Nature reserve enjoys resurgence of bearded tits
RSPB Blacktoft Sands, in Goole, has experienced a record year in the breeding of bearded tits, also known as "beardies", which came dangerously close to extinction in the UK in the 1940s.
Around 120 pairs of the small, reedbed bird produced 500 young last year at the reserve – more than double the breeding success rate of previous years.
Pete Short, RSPB Humber Estuary reserves manager, said seeing the orangey-brown, long-tailed birds at the reserve was a "special nature spectacle".
In 1948, the English population of bearded tits was thought to be down to just two pairs at RSPB Minsmere, the society said.
The population then grew to about 100 pairs in south-east England in the early 1960s and have nearly doubled over the past 25 years.
The RSPB said the resurgence was down to 25 years of dedicated reedbed management at Blacktoft, including winter reed cutting.
Mr Short said: "Watching our bearded tits darting around the reedbeds is a special nature spectacle.
"Carefully managing wetlands is important for some of our rarest species and we're delighted that our management of the reedbeds is paying off.
"Wetlands are important to us all and without them we would lose so much."
Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Mission to save willow tit from extinction
Thousands of migrating birds arrive on coast
Bird lovers gear up for annual watch: 'You get a bit hooked'
RSPB Blacktoft Sands
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
2 hours ago
- Time Business News
During Separation in Pakistan
Separation is arguably one of the most painful phases a couple may go through. In Talaq in Pakistan, where social traditions, religious views, and law are closely connected, separation is filled with a lot of ambiguity—particularly regarding the legal rights of the husband and wife. So, what exactly does the legal framework offers when a couple separates informally without obtaining a divorce? What rights does each partner possess? In this article, we will explore the entire context of separation, explaining a wife's rights in separation, a husband's duties, child custody issues, maintenance and more, all in simple English so everyone can grasp the information. What Does Separation Mean in Pakistan? Legal Separation vs. Divorce In Pakistan, separation isn't always formal. Sometimes, couples just stop living together — but no legal document is signed. This is different from Talaq in Pakistan, which ends the marriage legally. Separation, on the other hand, is a temporary pause or breakdown in cohabitation without formally ending the relationship. Is Separation Recognized by Law? Surprisingly, Pakistani law doesn't specifically define 'separation' the way some Western countries do. However, the law still grants certain rights and imposes responsibilities during this period — especially related to maintenance, child custody, and Mehr. Rights of the Wife During Separation The law leans heavily in favor of protecting the wife during this difficult time. Let's break it down. Right to Maintenance (Nafaqa) Yes, even during separation (as long as divorce hasn't taken place), a wife has the right to financial support from her husband. This includes food, shelter, clothing, and basic needs. This is rooted in Islamic teachings and also supported by Pakistani family law. Right to Residence A wife cannot be thrown out of her house without legal cause. She has the right to live in her marital home until a legal divorce is finalized. If the husband forces her out, she can take legal action. Right to Dowry and Gifts The wife can claim all the dowry items and gifts given to her during marriage — whether by her parents or in-laws. This includes jewelry, furniture, and other personal property. Custody and Guardianship of Children Under Pakistani law, custody usually goes to the mother if the children are under a certain age — typically up to 7 years for sons and until puberty for daughters. The father remains the legal guardian, but the mother has physical custody unless proven unfit. Child Support Rights Even if the wife has custody, the husband is legally bound to pay for the children's education, health, and general welfare. This applies regardless of separation or divorce. Rights of the Husband During Separation It's not just the wife who has rights — husbands also have entitlements and responsibilities. Right to Visit Children A father has the right to meet his children during separation, even if custody lies with the mother. Courts often provide fixed visitation schedules, especially when tensions run high. Financial Responsibilities and Limitations The husband must continue supporting the wife and children, but he can challenge exaggerated financial demands through the court. If the wife is employed and earning well, the amount may be adjusted accordingly. Protection of Property and Assets The husband retains control of his personal assets and income, unless joint property was purchased during the marriage. Any attempt to take his property unlawfully can be challenged in family courts. Legal Framework Governing Separation in Pakistan Relevant Laws and Acts Separation-related rights are governed by a mix of Islamic principles and state laws, such as: Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 These laws cover everything from maintenance to child custody and Mehr rights. Role of Family Courts Family courts play a central role in resolving disputes. Whether it's a wife claiming maintenance or a husband requesting visitation rights, family courts handle these matters through quick and private proceedings. Emotional and Social Impact of Separation Let's be honest — it's not just a legal issue. In Pakistan's traditional society, separation often comes with emotional trauma, social stigma, and pressure from extended families. That's why many couples stay separated but avoid formal divorce, hoping for reconciliation. Common Misunderstandings About Separation 'Talaq' vs. 