
Audi A5 review - is the Audi A4 replacement a better car?
Datsun was the original name given to cars built by Nissan and sold in Europe. The badge was dropped in 1984 in favour of the parent company's brand.
Going through a rebrand is a risky and very expensive business. In Datsun/Nissan's case it cost the company half a billion dollars… in 1984. Today that translates to roughly $1.3 billion just to change a name plate.
And Nissan is far from alone.
Mitsubishi cars used to be branded as Colts in the UK and Daewoo transformed into Chevrolet (in Europe at least) before disappearing altogether.
Cars change their names too. Famously, Porsche was forced into a last minute change for its 901 sportscar when Peugeot claimed the number. Instead, it's rear-engined sportster was called… the 911.
Tesla's Model 3 was originally going to be the Model E because the four model range would then spell out S-E-X-Y. Thankfully, clearer heads prevailed.
The Alfa Romeo 164 saloon had to be rebranded as the 168 in Taiwan and Hong Kong because the number 164 means 'all the way to death' in Chinese.
Which brings us to the Audi A5.
The A5 is the new name for the A4, Audi's highly successful compact premium saloon. Why? Because last year marketeers decreed that odd numbers would henceforth denote internally combusted engines and even numbers would be reserved for electrically powered models.
Or at least it did until earlier this year when the company did an about turn following complaints that the rebrand was causing confusion.
Except it has no plans to swap the A5 back to the A4 – the only model to be rebranded before the whole plan was scrapped.
Confused? You're not alone.
I had the A5 on test and was approached twice by enthusiasts asking if it was the new Audi coupe. To which my answer was 'sort of' because there isn't going to be a direct replacement for the old two-door A5 Coupe.
That's not to say the new A5 is unattractive.
The shape is a modern re-interpretation of the previous generation A4 (internally known as the B9) which was hailed as one of the most beautiful cars in the world in a survey a few years ago – so that's a good place to start. The A5 brings the body style up-to-date with a bigger grille, sleeker headlights, flush-fitting door handles and a full width light bar at the rear that echoes the Audi A6 EV.
The good news carries on when you slip inside.
Audi has a justifiable reputation for building some of the best cabins in the automotive business and the A5 is packed with high technology. Most obviously, there's the full width digital screen set-up which adds a third monitor above the glovebox for the passenger to fiddle around with (they can change the radio station, call up a weather forecast and see how fast you are travelling among other things). Audi says the third screen cannot be seen by the driver but I was always aware of it out of the corner of my eye.
The old A4 was one of the first Audi models after the Mk3 TT to get a virtual cockpit back in 2015 and the new system goes one further with a sweeping panoramic monitor set-up that can be customised to your individual requirements. The central screen is a whopping 14.5 inches and responds instantly thanks to a beefy processor upgrade and changes to the user interface. The high resolution means the graphics are sharp and easy to read.
The main instrument screen measures 11.9 inches and displays all you need to know at a glance.
Sadly, the beautiful row of silver alloy switches for the air con and climate control in the old A4 has been replaced by virtual controls on the new A5. At least they are permanently 'on' so it's fairly easy to adjust the temperate regardless of what you're doing (albeit not as simple as just flicking a switch).
Wireless CarPlay and Android Auto are standard along with a handy wireless charging plate for compatible phones.
The Sound and Vision optional upgrade adds a Bang & Olufsen branded stereo and a head-up display.
Touch sensitive pads on the steering control the audio and cruise/speed limiter, but they can sometimes be activated by mistake when turning the wheel and your palm accidentally brushes against them.
There's more room inside the new A5, which is both longer and wider than its predecessor, and five adults can sit in complete comfort, although there's a transmission tunnel hump to be straddled by anyone sitting in the middle.
The new model is more practical, too. Despite being designated as a saloon, the new model actually has a hatchback which opens to reveal a 445-litre space (417-litre in 4WD versions) that can be expanded by dropping the rear seat backs, creating a very useful long and flat load area. The BMW 3-Series may have a slightly larger boot, but it can't compete with the A5's hatchback versatility.
Audi sent the diesel A5 for evaluation. It's been awhile since I've had the pleasure of driving a turbo diesel – a far cry from the mid-Noughties when, for a time, it seemed as if DERV was the future. On re-acquaintance it's easy to understand why. Fast, smooth and very economical, the TDI has to be the engine of choice if you do a lot of motorway miles thanks to its effortless mid-range shove and miserly fuel consumption. At any speed, the A5 is quiet and smooth thanks to those smooth aerodynamic looks and acoustically-tuned glass. It's a very fine place to spend a long journey.
