America Could Get Its First New National Park in Years: What to Know
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Georgia is getting closer to passing a resolution that would establish the first National Park in the state.
If House Resolution 2345 passes, Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park would also become the first newly established National Park and Preserve in the country since 2020, when New River George National Park and Preserve was established in West Virginia.
"For Georgians, this is a legacy investment in both our natural environment and local economies," Seth Clark, executive director of the Ocmulgee National Park and Preserve Initiative, told Newsweek.
"National Park and Preserve status will drive sustainable tourism, expand and protect hunting and fishing access, create good jobs, protect private property rights, and generate long-term economic growth for Middle Georgia," he added.
"The passage of H.R. 2345 would establish Georgia's first and only National Park
and Preserve, culminating almost a century of public-private partnership," Representative Austin Scott, sponsor of the bill, told Newsweek.
"We are proud of the history they represent, what that history means to Georgia, and we want the country and the world to know about, and visit, the land," he added.
Newsweek has contacted the National Parks Conservation Association and the National Park Service via email for comment.
Why It Matters
The efforts to designate Ocmulgee Mounds in central Georgia as a National Park and Preserve have lasted over a century. The mounds were built in the 900s by the ancestors of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, which has since partnered with lawmakers and conservation groups to push for the designation.
Now, Georgia lawmakers are throwing their weight behind passing necessary legislation to upgrade the Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park into a National Park and Preserve.
Not only are 13 lawmakers, Democrats and Republicans, cosponsoring the House resolution, but two Georgia senators (Democrats) have also brought forward their own similar legislation, in a major effort to establish the first National Park in the state, the Savannah Morning News reported.
The Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park in Macon, Georgia, on August 22, 2022.
The Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park in Macon, Georgia, on August 22, 2022.
Sharon Johnson/AP
What To Know
House Resolution 2345 received bipartisan support in Congress in March with only one of Georgia's House members not cosponsoring the bill.
Currently, Ocmulgee Mounds is a national historic site, a designation that "tends to concentrate on one historical feature, rather than multiple buildings or locations," James Brooks, a professor of history at the University of Georgia, told Newsweek.
"National Historical Parks are the next step up from National Historic Sites, and they exist for the same basic purpose as historic sites, but tend to be larger in area," Brooks said.
The change in designation to the Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park, which spans over 700 acres, would increase the area of land protection to a total of 54,000 acres along the Ocmulgee River, supporters say.
This would make the region a "protected landscape, rather than just location," Brooks said.
When discussing his bill, Representative Scott also highlighted the "positive national security implications of the proposed boundary expansion," which would increase to include land near Robins Air Force Base.
He said this would "preserve installation operational areas and land use compatibility for military maneuvers."
Hunting and fishing access would also be protected and expanded in the preserve boundary, Scott said, adding that his bill "prioritizes public hunting and fishing access, while protecting states' rights in regulation and private property rights of middle Georgians."
Just over 5 percent of the state is in the federal registry, much of which is land in Georgia's "critical military bases," Scott said. "This establishment of a national preserve will only increase the federal land inventory of Georgia by about 0.018 percent."
Brooks added that the new park, if the legislation passes, will also be the first comanaged National Park Service unit with the Muskogee Creek Nation Historic Preservation office—which he described as "pathbreaking" management.
What People Are Saying
Representative Scott told Newsweek: "Establishing the mounds as a National Park will ensure that they are protected and preserved for years to come, allowing generations of Americans and Georgians to enjoy our state's rich history and cultures. Additionally, the proposed preserve protects Georgia's natural resources and expands hunting and fishing opportunities for generations of Georgians to come."
He added: "We want to bring people to Georgia to experience our state and the great things it has to offer. The Ocmulgee Mounds are a perfect example of what that can look like. We also want to preserve the history and culture that has helped shape our state into what it is today."
Seth Clark, executive director of the Ocmulgee National Park and Preserve Initiative, told Newsweek: "Designating Ocmulgee Mounds as a National Park and Preserve is critical to conserving some of the most ecologically and culturally significant landscapes in the United States. It protects vital wildlife corridors, wetlands, and river systems through local collaboration. This bipartisan piece of legislation is about smart, locally driven conservation through partnerships with the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, local and state governments, and local industry—and the window to act is now."
