Powys County Council's budget black hole value queried
HOW big a funding gap Powys County Council is expected to fill with cuts and savings over the next four to fove years varies by over £20 million – a councllor has pointed out.
Calls were made to clarify the figures that the council is using to explain their predicted financial black hole during a joint meeting of all of the council's scrutiny committee's on Wednesday, June 11.
At the meeting, councillors looked at the council's draft Corporate and Equalities Strategic Plan which has been updated from the version that was agreed earlier this year.
The plan sets out the council's well-being objectives, and what action they need to take to deliver them up the next local election in 2027.
All the departmental strategies, action and business plans are linked by a 'golden thread' into this document which encompasses them all.
This plan is supposed to keep track of how the council is performing against the three objectives of the Liberal Democrat/Labour cabinet's Stronger Fairer, Greener agenda.
Cllr Gareth E Jones (Powys Independents) highlighted the problem and said: 'If you go to the leader and deputy leader's introduction (to the document) there's a statement there that the funding gap is £60 million but on the MTFS (Medium Term Financial Strategy) the funding gap on those assumptions is shown as £39.1 million.
'I think they two figures need to be the same for consistency.'
Director of corporate services and section 151 officer, Jane Thomas replied: 'We can and will amend that to the latest figure, it should reflect what was approved in council back in February.
'We will see the gap change quite often now as we go through the years and we develop our five year plans.'
Making sure that the figure changes forms one of the recommendations made by councillors at the meeting – which will be added to the report when it goes before cabinet at a later date.
Another recommendation by councillors is that members of the Liberal Democrat/Labour cabinet should attend the joint scrutiny meeting to explain and if needed defend the council's performance.
Cllr Jones said: 'It was very disappointing about the number of cabinet members that were present today, we should have a recommendation at future meetings that they have more presence.
'This is the council's performance document ,officers develop the plan but cabinet member sign it off.'
Learning and skills committee chairman who chaired the joint-scrutiny meeting, Cllr Gwynfor Thomas (Conservative) said: 'I'm happy to do that as they (cabinet members) are the line holders and are responsible for the different measures and things.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
19 minutes ago
- The National
Wes Streeting forced to admit Labour wants fewer people claiming Pip
Wes Streeting was interviewed on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme by Victoria Derbyshire, who was filling in for Kuenssberg, about the UK Government's proposed cuts to welfare, which have been described as a 'two-tier disability system' by campaigners. The UK government confirmed on Friday evening that it will make major changes to its planned welfare cuts, aiming to avoid a rebellion by more than 120 Labour backbenchers. Under the new plan, people already receiving Personal Independence Payments (Pip) or the health element of Universal Credit will keep getting them. However, the cuts will apply to future claimants. READ MORE: Police 'examining' Kneecap and Bob Vylan Glastonbury Festival performances When pressed by Derbyshire, Streeting was forced to admit that the Labour Government is planning on having fewer people able to claim disability benefits by reforming the welfare system. During the interview, Derbyshire said: 'Members of the cabinet, you on this program this morning, and the Prime Minister have said it previously, the current system is not sustainable. 'But even after your review, the bottom line is you want fewer people in receipt of Pip, fewer disabled people in receipt of Pip, don't you?' Streeting replied: 'Well, we want to make sure we're getting the line in the right place in terms of.' To which Derbyshire cut him off and asked: 'So, the answer is yes. You want fewer disabled people claiming Pip.' (Image: BBC) Streeting continued: 'I think 1000 more people, coming on every day, like it's not sustainable in its current form, it's just not. 'And unless we address that issue, we've got to do it in a fair way. 'We've got to do it in the right way.' Derbyshire interrupted Streeting again saying: 'But you won't say that out loud. Why not?' Streeting replied: 'Well I just did.' Derbyshire then asked for clarification that there will be fewer disabled people able to claim Pip. To which Streeting replied: 'I literally just said, we've got to make sure that in terms of where we are, where we draw the line, where we get it right, that it is sustainable for the longer term.' MPs are expected to vote on the welfare reform bill on Tuesday at Westminster which the UK Government will be hoping to pass after it offered Labour rebels a series of concessions in an effort to head off Keir Starmer's first major Commons defeat since coming to power. The UK Government's original package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, and cut the health-related element of Universal Credit, saying this would save around £5 billion a year by 2030. Now, the changes to Pip eligibility will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only while all existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. Speaking on Times Radio earlier this week, campaigner at Disability Rights UK Mikey Erhardt said: 'The idea that you will be less in need, or less deserving of support, depending on the when of the condition that necessitates that support, is something you just have to reject out and out.' Meanwhile, Ian Greaves, who edits the Disability Rights Handbook containing in-depth information on the social security system across the UK, said Labour's 'very small' concessions on welfare reforms will still leave the system 'woefully inadequate'.