'Separation' These are not the same. Talaq (divorce) ends the marriage. Separation simply means living apart without ending the marital bond. Many people confuse the two — leading to legal and emotional chaos. Is Verbal Separation Legal? Just saying 'I don't want to live with you' doesn't count as formal separation or divorce. Unless talaq is pronounced and documented properly, the marriage still stands. It's always safer to involve legal help. Steps to Take During Separation Mediation and Reconciliation Sometimes, it's just a misunderstanding. The law allows and even encourages reconciliation through mediators or family elders before things go to court. Hiring a Family Lawyer If things escalate, a family lawyer can help you understand your rights and file the appropriate applications — whether it's for maintenance, custody, or visitation. Filing a Separation Petition Although there's no formal 'separation certificate' in Pakistan, you can file a suit for judicial separation under Section 22 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act. This is rare but possible. Rights Related to Mehr (Dower) Mehr (also spelled Mahr) is the mandatory financial gift from husband to wife. If unpaid, the wife can claim it during or after separation — and it becomes immediately payable upon talaq or khula. Final Thoughts Going through a separation is like being in a storm and not knowing what direction to go. Having a separation compass (or clear steps) will make it easier. Whether you're a husband or wife & procedure of talaq in Pakistan, there is a framework of entitlement, obligations, as well as fairness under Pakistani law. Each individual case, however, is distinct. You should speak to an attorney for guidance on how the law will work for your case. Even during a separation, courteousness, grace, respect, or understanding is always best. FAQs Can a wife claim maintenance during separation in Pakistan? Yes, she can. As long as the marriage is intact, the husband is obligated to support her financially. Does separation mean automatic divorce in Pakistan? No, separation and divorce are different. Legal divorce requires proper procedures, including notice and documentation. Can the husband stop the wife from seeing the children? Only if the court restricts access due to valid concerns. Otherwise, mothers usually have physical custody, especially for young kids. How can a couple legally separate in Pakistan? There's no official 'separation certificate,' but a suit for judicial separation can be filed under certain laws. Is the wife entitled to Mehr if she is separated but not divorced? Mehr becomes immediately payable upon divorce. However, if it was due at marriage or later specified, she can claim it at any point. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Business Wire
17 hours ago
- Business Wire
Arizona Literacy Plan 2030 Outlines Key Strategies to Boost Third Grade Reading Scores
PHOENIX--(BUSINESS WIRE)--To help more of Arizona's youngest students develop the literacy skills they need to be proficient readers and successful in school, partners in Read On Arizona, our state's early literacy initiative, have come together to launch Arizona Literacy Plan 2030. 'Arizona Literacy Plan 2030 is a rallying cry for committing to what works," Sean Ross, Executive Director, Arizona State Board of Education Share Literacy impacts every aspect of academic achievement. Research shows that students who don't learn to read well by the end of third grade are likely to fall behind in all subject areas and much more likely to drop out. But less than half of Arizona's third graders passed the state's most recent English Language Arts assessment, which encompasses reading, language, and writing. Arizona Literacy Plan 2030 outlines the proven strategies and actions required to improve literacy outcomes for Arizona students. Read On Arizona gathered input and commitments from state and local partners to align efforts and collaborate over the next five years toward the goal of 72% of third graders at reading proficiency. 'With the right instruction and support, almost all children can learn to read proficiently,' said Read On Arizona's Terri Clark. 