
Marathi language given classical status under NEP, not during Congress rule: Arjun Ram Meghwal
Union Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal said, 'This is part of the National Education Policy 2020. The Government of India has clearly stated that whatever the Indian language may be, we will respect it and promote it. We have given Marathi the status of a classical language. Was this done during the Congress regime?... The development of all languages, including Hindi, is taking place.'
Meanwhile, the controversy began after reports surfaced that some traders in Mumbai were allegedly attacked by Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) workers for not speaking Marathi. The incident followed remarks attributed to MNS chief Raj Thackeray, who reportedly instructed party workers to 'beat but don't make a video' of those refusing to speak Marathi.
Earlier, on Thursday, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Nishikant Dubey slammed Uddhav Thackeray and Raj Thackeray amid the Hindi-Marathi language row, saying they only beat 'poor people' for not speaking Marathi.
Speaking to reporters, Nishikant Dubey said, 'You beat up the poor. But Mukesh Ambani lives there, he speaks very little Marathi. If you have guts, go to him. Mahim has a large Muslim population. If you have guts, go there. SBI chairman doesn't speak Marathi, try hitting him.'
Nishikant Dubey further clarified that his earlier statement regarding the economy of Maharashtra has been misinterpreted.
He said, 'There is something which I said and which has been destroyed - Maharashtra has a great contribution in the economy of this country...What I said was misconstrued by people. But what I am saying is that we too have a contribution to the tax paid by Mumbai or Maharashtra. This has nothing to do with the Thackeray family or the Maratha. SBI and LIC, which pay tax, have their headquarters in Mumbai.'
Earlier, Dubey strongly reacted to MNS chief Raj Thackeray's remark. Raj had reportedly instructed his party workers to 'beat but don't make a video,' referring to individuals unwilling to speak in Marathi.
In response, Dubey had said, 'What are you doing, whose bread are you eating? You people are surviving on our money. What kind of industries do you have? We have all the mines in Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, and Odisha. What mines do you have? All semiconductor refineries are in Gujarat.'
Challenging the intent behind the aggression towards Hindi-speaking people, Dubey added, 'If you have the courage to beat Hindi speakers, then beat those who speak Urdu, Tamil, and Telugu too. If you're such a 'boss', come out of Maharashtra--come to Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu. 'Tumko patak patak ke maarenge'...'
'There is something which I said and which has been destroyed - Maharashtra has a great contribution in the economy of this country...What I said was misconstrued by people. But what I am saying is that we too have a contribution in the tax paid by Mumbai or Maharashtra. This has nothing to do with the Thackeray family or the Maratha. SBI and LIC, who pay tax, have their headquarters in Mumbai,' he added. (ANI)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Shiv Sena (UBT)-MNS alliance not sealed yet, Raj must clear air: Sanjay Raut
Mumbai: Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut on Sunday said that even though MNS chief Raj Thackeray and Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray came together against imposition of Hindi, their political alliance was not sealed yet. Raut said it was necessary for this alliance to forge, and now there should be no confusion. Raut also said that one day, Raj would come forward and clear the air on his high tea meetings with Devendra Fadnavis and Eknath Shinde. Raut made the comments in his weekly column in Sena (UBT) mouthpiece Saamna. Political analysts said through his column, Raut was cautioning Raj that he must stay true to the Thackeray reunion and announce a formal alliance without allowing confusion to creep in. "Raut is also pressing for a formal alliance between the two cousins and telling Raj that the slow response from him was creating confusion among people. Raut is also recalling that so far, tangoing with the BJP and Shinde resulted in a drubbing for the MNS, and its political fortunes are now at rock bottom. In the future, Raj must avoid any temptation to flirt with BJP or Shinde given his previous track record. Raut's comments serve as a note of caution and also a reminder that the reunion will require Raj's full commitment for it to sustain," a political observer said. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai "Although the two Thackerays' coming together has created confidence among the Marathi people, it does not mean that all the problems of Maharashtra and the Marathi people have been resolved immediately. Both the Thackerays came together against Hindi compulsion, but their political alliance has not been announced yet. This alliance is necessary; only then will Maharashtra get a new direction. The current rulers of Delhi and Maharashtra are shaken by the way the storm of Marathi unity has been created in the state. They will try to prevent this alliance from happening," Raut wrote in his column. "Shinde and Fadnavis go to Raj Thackeray's residence for tea, and Raj Thackeray welcomes them. Shinde's position in Maharashtra politics is like that of a mercenary. Fadnavis heats up the political air by meeting Raj Thackeray. Since Shinde is deflated now, his meetings with Raj Thackeray are short-lived, and it doesn't seem like the current Marathi unity will end because of these two. One day Raj Thackeray himself will come forward and speak on all this and clear up the confusion," Raut said. Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray is likely to spell out his plan for an alliance with the MNS for the upcoming BMC and other local body polls in an interview with Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut in party mouthpiece Saamna this weekend. It will be a two-part interview. Sena (UBT) functionaries said Uddhav will reveal the status of talks with the MNS chief and the roadmap for the alliance. Uddhav will also take on the Mahayuti govt on Hindi imposition, the Special Public Security Bill, and farmers' suicides in the state.