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
A British Leyland of TV is the Government's worst idea yet
A show about a good-looking human rights lawyer who becomes a triumphant, reforming prime minister? Or a mini-series about a brilliant, glamorous economist who becomes Britain's first female chancellor? Perhaps a movie about a fiery red-head who works her way up from poverty to become the most powerful woman in the country? As the Government paves the way for a potential merger between ITV, Channel 4, and Channel 5 to create a single, state-backed commercial broadcaster, it is not hard to imagine the kind of shows it might commission. But hold on. A British Leyland of television is the Government's worst idea yet. What the industry actually needs is more competition – not less. It may still be a few years off. But Sir Keir Starmer's Labour Government is very clearly paving the way for a major consolidation of the British broadcasting industry. Last week, as part of its shiny new 'industrial strategy', it opened the door to removing the barriers that prevent a merger between the existing terrestrial broadcasters. Apparently, ministers will examine 'possible consolidation between broadcasters', along with 'closer strategic partnerships'. Meanwhile, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and Ofcom will be asked to review their definitions of 'television advertising' to include YouTube and Netflix, which again will make mergers easier. Add it all up, and it is not hard to see where this is going. We will need a single, state-backed commercial broadcaster to cope with a changing market, stand up to the American streaming giants, and preserve what used to be one of the UK's strongest industries. Heck, they could even bring in the marketing whizzes who gave us Great British Energy and Great British Railways to come up with the branding for Great British Television. Of course, we all understand that something needs to be done. In a world where streaming dominates, and with most people under 30 barely even aware of what traditional broadcasting through signals and aerials was, the industry is in an increasingly dire position. ITV, the biggest of the three, has seen its share price slump from 265p 10 years ago to just 80p now, and the broadcaster is only worth £3bn. There has already been plenty of speculation about a break-up, perhaps with a sale of its production unit, or else a full-scale takeover of the company, probably by a foreign buyer. Channel 4 has been slashing jobs and cutting back on its programming budget as it grapples with a declining advertising market. Meanwhile, Channel 5, which has never been a huge success since it was launched in 1997, is also potentially in play as its American owner Paramount prepares for a takeover by media company Skydance. Why not put all three together and create a new British-owned powerhouse in commercial broadcasting?
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Judge me on my record, 18-year-old Warwickshire council leader says
An 18-year-old acting leader of a county council has urged people to judge him on his actions rather than his age. George Finch took temporary charge of Warwickshire County Council after the Reform UK leader stood down on Wednesday. He now oversees a local authority with £1.5bn of assets and a revenue budget of about £500m. The unusual situation has sparked debate, with his party calling it a proud moment and Labour and the Conservatives questioning his experience. Finch, a councillor for Bedworth and the local Reform UK chairman, has not ruled out running for the top job on a permanent basis. He said his track record was pretty good. Reform made unprecedented gains in Warwickshire in May's local elections, mainly at the expense of the Conservatives. They became the largest party and formed a minority Howard, who had been leader for 41 days, said he was quitting as council leader with "much regret" due to health reasons. Finch had been his deputy and will serve as interim until a new leader has been chosen, as per the council's constitution. Finch, who also serves as portfolio holder for children and families, said he hoped people would be able to see past his age. "The people of Bedworth Central elected me with a thumping majority of 1,100," he told the Local Democracy Reporting Service. "Don't judge me on my age, judge me on what I do. At the moment, my track record is pretty good."As party chairman I got 13 out of 13 candidates elected. "All of the things we needed to do to prepare for the elections, they speak volumes." Jaymey McIvor, an Essex county councillor and Reform UK local government spokesperson, praised Finch for taking over and getting on with the job. He said Warwickshire councillors were focused on issues such as fixing potholes and improving access to skills in deprived areas. "I was able to see councillor Finch in action," he told the BBC's Politics Midlands programme. "He was very professional."I think we should actually be quite proud that a young British man, who has been elected to office to represent his community, has found himself in a very senior position."Labour MP for Birmingham Edgbaston Preet Gill said the people of Warwickshire "frankly deserve better". "This is not work experience," she said. "This is not about learning on the job. "With all due respect, at 18 you will not know how to deliver adult social care, children social care [and] SEND services." Mike Wood, the Conservative MP for Kingswinford and South Staffordshire, was more apprehensive. He said he had previously been a local councillor, and it was a tough job."It really would take a quite remarkable 18-year-old to go straight from sixth form to running a large local authority with a half a billion pound budget with no previous experience," he said. Watch Politics Midlands on BBC One in the West Midlands at 10:00 BST on Sunday. The show will be available on iPlayer BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
