
Republicans Must Say No to the AI Regulation Moratorium
But hopes for a human-first tech policy are already dimming. In its all-consuming efforts to beat China in the A.I. race, the Republican Party has fallen into its old libertarian habits of deferring to Big Tech's interests, failing to protect children and families from predatory uses of emerging technology, and deregulating the industry so that it can operate without any concern for consumer welfare.
It's not too late, though. In the administration's earliest days, the president sided with longshoremen against efforts to make union members redundant via automation. Also, in his January 25, 2025 executive order, the president committed to A.I. policy that pursues "human flourishing." Vice President JD Vance declared at February's A.I. Action Summit in Paris that the administration would "fight for policies that ensure that AI" will lead to "higher wages, better benefits, and safer and more prosperous communities." This is the road that most Americans want the administration to take.
But since then, the Republican Party has taken one huge step backward. Last month the House of Representatives approved an amendment to the "Big Beautiful Bill" that, if ratified by the Senate, would shield A.I. companies from state regulation and liability for ten whole years.
Such a move shows astounding disregard for how ungoverned technologies can undermine human flourishing—and it would unbridle Big Tech's power. The moratorium would void a law in Utah, for instance, that prohibits mental health chatbots from targeting users with advertising, a policy that removes companies' incentives to exploit a suffering audience. It would also block a proposed law in Texas that would require a "human operator," i.e., a human driver, to accompany an autonomous long-haul truck as it transports its freight. And it would block several laws that have been introduced around the country, including in blue states like California and New York, that would require so-called "A.I. companions"—an Orwellian bit of Big Tech branding—to clarify that they are not human beings.
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 02: Open AI CEO Sam Altman speaks during Snowflake Summit 2025 at Moscone Center on June 02, 2025 in San Francisco, California.
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 02: Open AI CEO Sam Altman speaks during Snowflake Summit 2025 at Moscone Center on June 02, 2025 in San Francisco, California.Republicans must learn from Congress' past mistakes, such as when, in 1996, it passed the ignominious Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Section 230 was touted as necessary to guard the innovative potential of the nascent online service industry from death by regulation. But, by granting sweeping immunity for any content posted by third parties, platforms were disincentivized from making good-faith efforts to protect kids. Section 230 dug a legal moat around Big Tech from behind which the industry waged war on America's children.
The ten-year moratorium on A.I. regulation portends a similar legacy. It indicates that Congress, especially Republican leadership, has failed to reckon with how immunizing technological power from liability threatens human flourishing.
To its credit, by including human flourishing in its A.I. policy framework, the administration recognizes the possibility of promoting A.I. innovation without sacrificing other human goods. Human flourishing as an explicit policy objective underscores that "acceleration," as the techno-libertarian Right calls it, is an over-simplified paradigm, and that tech policy needs to pursue a broader suite of values, especially the good of the human person and the family.
As we have argued elsewhere, the achievement of human flourishing in the age of A.I. (as in every age) depends on deliberate policy choices. Technological innovation, no matter how beneficial to economic prosperity or national security, should never come at the expense of the family or the human person. And there are ways to balance these interests. We have called upon the Trump administration, for instance, to establish a Working Group on Technology and the Family, that would directly assist in the formation of policy to guide technology toward family empowerment, and away from legislation—like the moratorium—that would put families in the crosshairs.
In February 2019, the first Trump administration released an executive order that committed the federal government to securing "public trust" and "public confidence" in its A.I. policy. It acknowledged that protecting "American values" was a critical objective, even as it worked to advance "American leadership in AI." That is what an administration committed to human flourishing sounds like; and it is what the second Trump administration sounded like at its start. A ten-year moratorium on state regulation, by contrast, is just a retread of the tired libertarian playbook that trades American values and public trust for technological power and financial gain.
Fortunately, a groundswell of opposition among Republicans senators has emerged, such as Josh Hawley (Mo.), Marsha Blackburn (Tenn.), Ron Johnson (Wisc.), and Rick Scott (Fla.), who publicly oppose the moratorium. Representative Marjorie Taylor Green (R-Ga.) has done likewise, and more may join them.
So, the die is not yet cast. The word is not yet final. The future is still ahead. The Trump administration can still make a human-first A.I. policy. But the time for choosing is now.
Michael Toscano is director of the Family First Technology Initiative at the Institute for Family Studies. Jared Hayden is a policy analyst for the Family First Tech Initiative at the Institute for Family Studies.
