
Republicans Must Say No to the AI Regulation Moratorium
But hopes for a human-first tech policy are already dimming. In its all-consuming efforts to beat China in the A.I. race, the Republican Party has fallen into its old libertarian habits of deferring to Big Tech's interests, failing to protect children and families from predatory uses of emerging technology, and deregulating the industry so that it can operate without any concern for consumer welfare.
It's not too late, though. In the administration's earliest days, the president sided with longshoremen against efforts to make union members redundant via automation. Also, in his January 25, 2025 executive order, the president committed to A.I. policy that pursues "human flourishing." Vice President JD Vance declared at February's A.I. Action Summit in Paris that the administration would "fight for policies that ensure that AI" will lead to "higher wages, better benefits, and safer and more prosperous communities." This is the road that most Americans want the administration to take.
But since then, the Republican Party has taken one huge step backward. Last month the House of Representatives approved an amendment to the "Big Beautiful Bill" that, if ratified by the Senate, would shield A.I. companies from state regulation and liability for ten whole years.
Such a move shows astounding disregard for how ungoverned technologies can undermine human flourishing—and it would unbridle Big Tech's power. The moratorium would void a law in Utah, for instance, that prohibits mental health chatbots from targeting users with advertising, a policy that removes companies' incentives to exploit a suffering audience. It would also block a proposed law in Texas that would require a "human operator," i.e., a human driver, to accompany an autonomous long-haul truck as it transports its freight. And it would block several laws that have been introduced around the country, including in blue states like California and New York, that would require so-called "A.I. companions"—an Orwellian bit of Big Tech branding—to clarify that they are not human beings.
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 02: Open AI CEO Sam Altman speaks during Snowflake Summit 2025 at Moscone Center on June 02, 2025 in San Francisco, California.
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 02: Open AI CEO Sam Altman speaks during Snowflake Summit 2025 at Moscone Center on June 02, 2025 in San Francisco, California.Republicans must learn from Congress' past mistakes, such as when, in 1996, it passed the ignominious Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Section 230 was touted as necessary to guard the innovative potential of the nascent online service industry from death by regulation. But, by granting sweeping immunity for any content posted by third parties, platforms were disincentivized from making good-faith efforts to protect kids. Section 230 dug a legal moat around Big Tech from behind which the industry waged war on America's children.
The ten-year moratorium on A.I. regulation portends a similar legacy. It indicates that Congress, especially Republican leadership, has failed to reckon with how immunizing technological power from liability threatens human flourishing.
To its credit, by including human flourishing in its A.I. policy framework, the administration recognizes the possibility of promoting A.I. innovation without sacrificing other human goods. Human flourishing as an explicit policy objective underscores that "acceleration," as the techno-libertarian Right calls it, is an over-simplified paradigm, and that tech policy needs to pursue a broader suite of values, especially the good of the human person and the family.
As we have argued elsewhere, the achievement of human flourishing in the age of A.I. (as in every age) depends on deliberate policy choices. Technological innovation, no matter how beneficial to economic prosperity or national security, should never come at the expense of the family or the human person. And there are ways to balance these interests. We have called upon the Trump administration, for instance, to establish a Working Group on Technology and the Family, that would directly assist in the formation of policy to guide technology toward family empowerment, and away from legislation—like the moratorium—that would put families in the crosshairs.
In February 2019, the first Trump administration released an executive order that committed the federal government to securing "public trust" and "public confidence" in its A.I. policy. It acknowledged that protecting "American values" was a critical objective, even as it worked to advance "American leadership in AI." That is what an administration committed to human flourishing sounds like; and it is what the second Trump administration sounded like at its start. A ten-year moratorium on state regulation, by contrast, is just a retread of the tired libertarian playbook that trades American values and public trust for technological power and financial gain.
Fortunately, a groundswell of opposition among Republicans senators has emerged, such as Josh Hawley (Mo.), Marsha Blackburn (Tenn.), Ron Johnson (Wisc.), and Rick Scott (Fla.), who publicly oppose the moratorium. Representative Marjorie Taylor Green (R-Ga.) has done likewise, and more may join them.
So, the die is not yet cast. The word is not yet final. The future is still ahead. The Trump administration can still make a human-first A.I. policy. But the time for choosing is now.
Michael Toscano is director of the Family First Technology Initiative at the Institute for Family Studies. Jared Hayden is a policy analyst for the Family First Tech Initiative at the Institute for Family Studies.
