logo
EU walks trade tightrope as US-China rivalry intensifies – DW – 07/15/2025

EU walks trade tightrope as US-China rivalry intensifies – DW – 07/15/2025

DW15 hours ago
Can the EU still trust the US after President Donald Trump's latest tariff threat? And can it risk closer ties with China?
Last week, China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi held talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur.
The meeting between two top diplomats is especially noteworthy because Rubio has been officially sanctioned by Beijing.
Before he was tapped by President Donald Trump to become US secretary of state, Rubio had served in the US Senate, where he was a member of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China.
The commission is charged with monitoring human rights and the development of the rule of law in China, and submitting an annual report to the US president.
As a member of this body, Rubio sharply criticized the Chinese government for suppressing the democracy movement in Hong Kong, and for drastically restricting civil rights in the western province of Xinjiang.
Beijing lambasted what it saw as "interference in internal affairs" and placed Rubio on the sanctions list after the US government imposed punitive measures on Chinese politicians. The current US state secretary faced an entry ban and a freeze of any assets in China.
Last Friday, the first face-to-face meeting between Rubio and Wang took place behind closed doors in Malaysia.
Neither side revealed much about what was discussed but Chinese state media later reported that the talks were "positive, pragmatic and constructive."
At the Saturday press conference, Wang gave a brief summary of the conclusions made: Maintain contacts, avoid misjudgment, manage differences and expand cooperation.
However, he made no mention of whether Rubio would remain on Beijing's sanctions list.
There is a "strong will" in both Washington and Beijing to organize a meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, Rubio said after the talks. No date has yet been agreed.
While the US still remains the sole global superpower, the gap with China is narrowing.
President Xi wants China to become a "strong, democratic, civilized, and harmonious socialist nation" by 2049, the centenary of the People's Republic.
A study published by the consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) at the start of 2025 projected that China would overtake the US and become the world's top economy over the next three decades.
The US-China competition is already shaping the global economy and politics today, including trade wars, a global arms race and rising geopolitical tension.
The US is now using its economic might to force all economically weaker countries to compromise on trade. On Saturday, Trump announced a 30% tariff on all imports from the EU from August 1.
According to the DPA news agency, the decree will not apply to steel and aluminum. However, they are already subject to high tariffs. The US, for instance, imposes a 25% tariff on cars and car parts imported from the European Union and a 50% duty on steel and aluminum.
The president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen promptly responded, saying that she would take "all necessary steps" to protect EU interests.
At the same time, she said she is prepared to continue efforts to reach a mutually acceptable agreement with Washington. EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic was scheduled to hold talks with the US side on Monday.
German businesses have sounded the alarm amid the latest crisis.
The tariffs could damage "economic recovery and innovative strength," said Wolfgang Niedermark, member of the executive board of the Federation of German Industries (BDI).
Confidence in international cooperation would also be affected, he added, noting that Germany, as an export-oriented nation, is just as dependent on free trade as China.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Against this backdrop, the question arises as to whom the EU can rely upon — on the US, an old ally which is now throwing obstacles in the way of globalization, or on the communist party-led China, which is now seeking closer ties with Europe and Germany despite ideological differences.
Is a Trump-led US, like China, now seen seen as a "partner, competitor and rival" for Brussels? This is the question asked by China experts Paula Oliver Llorente and Miguel Otero-Iglesias in a new paper issued by Spanish think tank Elcano Royal Institute. The phrasing is borrowed from EU documents defining its relations with China, with the words also being included in the German government's China strategy in 2023.
"Uncertainty has become the defining factor looming over the strategic positioning of the EU in the context of US-China rivalry," the two scholars claim.
"For Germany, Trump's policies and the US-China conflict present historic challenges," said Claudia Wessling and Bernhard Bartsch, China experts at the Berlin-based MERICS think tank.
They point out that the US administration under Donald Trump upended trans-Atlantic relations, shaking some long-held and deeply entrenched beliefs in Germany. At the same time, Germany also cooled its ties with China despite intensive trade and business links.
Just last week, Germany's Foreign Office summoned China's ambassador after Berlin accused a Chinese warship of aiming a laser at a German aircraft on patrol in the Red Sea. The German plane was deployed as part of an EU-led operation to protect commercial ships from the Houthi militia operating out of Yemen.
But China has disputed Germany's allegations, saying it was "totally inconsistent with the facts known by the Chinese side."
The Chinese Ministry of Defense said the Chinese frigate in question was not in the Red Sea but in the Gulf of Aden at the time.
If Germany manages to set aside all the differences with China and moves closer to Beijing, it would certainly anger Washington, which still binds together the European security architecture. Notably, Russia's ongoing war against Ukraine has brought the importance of US military presence in Europe into sharp focus.
"Germany's new government (...) now faces unprecedented pressure to navigate in a geopolitical world amid an ongoing polarization of society at home," underlined Wessling and Bartsch.
That being said, the EU and the US have substantially different threat perceptions of China, said Llorente and Otero-Iglesias.
"The US is trying to fight a hegemonic competitor and an existential threat, while the EU is aiming to establish a balanced relation with a global player," they argued.
Against this backdrop, the experts underlined, "the EU prefers to develop differentiated de-risking strategies to reduce critical dependencies in its economic relations with China."
The German government's China Strategy, unveiled in 2023, indeed emphasized "de-risking," to reduce reliance on China.
Recent years have also seen many German firms investing not only in China, but also in the US.
However, many actors are now recognizing that these business strategies — such as further relocation to China and, increasingly, to the US — may ultimately run counter to the interests of the German economy, potentially leading to a crisis marked by declining exports and job losses, stressed Wessling und Bartsch.
"Thus, the slogan 'derisking, but doing it right' could prove to be a challenging mandate for the new German government."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The EU-China summit will take place in Beijing at the end of July. Could this be a new start for Beijing and Brussels? The answer likely depends on Trump.
His administration has already specified tariffs on the EU and its most important Asian allies, saying Washington will demand a 25% levy on imports from Japan and South Korea from August 1.
The latest US plan for goods from China, however, has yet to be announced. If the trade war between the two escalates once again, China might try to use the EU market to absorb Chinese production overcapacity. In turn, the US could also redefine goods manufactured in the EU through Chinese direct investment as Chinese products and demand higher levies from EU businesses.
All EU states must act together to reduce their external dependencies, the Spanish experts said.
"Different Member States have different types of relations and dependencies with both the US and China, as well as individual interpretations of economic security and strategic autonomy," they pointed out.
This "inherent heterogenous nature" of their trade ties leads to divergent foreign policy priorities, Llorente und Otero-Iglesias argued.
Nevertheless, "partnerships are indispensable for the EU," they added. "China will have to, among other things, open its market to European businesses, and this needs concrete actions and not just promises."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Institutional Investment Strategies & Regulatory Clarity Driving Crypto Bull Run
Institutional Investment Strategies & Regulatory Clarity Driving Crypto Bull Run

