Is generative AI all it's cracked up to be? Not yet and not without humans
Image: Gerd Altmann/Pixbabay
It's been about two years since generative AI exploded onto the mass market and into the boardroom buzzword lexicon. What began as a curiosity has quickly snowballed into a business necessity. It might sound hyperbolic, but those who are not exploring how AI can support their businesses are already falling behind.
But we've seen big tech ideas arrive, explode into the mass market and then quietly subside before. Remember when brands couldn't launch NFTs and Metaverse activations fast enough?
Generative AI has promised similar seismic change but unlike those other technologies, it is actually here to stay. It is powerful and it is changing the way businesses operate. Is it all it's cracked up to be though? Not yet.
What
AI
is doing well right now
At Euphoria, we've been working with AI tools for a while and their value is clear. From a productivity standpoint, it's like having a hyper-intelligent colleague in the room. Except this one doesn't get tired, doesn't take smoke breaks and doesn't recoil at the thought of sifting through hundreds of data points on a spreadsheet.
One of the biggest advantages for us has been in customer service analysis. Each day, our system generates hundreds of call transcripts which, when fed into an AI tool, allows us to identify poor tone or negative sentiment. A human, in our case our Operations Director Leonie Stanley, then reviews those flagged interactions each day and uses them as training opportunities. Without AI, reviewing those transcripts would take hours of manual work and problems would probably go undetected.
What AI does exceptionally well is make the invisible, visible. It transforms masses of data, which might be ignored or under-utilised in a business, into useful insights that can help improve operations, drive efficiency or change behaviours.
AI 's improvement areas
There are some exciting generative AI use cases that are emerging but still need maturing.
Voice agents, for instance, are improving rapidly and are capable of handling everything from ordering a pizza to directing calls.
But there are aspects of the tech that aren't perfectly seamless yet, like the way even a one second delay between responses feels awkward to the human ear.
Maybe it's because the human brain craves connection, and in an emotionally charged interaction, that delay is a reminder that you're speaking to an AI agent simulating empathy rather than a human being actually feeling it.
I don't believe they'll ever fully replace the need for humans, but in scenarios where there is a choice between an AI agent and no help at all, AI agents can make a big difference.
In call centres, we're seeing some businesses using AI agents to handle overflow calls and basic triage. This works, because it's an effective stopgap which removes the frustration that would come from long wait times.
There's also a strong use case for AI agents in owner-run and small businesses where they just don't have the human resources to do it all. If they're missing calls and not getting to customers, an AI agent provides service where previously there was none. That's a win-win for both the business and the customer and I'm excited to see how small business use of generative AI develops.
The future of
generative AI
Generative AI tools are developing rapidly and they're starting to be integrated everywhere from coding to virtual receptionists. In five years, the technology might be able to do almost anything. But that doesn't mean it should.
We're on the brink of changes that will be more profound than the Industrial Revolution and now is the time where we need to decide what we want AI to do, and what we want to preserve for humans.
There is growing evidence that rather than connecting humans, technology is making us lonelier. AI should make us more human, not less. That means handing over the grunt work to the AI, while protecting the value that comes from connection, intuition and creativity.
It's a thin line to walk but if we want both humanity and generative AI to succeed, we need to embrace technology while always putting people first.
Warren Hawkins, Managing Director, Euphoria Telecom
Warren Hawkins, Managing Director, Euphoria Telecom
Image: Supplied.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
09-07-2025
- IOL News
Is generative AI all it's cracked up to be? Not yet and not without humans
Generative AI has promised similar seismic change but unlike those other technologies, it is actually here to stay. It is powerful and it is changing the way businesses operate. Is it all it's cracked up to be though? Not yet. Image: Gerd Altmann/Pixbabay It's been about two years since generative AI exploded onto the mass market and into the boardroom buzzword lexicon. What began as a curiosity has quickly snowballed into a business necessity. It might sound hyperbolic, but those who are not exploring how AI can support their businesses are already falling behind. But we've seen big tech ideas arrive, explode into the mass market and then quietly subside before. Remember when brands couldn't launch NFTs and Metaverse activations fast enough? Generative AI has promised similar seismic change but unlike those other technologies, it is actually here to stay. It is powerful and it is changing the way businesses operate. Is it all it's cracked up to be though? Not yet. What AI is doing well right now At Euphoria, we've been working with AI tools for a while and their value is clear. From a productivity standpoint, it's like having a hyper-intelligent colleague in the room. Except this one doesn't get tired, doesn't take smoke breaks and doesn't recoil at the thought of sifting through hundreds of data points on a spreadsheet. One of the biggest advantages for us has been in customer service analysis. Each day, our system generates hundreds of call transcripts which, when fed into an