'Our educators are working hard to teach students to read every day, but they need support. This plan is a framework for Arizona to scale up evidence-based strategies so that all of our young learners can develop the literacy skills they need.' Scaling Up Successful Strategies Arizona Literacy Plan 2030 highlights several 'scale-to-succeed' strategies and goals, including expanding the number of literacy coaches to support educators in early grades and sustaining Arizona's K-5 Literacy Endorsement so that all new and certified early grades teachers are supported with training in the most effective literacy instructional practices. 'Evidence-based reading instruction and interventions work for all students, including English learners and students exhibiting characteristics of dyslexia,' said Sean Ross, executive director of the Arizona State Board of Education. 'Arizona Literacy Plan 2030 is a rallying cry for committing to what works. We know the direction to head, and we're all heading in that direction together.' Other key strategies outlined in the plan include increasing access to quality early learning for preschool-age children and reducing chronic absence to pre-pandemic levels. 'Attendance is critical,' said Janice Palmer, senior vice president of government affairs and public policy at Helios Education Foundation. 'We need our students in the classroom, especially in the early grades, when they're learning foundational literacy skills.' Partner Action Commitments Arizona Literacy Plan 2030 also includes commitments from a wide range of partners across the state, including state agencies, philanthropy, community partners, and more, to take specific, measurable actions over the next five years aligned with its key priorities. As part of the roll-out and implementation of the plan, Read On Arizona will look to connect with and collaborate with additional public and private sector partners in the coming months. 'The plan is the framework,' Clark said. 'Everyone has a role to play.' Arizona Literacy Plan 2030 is available on LitHubAZ, a free online resource for educators, administrators, community partners, and families to find effective ways to help students learn to read at grade level and be successful in school. About Read On Arizona Launched in 2013, Read On Arizona is our state's early literacy initiative. Partners in Read On Arizona are committed to working together to improve language and literacy outcomes for Arizona's children from birth to age 8, with strategic focus on school readiness and third grade reading proficiency. The Read On Arizona collaboration provides leadership at the state level through an advisory board consisting of representatives of founding partners — Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Community Foundation, First Things First, Helios Education Foundation, and Virginia G. Piper Charitable Trust — as well as the Arizona State Board of Education, the Governor's Office and several other key education stakeholders and philanthropic organizations. Read On Arizona also supports local literacy efforts through a network of Read On Communities. Learn more at
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
17 Phrases Know-It-Alls Use To Flex Their ‘Superiority'
We've all dealt with those people who can't help but try to outshine everyone else in the room. They drop subtle (or not-so-subtle) phrases designed to make you feel like they know more, like they're the walking encyclopedia of the conversation. These individuals often enjoy showcasing their perceived intelligence with lines that can come across as dismissive, condescending, or annoying. Here's a breakdown of what they say and what they're really trying to accomplish. People love to whip out 'Well, technically…' when itching to correct you on something small, often irrelevant. It's not about adding depth to the conversation—it's about asserting their intellectual dominance by focusing on a minor detail. This phrase is a favorite among those who need to be right, even if the 'correction' doesn't matter in the grand scheme. It's less about accuracy and more about control. Their goal is to sound smarter, not to be helpful. These people rarely bring up 'technically' moments in good faith. It's usually a way to remind you who's supposedly more precise. Even when they're right, their delivery reeks of superiority. They enjoy spotlighting flaws, even minor ones, to inflate their ego. The tone says it all: they want to feel smarter than you. When someone tells you something is 'simple,' they're not being helpful—they're belittling you. It's their way of suggesting that you're making something more complicated than it needs to be. Even if the topic is nuanced, they reduce it to a basic level to make it seem like you're the one who's struggling. The subtext is loud and clear: 'I've got this figured out, why haven't you?' It's condescending, plain and simple. What they really mean is that your confusion is beneath them. They want to look like the expert in the room. By minimizing complexity, they elevate themselves. This tactic shuts down deeper discussion fast. It leaves you feeling talked down to, not enlightened. When someone says, 'I read somewhere that…', it's often their way of flexing their 'well-informed' status. The problem is that they rarely cite reliable sources or offer any real depth. It's just a tactic to make you feel like they're more in the know, even if what they're referencing is vague or irrelevant. It's