He added: "This designation would be a model for how local communities can leverage conservation to drive economic revitalization. It shows that protecting land and creating opportunity aren't in conflict—they go hand in hand. Middle Georgia has been leading by example. and can serve as a model for the fulfillment of the goals of President Trump's recently announced Make America Beautiful Again Commission—but only if Congressman Austin Scott's bipartisan legislation to allow our region to fulfill this potential is passed this year."
Lincoln R. Larson, a professor in the Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management at North Carolina State University, told Newsweek: "National Park status affords a greater productive status than National Monument status, and given the Trump Administration's stated to desire to shrink public lands and reduce protections bestowed on them for drilling, development, and other purposes, conversion to National Parks whenever possible is good for conservation."
Larson added: "Ultimately I think that, in addition to protecting Ocmulgee, this resolution sends a larger message that parks and protected areas are not a partisan issue, and that everyone in this country should, and does, care about them."
What Happens Next
The measure was passed to the House Committee on Natural Resources at the end of March, and is yet to make further progress through Congress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Seven Democrats vying to run for Mike Lawler's House seat. Here are the contenders
One by one they threw their hats in the ring: a crowd of Democrats eager for a shot at the House seat held by Republican Mike Lawler in one of the country's most competitive districts. The field of Democratic contenders for New York's 17th Congressional District had grown to seven by early June, with no additions since then. Each is courting party support and raising money long before the 2026 primary for a Hudson Valley seat that Lawler has won twice and Democrats hope to flip in next year's mid-term elections. One early marker came Tuesday, July 15, when candidates reported how much they collected from April through June — an initial gauge of their support and viability for a costly battle. Two led the pack with big hauls: Cait Conley, a former national security official and Army combat veteran, raised $480,000 Rockland County Legislator Beth Davidson raised $352,000 Yet the newest candidate — Peter Chatzky, a tech company founder and deputy mayor of Briarcliff Manor — vaulted himself into their ranks by lending his campaign $500,000 and raising $180,000 in less than three weeks, according to his campaign. Lawler's campaign, meanwhile, took in nearly $1.4 million over those same three months, a quarter of which — $360,000 — came from three Republican committees that support GOP House candidates with tough races ahead. Lawler had $2.2 million in his coffers by June 30. Will Mike Lawler run for a third term in his NY House district? A big uncertainty still hanging over the race is whether Lawler will run for a third term. He has been weighing a campaign for governor instead, which would take him out of the House race and lift Democrats' chances of claiming his seat. Lawler had planned to announce his decision in June but hasn't said yet which office he will seek. Westchester County Democrats held a series of forums to introduce the large cast of candidates to party members. Suzanne Berger, Westchester's Democratic chairwoman, said the party is planning a forum with a slightly winnowed lineup of four or five top contenders in September. Democratic voters in the 17th District — all of Rockland and Putnam counties, half of Westchester and a sliver of Dutchess — ultimately will choose their party's nominee in a primary next June, still 11 months away. Here are the seven Democrats now vying for that role. Jessica Reinmann Reinmann, a 49-year-old Chappaqua resident, jumped in first, filing federal paperwork to be a candidate in January as the new House term was just getting under way. She is the founder of 914Cares — a nonprofit that fights poverty in Westchester — and has pitched herself as a problem solver with a "mission-driven" campaign. Her finance report shows she raised $109,000 and contributed $115,000 of her own to her campaign in the second quarter of the year. She had $443,000 on hand as of June 30. Beth Davidson Davidson, a 52-year-old Nyack resident, has been a county legislator since 2024 and served two terms on the Nyack school board before then. She joined the race in February with an early endorsement by former Rep. Mondaire Jones, who represented the 17th District before its lines were redrawn in 2022 and who lost a comeback bid against Lawler last year. Davidson, who has long been active in politics, has since rounded up endorsements from a few dozen elected officials and Democratic leaders from Rockland County, along with a litany of activists from around the district. She reported raising $352,000 in the second quarter and finishing with $489,000 in her coffers. She had raised a total of $855,000 during her five months in the race — the highest overall sum of the candidates. Cait Conley Conley, a 39-year-old Ossining resident, worked in the Biden administration for four years, first as director of counterterrorism for the National Security Council and then as senior advisor for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. She's a West Point graduate who served 16 years in the Army, with deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan. She has been endorsed by the progressive veterans' group VoteVets and a pair of forward-looking Democratic groups: New Politics and the Next 50. Conley reported raising $480,000 in the last three months and $816,000 overall since entering the race in March. She had $614,000 in her coffers by June 30. Mike Sacks Sacks, a 42-year-old Croton-on-Hudson resident, is a former journalist who has covered the Supreme Court and was a TV reporter for Fox 5 New York for four years. He now works as a "pro-democracy advocate and constitutional analyst." Sacks joined the race in April and has since raised $212,000, finishing the second quarter with $102,000 in his coffers. John Sullivan Sullivan, a 41-year-old Piermont resident, is a former FBI analyst who quit the agency after 17 years because of what he said was the chaos caused by the new Trump administration. He then moved to Rockland County from the Washington, D.C. area and launched his bid for Congress, after declaring he could better serve the FBI "from the outside." Sullivan reported raising $301,000 since joining the race in April, the third highest total. He had $164,000 on hand after expenses. Effie Phillips-Staley Phillips-Staley, a 54-year-old Tarrytown resident, is a longtime nonprofit leader and elected trustee in her Westchester County village. With five candidates already in place, she joined the field in May and set herself apart as a progressive stalwart, rejecting the idea that Democrats must move to the right to win. She has since raised $52,000 and kicked in $100,000 of her own money, finishing the second quarter with $99,000, according to her campaign. Her spokesman said Phillips-Staley was waging a grassroots bid with no "list of corporations, ultra-rich and Washington establishment figures to seed her operation." Peter Chatzky Chatzky, a 64-year-old Briarcliff Manor resident, is the founder and CEO of a financial technology company called Napa Group LLC. He has served for six years as a village trustee — now holding the title of deputy mayor — after an earlier two-year stint as mayor. NY17: Is ex-Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney the NY Dems' best chance against Lawler after 2022 loss? His $500,000 loan to his campaign and spurt of donations in June brought his balance to $674,000. That was the most any of the seven candidates had on hand as of June 30, just ahead of Conley's $614,000. Chris McKenna covers government and politics for The Journal News and USA Today Network. Reach him at cmckenna@ This article originally appeared on Rockland/Westchester Journal News: The 7 Democrats vying to run for Rep. Mike Lawler's seat: A guide Solve the daily Crossword
Newsweek
15 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Syria's Forgotten Minority—Why the Druze Deserve Our Protection and Attention
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As an Israeli Druze woman serving as a minister at the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C., I feel compelled to share what is happening to my people in Suwayda, Syria. The Druze of Syria, the largest concentration of Druze in the Middle East, numbering more than 700,000 people, are facing a brutal and systematic assault. Despite their relatively small numbers, the Syrian Druze played a foundational role in shaping modern Syria, just as we play a significant role in Israel. A convoy of Syrian military and security forces passes a sign for Suwayda, Syria on July 15, 2025. A convoy of Syrian military and security forces passes a sign for Suwayda, Syria on July 15, 2025. Stringer/Getty Images They led the Great Syrian Revolt against French colonial rule, fighting for liberalism, the rule of law, and human rights for all. This religious minority known for its dignity, neutrality, resiliency, and peaceful resistance is now being targeted by Jihadi militias supported by the Syrian regime, with tanks artillery, and heavy weapons. As a human being I am watching history repeat itself—in real time—through the footage of this horrendous ethnic cleansing. The atrocities of October 7 in Israel did not occur in a vacuum. We have warned the world for years about this growing wave of radical extremism. It has targeted the Yazidis in Iraq, the Alawites in Syria, Christians across the Levant—and now, it is butchering innocent Druze civilians: women, children, and the elderly. Homes are being shelled, families displaced, hospitals are being bombed, and religious sites and symbols desecrated, led by the Syrian regime with the blessing of President Abu Mohammad al-Jolani. And yet once again—the world has remained largely silent in the face of the genocide taking place against my people. Let me be clear: The Suwayda massacre is not an internal Syrian issue. As we have seen before, this has escalated into international sectarian war by radical Jihadists against minority groups that do not ascribe to their version of fundamentalism. As the only democracy in the Middle East that actively protects minority rights, Israel has not stood idly by. Israel is committed to preventing continued harm from being inflicted on the Druze in Syria. As the state of Israel, we are committed to protecting the Druze minority and maintaining the strategic security buffer on Israel's northern border with Syria in the Golan. