How Many Countries Recognise Palestine As A State?
AFP's tally includes France, following President Emmanuel Macron's announcement on Thursday of a "formal" recognition in September at the UN General Assembly.
France is among 10 countries that have announced their decision since the start of the war in Gaza, launched by Israel after Hamas's October 2023 attack.
In 2024, four Caribbean countries -- Bahamas, Barbados, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago -- did so, as well as five in Europe -- Armenia, Ireland, Norway, Slovenia, Spain.
France followed in 2025.
Until now, the Permanent Observer Mission of the State of Palestine to the UN, which represents the Palestinian Authority, had counted 139 countries as having stated their recognition of the Palestinian state, unilaterally proclaimed in 1988.
That would bring the total to 149 by adding the diplomatic gestures made since 2024.
- Understanding AFP's tally -
However, AFP's verification, based on official announcements and responses obtained by its global network of bureaux, concluded that at least four countries should not have been included in this list.
They are the Czech Republic, Hungary, Malta and Papua New Guinea.
The Vatican was also included in some counts but the Holy See only has observer status at the UN. It is not a member state.
For three other countries -- the Central African Republic, Ethiopia and Togo -- AFP had not received confirmation as of July 25.
Mexico meanwhile, absent from the list, has stated its recognition.
In 2024, the Mexican foreign ministry said the country had "long supported various actions" which "have the legal effect of recognising Palestine's status as a state".
So to recap AFP's calculation -- 139 states before the war, four of which were refuted (bringing the number to 135), three without confirmation (132), minus the Vatican (131), plus Mexico (132), as well as 10 new recognitions (142).
- Going back on past actions -
Among the four states removed from the list are two former Eastern Bloc countries, Hungary and the Czech Republic, which do not or no longer recognise the State of Palestine, as had been the case in 1988 as part of Soviet recognition.
Hungary, where Prime Minister Viktor Orban is a close ally of his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu, stated last year his country "does not agree with the recognition of a state of Palestine".
The Czech foreign ministry responded to AFP that its government "has not yet recognised Palestine as a state".
In 1988, the government "recognised only the act of the declaration of the State of Palestine... However, this does not mean recognition of statehood."
In Papua New Guinea, foreign secretary Elias Wohengu, questioned by AFP, said he was "not aware of any position by PNG to establish any relations with Palestine", adding: "Palestine has never been a nation."
Foreign Minister Justin Tkatchenko, for his part, responded that the country "recognises Israel and that's where it stands at this point of time".
The last of the four is Malta, which said it was ready to recognise Palestine in a joint message with Ireland, Spain and Slovenia in March 2024, once the conditions for the setting up of a state were met.
While the other three countries took those steps a few months later, Malta has not yet formally done so.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
16 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Houthis pledge to step up shipping attacks to pressure Israel on Gaza
The Houthis, who took control of Yemen's capital Sanaa in 2014, have been striking Israel and commercial vessels in the Red Sea after Israel's war with Hamas, which rules Gaza, began in October 2023 Bloomberg Houthi militants pledged to target ships of any company that deals with Israeli ports, escalating their military operations in a bid to increase pressure on Israel to further ease restrictions on the hunger-ravaged Gaza Strip. The targeted ships will be attacked 'in any location within the reach of our armed forces,' a spokesman for the Iranian-backed group, Yahya Saree, said in televised comments. 'All our military operations will be ceased immediately upon the cessation of aggression against Gaza and the lifting of the blockade.' More than $2 trillion of global seaborne trade had passed by the coast of Yemen per year — most of which were ships heading to and from the Suez Canal on journeys between Europe and Asia. Traffic plunged by about 70 per cent after the Houthis began attacking vessels in the area and has remained low despite a lull in attacks in 2025. Israel increased aid distribution to Gaza as it faces a growing international outcry over hunger in the shattered Palestinian enclave. The Israeli army on Sunday suspended some military operations to facilitate the movement of United Nations relief convoys and restored electricity to a desalination plant in Gaza for the first time since March. The Houthis have already been targeting ships that had ties to Israel. Earlier this month, the group carried out attacks that sank two cargo ships, killed three crew members and led to detention of 11 others. These were the first such assaults on merchant vessels since November. Israel has occasionally struck Houthi targets in Yemen in retaliation.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Express View on ICJ verdict on climate obligations: A welcome nudge
Last week, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that countries are 'obliged' to 'prevent harm from climate change'. The Court was responding to a UN General Assembly request, triggered by a resolution backed by small island states, for an 'advisory' to 'ensure protection of the environment' from GHG emissions. In a process that stretched over two years, the ICJ consulted experts, including those from the IPCC, as well as representatives of nations and blocs such as the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, to affirm that 'limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees C should be considered the primary temperature goal for nations' and that they are obliged to make 'adequate contributions' to achieve this target. The advisory is not binding on governments, but it could breathe new life into the flailing global climate change negotiations. It could also have significant implications for environmental jurisprudence, enabling vulnerable groups and nations to push for stronger climate action. Ten years after the Paris Pact set the roadmap for climate action, numerous inclement weather events all over the world have shone unflattering light on the absence of a collective resolve to decarbonise the world economy. The UN's annual climate meet has taken important decisions to compensate countries for loss and damages due to global warming-induced disasters. Yet, these meetings continue to be held hostage by decades-long differences over who should contribute how much to the mitigation efforts. Last year's UNFCCC meet at Baku, billed as the finance CoP, was a particular disappointment. Leaders of most major economies failed to turn up, and less than two months after the summit, the US President pulled his country out of the Paris Climate Pact for the second time in less than 10 years. The US did not face any legal challenge for pulling out of the treaty, and developed countries have, by and large, got away with not meeting their financial obligations. The ICJ advisory has not spelt out any consequences for defaulters. However, its strong endorsement of compensation to countries that suffer climate damage could trigger a wave of litigation for damages. In recent years, developed nations have reluctantly acknowledged that vulnerable countries require assistance to deal with climate disasters, but they have rejected any suggestion for reparations. The ICJ's opinion could move the needle forward. The top UN court has also affirmed the salience of the principle of 'common but differentiated responsibilities'. As rich countries increasingly put pressure on emerging economies, such as India, to assume more global warming mitigation responsibilities, this founding tenet of climate negotiations has come under increasing strain. The ICJ advisory should jolt the historically high emitters and nudge them to fulfil their climate commitments.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Macron, Erdogan Close Ranks On Gaza: Anti-Israel ‘Alliance' Brewing After Palestine Move?
/ Jul 28, 2025, 07:31AM IST Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and French President Emmanuel Macron held a phone call to discuss the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Erdogan expressed deep concern and urged international intervention while reiterating the need for a long-term resolution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict. Macron recently announced plans to formally recognize Palestine, a move that has drawn criticism from the U.S. and Israel.#Macron #Erdogan #GazaCrisis #Palestine #IsraelPalestine #MiddleEastPeace #TwoStateSolution #HumanitarianCrisis #Turkey #France #InternationalRelations #DonaldTrump #USPolitics