a throwaway line meant to make them seem well-read and knowledgeable. Most of the time, it adds nothing valuable to the conversation. This phrase is a lazy attempt at credibility. They hope you won't question the source. It's meant to shut down your perspective by implying they've already done the homework. But vague references rarely impress anyone genuinely informed. It's more about sounding smart than being smart. When someone starts a sentence with 'Actually…', they're waving a flag that says, 'I'm here to correct you.' This one word is a classic way to interject and undermine whatever you've just said, whether or not they have any groundbreaking information to share. It's a subtle power move meant to establish their intellectual dominance. They want you to know they're smarter, even if the correction is pointless. Their 'correction' is often unnecessary, but the condescension is crystal clear. They thrive on these moments of interruption. It's less about clarity and more about control. They want the room to pause and admire their knowledge. Even when it's petty, they crave that moment of superiority. 'Actually' is rarely as harmless as it seems. Hearing this phrase can feel like nails on a chalkboard, especially when you already get it. It implies you're clueless, and the speaker is swooping in to save you with their vast knowledge. In reality, they're positioning themselves as the 'expert' in the conversation, leaving you as the uninformed bystander. It's one of those statements that instantly turns a discussion into a lecture. They assume the teacher role whether you want it or not. Their tone isn't about being helpful—it's about being superior. This is how they assert dominance in subtle social ways. They need you to recognize their authority, even if it's over something trivial. These people mistake condescension for clarity. Conversations stop being equal the moment this phrase is dropped. 'Everyone knows that' isn't just a phrase—it's a dig, a not-so-subtle way of making you feel like you're the only one in the dark. It's designed to make you question your intelligence and put the other person on a pedestal. They're saying, 'How could you not know this?' It's dismissive and shows they're more interested in appearing smart than engaging in a meaningful conversation. It's arrogance wrapped in casual phrasing. What they want is to highlight how behind you are. They crave the comparison between their brilliance and your supposed ignorance. These statements aren't about facts—they're about hierarchy. Making you feel small makes them feel big. That's their real goal here. This one is the verbal equivalent of a door slamming in your face. When someone says, 'You wouldn't understand,' they're not just shutting down the conversation but also implying that your brain can't handle the topic. It's a passive-aggressive way of belittling your intelligence while making them feel superior. The worst part is it doesn't invite a discussion—it's designed to make you feel left out and inferior. It sends a clear message that they think you're intellectually inferior to them. This phrase is all about exclusion and hierarchy. They aren't offering to explain—they're declaring you unworthy of understanding. It's a power play disguised as protection. They get to feel smarter while you're left feeling dismissed. It's about maintaining their self-image, not clarity. If someone starts with this, prepare yourself. What follows will be rude, no matter how much they try to sugarcoat it. This phrase is the ultimate passive-aggressive opener. They're permitting themselves to be condescending under the guise of politeness. They really mean, 'I'm about to put you in your place, but I want to look like I'm being civil while I do it.' Their tone says it all—smug, knowing, and superior. They think prefacing it this way softens the blow. In reality, it just makes them seem more manipulative. They want to insult you but hide behind fake manners. This isn't honesty—it's veiled hostility. This phrase is nothing short of an insult. It's a direct jab at your intelligence, as if they question whether you know the subject. It's not an innocent question—it's a statement wrapped in a question mark designed to belittle you. Instead of offering clarification or engaging in a real conversation, they use this to remind you that, in their eyes, you're out of your depth. It's designed to make you feel embarrassed and small. They don't want your answer—they want you to feel inferior. This phrase is about posturing, not discussion. It's dismissive and patronizing in equal measure. Their goal isn't understanding—it's dominance. People who say this aren't curious; they're condescending. Whenever someone says, 'It's common sense,' they're not being helpful—they're being condescending. This phrase implies that whatever you discuss should be so obvious that only a fool wouldn't get it. It's their way of saying that you lack basic understanding while they are enlightened. It's a dismissive line that shuts down real conversation. Instead of explaining, they're choosing to belittle. They use this to make themselves feel superior. It's not about facts—it's about ego. Their words are meant to humiliate, not