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu firmly instructed the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to protect the Druze community in Syria and to attack strongholds of al-Jolani's regime in Damascus. Together with the minister of Defense, the PM publicly committed to eliminating the radical forces that attacked the Druze and called for a full withdrawal from Suwayda. We are determined to deter the regime from harming the Druze, by ensuring the full demilitarization of the border with Syria, acting to defend our common values, and for the protection of minority groups. Everyone should know that the Druze of Syria stand as the last symbol of pluralism and minority diversity in the Arab-majority region. If Suwayda collapses, Israel and Jordan face an immediate Jihadi threat on their border. Therefore, I urge you to speak out, clearly and urgently. Join Israel in condemning the violence and the targeted persecution of this minority group and in calling for an immediate withdrawal of Syrian forces from Druze Syrian villages. We must see an immediate cessation of the siege on all essential humanitarian necessities and a humanitarian corridor created between Syria and Jordan. Let me conclude by quoting the people of Suwayda: "Don't let this turn into another forgotten atrocity. Human rights are not selective. Minority lives are not optional." Sawsan Natour-Hasson is the minister of public diplomacy at the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C. She served as the director of the Middle East Economic Affairs Department at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Israel. Natour-Hasson has held a variety of posts in the Foreign Ministry in Israel and around the world, including deputy chief of mission in Athens and in Sofia. Prior to that, Natour-Hasson was an attorney specializing in civil and labor law. She has been awarded the Prize of Excellence for her work at the Foreign Ministry. Natour-Hasson holds LL.B. and LL.M. law degrees from Haifa University. She is Druze and lives with her family in Daliyat Al-Karmel. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
Senate passes aid, public broadcasting cuts
On Thursday's episode of The Excerpt podcast: The Senate has passed another legislative victory for President Donald Trump. USA TODAY National Correspondent Trevor Hughes breaks down a new Trump policy that will keep immigration detainees locked up longer. Trump signed a bill making tough sentences for fentanyl trafficking permanent. Execution is back on for Texas inmate Robert Roberson who has strong innocence claims. Last year, we spoke with Brian Wharton, the former police detective who led the investigation and subsequent arrest of Roberson. Wharton said he got it wrong and Roberson is innocent. Listen to or watch that episode here. Gun groups want a law reversed on mailing through the postal service. USA TODAY Reporter Andrea Riquier takes a look at how the president has been amping up pressure on Fed Chair Jerome Powell and how investors are reacting. Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text. Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here Taylor Wilson: Good morning. I'm Taylor Wilson, and today is Thursday, July 17th, 2025. This is USA TODAY. It's The Excerpt. Today, the Senate passes another victory for Trump and Congress, plus what a new administration policy means for keeping immigrants detained longer, and a lawsuit deals with mailing handguns through the Postal Service. ♦ The Senate earlier today approved President Trump's plan for billions of dollars in cuts to funding for foreign aid and public broadcasting. It's his latest legislative win. Most of the cuts are to programs to assist foreign countries suffering from disease, war, and natural disasters, while the plan also eliminates all $1.1 billion the Corporation for Public Broadcasting was due to receive over the next two years. Standalone so-called rescissions packages have not passed in decades. Lawmakers have typically been reluctant to cede their control of spending, but Republicans in Trump's second term who hold narrow majorities in the Senate and House have shown little desire to resist the President's policies. Now that the Senate has signed off, the bill returns to the House where lawmakers must approve the upper chamber's changes. They're expected to do so before an end of week deadline. You can read more throughout the day on ♦ A new Trump policy will keep immigration detainees locked up longer. I spoke with USA TODAY national correspondent Trevor Hughes to learn more. Hello, Trevor. Trevor Hughes: Hey, good to be here. Taylor Wilson: Thanks for hopping on. So just what is this new Trump immigration policy? How does it change the existing detention landscape? Trevor Hughes: Really, this comes down to a difference between criminal court and immigration court. And criminal court, which most Americans are familiar with maybe from Law and Order operates differently than immigration court. And in the immigration court, the administration controls basically everything, the judges, the prosecutors, the custody, and so they have a lot more power over exactly how things run. And in this case, what's happened is the Trump administration has essentially said, we are no longer going to hold bond hearings for detainees, which means they can no longer ask a judge to release them on personal recognizance or maybe a $50,000 bond or a $5,000 bond or even GPS monitoring while their immigration case is pending. So that means more or less, most of the people who get detained by immigration authorities now will stay in custody until their case is disposed of either through a decision to release them back into the community with permission