Int'l Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Institutional Investment Strategies & Regulatory Clarity Driving Crypto Bull Run

In 2024, cryptocurrencies once again entered a bull market. However, unlike the crypto bull markets of 2017 and 2021, when both Bitcoin as well as Altcoins like Ethereum, experienced rapid price appreciation, this time it seems as though Bitcoin is the main beneficiary of renewed bullish sentiment. Cryptocurrency prices can be found on Binance . Take a look at price performance over the past year, and one can see that, while Bitcoin is up by 71.9% over the past twelve months, Ethereum has fallen by around 26.3% . Other major Altcoins, like BNB, Binance's native token have gained since last year, but these gains have trailed that of BTC. This is not surprising. A key driver of this latest crypto bull run has been institutional adoption of Bitcoin. First, in early 2024, the SEC approved the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs. With a compliance-friendly vehicle for crypto ownership coming online, institutional investors cycled significant capital into these funds. By year's end, the value of all U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs totaled $104.1 billion , with $27.4 billion of this figure representing investment from institutions with assets under management exceeding $100 million. Then, the election of Donald Trump to a second term as U.S. President spurred another bullish wave, as market participants anticipated his new administration would fast-track regulatory clarity in the United States. So far, confidence in U.S. regulatory clarity has increased, as policymakers on both sides of the aisle finalize a clear and comprehensive crypto regulatory framework . Now, as the latest bull wave calms down, the questions now are whether a new bull wave will emerge, when regulatory clarity becomes reality, and whether major Altcoins, not just Bitcoin, will benefit in terms of price appreciation. For further insight into these questions, let's take a look at a recent interview with a crypto industry leader. 2024-2025 Crypto Bull Run: Driven by Institutional Allocation to Bitcoin Back in 2017, the cryptocurrency bull run was driven in large part by speculation in initial coin offerings (ICOs). During the 2021 bull run, a major factor at play was the rapid rise in popularity of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The 2024-2025 crypto bull run, however, has been differentiated by both its outsized focus on Bitcoin, and the outsized participation of institutional investors rather than crypto whales and a critical mass of retail traders. Earlier this month, Catherine Chen, Head of VIP and Institutional at Binance, sat down with Behind Binance host Jessica Walker, to discuss the dynamics of the latest crypto bull run , and what it means for crypto prices moving forward. According to Chen, institutional interest in crypto has been steadily growing, with last year's debut of spot cryptocurrency ETFs serving as a "pivotal moment" for institutional adoption. As Chen explained, "at the very minimum all of these institutional investor(s) has a fiduciary duty to at least take a proper look at this asset class and thanks to the introduction of ETF this asset class has also been given the much needed legitimacy." That said, Chen also argues that different types of institutional investors are moving into crypto at differing paces, with larger, more conservative institutional investors still largely sitting on the sidelines. Per Chen, "regulatory clarity" remains the key hurdle. Certain institutional investors, like insurance companies and pension funds, need well-refined regulations in order to move forward with direct crypto investments. What This Means for Bitcoin and Altcoin Prices Although the aforementioned interview focused primarily on institutional adoption, one can infer from this interview what recent institutional adoption trends could mean for both Bitcoin and Altcoin prices moving forward. Based on Chen's insights on regulatory clarity, it's clear that, once the U.S. and other major jurisdictions finalize and implement their cryptocurrency regulatory regimes, this could spur an even greater inflow of capital into this asset class. At first, as seen recently, this may simply mean a further bull run in which Bitcoin continues to experience outsized price appreciation relative to major Altcoins like ETH and BNB. However, in time, this could translate into a more significant bull run for Altcoins as well. Once institutional investors complete their initial allocation to Bitcoin, allocation to ETH and other major Altcoins could pick up as well, especially as new spot Altcoin ETFs make it to market. In short, given the large role institutional investors have played in this latest bull run, it is not surprising that the situation has played out far differently than the above-mentioned 2017 and 2021 bull runs. The Takeaway for Retail Investors With Bitcoin price plateauing, after extended rallies from October 2024 to January 2025, then from April 2025 through May 2025, it may at first seem like this latest bull run is coming to an end. However, per another crypto market expert, HashKey Capital's Xu Han, "the crypto cycle is still in a growth phase." Furthermore, per Han, there is another potential catalyst that could extend the current bull run. That would be the anticipated shift from hawkish to dovish monetary policy by the U.S. Federal Reserve. In other words, if the Feds continue to lower rates, as well as complete its wind-down of institutional tightening, the resultant liquidity boost could be a boon for crypto prices, given historical trends. Retail investors should keep all of this mind, when deciding whether to go bullish or bearish in the current market environment.