The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump tariffs would hit Hungary hard despite warm relations with MAGA-friendly Orbán
BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP) — Hungary's populist prime minister has spent years building a close political relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump and aligning himself with the MAGA movement. But despite Viktor Orbán's success in gaining favor with the culturally conservative and nationalist wing of Trump's administration, his country is poised to be among those hard hit by Trump's tariffs against the European Union. Trump earlier this month announced he would levy tariffs of 30% against Mexico and the EU beginning Aug. 1 — a move that could cause massive upheaval between the United States and the 27-member EU, of which Hungary is a member. As a small, export-oriented economy with major automobile, pharmaceutical and wine industries — some of the main categories of products Europe exports to the U.S. — Hungary will be particularly vulnerable to Trump's tariffs. The duties 'would put the Hungarian economy in a very, very difficult situation, because then the entire possibility for Hungary to export to America would be essentially eliminated,' Péter Virovácz, chief analyst at ING Hungary, told The Associated Press. 'Not the best way to make money' Hungary's largest trading partners are other EU countries like Germany, Italy and Romania, as well as China, but many Hungarian companies export their goods across the Atlantic. Outgoing trade to the United States represents around 15% of all Hungarian exports to countries outside the EU. One such enterprise, a Budapest-based company specializing in Hungarian wine, said it will likely cease doing business in the U.S. altogether if the 30% duty is levied on its products. 'If it's really going to be 30%, then there is no more shipment ... We might just call it a day at the end of the year,' said Gábor Bánfalvi, co-owner of Taste Hungary. Bánfalvi's company has been shipping around 10,000 bottles of premium Hungarian wine per year to the U.S. for about half a decade. With a base in Washington D.C., it exports a range of red and white wines to clients in numerous U.S. states including specialty wine shops and bars. Until now, 'it's been a thin profit margin, but it's been fine because we want Hungarian wine to be available' to U.S. consumers, Bánfalvi said. 'Then came 2025," he said. When Trump began imposing tariffs on EU exports earlier this year, the cost of Taste Hungary's shipments tripled, Bánfalvi said — price hikes he had to build into the sticker price of the wine. The imposition of 30% tariffs would make exporting 'unsustainable.' 'You just start to think, why are we doing this? Is it really worth it? It's just not the best way to make money,' he said. In total, the value of EU-U.S. trade in goods and services in 2024 amounted to 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion.) Doubts that political ties could soften the blow Hungary's government, a vocal proponent of Trump's 'patriotic' foreign policy prioritizing national interests, has acknowledged that the tariffs would present a challenge. But, careful not to criticize the Trump administration, it has instead blamed the EU, a frequent target of Orbán's scorn, for failing to reach a comprehensive trade agreement with Washington. Confident that his right-wing populist policies would help win him favor with Trump's administration, Orbán said in an interview in April that while tariffs 'will be a disadvantage,' his government was negotiating 'other economic agreements and issues that will offset them.' But Péter Krekó, director of the Budapest-based Political Capital think tank, expressed doubt that political affinities could play a meaningful role in mitigating damage to Hungary's economy caused by Trump's trade policy. 'The unquestionably good bilateral relations simply cannot compensate for the trade conflicts between the EU and the U.S., and as a consequence, Hungary will suffer the tariffs the same way that the EU will,' Krekó said. 'Mutual nationalisms cannot be coordinated in a way that it is going to be a win-win situation.' Car manufacturing and pharmaceuticals Virovácz, the economist, pointed out that Hungary is home to numerous automobile factories for major automakers like Audi and Mercedes. The manufacturing of cars and motor vehicle parts represents an 'overwhelming majority' of the country's total exports, he said. Pharmaceuticals make up an even larger share of Hungarian exports to the United States — an industry on which Trump this month threatened to impose 200% tariffs. That 'will essentially kill European and thus Hungarian exports to America," Virovácz said. 'It's impossible for tariffs to be levied on EU products but not on Hungarian ones,' he said. 'A theoretical option is that Trump could somehow compensate Hungary because he's on good terms with the Hungarian political leadership, but if that only starts happening now, it's way too late.' Krekó, the political analyst, said Trump's administration 'gives practically nothing for free. If Hungary ... cannot fulfill the interests of the U.S., then I think Hungary is not going to receive gifts.' 'Hungary just doesn't have the cards, to use Trump's terminology,' he added.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's 401(k) Overhaul: What Retirement Savers Need To Know Now
President Donald Trump is reportedly planning to open the door for retirement plans like 401(k) plans to include private equity and other alternative assets. While the move may favor high-net-worth investors, what could it mean for the average American saver? Find Out: Read Next: Experts explained what it means, the pros and cons and whether the average retirement saver should look to make this move if it opens up. How Trump's New Move Could Expand Investment Options At first glance, this move could be positive, according to Chad D. Cummings, Esq., CEO at Cummings & Cummings Law. 