to remain or deportation. Taylor Wilson: And Trevor, what are you hearing from immigrant advocates about all this? Trevor Hughes: Well, there's a real concern that this is a solution in search of an actual problem. Statistics show that something like 85, 90% of people who are released on bond show up to their court hearings, because again, these are people who are being considered for release by judges. Many times they're being released with GPS monitors. These are not folks who are considered a danger to the community, right? Folks who are considered a danger are kept in custody. And so immigrant rights folks really are making the point that this is a loss of due process. We're locking up people who don't need to be locked up. They're not a flight risk. And it's sort of pulling apart families, pulling apart the people who are earning the money, and making it harder for people to fight their immigration cases. Taylor Wilson: Well then Trevor, if statistically they're not a flight risk, they're not, again, statistically speaking, committing crimes on a mass level, why does the Trump administration push for this? Trevor Hughes: Well, the Trump administration has been arguing for years that people who are living in this country without permission should not be living in this country without permission. And they've changed a lot of rules to increase the number of people targeted. But at the end of the day, the Trump administration's argument is if you want to live in America, you have to have come through the correct immigration process. And their argument is none of these folks did. Taylor Wilson: We should say that these detentions cost US taxpayers as well, right? Trevor Hughes: Oh, they're terribly expensive. But again, it's really important to remember, President Trump ran on a very specific platform of increased immigration enforcement. Everyone knew this would cost a lot more money. He said it would cost a lot more money. And the new federal spending plan contains billions of dollars to make that happen. Huge numbers of new ICE agents, huge numbers of new detention beds. But this is the priority of the current United States government. Taylor Wilson: Trevor Hughes is a national correspondent with USA TODAY. Thank you, Trevor. Trevor Hughes: You bet. ♦ Taylor Wilson: President Trump has signed a law that extends tougher prison sentences for fentanyl trafficking surrounded by relatives of people who died from overdoses and lawmakers who approved the bill. Donald Trump: We'll be getting the drug dealers pushers and peddlers off our street, and we will not rest until we have ended the drug overdose epidemic. Taylor Wilson: The law places fentanyl on the Drug Enforcement Administration's list of most serious drugs with no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. The list includes drugs such as heroin, cocaine, and LSD. Fentanyl has been temporarily assigned to the Schedule 1 category since 2018. The law makes the designation permanent. It also makes permanent mandatory minimum penalties of five years in prison for trafficking 10 grams of fentanyl and 10 years for 100 grams. ♦ A Texas judge has rescheduled the execution of a death row inmate who won a rare stay of execution last year as prison officials were poised to administer his lethal injection. The judge set Robert Roberson's execution for October 16th, almost exactly a year after the Supreme Court in the state granted him a stay on his last execution day. Roberson is imprisoned in the 2002 death of his 2-year-old daughter, Nikki. Despite strong evidence that suggests he is innocent, he was convicted based on shaken baby syndrome, which has since been largely debunked. Last year with hours left to live, Roberson's life was spared following an effort by a bipartisan group of Texas lawmakers. We explored this case last year on a special episode of The Excerpt. The lead investigator in Roberson's case, Brian Wharton, told me that Robert is a completely innocent man and they got it wrong. Brian Wharton: Robert is a completely innocent man, and we got it completely wrong because we were looking for the wrong things. Taylor Wilson: You can go back and listen to or watch that episode with a link in today's show notes. ♦ Two gun organizations are challenging a 1927 law prohibiting mailing handguns through the Postal Service. Gun Owners of America and Gun Owners Foundation, together with Pennsylvania resident Bonita Shreve have filed a lawsuit in the Western district of Pennsylvania against the US Postal Service. Shreve wants to mail her father a handgun as a gift according to the filing, but is prohibited by federal law and Postal Service regulations. In their filing the plaintiffs argue the Postal Service allows businesses and government officials to ship handguns and that individual Americans should be able to do the same. Private shipping companies like UPS and FedEx have policies prohibiting shipping a handgun. A spokesperson for the Postal Service said it is USPS policy not to comment on pending litigation. ♦ President Trump is amping up pressure on Fed Chair Jerome Powell. I caught up with USA TODAY Reporter Andrea Riquier for more and a look at how investors are reacting. Thanks for joining me, Andrea. Andrea Riquier: Sure. Always a pleasure. Taylor Wilson: All right. So how is President Trump amping up the pressure on Fed Chair Jerome Powell? Andrea Riquier: Trump has been putting the pressure on the Fed Chair ever since the start of this year as he was inaugurated for a second term. But what's