It's a pretty snappy mover as well. If you choose the Quattro all-wheel drive version 62mph comes up in less then seven seconds. More importantly, there's enough mid-range torque to accomplish overtakes with nothing more than a mere flex of your right foot.
The A4 – and the Audi 80 before it – have been a mainstay of the German marque's range for the best part of three decades. It's not hard to see why. With its smart looks, posh interior, roomy cabin and flexible load carrying capacity, the A5 is all the car most people will ever need.
As for the name change, I think if this car were a breakfast cereal it would be Coco Pops – a firm family favourite that was rebranded as Coco Krispies in 1998 prompting a national outcry before common sense won out and the chocolate-flavour breakfast reverted to its original name just months later.
Whatever the badge says, it's a damn good car.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Auto Blog
3 hours ago
- Auto Blog
2025 Nissan Pathfinder Rock Creek vs. Toyota Highlander: Which Capable 3-Row SUV is Best?
They're both capable in their own ways Both Nissan and Toyota have been making reliable, capable, and relatively affordable SUVs for decades. Nissan always had a focus on the more rugged aspect of SUV ownership, focusing on four-wheel drive paired with a reliable, torquey motor (looking at you, old Pathfinders and X-Terras). Toyota's the same, paving the way for other companies with the 4Runner, Tacoma, Hilux, and Land Cruiser. Aside from the muscular 4x4s, Toyota pretty much perfected the formula for versatile all-wheel drive SUVs and sedans. The RAV4, after the very first generation, came with full-time AWD systems and was very well known for its prowess in multi-season climates. When the Highlander was introduced, Toyota fans enjoyed a bigger but just as capable SUV for the family, without the heft of 4WD. 0:02 / 0:09 What is the Jeep Wrangler 4xe Backcountry? Watch More Nissan's story is very similar. The Pathfinder was introduced in 1987, and it was appealing to buyers for the same reasons as the 4Runner: it was competent, poised, relatively comfortable, and affordable for what you were getting. Of course, the two companies have competed for customers ever since, but they have refined their images a lot since the 1980s. The Rock Creek edition of the Pathfinder accentuates the SUV's capabilities and amplifies a more off-road-ready look, while the Highlander's design is sleek, with a focus on beauty and aerodynamics. The Pathfinder has bigger muscles than the Highlander In the age of hybridized turbo four-cylinder engines, the Pathfinder is one of the last full-sized SUVs with a meaty, 3.5-liter, naturally aspirated V6. It's not made to be nimble, as it produces 295 horsepower and has 259 lb-ft of torque (11 more hp over the standard Pathfinder). Those numbers indicate it's more of a quarter horse than a thoroughbred, designed to work and pull instead of boasting impressive mileage. Around Bend, Oregon, I was averaging around 19 mpg—but that does mean low speeds, frequent stops, and short-distance driving. Heading to Smith Rock State Park, however, I was getting around 23 mpg. Not bad for a full-sized SUV with a curb weight of 4,579 lbs, even with standard 4WD. The V6 was smooth and quiet, thanks to an 8-speed automatic transmission, which gives it a max towing rating of 6,000 lbs. Source: Kristen Brown On the other end of the spectrum, the non-hybrid Toyota Highlander is fitted with a 2.4-liter turbo four that makes 265 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque. Those figures are adequate for a three-row SUV that weighs in at 4,155 lbs for the FWD version and 4,595 lbs when the optional AWD system is included. A smaller engine and a turbocharger help it get slightly better mileage, especially in the FWD setup. Most owners report close to 30 mpg combined when it's FWD, and around 28 mpg as an AWD hybrid. But we're here to talk about the gas version with AWD, which typically gets about 24 mpg combined, according to Toyota. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Size-wise, the Pathfinder is shorter than the Highlander by two inches, but has a wheelbase that's longer by two inches. It's taller than the Toyota by two inches, too, but both seat eight passengers. A longer body means more legroom in the third row and more overall cargo space, but not by much. The Pathfinder's third row was more comfortable, and it had more legroom, but again, not by much. I'm about 5'8' and I had to sit sideways to fit my knees in either SUV. The Nissan's second row, like the Highlander's, can slide forward to increase leg room (as well as make the third row more accessible with the slide and tilt function), but even I wouldn't want to be stuck in the third row for a road trip in either one. Otherwise, cargo space in both SUVs is very similar, with the Pathfinder