AI tool, allows us to identify poor tone or negative sentiment. A human, in our case our Operations Director Leonie Stanley, then reviews those flagged interactions each day and uses them as training opportunities. Without AI, reviewing those transcripts would take hours of manual work and problems would probably go undetected. What AI does exceptionally well is make the invisible, visible. It transforms masses of data, which might be ignored or under-utilised in a business, into useful insights that can help improve operations, drive efficiency or change behaviours. AI 's improvement areas There are some exciting generative AI use cases that are emerging but still need maturing. Voice agents, for instance, are improving rapidly and are capable of handling everything from ordering a pizza to directing calls. But there are aspects of the tech that aren't perfectly seamless yet, like the way even a one second delay between responses feels awkward to the human ear. Maybe it's because the human brain craves connection, and in an emotionally charged interaction, that delay is a reminder that you're speaking to an AI agent simulating empathy rather than a human being actually feeling it. I don't believe they'll ever fully replace the need for humans, but in scenarios where there is a choice between an AI agent and no help at all, AI agents can make a big difference. In call centres, we're seeing some businesses using AI agents to handle overflow calls and basic triage. This works, because it's an effective stopgap which removes the frustration that would come from long wait times. There's also a strong use case for AI agents in owner-run and small businesses where they just don't have the human resources to do it all. If they're missing calls and not getting to customers, an AI agent provides service where previously there was none. That's a win-win for both the business and the customer and I'm excited to see how small business use of generative AI develops. The future of generative AI Generative AI tools are developing rapidly and they're starting to be integrated everywhere from coding to virtual receptionists. In five years, the technology might be able to do almost anything. But that doesn't mean it should. We're on the brink of changes that will be more profound than the Industrial Revolution and now is the time where we need to decide what we want AI to do, and what we want to preserve for humans. There is growing evidence that rather than connecting humans, technology is making us lonelier. AI should make us more human, not less. That means handing over the grunt work to the AI, while protecting the value that comes from connection, intuition and creativity. It's a thin line to walk but if we want both humanity and generative AI to succeed, we need to embrace technology while always putting people first. Warren Hawkins, Managing Director, Euphoria Telecom Warren Hawkins, Managing Director, Euphoria Telecom Image: Supplied.
IOL News
18-06-2025
- IOL News
Old but gold: DRDGold still digs profit from a century of dirt
A few years after the JSE was formed to list companies that were rushing to pull gold out of the mine after it was discovered in 1886, DRDGOLD listed on the bourse. Image: Gerd Altmann/Pixabay A few years after the JSE was formed to list companies that were rushing to pull gold out of the mine after it was discovered in 1886, DRDGold listed on the bourse. It's now the oldest company still listed, having offered its shares to the public in 1895. Its operations have shifted over time, and it is now pulling gold dust out of mine dumps, which were the result of more than a century of mining and dumping the left-over dirt on the edges of mines. Initially, DRDGold, formerly Durban Roodepoort Deep, operated underground mines before transitioning completely from deep level underground mining to the large-scale retreatment of mine dumps and tailings dams. Although there is no information as to how much its stock was worth when it listed, IOL's calculations show that a R10,000 investment into the company five years ago would have reaped an additional R3 708 if dividends were reinvested. Although that's a return of 37.08% over the past decade, it's far less than the bourse's ALSI gain of 75.5% over the same period and worth only two-thirds of the average basket of household items based on May figures from the Household Affordability Index, published by the Pietermaritzburg Economic Justice & Dignity Group. And, reinvesting dividends doesn't make much of a difference, because the total gain is only R3 582, a return of 35.83%. The Pietermaritzburg Economic Justice & Dignity Group's report indicated that the national minimum wage in May, based on 21 working days, is R4 836. The average cost of a household food basket, in the same month, is R5 466. In DRDGold's May press release on its operating performance for the quarter to end-March, it noted that it was celebrating its 130th anniversary of being listed. CEO Niel Pretorius, said in the statement: 'The idea of rolling back mining's environmental legacy aligns with the values of our people. Our people are not only working for the next month or year, but they are also working for the next generation and towards a better future. This is what sustainability is all about.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Macrotrends' information indicates that the all-time high DRDGold stock closing price was 48.32 on March 11, 1997. The discovery of gold on a Transvaal farm, Langlaagte, on the Witwatersrand in 1886 by two prospectors was a turning point in South African history. It changed South Africa from an agricultural society to become the largest gold producer in the world – although it has since lost this crown and isn't even in the top ten producers globally. China is now in first place in terms of gold producers. IOL
Mail & Guardian
17-06-2025
- Mail & Guardian
The Merge aftermath: Did Ethereum really become green?