been going on over the past couple of weeks is that he's sort of started to enlist other people to bring the pressure. His budget director is one example. Other congressional Republicans are another example. In speaking with reporters, the president initially seemed to suggest that he was really getting ready to fire Jerome Powell, but then also sort of walked it back a little and sort of seemed to deflect some of that back onto Congressional Republicans saying, "I wouldn't fire him, but when I polled members of Congress, they all said they would fire him." Taylor Wilson: Well, you mentioned Congressional Republicans. I mean, what do we hear from lawmakers on this? Trump clearly is saying that at least some Republicans support firing him. Andrea Riquier: So another example is not just Congressional Republicans, but Bill Pulte, who is the Director of FHFA, the Federal Housing Finance Agency which regulates Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, again, the Office of Management and Budget Director, who among other things is talking about a headquarters renovation. The Fed has been spread among several different buildings in Washington DC. This renovation was planned for years and years and years, actually even pre-pandemic. And it's actually seen as a long-term money saver because it's going to modernize a lot of buildings, which we've also heard from other Trump administration agencies that they're working in very old, very dated, in some cases slightly unsafe buildings. So this was the Fed's very well-vetted effort to modernize, streamline and cut costs. But just about any construction project you've ever heard of, it has gone over budget. This spans the pandemic period when things were very difficult. The cost of labor was crazy. The cost of getting materials into the country was awful. So it's not surprising that this big project had cost overruns, but now it's sort of being used as a political tool to say, Powell's overseeing this project that's just gone completely amok. That's important because in order to be fired, in order to be removed from his seat as Fed Chair, there has to be cause. And so the idea is, while this is a very political step, it is seen as one step towards firing for cause. Taylor Wilson: Andrew, is this new terrain, the idea of a president pressuring the central bank in this way? Andrea Riquier: It's not new at all. President Nixon apparently rode hard on his Fed Chair. President Lyndon Johnson really wanted to bring interest rates down when he was fighting a war in Vietnam. What is different, at least what my sources have told me, is that Trump, as we know, does things very publicly. In some cases some people say that there is a private Trump who will often reassure people to their face and be friendly and polite and professional in one-on-one or small group settings, but then he kind of lashes out in public. Taylor Wilson: How is all this landing with either Powell himself or just kind of inside the Fed more broadly? Andrea Riquier: So my sense is that Powell is just sort of keeping his head down and trying to be professional and stay above the fray. He has said publicly that he will not resign. Nobody knows if he could be forced into something. He probably doesn't even know what kind of pressure could be coming from the White House. But one sort of telling moment came a couple days ago when the Fed put out a big response to these critiques about the headquarters that we just talked about. They went through an FAQ of frequently asked questions about the renovations, and pointed out what I just said. This was approved. It was vetted. Yes, there are cost overruns, but there's very good reasons for it, and ultimately it should save taxpayer money. And so a lot of people watching this think that this is the Fed sort of being really forced to respond, being backed into a corner as it were. Taylor Wilson: Well, all eyes are on the markets and investors. How have investors been reacting? Andrea Riquier: So markets yesterday did have an initial response to this discussion. Both stocks and bonds sold off when Trump was initially talking around the idea that Powell could be fired. But then when he's clarified and sort of walked it back a little bit, assets recovered. What we have not seen yet is we've not seen the kind of big freak out that we saw, for example, in April after the tariffs were first rolled out, that really caused politicians to sit up and take notice. So I wrote a piece saying, who knows when we'll see that, but we're not there yet. Taylor Wilson: Another interesting piece from you, Andrea. USA TODAY reporter, Andrea Riquier. Thanks for stopping by. Andrea Riquier: Thank you, Taylor. ♦ Taylor Wilson: And coming up later this afternoon, what if your hospital room had a view of trees instead of a parking lot? Turns out it could change your recovery. Dr. Jay Maddock: People with a view of the park-like setting, got out of the hospital faster, used less painkillers, and had less post-op complications. Taylor Wilson: Public health expert Dr. Jay Maddock joins my colleague Dana Taylor to share the surprising health benefits of greening our medical spaces. Catch that conversation today, beginning at four PM Eastern Time, right here on this feed. ♦ And thanks for listening to The Excerpt. You can get the podcast wherever you get your audio. And as always, you can email us at podcasts@ You can find a link to that email in today's show notes. I'm Taylor Wilson. I'll be back tomorrow with more of The Excerpt from USA TODAY.