The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
a few seconds ago
- Business Insider
If you live in one of these 13 states, you might have a higher electric bill next year. Blame data centers.
Your electric bills may have shot up in recent months, and you might be tempted to blame your roommate, who never turns the lights off, or your old window air conditioner unit. It's not because of your roommate. It's not your window unit. It's actually Big Tech's fault. Customers of the biggest regional power grid operator in the US could see their bills go up next year, largely due to skyrocketing demand for electricity coming from AI data centers. Last week, PJM Interconnection closed its annual capacity auction with prices for wholesale electric capacity up 22% from 2024, another record-breaking year. As a result, monthly electric bills in PJM's territory, which covers 67 million customers, could increase up to 5% next year, the grid operator said. PJM Interconnection territory spans thirteen states from the Midwest to the East Coast— including all or parts of Delaware, Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and Washington, D.C. Every year, PJM's summer auction determines the cost of wholesale electricity for the following year. Though its territory doesn't cover the entire US, the energy industry looks at the PJM auction as a bellwether for electricity prices for the entire country. PJM's territory includes Data Center Alley in Northern Virginia, home to the world's biggest concentration of data centers. It also includes areas of the country where data centers are rapidly expanding, such as Columbus, Ohio. The grid operator identified data center expansion as the primary driver of demand in its territory, which caused the jump in wholesale electricity prices. After a decade of little to no growth, electricity demand in the US is expected to grow 2.5% annually through 2035, driven largely by data centers, according to the Bank of America Institute. Utility bills are climbing faster than the pace of inflation, according to the US Energy Information Administration. That trend is expected to continue through the next year. In Maryland, People's Counsel David Lapp has been urging state and federal regulators to intervene on behalf of residential utility customers and small businesses. "We are witnessing a massive transfer of wealth from residential utility customers to large corporations—data centers and large utilities and their corporate parents, which profit from building additional energy infrastructure," said Lapp. "Utility regulation is failing to protect residential customers, contributing to an energy affordability crisis."


Fox News
a few seconds ago
- Fox News
Could Senator Adam Schiff really go to jail over alleged mortgage fraud?
Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director William Pulte sent a criminal referral to Attorney General Pam Bondi in May alleging that California Democrat Sen. Adam Schiff "has, in multiple instances, falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, impacting payments from 2003-2019 for a Potomac, Maryland-based property." What is the gist of the complaint? That Schiff, while representing a California district in the House of Representatives, falsely listed his posh Maryland home as his primary residence in order to get more favorable loan terms when, in truth and in fact, his California condo, which he designated as his primary residence in order to qualify for a California homeowner's tax exemption, was his real primary residence. Even worse, according to the referral, Schiff claimed his Burbank condo as his primary/principal residence in California tax filings during the same years he listed his Maryland home as his primary/principal residence on loan applications to finance that home. Schiff's response to the criminal referral and to subsequent Truth Social posts by President Donald Trump was one we often see in white collar cases. Per the senator's office, "the lenders who provided the mortgages for both homes were well aware of then-Representative Schiff's Congressional service and of his intended year-round use of both homes, neither of which were vacation homes." That's not much of a denial, senator. The question is whether you lied on these forms or not. Were your answers accurate or not, and if they were inaccurate, were the answers a mistake or intentional? The devil is always in the details in white-collar cases like this. Which representatives of which particular lenders "were well aware" that Schiff intended to use both homes year-round, and why does that matter? The issue is whether Schiff intentionally lied on federal or state forms to gain a financial advantage. If he falsely listed his Maryland home as his primary residence in order to get a lower interest rate, that matters too. (After all, similar alleged falsehoods by Donald Trump were used by New York Attorney General Letitia James to go after Trump in her massive New York state civil action.) Did Schiff lie on California tax forms to gain an exemption he was not entitled to, and, if so, does it implicate any federal criminal statutes? This is what inquiring minds want to know, and we just don't have enough information at this stage to know all the answers. Based on what we do know, how likely is it that Schiff will be indicted for violating one of several federal bank fraud statutes that potentially cover his conduct? Not very likely. Here are several reasons why: The devil is always in the details in white-collar cases like this. Which representatives of which particular lenders "were well aware" that Schiff intended to use both homes year-round, and why does that matter? This leaves open the possibility of a state of California prosecution for filing false tax returns. Would you care to place any bets on that happening? The bottom line is this: Schiff's alleged conduct may be sleazy and his explanation shifty, but a criminal charge at the federal or state level does not seem to be in the offing.


Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
ASML Stock: What Are The Latest Developents?