In 2022, Ethereum made a dramatic change. It shifted from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, a move that promised to cut its energy use by over 99 percent. Headlines called it a climate win, and supporters claimed Ethereum had finally gone green. But going green is more than just a headline. It takes proof, consistent results, and more than surface-level changes. Now that some time has passed, it's worth asking what really changed. Has Ethereum become as energy efficient as promised? Did the Merge fix the environmental criticism that followed the network for years? Let's look at the aftermath and what it really means to be a 'green' blockchain. How the Merge Changed Ethereum's Energy Use Ethereum used to run on a system called proof-of-work, where miners used powerful machines to validate transactions. That process burned through huge amounts of electricity. At its peak, Ethereum's energy usage matched that of some small countries. This sparked criticism from environmental groups and pushed projects, including those on the The Merge introduced a cleaner model called proof-of-stake. Instead of solving power-hungry puzzles, validators now secure the network by locking up ETH. Here's what changed: Energy consumption dropped by over 99% after the switch. Mining was replaced by staking, ending the need for expensive equipment. The network became more efficient, using far less electricity per transaction. Eco-conscious platforms joined the network, from NFTs to gaming apps. Reduced costs and cleaner operation attracted developers to build new projects. Ethereum's shift was not just about sustainability. It opened doors for broader adoption, especially in industries that care about transparency and energy use. Has Ethereum's Carbon Footprint Actually Improved? Reducing energy use was the main goal of Ethereum's total energy use has dropped by over 99%. That's a huge improvement. It also shifted Ethereum's public image. Many now see it as the 'cleaner' alternative to Bitcoin. But having a smaller footprint doesn't mean there's no footprint at all. How Ethereum Compares Today, Step-by-Step: Here's a breakdown of what changed after the Merge and what those changes really mean: Estimated CO₂ output: ~0.6 metric tons per year. Before the Merge, it was in the millions. Energy per transaction: Less than 0.01 kWh. That's about the same as a Google search. Bitcoin comparison: Bitcoin still uses over 100 TWh a year and emits tens of millions of tons of CO₂. Top carbon trackers: Groups like Crypto Carbon Ratings Institute and Digiconomist track Ethereum's progress. Ethereum now fits better into ESG conversations. Some funds and apps that once avoided crypto are now including it because of these changes. But not every validator runs on clean power. And if Ethereum keeps growing, power use could rise again. The Merge was a huge step, but it wasn't the final one. Institutional Adoption and Green Narratives Ethereum's switch to proof-of-stake did more than lower energy use. It also shifted how institutions see the network. Before the Merge, Ethereum faced the same criticism as Bitcoin for consuming too much energy. That kept many ESG-focused funds and climate-conscious investors from getting involved, even as Ethereum powered major parts of DeFi and NFTs. After the Merge, with energy use cut by over 99 percent, Ethereum became one of the most environmentally friendly blockchains. This change opened the door to wider institutional interest. Investors began to view Ethereum as a platform that could evolve and align with modern sustainability goals. The improved energy profile fits better with corporate ESG standards, making it easier to include in portfolios. Because of this, Ethereum is now seeing increased attention from asset managers, fintech platforms, and even banks. The shift is not just about image. Cleaner technology leads to real investment from groups that would not have considered it before. Life After the Merge: How Ethereum Users Have Responded The Merge was more than just a technical change. It shifted how people view Ethereum's purpose and long-term role in the crypto world. Before the switch to proof-of-stake, Ethereum was often criticized for its energy use and scalability problems. After the update, the network gained a reputation for being cleaner and more future-ready. That shift influenced behavior across the board. More users began staking ETH, developers turned their focus to scaling tools, and many projects embraced the idea of Ethereum as a sustainable base layer. It's not perfect, but it's no longer seen as the energy hog it once was. Ways the Merge changed user habits: Staking increased: Many users now treat staking as a regular way to earn and support the chain. Green appeal grew: Lower energy use helped attract users who care about sustainability. Builders refocused: Developer attention shifted to lower fees and better speed. Investor confidence returned: Some had paused activity before the Merge and came back after. App messaging evolved: DApps and platforms now highlight Ethereum's cleaner footprint. Tip: If you're active on Ethereum, track how your gas usage and staking habits have changed over time. It helps you see whether the Merge is matching your expectations in real terms. What Still Needs Fixing on Ethereum The Merge improved Ethereum's energy usage, but it didn't solve every problem. Several ongoing issues continue to affect usability, performance, and decentralization. While switching to proof-of-stake was a major step, it left some challenges untouched. Gas fees are still high when the network is busy. Staking also introduces concerns about power concentration, as a small number of platforms now control a large portion of staked ETH. For many users, these factors create friction and uncertainty. Common concerns post-Merge include: High transaction fees: Still a major barrier for everyday users. Validator centralization: A handful of entities hold too much control. Scalability limits: Network still lacks the speed for mass adoption. User experience issues: Complex tools and confusing wallets. Long upgrade timeline: Future improvements take years to roll out. Conclusion The Merge marked real progress for Ethereum, especially by cutting energy use. But it did not fix everything. Fees remain high, and control still leans toward a small group of validators. Ethereum is greener now, but it has more to prove. For the network to reach its full potential, it needs to become faster, cheaper, and more open to everyone. People want more than clean energy. They want a system that delivers on its original promises. The Merge was a strong step forward, but it is only part of a longer path to real change.
