
Confronting cyberbullying with law
In today's hyper-connected world, the internet has become a powerful tool for communication, education, and work.
But behind the glow of our screens lurks a darker reality: cyberbullying — a silent epidemic that's tearing through digital communities and leaving real-world scars.
Cyberbullying happens when people use online platforms — like social media, messaging apps, or comment sections — to harass, shame, threaten, or humiliate others.
Unlike traditional bullying, it doesn't stop at the school gate or the office door. It follows victims 24/7, invading the one space that should feel safe — their own homes.
Malaysia now ranks fifth globally for cyberbullying incidents, according to a 2024 report by IPSOS, as reported in Sin Chew Daily.
While this statistic is alarming on its own, what's more concerning is how underreported these cases are.
Many victims suffer in silence — especially women and young people — fearing judgment, a lack of legal protection, or simply because there's no clear or effective way to report abuse.
The nation was rocked in July 2024 by a tragic case that brought the cyberbullying crisis into sharp focus.
On July 5, Malaysians woke to heartbreaking news. A 29-year-old Indian influencer known online as 'Eesha' — real name Rajeswary — was found dead in her family home in Kuala Lumpur after enduring a brutal online harassment campaign.
The abuse, which took place largely on TikTok, included doctored photos used as backdrops for live broadcasts and coordinated attacks by trolls who incited mass ridicule.
Two individuals were arrested soon after. One was charged with criminal intimidation and released on bail of RM36,000; the other was fined a mere RM100 for public insult.
The punishments triggered public outrage, with many Malaysians asking: is that all a life is worth? As Lianhe Zaobao reported, the backlash was swift and overwhelming, and it forced the government to act.
Legal reform amid tragedy
In December 2024, the Malaysian government introduced a landmark legal reform. For the first time, doxing — the act of publishing someone's personal information online with malicious intent — was officially criminalised under amendments to the Penal Code and Criminal Procedure Code.
Under the new law, anyone who threatens, insults, or defames another person through digital communication can now face up to 10 years in prison.
Communications Minister Fahmi Fadzil, quoted in Ta Kung Pao, emphasised that the government is working to define cyberbullying more precisely and ensure that offenders are held accountable. 'It's time we treat online abuse as seriously as we do real-world threats,' he said.
The rise of cyberbullying reflects a deeper ethical crisis in our digital culture. As digital sociologist Daniel Trottier notes in the European Journal of Communication, the internet can act as a 'magnifier for moral panic,' turning individuals into targets of a rapidly growing digital mob.
Cyberbullying thrives in a digital environment shaped by a dangerous mix of inauthenticity, anonymity, and algorithmic amplification.
Offenders often manipulate or falsify images and information to publicly shame or humiliate their targets, as seen in Eesha's tragic case.
Hidden behind fake profiles, they exploit anonymity to avoid accountability while unleashing verbal violence without restraint.
Making matters worse, social media algorithms tend to boost the most sensational and emotionally charged content — whether true or not — further fuelling online abuse.
Although legal frameworks are slowly catching up, experts like Whittaker and Kowalski note that vague definitions and weak enforcement still leave significant gaps in prosecuting digital harassment.
As Trottier points out, the imbalance of justice is stark: victims shoulder the emotional and financial burden of defending their rights, while perpetrators often walk away with minimal consequences. Together, these factors create a system where cruelty is easy, and justice is hard to reach.
A moral crisis, not just a legal one
While the new law marks progress, cyberbullying isn't just a policy issue — it's a moral and cultural challenge.
How did cruelty and humiliation become online entertainment? What responsibility do platforms, media outlets, and users bear?
Media coverage must also tread carefully. Over-exaggeration or sensationalist headlines can retraumatise victims and inflame tensions.
Ethical journalism demands compassion, accuracy, and restraint — especially when reporting tragedies.
Social media companies, meanwhile, must go beyond symbolic gestures. They have the power to create ethical algorithms, launch real-time moderation, and provide accessible mental health tools. As the main gatekeepers of today's digital discourse, their accountability is critical.
Experts agree that tackling cyberbullying requires more than isolated fixes — it demands a comprehensive, multi-level strategy.
Legal reform is a critical first step, and while Malaysia's new anti-doxing law marks important progress, broader legislation is still needed to address the full range of online abuse.
At the same time, social media platforms must take greater responsibility, investing in real-time monitoring systems and adopting transparent policies that prioritise user safety over engagement metrics.
Education plays a crucial role as well. By embedding digital literacy in schools and community programmes, especially for young users, we can empower individuals to recognise manipulation, think critically, and choose empathy over cruelty.
Lastly, support systems must be strengthened — from expanded mental health services to accessible victim support and confidential reporting channels. Only through this layered approach can we begin to dismantle the digital environments that allow online harm to flourish.
Digital media scholar Elizabeth Whittaker stresses that education must include not just how to use technology — but how to use it ethically.
'Behind every screen is a person,' she reminds us. 'Empathy must be part of our digital DNA.' —July 1, 2025
The authors are from the Department of Science and Technology Studies, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya
Main image: GovTech