CANADA - 2025/07/17: In this photo illustration, the ASML Holding logo is seen displayed on a ... More smartphone screen. (Photo Illustration by Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) ASML (NASDAQ:ASML), the prominent Dutch semiconductor equipment manufacturer, has experienced a stock drop of nearly 5% over the past week, remaining down by 11% in the last month due to trade tensions that have prompted the company to issue a softer financial forecast. In its Q2 2025 earnings report, ASML cautioned that it could no longer assure that its revenue would increase in 2026, overshadowing an otherwise strong quarter. Revenue for the third quarter is anticipated to be between 7.4 to 7.9 billion euros, slightly under expectations. The gross margin is estimated to be around 52%, down from a prior estimate of 51% to 53%. This mixed prediction contrasts with the overall semiconductor market, which continues to show resilience. For instance, TSMC, the largest semiconductor fabrication firm in the world, often regarded as a barometer for the chip industry, reported robust quarterly results and raised its sales growth forecast for 2025 to 30% in dollar terms. Notably, ASML is a unique company. It manufactures what is arguably the most advanced piece of manufacturing technology and plays an essential role in producing the state-of-the-art chips that power everything from smartphones to AI data centers. Considering its pivotal position in the semiconductor value chain, could this be a long-term buying opportunity? Trade And Geopolitical Tensions President Donald Trump has threatened to impose 30% tariffs on imports from the EU, which could significantly affect semiconductor equipment manufacturers like ASML. Located in the Netherlands, ASML ships its products worldwide, with key clients such as Intel in the U.S. and Asia's TSMC and Samsung Electronics – both of which also have manufacturing facilities in the United States. The proposed tariffs might increase costs for customers importing ASML's high-value tools into the U.S. For context, ASML's latest generation High-NA EUV machines can cost up to $400 million per unit. Additionally, ASML maintains manufacturing operations in San Diego, which could also be subject to retaliation through EU tariffs on products sent back to Europe. Importantly, if ASML's clients decide to cut back on capital expenditures, ongoing trade conflicts and export control regulations between the U.S. and China could complicate demand forecasting. As a leading entity in advanced chip manufacturing technology, ASML has also found itself a pawn in the growing U.S.-China technological and trade rivalry, prompting U.S. officials to urge the Dutch government to impose tighter export controls. While the company has been prohibited from selling its most advanced EUV equipment to Chinese clients for several years, new regulations imposed the previous year mandate that the company must secure a license to export any immersion DUV or more advanced systems to China. AI Narrative Drives EUV Demand ASML's flagship product is its extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV) machines, which are vital tools for manufacturing the most advanced chips at process nodes of 5 nanometers and smaller. These machines use ultra-short wavelengths of light to carve out circuit designs, making it possible to produce chips that are smaller, faster, and more efficient. EUV technology is crucial for prolonging Moore's Law, a long-standing industry trend of doubling transistor density roughly every two years, enabling chip manufacturers to continue pushing the boundaries of computing performance and cost-efficiency. The demand for ASML's products has surged as semiconductor chips are integrated into a wide array of devices, from computers to vehicles. AI, in particular, has emerged as a significant driver for ASML recently, as the increase in training and operating complex models necessitates the high-performance semiconductors that its machinery facilitates. The company has indicated that several of its major customers are enhancing their EUV capacity to accommodate the rising demand for AI chips. ASML anticipates that EUV tool deployments will increase by around 30% in 2025, indicating a broader industry transition from older Deep Ultraviolet (DUV) technology toward EUV, which could further enhance its revenues. Is The Stock A Buy? ASML stock is trading at 27 times the estimated earnings for FY2025, which is a reasonable valuation considering ASML's revenues are projected to grow by approximately 14% this year, according to consensus estimates. During the previous quarter, ASML reported net bookings of 5.5 billion euros ($6.4 billion), which is roughly 25% higher than expected, along with a record backlog of 33 billion euros ($38 billion). With lead times of 12 to 18 months for the majority of its products, current orders should genuinely reflect customer confidence into 2026, suggesting strong future revenue growth. Furthermore, the company's dominant position, cutting-edge proprietary technology, and exposure to the generative AI trend could also make the stock appealing. Learn more about Trefis RV strategy that has outperformed its all-cap stocks benchmark (which includes the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000), yielding strong returns for investors. Additionally, if you seek upside with a more stable performance than an individual stock like ASML, consider the High Quality portfolio, which has surpassed the S&P and achieved over 91% returns since inception.