
Tribals in Great Nicobar not against development but lack info about mega project: NCST member
New Delhi, Tribal communities in Great Nicobar are not opposed to development but lack sufficient information about a proposed mega infrastructure project on the island, National Commission for Scheduled Tribes member Asha Lakra has said.
The project, titled Holistic Development of Great Nicobar, involves the construction of a transshipment port, an international airport, a township and a power plant over more than 160 sq. km of land. This includes around 130 sq. km of pristine forest inhabited by the Nicobarese, a Scheduled Tribe , and the Shompens, a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group , whose population is estimated to be between 200 and 300.
In an interview with PTI, Lakra said she led an NCST team to the Andaman and Nicobar Islands from June 5 to 7 to review the issues faced by the tribal communities.
She said the commission held a detailed meeting with representatives of all tribal groups, including the Great Andamanese, Jarawa, Nicobarese and Shompens.
"We met everyone.... We also had talks with both Shompen and Nicobarese people living on Great Nicobar Island. Most of the people have no idea about the project. They are busy with their own lives.... They demand more ferries to travel between islands," Lakra said.
Asked about her interaction with the residents of Great Nicobar, she said, "They have no other problems. All they need is development.... Better transport, education and health facilities. This is what they told us. Everyone, barring the Sentinelese, said the same thing. They are in favour of development."
"They want employment and their financial situation to improve," Lakra added.
She, however, stressed the need for a stakeholders' meeting with educated people from the island regarding "such a big project" and said all necessary information should be shared with them.
However, Barnabas Manju, chairman of the Little and Great Nicobar Tribal Council, told PTI over the phone that the council was not invited to the meeting and came to know about it through the local media.
The council had written to the Union environment ministry and the Andaman and Nicobar administration in November 2022, withdrawing the no-objection certificate it issued in August that year for the denotification of 84.1 sq. km of tribal reserve and the diversion of 130 sq. km of forest for the project. It alleged that crucial information was withheld while seeking the NOC.
The tribal council had expressed shock on learning that parts of their pre-tsunami villages would be "denotified and diverted" under the project.
During a public hearing held at Campbell Bay in January 2021, the council's chairman had said that although they support the development plan, "we want to go back to our ancestral villages".
Tribal councils in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands are statutory bodies established under the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Regulation, 2009. They have limited advisory and executive powers, unlike autonomous councils under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, which have legislative, executive and limited judicial powers and enjoy greater autonomy.
Around 853 sq. km of the island's total 910-sq. km area is designated as a tribal reserve under the Andaman and Nicobar Regulation, 1956.
In tribal reserves, the tribal communities own the land and have full rights to use it for their daily needs. However, transferring, acquiring or selling land in these areas is strictly prohibited.
Asked whether the commission looked into complaints of Forest Rights Act violations related to the project, Lakra said, "The only kind of FRA violations that has been reported involves non-tribal outsiders, who come for construction work, marry ST women and settle on tribal land."
This allows non-tribals to gain de-facto control over land protected under the FRA, she added.
In April 2023, the NCST issued a notice to the Andaman and Nicobar administration, seeking "facts and an action-taken report" on allegations that the mega project would violate the constitutional mandate and "adversely impact" the lives of local tribals.
Lakra said the commission would check whether a response has been received.
At a media interaction earlier this month, Union Tribal Affairs Minister Jual Oram said his ministry is examining objections raised by tribal communities regarding the proposed project.
"Yes, it is under examination. I had also answered a question in Parliament. We are currently examining the documents they have submitted. After that, we will decide the course of action," he had said, replying to a question.
On further questioning about what the ministry seeks to ascertain, Oram had said, "First, we need to determine whether the gram sabha was held, what the gram sabha recommended and whether there have been any violations."
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Jaishankar slams Opposition during Op Sindoor debate, asks ‘Which one of you…'
External affairs minister S Jaishankar on Monday invoked the strikes on terror camps in Pakistan to underline the Modi government's resolve in responding to cross-border terrorism. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar speaks during debate on Operation Sindoor in the Lok Sabha.(PTI) 'It was a commitment made by the Prime Minister, to the people of India, that we would hit those symbols, those sites, those planning places,' Jaishankar said in the Lok Sabha. Jaishankar questioned the Opposition parties, asking if any of them had ever imagined that terror hubs like Bahawalpur and Muridke could be hit the way they were. 'So today, when I hear many questions from across the A, I want to say, which one of you would imagine that Bahawalpur and Muridke would be brought down the way it was. Which one of you thought?' he asked. Jaishankar hits out at Opposition for ruling out strikes Jaishankar said the opposition never even considered such strikes during their tenure and stressed that the May 7 operation sent a strong message to Pakistan to stop supporting terror. 'When did you even think of it during your term? You didn't even cross your mind. In fact, on the contrary, you ruled it out after 26 years,' he said. 'So, I think our objectives are very clear. We wanted to send a message to the terrorists. We wanted to send a message to Pakistan, but do not continue the support for terrorism. And I think on the morning of 7th of May, that message went home loud and clear,' the minister added. Jaishankar said Operation Sindoor reflects a new normal in India's anti-terror response, hit out at the Opposition for enabling Chinese tech earlier, and asserted that unlike past governments, the current regime engaged China with clarity on terrorism, trade, and de-escalation. 'Opposition lectures us on dealing with China but they allowed 2G and 3G from China; our government made indigenous 5G, ' said Jaishankar, adding, 'Did not go to China for Olympics, secret deals; went there to make India's stand clear on terror, trade and de-escalation.'

