Hakeem Jeffries sets record with 8 and a half hour speech before vote on Trump tax bill
Mr Jeffries' speech, at 8 hours and 46 minutes, marked Democrats' last chance to prosecute their case against the $3.4 trillion package.
Advertisement
Lacking the votes to defeat the measure in a chamber that Republicans control by a slim 220-212 margin, Mr Jeffries, 54, railed against legislation that he characterised as a giveaway to the wealthy that would strip low-income Americans of federally-back health insurance and food aid benefits.
"It's not the type of leadership that this country needs right now. But that's what we're getting. Chaos. Cruelty. And corruption," he said.
Mr Jeffries began speaking at 4.53am and wrapped up at 1.38pm.
That broke a 2021 House record sent by then-House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy, who spent 8 hours and 32 minutes lambasting Democratic president Joe Biden's clean-energy and domestic-spending package. Shortly after Mr Jeffries concluded his speech, the House voted 218-214 to pass the bill. Every Democrat and two Republicans opposed it.
Advertisement
His speech recalled that of another Democratic lawmaker, senator Cory Booker of New Jersey, who broke the record for the longest Senate speech in April with a 25-hour, five-minute attack on Mr Trump's unilateral firings of federal workers.
Mr Booker's performance drew cheers from Democratic voters who have been frustrated by their party's powerlessness in Washington and have accused the party's leaders of being too meek.
Mr Jeffries used his status as Democratic leader to stretch his customary 60-second speaking time, known as a "magic minute," for hours.
Mr Jeffries made clear he also had his eye on a prize further down the road. Voters, Mr Jeffries said, "will get even" in the November 2026 midterm elections "because of these cuts being unleashed on the American people".
Advertisement
If Democrats win control of the House, Mr Jeffries would be positioned to make history again by becoming the first Black House speaker in the Congress that convenes at the start of 2027.
Early into his speech, Mr Jeffries showcased sick children in Republicans' home districts who might eventually lose Medicaid coverage under the legislation. It was a
manoeuvre
that could increase coverage of his speech in local media across the country.
Mr Jeffries pulled no punches.
He said the bill was "ripping healthcare" from Americans and called it "shameful," "disgusting" and "reckless".
"This is a crime scene and House Democrats want no part of it," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
Rupee ends week little changed, looming tariff deadline in focus
MUMBAI, July 04 (Reuters) - The Indian rupee witnessed muted price action on Friday to end the week little changed as traders awaited developments in U.S.-India trade talks, with a positive outcome potentially helping the local currency break past a sticky resistance level. The rupee closed at 85.3925, down about 0.1% each on the week and day. The currency had risen to a one-month peak of 85.25 in the previous session but pared gains on Friday after traders scaled back wagers on rate cuts by the Federal Reserve following a stronger-than-expected U.S. labour market report. On the day, routine dollar demand from importers weighed on the rupee with market participants also avoiding aggressive bullish wagers on the local currency to limit carrying risk over the weekend, a trader at a foreign bank said. While the rupee has persistently failed to rise and hold above a technical resistance level around 85.35-85.40 over recent sessions, a favourable trade deal with the U.S. may help the currency clear the hurdle, the trader added. U.S. President Donald Trump has said that Washington will start sending letters to countries on Friday specifying what tariff rates they will face on imports to the United States. "If Trump's comments prove accurate, then investors will again begin to downgrade growth expectations and upgrade inflation expectations, which will only encourage further dollar selling," MUFG said in a note, referring to the letters. Earlier in the week, Trump announced a deal with Vietnam, and the White House teased a forthcoming agreement with India. Meanwhile, talks with Japan - the U.S.' closest ally in Asia - have appeared to hit road blocks. Amid the ongoing uncertainty, analysts have pointed out that India's climbing foreign exchange reserves and the central bank's shrinking forward book are cementing the rupee's defences.
The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
Amazon shoppers risk bank-emptying nightmare in days as expert reveals 5 ‘red flags' that mean you could lose £100s
EXPERTS have revealed the 5 "red flags" to look out for in a bid to protect online shoppers from scams, as millions gear up for Amazon Prime Day. New research conducted by McAfee shows the users most at risk and how to stay safe online as scams become increasingly difficult to spot. 1 Scams becoming harder to spot According to Abhishek Karnik, the Head of Threat Research at McAfee: "As inflation and tariffs push more people to hunt for deals, scammers are using generative AI to craft scams that are more polished, personal, and persuasive. "From retailer impersonations to hyper-realistic delivery scams, these threats are getting harder to spot." Experts reveal 5 'red flags' In light of this new growing threat, the cyber security company has shared five red flags to watch out for to help users stay safe online: Urgent language demanding immediate action ("Your account will be closed in 24 hours!"). Requests for payment via gift cards, wire transfers or cash. Claims that you need to "verify" or "legalise" your money. Transfers to "goverment agencies" during the same call. Pressure to keep the call secret or not hang up. McAfee also emphasised that Amazon will never call you about suspicious account activity or unauthorised purchases. Further advice includes, using Amazon's Message Centre, and never giving personal information, passwords, or payment details over the phone. Mr Karnik added: "The good news is that the tools to fight back are getting smarter too. "The best way to stay safe is to pause before you click, trust your instincts, and use AI-powered protection like McAfee's Scam Detector to stay one step ahead." On how to protect your shopping experience, McAfee advised that you enable two-factor authentication on your Amazon account, use strong and unique passwords, and only shop on secure websites. It also suggests you monitor your bank and credit card statements regularly, never click on suspicious emails, and, most importantly, trust your gut. I tested the viral £17.99 Amazon underseat cabin bag to see how many outfits I could fit in McAfee identified older adults as particularly at risk, while platforms like TikTok shop and Instagram Shopping are fast becoming hot spots for scam exposure. Scammers strike again Earlier this year, Amazon shoppers