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Dalai Lama succession issue ‘thorn' in relations with India, says China
The succession of Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, is a thorn in China-India relations, the Chinese embassy in New Delhi said on Sunday (July 13, 2025), as India's Foreign Minister prepares to visit China for the first time since deadly border clashes in 2020. Before the celebrations this month for his 90th birthday that were attended by senior Indian Ministers, the head of Tibetan Buddhists riled China again by saying it had no role in his succession. Tibetans believe the soul of any senior Buddhist monk is reincarnated after his death, but China says the Dalai Lama's succession will also have to be approved by its leaders. The Dalai Lama has been living in exile in India since 1959 following a failed uprising against Chinese rule in Tibet, and Indian foreign relations experts say his presence gives New Delhi leverage against China. India is also home to about 70,000 Tibetans and a Tibetan government-in-exile. Yu Jing, a Chinese embassy spokesperson, said on social media app X that some people from strategic and academic communities in India had made 'improper remarks' on the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama. Ms. Yu did not name anyone but in recent days, Indian strategic affairs analysts and a government minister backed the Dalai Lama's remarks on his succession. 'As professionals in foreign affairs, they should be fully cognisant of the sensitivity of issues related to Xizang,' Ms. Yu said, using the Chinese name for Tibet. 'The reincarnation and succession of the Dalai Lama is inherently an internal affair of China,' she said. '(The) Xizang-related issue is a thorn in China-India relations and has become a burden for India. Playing the 'Xizang card' will definitely end up shooting oneself in the foot.' Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, who sat next to the Dalai Lama during the birthday festivities a week ago, has said that as a practising Buddhist, he believes only the spiritual guru and his office have the authority to decide on his reincarnation. The Foreign Ministry said on July 4, two days before the Dalai Lama's birthday, that New Delhi does not take any position or speak on matters concerning beliefs and practices of faith and religion. External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar will be attending a regional security meeting under the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation in Tianjin in northern China on July 15 and hold bilateral meetings on the sidelines. This will be one of the highest-level visits between India and China since their relations nosedived after a deadly border clash in 2020 that killed at least 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers. Late last month, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh held talks with his Chinese counterpart in China on the sidelines of a Defence Ministers' meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
India's commitment to justice does not end at its borders: Justice Surya Kant in Sweden
India's commitment to justice does not end at its borders, Supreme Court judge Justice Surya Kant said Friday, pointing out that the country's courts have in some cases extended the protection of fundamental rights even to non-resident Indians. Addressing the Indian diaspora in Sweden on Friday, Justice Kant said, 'The Indian Constitution, when fully realised, is not merely a set of rules' but 'a moral compass' and 'envisions a nation where justice is not a privilege of the few, but a right for all.' The judiciary, he added, 'as one of the key constitutional pillars, plays a central role in translating this vision into reality.' Justice Kant said that 'in India, courts have served not only as adjudicators but as moral voices – upholding the rights of the marginalised, protecting freedoms, and sustaining the integrity of democratic processes.' Justice Kant said that 'the judiciary has, through a series of judgments and principled interventions, upheld values like secularism, equality, and dignity, which form the cornerstone of our constitutional identity' and 'for the diaspora, this becomes a source of immense reassurance and pride.' He added, 'You may live far from India, but you remain intricately connected to its legal, cultural, and emotional fabric. This is especially true when diaspora members face legal challenges involving property, inheritance, matrimonial issues, or guardianship. The Indian judiciary has increasingly recognised these complexities and has sought to make justice more accessible to non-resident Indians. In some cases, courts have extended the protection of fundamental rights even to those residing abroad, reinforcing the message that India's commitment to justice does not end at her borders.' Lauding the diaspora members, he said that 'in a globalised world, where identities often blur and borders become less rigid, it is easy to feel unanchored. Yet, the Indian diaspora has shown the world how one can be truly global while remaining authentically Indian. It is a delicate balance, but one that you have mastered with grace and conviction.' Justice Kant said that 'India and Sweden share a commitment to justice, gender equality, and human dignity — values enshrined in both our national narratives. Our legal systems may differ in structure, but not in aspiration. India's pluralism and Sweden's social democracy are both grounded in the belief that every individual deserves respect, opportunity, and dignity. These shared values are the bedrock of mutual understanding – and they are the foundation on which relationships between nations, and indeed peoples, must be built.' The Supreme Court judge also said that 'our pursuit of liberty and equality does not exist in a vacuum. It draws strength from who we are – from the values we carry and the culture that shapes us… Our Constitution promises liberty, equality, and fraternity, but the fulfilment of that promise depends on our willingness to confront the contradictions within us. Justice is not just a matter for courts – it is a moral responsibility that must animate our communities and define how we treat one another, both in India and across the world.'