The Wire
26 minutes ago
- The Wire
‘Op Sindoor Not Stopped Under Pressure': Rajnath Tells Parliament, Skips Mention of Pahalgam Attack Probe
Government With Modi absent, Singh opened the special discussion in the Lok Sabha but skipped naming the US President's claims of ceasefire mediation. He also said that instead of asking about Indian jets, opposition should ask how many Pakistani ones were downed. Defence minister Rajnath Singh speaks in the Lok Sabha during monsoon session of parliament. Photo: PTI New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi remained absent in parliament on Monday (July 28) as the Lok Sabha began a special discussion on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. Union defence minister Rajnath Singh, who opened the discussion, made only a passing reference to the April 22 terror attack, and made no reference to US President Donald Trump's continued claims of having mediated a ceasefire between India and Pakistan following the four-day long military confrontation. Instead, Singh said that the decision to stop hostilities was taken because India had already achieved its 'stated political and military objectives' and to say 'the operation was stopped under any pressure is baseless and completely incorrect". The discussion in parliament began in the Lok Sabha on Monday after months of pressure from the opposition to have a special session on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor in the presence of the prime minister, although Modi was not present in the House today. Meanwhile, Singh's speech in Lok Sabha focused on Operation Sindoor and its achievements without making any mention of how the terrorists behind the Pahalgam attack had entered India, the status of the investigation against them and how they were allowed to flee. The only mention in Singh's about hour-long speech of the terror attack itself was when he said that the "inhuman and cowardly attack took place on April 22". "In this attack 25 innocent Indians and one Nepali civilian were killed. These innocent civilians were killed after asking their religion. This itself showed the inhuman and horrific nature of the attack. The attack was a test of India's tolerance," he said. Singh then went on to elaborate about Operation Sindoor, and repeated the claims already made by the Union government on the armed forces being given a free hand to undertake Operation Sindoor in which nine locations in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoK) were targeted on May 7. While the four day-long military conflict between India and Pakistan stopped following the announcement of a ceasefire by Trump, India has since maintained that the decision was taken bilaterally after the Pakistani DGMO called his Indian counterpart. This is despite the fact that Trump has continued to make the claim that he had used trade as leverage to bring the two countries back from the brink of nuclear war. While the opposition has been demanding that the Union government address Trump's claims, Singh, without taking the US President's name, said that the decision to halt the operations was not taken under any pressure. 'The objective of this operation was to destroy terrorist camps and target their supporters and to give the clear message that India has zero tolerance for terrorism. India only halted the operation because before and during the conflict its stated political and military objectives had been achieved. Therefore to say that the operation was stopped under any pressure is baseless and completely incorrect.' he said. While Operation Sindoor involved four days of military confrontation for the first time in decades, Singh said that the objective of the operation was not to 'start a war' or 'crossing the border or capturing territory.' 'I would also like to inform the House that crossing the border or capturing territory there was not the objective of this operation. The purpose of launching Operation Sindoor was to eliminate those terror nurseries that Pakistan had nurtured for years. Operation Sindoor was launched to deliver justice to those innocent families who lost their loved ones in Pak-sponsored terrorist attacks. Our forces only targeted those who, while supporting these terrorists, were continuously involved in attempting to attack India,' he said. 'The overall politico-military objective of Operation Sindoor was to punish Pakistan, which was waging a proxy war in the form of terrorism. For this reason, the Armed Forces were given complete freedom to choose their own targets and deliver a strong response. The purpose of this operation was never to start a war but to compel the adversary to yield through the demonstrative use of force,' he added. While questions have also been raised about the number of Rafale jets that India lost in the conflict, there has been no clear answer from the government except admissions like"losses are a part of combat" by the military leadership. Singh argued that while the opposition is asking how many Indian jets were lost, they did not ask how many Pakistan ones were downed. 'I want to tell the opposition that if you have to ask a question, then ask this question: was Operation Sindoor successful? The answer is, yes. If you have a question to ask, ask this: Have the terrorists who wiped the sindoor off our sisters and daughters been dealt with by our forces in Operation Sindoor, eliminating their masters? The answer is, yes. If you have a question to ask, ask this: were any of our brave soldiers harmed in this operation? The answer is, no, none of our soldiers were harmed,' he said. Singh further said that the focus should not be on 'relatively small issues' and only the results matter. 'When the goals are big, our focus should not go to relatively small issues. Because by constantly focusing on small issues, attention can shift away from major issues like the country's security and the honour and morale of soldiers, as is happening with some of our friends in the opposition. 'The result matters in the outcome of any examination. If a child scores good marks in an exam, then for us, those marks should matter. We should not focus on the fact that their pencil broke or their pen got lost during the exam. Ultimately, the result matters, and the result is that during Operation Sindoor, our armed forces fully achieved the objectives they had set,' he said. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.


News18
29 minutes ago
- News18
Telangana ministers pay homage to Jaipal Reddy on death anniversary
Hyderabad, Jul 28 (PTI) Former Union Minister S Jaipal Reddy played a key role in sanctioning the Hyderabad Metro Rail and other key infrastructure projects in the city, Telangana Roads and Buildings Minister Komatireddy Venkat Reddy said on Monday. Venkat Reddy and several other leaders paid rich tributes to Jaipal Reddy at his memorial on the banks of Hussain Sagar lake here on the sixth death anniversary of the departed leader. Describing Jaipal Reddy as 'Ajatashatru' (a person who has no enemy), Venkat Reddy recalled that the former union minister had sanctioned Rs 10,000 crore for various development works in the state and Rs 400 crore to Nalgonda district. He demanded that Bharat Ratna be conferred on Jaipal Reddy. State Labour Minister G Vivek Venkataswamy said Jaipal Reddy, an untainted leader, is a role model to the new generation of political leaders. PTI SJR SJR KH Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.