having more cargo space behind the second and third row by around .5 inches or so. Both are designed with intent, just not the same one By now, you've noticed that the Pathfinder Rock Creek comes standard with a full-time 'Intelligent' 4WD system, so it's basically AWD until you lock the differentials, and the Highlander comes standard as a FWD SUV, but can be configured with an optional AWD system for a higher price. The Pathfinder, though, does allow drivers to select a 2WD mode to prioritize mileage. The Toyota is either FWD or AWD. No ifs, ands, or buts about it. To put it simply, the 4WD signifies it's meant to tackle tougher trails, navigate a myriad of terrains, and get you out of a bind no matter where you are. The Toyota can do it, but it's meant for grocery hauls and school drop-offs, with the option of AWD in case it's snowing or raining. The Pathfinder can easily be a family hauler, but it's built tougher. Source: Toyota With that being said, the Rock Creek edition, strangely enough, has less ground clearance than the Toyota by an inch, but it comes from the factory with aggressive all-terrain tires, beadlock 'style' wheels, more aggressive matte-black accent trimming, an all-black grille, and water-repellant leatherette material. Underbody protection, like skid plates, is standard, as well as tow hooks and hill descent control. The Highlander doesn't have all that, because it's much more family-oriented, with a focus on comfort and convenience rather than capability. The Toyota's interior can feature leather, and if it matters to buyers, the Toyota has a much bigger screen and a more tech-forward interior compared to the Nissan. The Nissan's media screen is smaller than the Toyota's by miles, and it doesn't have wireless Android Auto/Apple CarPlay. You need to have a hard connection for it to activate, while the Toyota is wireless. I don't ever mind that too much because the audio is clearer and the connections are much more reliable, but it does mean you need to make sure you always have a cord on you to use it. The center console in the Nissan is much more off-road focused, too. The 4WD controls are there, featured as a dial, as well as the terrain selector. The Toyota's center console controls are the same, with a Trail mode and a terrain selector (though noticeably fewer modes than the Pathfinder), so it's definitely versatile enough to help drivers feel more prepared for the unexpected, but it's not built for the wild like the Pathfinder is. Pricing is a pretty big separator Looking at what the Pathfinder has to offer, you might assume that the Nissan was the more expensive option of the two, but you'd be wrong. Even though the Toyota doesn't have as high of a towing rating, or a V6, or a full-time 'intelligent' 4WD system that doubles as an AWD system until the diffs are locked, has a smaller third-row, and comes with a smaller engine, the Toyota is more expensive. The gas-only AWD version ranges from $42,745 (subtract $1,600 for the FWD setup) to $53,720 for the Platinum trim with standard AWD. The hybrid models are obviously more expensive. The Rock Creek is a trim level of the Nissan Pathfinder, so the only price range is from the dealership. The MSRP for the Rock Creek is $44,490, which is higher than the AWD Toyota's starting price, but noticeably lower than the maximum price of the Platinum. At that price, it also comes with a tubular roof rack from the factory and trim-specific 18-inch wheels. Source: Kristen Brown The Pathfinder is much more rustic and barebones, lacking many of the technologies that the Toyota has, but the Rock Creek's identity is centered around its robust 4WD system. After all, the name 'Rock Creek' is rumored to be a nod to the recreation area that's close to the assembly plant in Tennessee. The Toyota Highlander is a city slicker that can handle the wilds, but it isn't designed around its abilities. Final thoughts When I think of these two, I separate them by what they were built to do. The Highlander was built to be pretty good at just about everything, but it excels at fitting into your daily routine, with an AWD system to help out just in case you run into nasty weather while you're heading to your son's field trip or the grocery store. That's especially true for the hybrid version. The Rock Creek, however, was built to go off-road and tow, as well as execute daily tasks effectively, but not as effectively as the Highlander. Source: Toyota For the pricing, both are hard to beat. The Highlander is comfortable and adaptable, while the Rock Creek was excellent off-road, and otherwise just 'okay' otherwise. Mileage wasn't great around town, and it was easy to get my toddlers' car seats in, but the lack of technology could be a pain point for some. I didn't mind the lack of wireless Android Auto or Apple CarPlay, but I could see that being a dealbreaker for a lot of curious buyers. Both have exceptional safety ratings and a passable third row, both are reliable, and float around the same price. Therefore, if you plan on off-roading pretty avidly and need something that can tow a trailer, your dirt bikes, or an ATV, the Rock Creek is the obvious winner. If you want something that can handle trails on a just-in-case basis and plan to do a lot of commuting or daily errands, the Toyota is the smarter horse to bet on. About the Author Kristen Brown View Profile


