Second 'people power' lessons for Sara Duterte trial from Joseph Estrada's fall
But while it ended well, Estrada eventually walked out of prison, only a few weeks after his conviction for two counts of plunder, and for a UP Diliman professor of political science, it was a clear indication that 'the powerful have advantages.'
The 'revolution' on Jan 16 to 20, 2001 was a show of dissent — people believed that the trial in the Senate, marked by the refusal of 11 senators to open an envelope that could serve as the smoking gun to convict Estrada, will not hold him liable.
Like the one in 1986 that ended a 20-year dictatorship, millions of people crowded the streets and called on Estrada to resign. It was a protest against corruption, a display of power that will always be greater than the presidency and any one in government.
With the refusal of 11 senators, Aquilino 'Nene' Pimentel Jr. resigned as Senate president and walked out of the session hall, together with nine other senators who voted to open the 'second envelope.'
This triggered Filipinos to converge on EDSA on the night of Jan 16. The next day, Manila Archbishop Jaime Cardinal Sin, as he did in 1986, called on the people to take part in the protest, which grew immensely.
ALSO READ PART ONE: The rise and fall of Joseph Estrada: From people's champion to disgraced Philippine president
As more people came, a kilometres-long human chain was formed from Ayala Avenue in Makati City to the EDSA Shrine on Jan 18, signalling to Estrada that millions of Filipinos were already demanding his resignation.
But even as the police and the military withdrew their support and eventually took part in the protest, Estrada asserted that he will not resign, calling on TV for a snap presidential election on May 14 but without him as candidate.
This, however, was only viewed as his way to still hold on to the presidency.
Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, who was then the vice president, took her oath of office as president before Supreme Court Chief Justice Hilario Davide on Jan 20, the same day Estrada left Malacanang without making an official resignation.
A few months after his ouster, the Ombudsman filed two charges against Estrada before the Sandiganbayan: one for plunder and one for perjury, which is a case he was later cleared from.
The plunder charge consisted of four cases:
> Receiving P545 million worth of payoffs from illegal gambling
> Diverting P130 million in excise tobacco taxes to his own use
> Bagging P189 million worth of commission from the sale of the shares of Belle Corporation to government pension funds
> Maintaining a P3 billion bank account with the name 'Jose Velarde'
Republic Act No. 7080, as amended, penalises public officials who 'amass immense wealth through a series or combination of overt or criminal acts described in the statute in violation of the public trust.'
Estrada and his son, Jinggoy Estrada, were eventually arrested.
They were both initially detained at the Veteran's Memorial Medical Center, but when the younger Estrada posted a P500,000 bail, his father was moved to Fort Sto. Domingo in Sta. Rosa, Laguna.
He was placed on house arrest at his rest house in Tanay, Rizal, close to a military camp. It was where Estrada stayed until and even after the Sandiganbayan rendered its decision on the case.
It took over six years for the Sandiganbayan to reach a decision.
Estrada, in 2007, was convicted of two counts of plunder — the acceptance of 'protection money' from illegal gambling and bagging commission in the sale of shares of a real estate company to government pension funds.
He was cleared of the other two. His son, Jinggoy, was acquitted.
As a result of the conviction, Estrada was sentenced to reclusion perpetua. The verdict likewise barred him from holding public office again, while millions worth of resources were ordered forfeited.
> Over P545 million, with interest and income earned, inclusive of the amount of P200 million deposited in the name and account of the Erap Muslim Youth Foundation
>P189 million, inclusive of interests and income earned, deposited in the 'Jose Velarde' account
>The real property 'Boracay Mansion' located in New Manila, Quezon City
The period within which Estrada has been in detention was credited to him.
For political analyst Maria Ela Atienza, there was 'moral and legal victory in the fact that Estrada was impeached, forced out of the presidency, and convicted in court.' But his eventual release proved how powerful the elite are.
Not even a year had passed when Arroyo, who rose to the presidency in the same 'revolution' that ousted Estrada, gave the latter an executive clemency through a pardon, which Estrada accepted on Oct 26 of the same year.
It was believed that Arroyo's move was made for her to get advantage from the opposition and to deflect the charges of corruption within her own administration, as stated in a report by Reuters.
But the pardon and his eventual release from detention paved the way for his political resurrection, even when his conviction carried a penalty of perpetual disqualification from public office.
This, as he initiated a bid for the presidency in the 2010 elections, having then Makati Mayor Jejomar Binay as his candidate for vice president. While he lost to Benigno Aquino III, he received over nine million votes.
Estrada, three years later, won as mayor of Manila. While his win was met with opposition, considering that he was barred from holding public office again, the Supreme Court said he was eligible.
While Associate Justice Marvic Leonen pointed out that Estrada 'continues to suffer the penalty of perpetual absolute disqualification,' the Supreme Court, in an 11-3 vote, stressed that Estrada had the right to seek public office.
Estrada was mayor of Manila for six years until 2019, when he lost his reelection bid to Isko Moreno-Domagoso, who was once his candidate for vice mayor back in 2013, the year that marked his political comeback.
