
India frustrate England at Old Trafford to keep Test series alive as Bazball meets its match on a mercilessly flat pitch, writes LAWRENCE BOOTH
A total of 143 overs in more than five sessions yielded a grand total of four wickets – two of them in the first five balls – allowing the tourists to leave Lancashire with a creditable draw and arrive in London this week with a chance to square the series at 2–2.
To add to England's irritation, the Indians turned down Ben Stokes 's offer of a draw with 15 overs to go, because both Washington Sundar and Ravindra Jadeja were nearing centuries. Their refusal seemed to offend England's disdain for personal milestones, though the batsmen surely deserved the chance to complete hard-fought hundreds – in Sundar's case, his first in Tests.
And so tempers – English tempers, mainly – frayed once more in a series that has pushed both sides to the brink of mental and physical exhaustion.
Harry Brook, who led the sarcastic remarks picked up by the stump mike, came on to bowl 35mph off-breaks that reeked of petulance. Undeterred, the batsmen tucked into the freebies, each bringing up three figures in a match-saving stand eventually worth 203. There was more testiness as the players walked off with the scoreboard reading 425 for four, laying the groundwork for a pulsating finale at The Oval on Thursday.
'Both of them were in the nineties,' said India's captain, Shubman Gill. 'We thought they deserved a century.' Their coach Gautam Gambhir agreed: 'Would England have walked off if they were approaching a hundred?'
By the time Stokes addressed the media, he had calmed down, praising his opponents while suggesting 'there would have been no less satisfaction walking off with 80 not out than 100 not out'.
But England should have taken their medicine, especially on a day when their shortcomings with the ball were exposed by centuries for Gill, his fourth of a momentous series, and India's two spin-bowling all-rounders. When conditions go as flat as this in Australia this winter, as they inevitably will, England will need more incision, or they can kiss goodbye to the Ashes – again.
It might have been different. Had Jadeja not been dropped in the slips by Joe Root moments before lunch off a despairing Jofra Archer, England might now be celebrating their first Bazball series triumph over fellow 'Big Three' opponents.
Instead, a tiring attack was blunted on another mercilessly flat pitch by Jadeja and Sundar, who arrived to a barrage of verbals led by Brook, and proceeded to silence England with elegant ease.
There will be changes for The Oval because, quite simply, there have to be. It feels unwise to risk Archer for a third game in a row so soon after his comeback, and there is an equal case for resting both Chris Woakes and Brydon Carse, who have both played the first four games, and returned bowling averages of 52 and 60 respectively.
'Everyone's going to be pretty sore,' said Stokes. 'We'll make an assessment of everyone, and use the next few days wisely.'
Yet again, the pick of England's seamers – indeed their only genuine threat – was Stokes, who ignored a sore biceps tendon in his right arm to begin the last day with an eight-over spell that produced the wicket of KL Rahul, trapped plumb in front by an inducker for 90. Stokes said his chances of missing the fifth Test were 'very unlikely'.
It's a fool's errand trying to keep up with his niggles, though England insisted this one has been brewing for a while. Yet it was soberingly clear that without his ability to create hope where none exists, India could do as they wished.
That much had been evident on the fourth day, when Stokes – still suffering the after-effects of cramp – didn't bowl at all, allowing Rahul and Gill to kickstart India's recovery from none for two with a stand eventually worth 188. And when, on the final afternoon, Stokes limited himself to three overs between lunch and tea, and none at all thereafter, England again looked toothless.
Only when Gill, having moved past 700 runs for the series, edged a loose cut off Archer in the penultimate over of the morning session, did England look favourites. But their spirits were instantly doused: when Jadeja flashed unaccountably at his first ball, Root could only parry the head-high chance, before failing to grab the rebound. India still trailed by 89. Yet that, pretty well, was that.
It didn't help that Liam Dawson sent down 47 wicketless overs of left-arm spin that had Stokes urging him to vary his angle of attack as the players walked off at tea. Dawson kept India to two an over, as Shoaib Bashir would have been unable to do. But the feeling persisted that Bashir might have grabbed a wicket or two.
