play in tackling the buildup of risky imbalances in the world economy, many of them coming from the United States and China. In a speech he was due to give to Britain's finance elite, Bailey acknowledged the concerns of U.S. President Donald Trump's administration about the danger of IMF overreach. But the BoE boss said attempts to fix the problems in the world economy - chief among them the big U.S. trade and current account deficits alongside China's big surpluses and its weak domestic demand - had to be resolved at the multilateral level. "If it is only done at the national level, we will get less good policymaking," he was due to tell the annual Mansion House dinner. Bailey has previously stressed the importance of the IMF and other multilateral bodies at a time of heightened trade tensions following Trump's imposition of high import tariffs and his threats to go further. The IMF recently criticised another part of Trump's economic programme - its plans for massive tax cuts. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has accused the Fund of straying too far from its core economic stability and surveillance missions. Bailey said countries running big deficits were typically the ones that come under the most pressure in financial markets. "We have seen market disturbance this year. We have to be highly alert to financial stability risks – something that I can assure you we are following closely," he said. Bailey also said China should free up its domestic demand as part of a global plan to tackle "excess imbalances before dangerous levels of trade restrictions come into play, and before we face the prospect of difficult adjustment with macroeconomic volatility and financial instability." Bailey said the IMF should consider using its powers to convene talks with member countries - chief among them the U.S. - as well as working with the World Trade Organisation to produce a nuanced assessment of the global trading system. "I think it helps to remember that the key challenge we all face is to increase growth in the world economy: to grow the pie to support living standards for the people we serve, all of the time," Bailey said. "It is as simple as that." He said he would use his new role as head of the Financial Stability Board - grouping global financial regulators - to develop with the IMF resilience tests for the global financial system, including firms such as hedge funds and banks. Bailey also said in his speech that he favoured using digital payment technology for retail payments and bank accounts as a next step for the industry. He said he was unconvinced about the need for a retail central bank digital currency, and that stablecoins were not a substitute for commercial bank money.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Europeans open to buying US arms for Ukraine under Trump plan but need details
BRUSSELS, July 15 (Reuters) - Several European countries said on Tuesday they were willing to buy U.S. arms for Ukraine under a scheme announced by U.S. President Donald Trump, although arrangements still needed to be worked out. Trump said on Monday that Washington will supply Patriot air defence systems, missiles and other weaponry to Ukraine for its war against Russia's invasion and that the arms would be paid for by other NATO countries. But much remains undisclosed, including the amounts and precise types of weapons to be provided, how quickly they would be supplied and how they would be paid for. U.S. officials have suggested that European countries will be willing to give up some of their own stocks of weapons for Ukraine and then buy replacements from the United States. But some of the countries involved say they still don't even know what is being asked of them. Such a move would get weapons to Ukraine more quickly but would leave donor countries' defences more exposed until new systems are ready. "We are ready to participate. Of course we can't do it on our own, we need others to partner up – but we have a readiness,' Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen told reporters in Brussels on Tuesday ahead of a meeting of European Union ministers. Speaking alongside Trump at the White House on Monday, NATO chief Mark Rutte said that Germany, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Canada want to be part of the new initiative. Many of those countries have been among the biggest military aid donors to Ukraine, either overall or per capita. Asked whether Denmark could give U.S. arms from its own stocks as part of the scheme, Rasmussen said: 'We don't have these kind of systems – the Patriot systems – so if we should lean in, and we are absolutely ready to do so, it will be (with) money and we have to work out the details.' European ministers said they would now need to examine how new purchases of U.S. weapons could be paid for. In many cases, that seems likely to involve countries teaming up to buy U.S. weapons systems. "Now we need to see how together we can go in and finance, among other things, Patriots, which they plan to send to Ukraine," Sweden's Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard told Swedish radio. In Brussels, Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp said his country is looking into the plan 'with a positive inclination'. Asked about the scheme, Norwegian Defence Minister Tore Sandvik told Reuters that Oslo was 'in close dialogue with Ukraine' on military aid and 'air defence remains a high priority for Ukraine and for the Norwegian military support'. 'Norway has contributed to significant amounts of air defence for Ukraine, including co-financing the donation of a Patriot system and missiles,' he said. The Finnish Defence Ministry said Helsinki 'will continue to provide material support to Ukraine'. "The details of the U.S. initiative ... are not yet known and we are interested to hear more about them before we can take more concrete lines on this issue,' it said.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Dollar rides Treasury yields higher as Trump's tariffs begin to bite
President Donald Trump on Tuesday said the U.S. would impose a 19% tariff on goods from Indonesia under a new agreement with the Southeast Asian country and more deals were coming, while offering fresh details on planned duties on pharmaceuticals.