For Atienza, this is the reason that 'we have to impress upon presidents who have the power to pardon that it is not in their interest to pardon officials who commit high crimes.' - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Tariffs, Duterte risks loom as Philippines' Marcos charts last years in power
MANILA: Fresh from tariff talks with President Donald Trump, Philippine leader Ferdinand Marcos Jr (pic) is on Monday (July 28) set to unveil plans to boost growth as he starts the second half of his single six-year term beset with economic and political risks. Marcos will use his annual speech to Congress to push welfare and infrastructure programmes as he steers the South-East Asian economy through global trade tensions. He's also likely to call for national unity after his rival, Vice President Sara Duterte, on Friday successfully thwarted efforts to disqualify her from office and the 2028 elections. "We will be talking about the social projects of the government for people in need,' Marcos said on July 22 of his upcoming fourth State of the Nation Address. "We will talk about the programmes that we have initiated and will continue to promote and endorse.' The speech comes days after Marcos returned from the US, where he secured a modest tariff cut to 19% which his government hopes to further reduce ahead of Trump's Aug 1 deadline. His economic managers have tempered economic growth targets this year due to the potential impact of Trump's levies on the global economy. Still, the Marcos agenda faces hurdles after his allies had a disappointing performance in May's midterm elections, while Duterte is now free of the threat of an impeachment trial at the Senate. "Duterte allies in the Senate and even VP Duterte are expected to be obstructionists,' said Arjan Aguirre of the Ateneo de Manila University's political science department. Marcos "will still pursue those basic services that are meant to pull his numbers up or make him popular to the public but, again, it will not be easy.' Here are the main things to watch for in the president's speech, scheduled for 4pm Monday, Manila time: Marcos will likely push his plans to build over 8 trillion pesos (US$140 billion) worth of flagship infrastructure programmes, with three years left in his term. He's also expected to highlight agricultural reforms, as lowering rice prices remains a focus for his administration. Those programmes need funding, but new tax measures could be tougher to pass as Marcos' popularity wavers. His government is expecting a wider fiscal deficit this year compared to earlier projections. "Pushing for broader tax measures might be more politically challenging now,' said Union Bank of the Philippines chief economist Ruben Carlo Asuncion. "With midterm elections behind us and the clock ticking toward 2028, the window for passing complex tax legislation is narrowing.' The marginal US tariff reduction has frustrated some, including Marcos' allies. But unlike its neighbours, Marcos - who Trump called a "tough negotiator' - is opening up the Philippine market to a relatively limited number of US exports, such as cars, soy and wheat products and medicines, in a bid to protect domestic industries. "The deal looks very lopsided for Washington's closest ally in Asean, though Manila seemingly put little on the table,' Peter Mumford, South-East Asia practice head at risk consultancy Eurasia Group, said in a note on July 23. The Philippines is aiming to negotiate further with Washington to drop the tariff to 15%, Manila's envoy to Washington Jose Manuel Romualdez told Bloomberg Television on Thursday. "We will continue to protect major domestic agricultural and manufacturing industries,' Philippine Trade Secretary Cristina Roque said in a statement. "They are not included in our concessions.' The president's relationship with his vice president broke down more than a year ago, and Sara Duterte - who denied wrongdoing - was impeached earlier this year for allegedly misusing public funds and plotting to assassinate Marcos. On Friday, the Supreme Court said the impeachment complaint was unconstitutional, ending prospects of an August trial in the Senate. The political chasm between the country's two top politicians, who ran for office on a successful joint ticket in 2022, widened this year when the Marcos administration turned over her father, former President Rodrigo Duterte, to the International Criminal Court. The elder Duterte denies charges he committed crimes against humanity during a war on drugs that killed thousands. And the Marcos government has signalled its openness to rebuild ties with the ICC severed during Rodrigo's presidency. While Marcos had long disavowed the impeachment effort, his deputy may not hear any call for unity. Even before her court victory, the vice president was reportedly set to skip the speech for a second straight year. A sector that Marcos could pitch as a source for new taxes is the country's booming online gambling industry. The rise of Internet betting has raised alarm among lawmakers and Church leaders wary of gambling addiction, which could give the president reason to pitch regulations. The question is how far will Marcos go to curb an industry that's also contributing to government coffers. There's a proposal to ban online gambling operations, while there are also suggestions to just limit access to it. In his 2024 speech, the president outlawed online casinos that catered to Chinese gamblers, amid claims it was involved in crimes including money laundering. Marcos is also likely to affirm his efforts to safeguard the Philippines' rights in the South China Sea, which has seen him forge closer defence ties with like-minded nations as he pushes back against Beijing's expansive claims in the resource-rich waterway. During his first three years in office, the Philippines expanded the number of military bases that the US can access, ramped up drills with American troops and hosted US missile systems, which riled up Beijing, Manila's top trading partner. But the Philippines may have to weigh whether Marcos' warmer ties with the US are paying off following the latest tariff deal. "Washington's stiff tariffs risk undermining Marcos' US pivot, though Manila needs US security support given South China Sea tensions with Beijing,' Eurasia's Mumford said. - Bloomberg