With Bashir nursing a broken finger, Dawson will get another chance at The Oval, but any or all of Gus Atkinson, Josh Tongue and Jamie Overton could be drafted in to refresh the England attack.
India, too, will make changes, with Rishabh Pant already ruled out by his broken foot, and their pre-series pledge to limit Jasprit Bumrah to three games sure to be tested by the state of the series. Gill said India would 'wait and see', though it's hard to imagine that either Mohammed Siraj or Anshul Kamboj will feature again.
For the moment, his side should enjoy inflicting on England only the second draw in 40 Tests in the Bazball era. The first, also in Manchester, owed everything to rain that saved Australia two years ago. This was down to Indian guts and English impotence. A draining series may not have seen its final twist.
BY RICHARD GIBSON
England
Crawley 7.5 - Playing in Manchester, scene of his brilliant Ashes hundred two years ago, awoke the Kent opener from his mid-series slumber.
Duckett 7.5 - Looked crestfallen at narrowly falling short of a seventh Test hundred, after overcoming an examination in gloomy conditions at the start of England's reply on day two.
Pope 7 - Hit lots of balls in between Tests and it told as he rediscovered some of the fluency conspicuous by its absence at both Edgbaston and Lord's.
Root 9 - Another batting masterclass by a man whose eminence was highlighted by his passing of Ricky Ponting into second place in Test cricket's run scoring chart.
Brook 5 - Since briefly interrupting Root's reign as the world's No 1 batter, the Yorkshireman's form has dropped off and he was brilliantly duped by Washington Sundar's drift here.
Stokes 9.5 - Yet another superman display. A five-wicket haul, a first Test hundred in two years and more body defying brilliance in a final burst with the ball on day five.
Smith 6 - Glovework, a drop down the leg side that reprieved Sai Sudharsan in the first innings aside, was sound, but this was a rare barren Test with the bat for the Surrey man.
Woakes 6 - Made the ball talk at the start of the second innings, briefly stirring hopes of a four-day victory, but struggled once it went softer.
Dawson 6 - Gave Stokes control by going at two runs per over, but after celebrating a Test recall by striking with his seventh delivery, the lack of a second mark in the wickets column was disappointing.
Carse 5 - Showed his value as a tail-ender once again, but a wicketless display took his series average with the ball north of 60 and he desperately looks in need of a rest.
Archer 7 - Lost his lines at times, but still managed speeds touching 90 miles per hour on the final day and had a fifth wicket materialised when Ravindra Jadeja nicked his first delivery, the match might have taken a different course.
India
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
11 minutes ago
- Metro
England hero Chloe Kelly criticised for 'cocky gesture' during Euro 2025 final
England hero Chloe Kelly has been accused of making a 'cocky gesture' at the end of the dramatic Euro 2025 final penalty shootout against Spain. Arsenal forward Kelly struck England's winning penalty in Basel after the final finished 1-1 after extra-time. Pre-tournament favourites Spain took the lead midway through the first half through Mariona Caldentey but Alessia Russo equalised for the Lionesses just before the hour mark. England withstood plenty of Spain pressure in extra-time before winning the shootout 3-1, goalkeeper Hannah Hampton making two superb saves. Kelly scored the winner in the Euro 2022 final win and was England's hero again as she blasted her spot-kick past the helpless Cata Coll, who had saved two previous penalties. It was at that moment that Kelly made a 'cocky gesture', according to sections of the Spanish press, as she wheeled away in celebration in front of Coll. Kelly initially went to sprint to her right – in the opposite direction of the diving Coll – before quickly changing direction and running in front of the Spain goalkeeper. Coll gestured angrily at Kelly as she ran past but the England star paid little notice and was soon celebrating back-to-back European titles with her teammates. Kelly appeared to be focused on the celebrating England fans inside St Jakob-Park rather than her opponent but Spanish outlet AS nonetheless said it was a 'cocky' and 'unnecessary gesture'. 'This is unnecessary, my friend,' they wrote. 'Chloe Kelly's cocky gesture to Cata Coll after scoring the decisive penalty. 'The England specialist changed her run during her penalty celebration to get past the goalkeeper she had just beaten.' In a separate article, AS claimed Spain had been 'robbed' after losing a final they if not dominated at least were in control of for large periods. 'The dream ends in a nightmare,' one piece said. 'Spain lost the European Championship on penalties. England tied a match that Spain largely dominated. 