were also advised to watch out for dangerous scams and "unexpected" attacks that could empty bank accounts. In March, Amazon released an official list of the four "common scam trends" that users needed to look out for, ahead of its spring sale. Among the list, were prime membership scams whereby cybercriminals attempted to convince shoppers that they needed to reinstate their membership. How to protect yourself from scams BY keeping these tips in mind, you can avoid getting caught up in a scam: Firstly, remember that if something seems too good to be true, it normally is. Check brands are "verified" on Facebook and Twitter pages - this means the company will have a blue tick on its profile. Look for grammatical and spelling errors; fraudsters are notoriously bad at writing proper English. If you receive a message from a 'friend' informing you of a freebie, consider whether it's written in your friend's normal style. If you're invited to click on a URL, hover over the link to see the address it will take you to – does it look genuine? To be on the really safe side, don't click on unsolicited links in messages, even if they appear to come from a trusted contact. Be careful when opening email attachments too. Fraudsters are increasingly attaching files, usually PDFs or spreadsheets, which contain dangerous malware. If you receive a suspicious message then report it to the company, block the sender and delete it. If you think you've fallen for a scam, report it to Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040 or use its onlin
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘Accelerated censorship': advocates criticize US supreme court ruling on LGBTQ+ books
Kiernan, a 24-year-old transgender person from Colorado, feels drained from dealing with legislation that consistently limits the spaces and freedoms of people like him. Since he transitioned in 2016, it's been the same – first bathroom bills, then censorship in the education system – routine attacks on LGBTQ+ rights that Kiernan feels have now just become part of living in the US. Now, in the wake of the Mahmoud v Taylor supreme court ruling, the stigmatization of these communities is likely to worsen. The highest court in the US ruled that parents in Maryland's Montgomery county school district can opt their children out of lessons that include books with LGBTQ+ themes and characters if they feel that it violates their religious rights. The move angered LGBTQ+ groups and civil rights advocates who also say that the lengthy and judicial process of these opt-outs could have chaotic implications for the US education system nationwide. 'LGBTQ-relevant books are just the beginning in accelerated censorship,' Sabrina Baêta, a senior member of PEN America, told the Guardian. 'What's to stop schools from backing away from any books that may be offensive? We have already seen other topics like Black history disappear as districts try to avoid anything potentially controversial.' PEN America highlighted in a recent report that teachers may be more likely to overlook topics that require parental consent, thereby brushing over crucial books and subjects in classrooms that promote diverse identities and learning. In administrative terms, the court's ruling also poses problems for teachers and educators. Rather than focusing on lessons at hand, they will have to grapple with what is or isn't appropriate on religious grounds. And while anything with LGBTQ+ themes will constitute a student being able to leave the classroom, it creates a grey zone for topics like science and history, where certain lessons – such as about reproduction – could be seen as now potentially inappropriate. Opt-outs are believed by experts to have a pernicious effect on educational environments, but their implementation is not a new phenomenon. For a short period between the 2022-2023 school year, the Montgomery county board of education allowed them after introducing several 'LGBTQ+ inclusive' texts into the curriculum. Less than a year after the books were introduced, however, the board rescinded this option, saying it 'could not accommodate the growing number of opt-out requests without causing significant disruptions to the classroom environment'. Moreover, a school board official stated that permitting some students to opt out while stories were being told would expose others to 'social stigma and isolation'. 'It's really frustrating and a burden on my psyche,' Kiernan said, speaking on the mounting number of bills and legislation that have recently targeted LGBTQ+ youth. 'These bills aren't doing anything positive for children; it's a political agenda that's trying to veil itself in support for religious people,' he said. 'I wish it would go away. Let people be people and stop using us as a political scapegoat.' Justin Driver, a professor at Yale Law School, submitted a document to the court in the Mahmoud v Taylor hearing in support of the Montgomery county school district, saying: 'the decision succeeds in opening Pandora's box in countless classrooms located in our nation's public schools.' Driver, who specializes in education law, believes it unwise that parents and students be granted the authority to veto individual school lessons and assignments, and added that legal experts have 'long extolled local control of public education'. 'Public schools must now brace themselves for a dizzying array of curricular opt-out demands,' Driver said, adding: 'the American education system will be much poorer for it.' When the conservative-dominated court ruled 6-3 in favour, siding with the Muslim, Christian and Catholic parents who brought the case, Justice Samuel Alito authored the majority opinion, and the three liberal justices – Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson – were in dissent. In the ruling, Alito wrote: 'We have long recognized the rights of parents to direct 'the religious upbringing' of their children. And we have held that those rights are violated by government policies that substantially interfere with the religious development of children.' While parents will be able to uphold these rights under the new ruling, teachers may be overwhelmed at the beginning of the school year. Schools could struggle to determine what constitutes infringement on someone's religious liberty while simultaneously honoring the freedom of speech guaranteed by the first amendment. Assessing the validity of removing books on religious grounds will also be problematic, given the broader ongoing campaign by parents' rights groups and religious organizations to remove LGBTQ+ content from schools across the nation, especially in Republican-led areas. 'The creation of opt-outs is license to censor the very existence of the LBGTQ+ community and their families,' the PEN American writer AJ Connelly concluded in her report. 'It is not difficult to imagine that other groups might soon be added to the list of those who may not be named,' she added.