EU backs Trump Ukraine U-Turn but wants US to 'share burden' – DW – 07/15/2025
EU backs Trump Ukraine U-Turn but wants US to 'share burden' – DW – 07/15/2025

DW

time2 hours ago

  • DW

EU backs Trump Ukraine U-Turn but wants US to 'share burden' – DW – 07/15/2025

The European bloc welcomed a shift in US rhetoric on Ukraine but pressed Washington to chip in. The EU, however, failed to agree on a new round of sanctions on Russia. The European Union's foreign affairs chief may be having something of an "I told you so" moment as US President Donald Trump reverses his past praise of Vladimir Putin and vows to ramp up pressure on Moscow. "We see from the United States that they have also realized that Russia does not really want peace," Kaja Kallas told reporters in Brussels on Tuesday. The former Estonian prime minister made a name for herself as one of Ukraine's staunchest political backers, and warned at this week's EU talks that Russia's bombing campaign had "reached record levels." Kallas and many of her EU counterparts welcomed Washington's shift in rhetoric as they filed into a meeting. "What we experienced yesterday with the new messages from Trump was very, very important," Denmark's Lars Lokke Rasmussen said. But some of the EU's top brass also had notes for the US on its latest announcements, including Washington's threat to slap 100% secondary tariffs on Russia and countries that trade with it unless a peace deal with Ukraine is reached by early September. "The 50 days that Mr. Trump has announced is rather long," Dutch foreign minister Caspar Veldkamp said on the sidelines of Tuesday's talks. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump also made headlines Monday with an announcement that he'd be greenlighting sales of Patriot air defense systems and other arms to European countries to send on to Ukraine, just two weeks after Washington paused some arms shipments to Kyiv. The new plan should speed up and expand deliveries of US arms which Ukraine says it needs as it faces increased Russian aerial attacks. Some European countries have already been buying and sending US-made weapons to Kyiv, though the latest scheme could offer more certainty on the permissions needed to swiftly transfer the arms. A US commitment to sell replacements for American-made weapons sent to Ukraine could also encourage European states to ship more of their own military supplies. NATO chief Mark Rutte said the deal would "work through NATO systems" and that European countries including Germany, Finland, Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands were all interested in taking part. But the US is yet to disclose more details of its new scheme and DW understands the technicalities of exactly how it will work are still being discussed. Trump was, however, quick to cast the new deal as a lucrative business opportunity for the US, stressing Europe would foot the bill. And that seems to be raising some eyebrows among his counterparts across the Atlantic. The EU's Kallas told reporters after Tuesday's meeting that she would like to see Europe and the US "share the burden" of arming Ukraine. "If we pay for these weapons, it's our support — so it's European support — and we are doing as much as we can to help Ukraine. And therefore the call is that everybody would do the same," she said. "If you promise to give the weapons then say that somebody else is going to pay for it, it's not really given by you, is it?" Kallas added. Denmark's Rasmussen made a similarly veiled allusion. "We are providing a lot of funding for Ukraine to buy whatever weapons and ammunition they need … But I mean, I would very much like to see all our partners actually also contributing if we want this war to stop," he said. While the US ranks as Ukraine's single largest donor since its full-scale invasion by Russia, the European Union as a whole has spent roughly the same amount as Washington over the same period, according to data from the Kiel Institute cited by Radio Free Europe. The EU outspends the US when the cost of hosting and assisting Ukrainian refugees is factored in. EU states may be breathing a sigh of relief after the US policy shift, but policy analyst Torrey Taussig says it's too soon to judge whether Trump's stance has changed for good. "There has been a seesaw approach to this relationship throughout the last several months of this administration, and I wouldn't be surprised if this relationship, the US-Ukrainian relationship, still has more turns that it can take," the former US government official turned Atlantic Council fellow told DW. "I'm very reluctant to call this a strategic shift in the US-Ukrainian relationship," she added, though added that the two sides' ties now seem far more "positive." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video With European countries racing to boost their own defenses amid pressure from the US and a broader rethink of the EU's geopolitical fragility, governments have been debating how much of a planned military spending splurge should go to US weapons. Arms purchases, especially those involving large weapons systems, tend to lock the buyer into a years-long relationship with the seller, from production to delivery to future repairs. Experts say ending Europe's dependency on the American-made weapons, logistics and intelligence capacities it lacks could take at least a decade — and with US foreign policy proving unpredictable, that leaves some worried. EU heavyweight France has pushed for more European-only purchases, frustrating some other states which argued this only serves to slow down the process of getting weapons into European and Ukrainian hands. The latest US-led plan may be seen by some as a blow to France's efforts, with the potential for more European money to flow toward US arms manufacturers. As Europe nudges the US to do more to support Ukraine and punish Russia, the bloc's own efforts are faltering. Kallas said she was "really sad" that ministers failed to adopt an 18th round of EU sanctions on Moscow on Tuesday due to a holdout by Slovakia. The landlocked central European state has been protesting planned EU laws to ban all sales of Russian gas, and Prime Minister Roberto Fico said in an online post on Tuesday that Slovakia had asked the EU to postpone the vote on sanctions while his government mulled its response to an exchange with the EU's executive aimed at ending the stalemate. Kallas said she was "optimistic" an agreement could be struck among EU states in the coming days.

Trump Admin to Destroy Enough Emergency Food to Feed Every Child in Gaza for a Week Due to DOGE Dismantling USAID
Trump Admin to Destroy Enough Emergency Food to Feed Every Child in Gaza for a Week Due to DOGE Dismantling USAID

Int'l Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Trump Admin to Destroy Enough Emergency Food to Feed Every Child in Gaza for a Week Due to DOGE Dismantling USAID

The Trump administration is set to destroy enough emergency food to feed every child in Gaza for a week due to the Department of Government Efficiency's (DOGE) dismantling of USAID. Several hundred metric tons of emergency food, including high-energy biscuits intended for children under 5, are set to expire in a matter of days after being held for months without being distributed, two sources told The Atlantic . After DOGE dismantled USAID earlier this year, the agency was taken over by the State Department. Under new leadership, any food, money or aid needed direct approval to be handed out. Multiple sources told the outlet that they asked for approval to move the food, but never heard back from officials. An order to destroy the food was sent out in May, just before Secretary of State Marco Rubio told members of Congress that he would see to it that the food gets delivered. An estimated 1.5 million hungry children could have been fed by the nearly 500 metric tons of food for a week, leading critics to review who could have received the much-needed food, such as famine-facing countries like Sudan. In Gaza, about 500,000 people are currently facing starvation, according to the United Nations . A Food Security Phase Classification report from May stated that 71,000 children under the age of 5 are facing acute malnutrition. Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed over the last six weeks while trying to obtain humanitarian aid at aid distribution centers in Gaza, according to the UN. Israeli forces killed at least 31 people on Saturday alone while attempting to access aid from a US-backed food distribution site. The food aid had originally been intended for Afghanistan and Pakistan, however the State Department ended aid to Afghanistan and Yemen over concerns that it would fall into the hands of terrorists, NPR reported in April. Worries about accidentally aiding terrorists were not included in the reason for ending Pakistan's aid. Originally published on Latin Times

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store