'History is made by victories, and also by defeats. Spain fell in the Euro Cup final but left its name sealed in gold. England robbed them of their dream; the world champions couldn't close the circle they began to write two years ago in Sydney. 'They couldn't have been crueller in the penalty shootout, tossing a few dice in the air.' A separate piece from the Spanish outlet, which accused England of playing for penalties, added: 'England had been eliminated three times. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'But they must have been using Houdini's secret manual of tricks to take home the trophy. Congratulations. 'The English embraced penalties like happy castaways, and it showed.' Spain manager Montse Tome was fairly magnanimous following her side's heartbreaking defeat and insisted she was 'proud' of the World Cup holders. 'It's a final and we are sad because we weren't able to win,' he said. 'I think the effort from all of the players was very good. 'They tried until the very end to try to win but then we arrived at a penalty shootout and we weren't able to do it. I thought overall we were very good on the ball. More Trending 'They are a team that play a lot on the second balls and they managed to hurt us a bit in these situations. 'I think in extra time we got the momentum back, got on the ball and were able to attack, but we were not able to avoid a penalty shootout and in the end we were not able to do that better. 'Now we have a strange feeling because we wanted to win so much. You have it so close and you are not able to do it. 'But I am always proud of the effort of the team and the staff that has been really positive. Now we have to stop and relax, and that is what I'm going to do.' For more stories like this, check our sport page. Follow Metro Sport for the latest news on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. MORE: Joey Barton branded 'bitter and twisted' after vile posts about England's Euro 2025 win MORE: 7 films celebrating women in sport after the Lionesses win Euro 2025 MORE: 'If that's not a sign…' – Ella Toone shares poignant tribute to 'angel' dad after Euro 2025 win


The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why do men like Jeremy Clarkson get so upset at women playing football?
The old dinosaur Jeremy Clarkson claims he likes women's football. In fact, he wrote a column about it for The Sunday Times, saying he found the Lionesses' Euros final 'exciting'. Great! Progress, right? Well… not quite. Because in the very same breath, he compares that excitement to what he imagines he'd feel watching cow racing in Sri Lanka. Yes, really. His exact words: ' It was exciting – in the same way that I'd be excited if I were in Sri Lanka and the locals invited me to watch some cow racing.' It's a thinly veiled pat on the head – the kind of backhanded compliment women in sport have heard for decades. Clarkson's message is clear: well done, ladies – that was 120 minutes of fun, in a novelty sort of way. Not real football, of course. Just a quirky spectacle for a Sunday afternoon. And that, right there, is the problem. Because even when some men say they like women's football, it's often delivered with a side of snark, scepticism or condescension. It's not quite "real". It's not quite worthy. It's the football equivalent of a try-hard indie band – enjoyable, but let's not pretend it deserves top billing. That mindset – whether shouted from comment sections of newspapers or whispered into broadsheet columns – is why women's football continues to be met with hostility. And it's going to take far more than England's back-to-back Euros win, a Downing Street visit and a street parade through the capital to convince men like Clarkson that women's football is worthy of their attention. What are they waiting for – a Bank Holiday in the Lionesses' honour? Nothing has stirred more bizarre, irrational rage in recent years than women playing football. Not climate change, not taxes, not even unfixed potholes. No – it's women daring to lace up their boots and play the same sport men have dominated for over a century. The horror! Now, don't get me wrong. I'm well aware there are thousands of men who have supported the Lionesses wholeheartedly through the Euros and through the trials and triumphs of women's football. Those men exist. In fact, I live with two of them. But what's also been impossible to ignore is the other group – a loud, seething contingent who foam at the mouth every time women's football gets airtime. Let's be honest. Some of these men don't just dislike women's football – they absolutely hate it. Viscerally and irrationally. As though women simply kicking a ball poses a threat to their very identity. Take Graham (real name, I believe), a caller I heard on LBC just the other day. He proudly declared – without a hint of irony – that he 'can't stand' women's football. Not just that he doesn't enjoy it. Not just that it's not his thing. No, Graham hates it. He can't watch it. He repeated several times that he can't bear it being 'shoved down our throats'. Shoved down our throats? Remind me… has there ever been a sport more relentlessly marketed, broadcast and worshipped than men's football? We've had 24/7 coverage for decades, wall-to-wall analysis of Premier League games, live transfer updates (snore) that border on obsession. Somehow, that's just normal. But when the BBC dares to air a Lionesses match? Now it's an outrage. Another gem came from a man I came across on a well-known sports account on Instagram who insisted women's football 'isn't the same sport' as men's. It's not as fast, not as powerful. Therefore, in his eyes, it's a different game entirely. Let's unpack that for a second. Two teams. Eleven players per side. A ball. A pitch. A goal at each end. A ref. Sounds like football to me. The only real difference? Some of the players have penises and some don't. That's not a different sport. That's just biology. By this logic, does he tell his son – who maybe plays under-12s on a soggy Sunday morning – that his football isn't real football because it lacks the speed and precision of the Champions League? Does he pat the kid on the head and say, 'Sorry son, it's just not the same sport'? Unlikely. The moment you challenge these men, even gently, the reaction is instant and vicious. I dared to comment on one of these videos, pointing out the obvious: it is the same sport. Cue the backlash. Within seconds, I saw replies accusing me of 'rage bait', clown emojis and insults I won't repeat here. The vitriol is astonishing – and sadly familiar, if you've ever spoken up for women's sport. But it begs the question: why does women's football cause such a meltdown in some men? Why this sport in particular? Why not women's tennis, where the stars earn millions and fill arenas? Why not rugby or cricket? Why this obsessive need to gatekeep football? The answer is as uncomfortable as it is obvious: misogyny. It's pure, deep-seated and often subconscious. Men's football is one of the last cultural arenas where some men feel untouchable. It's 'theirs'. The pub, the banter, the tribalism. And it seems when women enter that space (and excel in it), it rattles them to their core. Here's the real kicker: the England Lionesses aren't just playing football. They're winning. They're one of the most successful England teams this country has ever produced. While the men's team continues to serve us heartbreak, hype and penalty shootout trauma, the Lionesses deliver us trophies and finals and pride. At last! And it's not just what happens on the pitch. Off the field, the women are widely seen as more approachable, less egotistical and, frankly, better role models. They play as a team. They show humility. They connect with fans in a way that's rare in the era of £100k-a-week Instagram stars. That success – both in results and in values – should be a source of national pride. But instead, a portion of the male population would rather die on the hill of 'it's just not the same' than cheer on the best England football team we've got. Before I get accused of having no facts to back up my point – let's talk numbers for a minute. The Lionesses won the 2022 European Championship, something the men haven't done. They've reached the World Cup finals. Their matches have sold out stadiums. They've inspired millions of young girls – and plenty of boys – to take up the sport. If you're still arguing they don't deserve the spotlight, then sorry, but you've left logic behind. It's a sad day when a country finally gets to be world-class at something… and a significant chunk of its population responds by crossing its arms and pouting. Here's the truth: no one's asking you to like every pass or admire every tackle. But if you hate it – if it genuinely makes you angry to see women succeeding in sport – then maybe the problem isn't the football. Maybe the problem is you.


The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ella Toone and Beth Mead share moving tributes after Euro 2025 win
Ella Toone dedicated England 's Euro 2025 victory to her late father, Nick, marking her first trophy since his passing last September. Following England's shootout win against Spain, an emotional Toone looked skyward and was comforted by teammates. She later shared on Instagram that a spare seat next to her mother at the final felt like a sign her father was watching. Toone also shared a poignant moment with Beth Mead, who lost her mother 18 months ago, dedicating their win to 'our angels in the sky'. Toone and Mead have shared a special bond during the tournament by supporting each other through grief and posed with their Euro 2025 medals.