'Everyday workers might be able to invest in private companies and other assets not traded on public exchanges. The average 401(k) investor could potentially see higher returns.' Learn More: But Not Immediately — and With Trade-Offs The key word here is potentially. With greater returns comes the trade-off of greater risks, and 'much less visibility of the underlying asset performance since the assets are not publicly traded,' Cummings warned. Additionally, the average 401(k) investor would not likely see these available options for months or even a year, because all investment options for 401(k) plans must first be established through the Department of Labor (DOL) regulations. Risks of Private Equity in Retirement Accounts While private equity may sound like an exciting new vista to tap, according to Bill Harris, former CEO of TurboTax, founding CEO of PayPal and founder of Personal Capital, 'Private equity funds do not belong in the 401(k) of an ordinary investor.' The biggest downside is the high fees that managing this kind of equity tends to bring with it at a time when, 'the average 401(k) plans are finally moving from higher-fee mutual funds to lower-fee ETFs,' he said. '[This] is the wrong time to go the other direction.' Your Gains Could Be Taxed at a Higher Rate Additionally, distributions from private equity funds are typically treated as long-term capital gains, which are taxed at a maximum federal tax rate of 20%, Harris said. That is, unless you hold them in a tax-deferred account like a 401(k), in which case, 'the gains are automatically converted to ordinary income, which is taxed at a maximum federal tax rate of 37%.' 'The kicker is that PE funds are illiquid, which means you often can't get your money out for up to 10 years,' Harris said. To sum it up, he suggested that this shift will not do much for the average investor at all. 'So, PE fund fees are too high, a 401(k) is the wrong place to hold them, and you can't get your money when you need it. Wrong thing, wrong place, wrong time.' What Employers Must Do Before Offering Private Equity in 401(k) Plans Regardless of what happens, Cummings assured that the Department of Labor's regulations will still require employers and plan administrators to uphold their legal responsibility to always act in the best interest of the 401(k) investors. 'If the 401(k) assets are administered through a plan administrator who adopts private equity investments, the employer must also decide whether to offer the investment asset to its 401(k) participants,' Cummings said. Employers also have a fiduciary responsibility to evaluate investment risks, cost and fairness of each investment option as well as ensure the investment is suitable for long-term retirement goals. Invest With Caution In a nutshell, Cumming said that retirement savers should consider private equity 'only if they understand the differences among existing investment options in their plans such as the difference between stocks and bonds and understanding that riskier investments could result in big swings in their asset value and even complete loss of investment.' Most retirees should be focusing on stable, low-risk investments. 'Riskier retirement investments are usually better suited for investors who have a longer retirement timeline and are aware of the risk and return tradeoff,' Cummings said. Why You Should Talk To a Financial Advisor First Should PE become more available in 401(k) plans, Cummings pointed out that a financial advisor can help review whether it makes sense as part of a larger strategy. 'If the investor values simplicity and steady growth, even with lower earnings, this type of investment might not be the best fit.' More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on Trump's 401(k) Overhaul: What Retirement Savers Need To Know Now Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alpha Modus Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: AMOD) Eliminates Variable Rate Debt and Finalizes Capital Structure Cleanup
CHARLOTTE, N.C., July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Alpha Modus Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: AMOD), a pioneer in AI-driven retail technology, is pleased to announce a significant milestone in its ongoing commitment to long-term shareholder value. As of today, the Company confirms that all variable rate debt associated with the DESPAC process has been fully resolved and extinguished. This achievement marks the culmination of a strategic initiative that has been central to Alpha Modus' financial philosophy over the past six months: preserving the integrity of the company's capital structure and avoiding the use of dilutive derivative instruments that erode shareholder confidence. 'We've been very clear with the market—we will not jeopardize our vision or shareholder value through toxic financing,' said William Alessi, CEO of Alpha Modus. 'Today's announcement reflects our steadfast commitment to that principle. We now operate with a fully streamlined capital structure—clear, investor-aligned, and built to support long-term value creation.' With a clean cap table and no third-party variable rate debt overhang, Alpha Modus enters its next phase of expansion with enhanced appeal to institutional investors, strategic partners, and shareholders focused on long-term value creation. For more information, visit: About Alpha Modus Holdings Modus Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: AMOD) is redefining the retail experience through its patented AI technologies, intelligent kiosks, and targeted consumer engagement tools. By integrating innovation with infrastructure, Alpha Modus is unlocking new monetization pathways for retailers and fintech providers alike. For more information and to access Alpha Modus' press room, visit: Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release includes 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of the 'safe harbor' provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Alpha Modus's actual results may differ from their expectations, estimates, and projections, and, consequently, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Words such as 'expect,' 'estimate,' 'project,' 'budget,' 'forecast,' 'anticipate,' 'intend,' 'plan,' 'may,' 'will,' 'could,' 'should,' 'believes,' 'predicts,' 'potential,' 'continue,' and similar expressions (or the negative versions of such words or expressions) are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying these statements. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, Alpha Modus's expectations with respect to future performance. Alpha Modus cautions readers not to place undue reliance upon any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Alpha Modus does not undertake or accept any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in its expectations or any change in events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such statement is based. Contact Information Investor RelationsAlpha Modus Holdings, ir@ Follow us on LinkedIn | Follow us on XError in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data