
Mark Cavendish watch raiders must pay back cash or face extra jail time
Two Richard Mille watches were among the items taken in the raid at about 2.30am on November 27 2021.
Three men, who were each convicted and jailed in 2023 for their roles in the robbery, faced further court proceedings over the stolen goods which are still missing.
Judge Alexander Mills gave a ruling at a Proceeds of Crime Act hearing at Chelmsford Crown Court on Monday.
He said that prosecutors set out the value of the stolen items, with Sir Mark's Richard Mille watch valued at £400,000 and his wife's watch at £350,000.
He said Sir Mark's two mobile phones were valued at £979 and £647, and his wife's stolen Louis Vuitton suitcase was £2,200 and her phone £699.
The judge said that the total value of the stolen goods at the time was £754,525.
He said he was satisfied the defendants were 'in it together' and had jointly obtained the total value of the property.
The watches were 'never located at the scene and have not been seen since' he said.
The judge said he 'did not accept it's inevitable they (the watches) were sold', adding that they were 'not depreciating goods but goods that act as a store of wealth'.
He ordered that the men pay the value of the stolen goods, £754,525, within three months or have a default period of six years added to their prison sentence.
The judge said that 'any defendant can pay off this order to relieve the others of the responsibility of doing so'.
Romario Henry, 34, of Bell Green, Lewisham, south-east London, and Ali Sesay, 30, of Holding Street, Rainham, Kent, were both convicted of two counts of robbery at Chelmsford Crown Court in 2023.
Henry, who was found guilty following a trial, was sentenced to 15 years in prison.
Sesay, who admitted the offences, was jailed for 12 years.
Jo Jobson, 28, who was on the run at the time of the first trial, later handed himself in, and was found guilty in a separate trial at Chelmsford Crown Court later that year of two counts of robbery.
Jobson, of no fixed address, was sentenced at the same court to 15 years in prison for his role in the raid.
The charges were that the accused men robbed Sir Mark of a watch, phone and safe, and robbed his wife of a watch, phone and suitcase.
The judge said that a Mercedes-Benz car valued at £1,000 was seized from Sesay, and police seized £24,740 in cash from a property where Sesay had been living.
The judge said that an unspecified amount was seized from Jobson's NatWest account, while no assets attributed to Henry were seized.
He ordered that compensation be paid from these seized assets, of £1,897 to Sir Mark, £3,359 to Peta Cavendish and the remainder to the watch company.
Prosecutor Edward Renvoize said that the 'losers of the value of the watches are in fact the (watch) company'.
The judge said that Sesay, Henry and Jobson can on application ask that an extension be considered to the three-month period in which the £754,525 must be paid.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
5 hours ago
- Times
NatWest faces questions over links to collapsed 79th Group
NatWest is facing scrutiny over its relationship with a collapsed £200 million investment group which insolvency practitioners suspect was a Ponzi scheme. 79th Group attracted thousands of investors from the UK and overseas, before collapsing into administration in April, two months after the City of London police announced an investigation into a 'suspected widespread fraud'. The company has denied wrongdoing. Insolvency practitioners estimate 79th Group owes more than £200 million to about 3,700 people. Some investors have life savings at risk. The matter was raised in parliament this month. The 'main account' of the group was held at NatWest, according to administrators from Kroll and Quantuma. It is understood that the relationship originated at the bank's Southport branch, which is near 79th Group's Merseyside head office. The bank also holds an outstanding charge over a 79th Group entity which was first registered 20 years ago. That company went into insolvency in May. Investors' funds were paid into a 'treasury account [and then] transferred out to other entities', administrators said in a recent report to creditors. They are investigating the 'flow of funds'. Investors' money does not appear to have been 'ring-fenced' and was instead 'pooled' in group accounts. No formal loan accounts appear to have been recorded or board minutes yet identified relating to the management of investors' money, insolvency practitioners have claimed. The bank declined to answer a series of questions over its banking relationship with 79th Group, including how much money was received and processed by the bank; whether it had continued to receive investor funds after the arrests; whether it had failed to detect serious irregularities; and whether NatWest was investigating. A NatWest spokeswoman said: 'Combating fraud is a top priority and we are committed to preventing criminal activity. We will not make any further comment on this case.' Contractual agreements between the group and investors stated that funds would be used for specific projects, including a £250 million holiday park in north Wales and a mining venture. City of London police said in February that four people had been arrested and that 'a large amount of cash, luxury watches and jewellery were found during searches of properties, all of which were seized'. All people arrested have been released on bail and inquiries continue. There have been no charges. The Times reported this month that 79th Group's board included a former senior HM Revenue & Customs official who was in charge of combating fraud for the tax office. Andy Cole, former director of specialist investigations at HMRC, was a non-executive adviser. There is no suggestion of wrongdoing by Cole or that he is being investigated. He has not been arrested. Administrators from Grant Thornton have told 79th Group investors that 'we believe this is a Ponzi', the term for a fraudulent investment scheme in which early investors are paid with money from later investors rather than legitimate business activities. Banks have a regulatory duty to counter the risk that they might be used to further financial crime. Lenders face strict 'know your customer' and anti-money laundering rules; adherence requires due diligence, transaction monitoring and reporting of suspicious activity. Three sets of insolvency firms are engaged on the case. Administrators are liaising with NatWest over the outstanding charge owed to the bank, which has said it is not in a position to release it, according to its report. In 2021, NatWest was fined £264.8 million for anti-money laundering failures related to the gold trading business Fowler Oldfield. This month Barclays was fined £39.3 million for failing to tackle financial crime risks in its dealings with Stunt & Co, which received £46.8 million from Fowler Oldfield.


Belfast Telegraph
a day ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Dad is prime suspect in shocking Maguiresbridge shootings
Exclusive | Cops appeal for information on movements of silver Mercedes day before murders This is the man suspected of brutally murdering his wife and two teenage children by shooting them at the family home in Maguiresbridge on Wednesday morning. Ian Rutledge is believed to have suffered self-inflicted gunshot wounds and is currently in the Royal Victoria Hospital in Belfast.


Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Moment yobs block off London street with fleet of supercars and set off fireworks in the middle of the road at midnight during 'wedding celebration'
This is the moment a group of yobs block off a street in Tottenham, north London, with supercars and and set off fireworks in the middle of the road at 1am, after reportedly attending a wedding nearby. The men are heard revving the engines of their Ferraris and Mercedes G Wagons, while also setting off smoke bombs. Click above to watch the video in full.