clarify. When someone defaults to this phrase, they're signaling impatience and arrogance. It's a shortcut to making you feel small. This phrase is a favorite of people pretending they're experts, but their 'research' often consists of reading a few articles or watching a YouTube video. They use this line to back you into a corner, making it seem like their viewpoint is bulletproof because they've put in more 'work.' The reality is they're probably as informed as you are, but they'll claim superior knowledge to discredit your opinion. It's less about facts and more about authority. They want to win the argument, not exchange ideas. Their version of research rarely withstands scrutiny. It's a bluff to make you back down. They hope you won't challenge their so-called expertise. Saying this phrase signals they're done listening. They value appearing right over being open-minded. This is one of those humblebrag phrases that people drop to make it seem like you're late to the party. By saying, 'I've known that for ages,' they're trying to make you feel like you're behind the curve while they've been sitting on this information forever. It's dismissive, unnecessary, and another way to inflate their ego by making you feel like you're playing catch-up. It's not about sharing knowledge—it's about subtly putting you down. They want you to know they've been ahead of you all along. Their goal is superiority, not camaraderie. They frame themselves as more experienced, more informed, and ahead of the game. It's rarely said kindly—it's meant to highlight your ignorance. This isn't about facts; it's about status. They want you to feel embarrassed, not enlightened. This phrase is a classic move to shut down your perspective, regardless of whether their 'experience' is relevant. Even if it is, they use it to shut down the conversation because, in their mind, more experience equals superior knowledge. It's an automatic conversation ender, implying that their lived experience trumps your understanding, no matter what you bring to the table. They aren't offering insight—they're closing the door on your opinion. It's all about pulling rank. Experience doesn't always equal wisdom, but they want you to think it does. This phrase is about power, not collaboration. They want you to defer, not discuss. Once this line drops, they've signaled they're done listening. Their ego won't allow for debate. While this might seem like a friendly offer, it's often a backhanded way of saying you're doing something wrong, and they're here to save the day. The real meaning behind this phrase is, 'I know better than you, and you need my guidance.' It's condescending and often unnecessary, especially when you didn't ask for their help in the first place. They frame it as kindness, but it's rooted in superiority. They want credit for being the wiser voice in the room. This isn't generosity—it's about control. They believe their unsolicited advice is a gift you should accept. Dismissing your ideas feels like doing you a favor. Their 'help' isn't about your growth—it's about their ego. These words mask superiority as concern. This one's sneaky because it sounds like they're just offering an alternative perspective, but really, it's a way of saying their method is better than yours. It's a quiet way of implying that your approach is flawed and theirs is superior. Even if they don't outright say your way is wrong, the subtext is clear—they think they know better. It's dismissive, masked as casual commentary. They aren't offering advice—they're issuing judgment. Their words imply there's only one right way—their way. They want you to question your choices and defer to their experience. Subtle superiority is still superiority. It's rarely about improvement; it's about control. This phrase chips away at confidence while elevating their ego. When someone says, 'I'm pretty sure…' they cast doubt on what you've just said, even if they don't have solid evidence. It's a way of hedging their bets while implying they have a better handle on the topic. It's passive-aggressive because it sounds uncertain, but in reality, they're trying to gently correct you, whether or not they have the facts to back it up. They want to sound knowledgeable without fully committing. This gives them cover if they're wrong. This phrase is about planting seeds of doubt. They subtly question your grasp on reality. Even if they're wrong, they've unsettled your confidence. They use uncertainty as a weapon. It's less about facts, more about control. While this might sound diplomatic, it's often just a way for someone to end the conversation when they think they've won. By saying, 'Let's agree to disagree,' they're essentially saying, 'I'm right, but I'll let you have your little opinion.' It's a dismissive way to shut down further discussion and avoid engaging with your viewpoint. They want the final word without offering closure. It's condescension dressed up as civility. What they're saying is they're done respecting your perspective. They don't want dialogue—they want you to back down. This phrase isn't about respect, it's about control. It ends conversations on their terms, not yours. They leave feeling superior, not reconciled.