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
30 minutes ago
- The Sun
Mohammed Siraj fined for Ben Duckett send-off in Lord's Test
INDIA fast bowler Mohammed Siraj has been penalised with a 15 percent deduction of his match fee for an aggressive send-off directed at England's Ben Duckett during the ongoing third Test at Lord's. The International Cricket Council confirmed the disciplinary action on Monday. The incident occurred after Siraj dismissed Duckett in England's second innings on Sunday. The Indian pacer was found guilty of breaching Article 2.5 of the ICC Code of Conduct, which prohibits actions that could provoke an aggressive reaction from a dismissed batter. Siraj's celebration, deemed excessive and conducted in close proximity to Duckett, resulted in an additional demerit point on his disciplinary record. This marks his second offence within 24 months, following a previous incident during the 2024 Adelaide Test against Australia. The 29-year-old admitted to the violation and accepted the sanction imposed by match referee Richie Richardson, avoiding a formal hearing. Under ICC regulations, accumulating four or more demerit points within two years leads to suspension points, potentially resulting in match bans. Two suspension points translate to a one-Test ban or exclusion from two limited-overs matches, depending on the player's schedule. Siraj's previous demerit point was issued on December 7, 2024, during the second Test against Australia.

Barnama
an hour ago
- Barnama
Bursa Malaysia Reprimands Zetrix AI, Fines Seven Directors RM150,000 Each
BUSINESS KUALA LUMPUR, July 14 (Bernama) -- Bursa Malaysia Securities Bhd has publicly reprimanded Zetrix AI Bhd, formerly known as MYEG Services Bhd, and fined seven directors for breaching the Bursa Malaysia Securities Main Market listing requirements (LR). The stock exchange operator imposed a fine of RM150,000 on each director, including the company's group managing director, Wong Thean Soon; executive chairman Datuk Dr Norraesah Mohamad; and non-independent non-executive director, Datuk Mohd Jimmy Wong Abdullah. Also reprimanded and fined were independent non-executive directors Wong Kok Chau, Datuk Seri Mohd Mokhtar Mohd Shariff, Datuk Mohd Jeffrey Joakim and Mohaini Mohd Yusof. According to Bursa Malaysia Securities, the findings of breach and the imposition of penalties on the company and the directors were made pursuant to paragraph 16.19 of the Main Market LR upon completion of due process and after taking into consideration all facts and circumstances of the matter. These included the materiality of the breaches, the impact of the breaches on the company and shareholders/investors, and the roles, responsibilities, knowledge, involvement and conduct/action/inaction of the directors. "Bursa Malaysia Securities has also reminded the company and its board of directors of their responsibility to maintain the appropriate standards of corporate responsibility and accountability to its shareholders and the investing public," it said in a statement. On July 7, 2023, Zetrix AI announced that the company received a notification letter dated July 4, 2023 from the Ministry of Home Affairs (MOHA) to confirm that the Ministry of Finance (MOF) had approved for the company to be appointed as the collection agent for the government revenue and to extend its role as the provider of online services for the Immigration Department of Malaysia. "However, the July 7 announcement was not factual, inaccurate, false and misleading as the contents of the July 4 letter were inconsistent with the company's representations in the July 7 announcement," said Bursa Malaysia Securities. -- BERNAMA


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Four injured in Bukit Sentosa bus crash; police cite brake failure
RAWANG: Three people, including a child, sustained minor injuries when a bus veered off the road and overturned in Jalan Tulip 3, Bukit Sentosa, today. Hulu Selangor police chief Superintendent Ibrahim Husin said the incident occurred about 11.30am. He said the 57-year-old driver was left unharmed, adding that there were only three passengers, aged 9, 17 and 38, at the time. "The bus, travelling from the Serendah KTM station to Bukit Sentosa, had just picked up the passengers at the Serendah government health clinic bus stop when the driver lost control at a bend," he said in a statement. Initial investigations suggest the bus experienced a brake failure before skidding and flipping onto its left side. All three passengers were taken to Selayang Hospital for treatment. The case is being investigated under Section 42(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987 for reckless and dangerous driving, which carries a penalty of up to five years in jail and a maximum fine of RM15,000, upon conviction. Police are urging members of the public with information on the incident to come forward and assist with the investigation.