Auto Blog
11 hours ago
- Auto Blog
2026 Nissan Armada Nismo Gallery: The Angriest Armada In Pictures
See all the visual details that set apart the first Armada Nismo If you ask the average Nissan fan which model they'd like to get the Nismo treatment, the Armada would probably be low on the list. The Altima and even the Murano would make a stronger case for a high-performance model, but anyway, here we have the new Armada Nismo – a massive, full-size, off-road-capable SUV optimized for on-road performance. It sounds like a juxtaposition, but obviously Nissan believes in this product. Here's a closer look at the craziest Armada yet. 1 Source: Nissan Much more aggressive than the normal Armada, this is the first-ever high-performance Nismo version of the Armada SUV. 2 Source: Nissan The Armada Nismo sits slightly lower to the ground than the standard model; the Nismo's minimum ground clearance is 8.9 inches. 3 Source: Nissan A Nismo-specific rear fascia forms part of the styling alterations, and there is also a standard rear spoiler. 4 Source: Nissan As with the Nissan Z Nismo sports car, the Armada Nismo can be specified in Nismo Stealth Gray paint, with or without a Super Black contrast roof. 5 Source: Nissan Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. 22-inch forged alloy wheels are unique to this Armada, and they're wrapped in a special all-season tire that optimizes handling, acceleration, steering, and braking. 6 Red accents are found all around the muscular body of the Armada Nismo, including on the grille, side skirts, and D-pillar. 7 Source: Nissan This is the party piece of the new Armada. The 3.5-liter twin-turbocharged V6 has been tuned to produced 460 horsepower, up from 425 hp in other Armadas. Torque remains the same at 516 lb-ft. Interestingly, the Nissan Patrol Nismo sold overseas is even more powerful than this Armada. 8 Source: Nissan As with the exterior, the interior is accentuated by plenty of red accents on the seats, dashboard, and center console. 9 Source: Nissan Nismo suede covers the seats in this Armada, which have 12-way power adjustments for both front occupants. Heated and massaging front seats are also standard. 10 Source: Nissan Seating for seven occupants is available for the Armada Nismo. The third-row seats have a convenient power-folding function. 11 Source: Nissan To go with the red accents, there is also red ambient lighting along the dashboard and doors. 12 Source: Nissan The latest Armada SUV is much nicer inside than the previous model. Not only does it feature advanced features, but the quality has taken a big step up. 13 Source: Nissan Besides the digital driver's display, there is also a 14.3-inch touchscreen and a Klipsch sound system with 12 speakers. Wireless operation of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto is standard, too. About the Author Karl Furlong View Profile


Auto Blog
11 hours ago
- Auto Blog
This Is The Cheapest Audi In America
The cheapest Audi mostly lives up to the brand's high standards With rising car prices not helped by tariffs, many people need to make sacrifices when shopping for new wheels. That could look like buying used instead of new or considering a car from a lower segment than you initially intended. For anyone looking for affordable luxury, the options are particularly scarce, but the cheapest new Audi in America demonstrates that you can still get a premium ride for under $40,000. Let's see what this model is and how it compares to a key BMW rival. Audi reveals sporty new A5/S5 with an emphasis on design Watch More The Cheapest New Audi Is The A3 Sedan Source: Audi Beginning at $38,200, the base A3 Sedan is the most affordable new Audi and one of only a few new Audis that still start at below $40k. This price applies to the Premium 40 TFSI derivative, and the MSRP excludes a destination charge of $1,295. Interestingly, the least expensive Audi just about undercuts the cheapest BMW, which is the 228 Gran Coupe. The BMW starts at $39,600 for the 2026 model year and can be considered a direct rival to the Audi. Both are subcompact four-door models that aim to bring a prestigious badge and upscale feel to a wider audience. But can this cheap Audi still be called a luxury car? Let's find out. Design: More Cohesive Than BMW Rival Unlike its BMW rival, the A3 goes the more traditional sedan route and is not a four-door coupe. It looks very much like a shrunken A4, which is no bad thing. For the 2025 model year, the A3 received mildly revised styling, such as a restyled grille and headlights. The cheapest Audi sedan model looks less awkward than the BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe. Only two colors are standard on the base Audi, those being black and white. Metallic shades will add $595 to the bill and include Navarra Blue, Progressive Red, and District Green. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. The following exterior features are standard: 17-inch alloy wheels Full LED headlights Panoramic sunroof Heated and power-adjustable mirrors LED taillights with dynamic turn signals For a sportier look, the $1,750 Black Optic Package adds 18-inch bi-color wheels, a sport suspension with a slightly lower ride height, and black exterior trim. Although the standard alloy wheels look a bit small, nothing about the cheapest Audi screams entry-level; it's a classy and neatly styled small sedan. Interior: High-Tech Design But Limited Space Audi interiors have been class-leading for many years, although we're hesitant to say the same of the A3. Yes, you get dual display screens with crisp graphics and a distinctively designed dashboard, but there are just enough harder plastics to remind you that this isn't an A4. The back seat isn't great for tall adults, either, but few sedans of this size can be described as spacious. Not being one of Audi's newest models, there are appreciably still a decent number of hard buttons for key controls, but the odd gear shift controller isn't as easy to use as a normal one. The following features are standard in the base A3: 10.25-inch digital gauge cluster and 10.1-inch touchscreen Six-speaker sound system Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto Three-zone automatic climate control Leather upholstery and heated front seats Leatherette door armrests Lane departure warning High beam assist The cheapest BMW is a little better specified, getting a driver's-seat memory function, parking assist, and a Harmon Kardon sound system as standard. However, the Audi does have an extra zone for the climate control system. The Audi's $1,700 Convenience Package is worth a look for features like adaptive cruise control, driver's seat memory, parking assistance, and wireless phone charging. Performance: Quick Enough, And AWD Comes Standard Source: Audi The 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine in the A3 Sedan produces 201 horsepower and 236 lb-ft of torque. This is paired with a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission and standard all-wheel drive. For the 0-60 mph sprint, the Audi needs a claimed six seconds, only a tenth quicker than the base BMW 228 Gran Coupe which has standard front-wheel drive. The more expensive AWD version of the BMW takes 5.8 seconds, so there's not a big enough difference here to decisively pick one car over the other. To drive, the A3 does a good job of matching its larger siblings. Handling is competent and grip is plentiful, while the ride is easily comfortable enough for the daily commute. The spirited turbo-four also has more than enough punch for the A3's light body. Efficiency is fair but not class-leading. The A3 returns 24/34/28 mpg city/highway/combined, whereas its BMW rival with AWD gets 26/38/30 mpg. That difference may only be significant if you do a lot of driving. There's Another Affordable Audi To Consider Source: Audi If you don't want a sedan, the base Audi Q3 crossover isn't much more expensive than the A3. It begins at $39,800 before the destination charge and options, and also has AWD as standard. With 228 hp and 251 lb-ft, the Q3 is more powerful than the A3, but its larger body and greater weight mean it needs 7.1 seconds to reach 60 mph. If you want to have more fun behind the wheel, get the A3, but the Q3 does have a much larger trunk. Bear in mind that Audi has recently revealed an all-new Q3, so it might be worth waiting for that if you're looking for a relatively affordable small Audi. Summary: Audi's Cheapest Car Has Few Flaws Source: Audi Considering its price, there's not much that Audi's cheapest car does wrong. Yes, it's more cramped and isn't built to the same standards as an A4, but other than that, it delivers a driving experience that one would expect from the brand. It's comfortable, refined, and makes the most of not much power. It's also cheaper than its BMW and Mercedes rivals, especially considering the standard quattro AWD system. But perhaps the cheapest Audi's main rivals lie beyond other German subcompacts. Cadillac's CT4 is more powerful and more fun to drive, for instance, while the Acura Integra comes with a satisfying manual gearbox and more features. But if nothing but a German badge will do, the Audi A3 is a solid bet. About the Author Karl Furlong View Profile