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
One year after ban, offshore gaming shadow still looms in the Philippines
MANILA: Thousands of Chinese nationals who previously worked in now-defunct Philippine Offshore Gaming Operator (Pogo) hubs remain in the country despite President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s total ban on the industry a year ago. Still, some lawmakers believe the government has learned from the 'bitter lessons' of the Pogo controversy. 'I believe so. The Pogo ban demonstrates the government's commitment to correcting the mistake of allowing Pogos into our country,' said Senator Risa Hontiveros, chair of the Senate committee on women, children, family relations and gender equality, which led the inquiry into Pogo-related crimes. She described the nationwide ban as a 'major breakthrough.' 'Shutting down massive Pogo scam hubs is certainly an achievement, especially since these hubs were involved in scamming, trafficking and harming not only Filipinos but also thousands of other nationals,' she said. 'Our Senate hearings revealed how Pogos exploited our institutions and corrupted officials to profit from innocent people. I hope these mistakes are never forgotten,' she added. Thousands of foreign Pogo workers have already been deported, but Hontiveros said some large operations have unfortunately reorganised into smaller, guerrilla-style scam networks. 'There were reports of improper deportation procedures. We called on the Bureau of Immigration to ensure foreign Pogo workers actually return to their countries of origin and don't go to Cambodia or Myanmar to victimise others,' she said. As of June 2025, over 9,000 former Pogo workers remain at large in the country, according to the Presidential Anti-Organised Crime Commission (PAOCC). Senator Sherwin Gatchalian, a longtime critic of Pogos, said the effects of the ban were becoming more evident. 'It's only been six months since the ban in 2025. Let's give it three to six months more until all Pogo remnants are gone,' he told the Inquirer in a phone interview. 'I think we're seeing 90 to 95 per cent of the remnants already gone. Their world is getting smaller.' Gatchalian said remaining workers were likely not involved in operations. 'I saw in the news some Pogo-connected people trying to return, but they're not necessarily operating. Once they go back to China, they will be detained, so they're avoiding prosecution and hiding here,' said the chair of the Senate ways and means committee. 'Some were caught trying to sneak back using backdoors. I think it's just a matter of time before we eradicate all individuals related to Pogos.' He added there was no confirmation that these include Pogo 'big bosses.' 'These are not high-level criminals. Some were just trying to stay because they have girlfriends or babies here,' he said. In his third State of the Nation Address last year, Marcos ordered an immediate ban on Pogos and directed the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp. (Pagcor) to wind down all operations by Dec. 31, 2024. He later signed Executive Order No. 74, imposing an outright ban on offshore and internet gaming, citing national security and public order. The EO, based on a Department of Finance study, said the risks and consequences of Pogos — such as increased crime, social instability and exploitation — outweighed their economic benefits. The Anti-Money Laundering Council had also flagged Pogos as prone to money laundering, fraud and other illicit activities, posing threats to the financial system. Despite the EO, both Hontiveros and Gatchalian are hopeful Marcos will sign Senate Bill No. 2868, or the Anti-Pogo Act of 2025, which seeks to permanently prohibit the industry. The House of Representatives has adopted the Senate version, which bans the establishment, operation and service provision of Pogos. 'This is the only thing missing. The EO can only do so much—it cannot go beyond the law,' said Gatchalian, the bill's principal author. 'This isn't just a law—it's the people's demand to end the Pogo menace.' Hontiveros said the measure would ensure the prohibition survives beyond the Marcos administration. 'Whoever sits in Malacañang, it won't be easy to establish a Pogo scam hub in the country. We need this law to ensure Pogos never emerge again,' she said. If enacted, the bill would repeal Republic Act No. 11590, which legitimised offshore gaming. Thousands of Chinese nationals who previously worked in now-defunct Philippine Offshore Gaming Operator (Pogo) hubs remain in the country despite President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s total ban on the industry a year ago. The Pogo industry began in 2003 as an unregulated service employing around 80,000 foreign workers. In August 2016, Pagcor issued rules and regulations, allowing the sector to thrive—particularly under the Duterte administration—even as it became increasingly linked to organised crime. Congressional hearings on Pogos, prompted by raids on large complexes employing foreign nationals, revealed allegations of killings, torture, trafficking, prostitution and cyber scams. One key case was that of former Bamban, Tarlac Mayor Alice Guo (pic), or Guo Hua Ping. A Senate inquiry found she was an incorporator of Zun Yuan Technology Inc., a Pogo firm raided for alleged human trafficking and illegal detention. Guo's nationality was questioned, and a Manila court recently declared her 'undoubtedly a Chinese citizen,' disqualifying her from office. Fingerprint analysis proved Guo and Guo Hua Ping were the same person. She is currently detained at Pasig City Jail, facing 62 counts of money laundering and qualified trafficking. Once enacted, the Anti-Pogo Act would: Punish corrupt government workers who help individuals with fraudulent documents enter or leave the country. Forfeit all Pogo-related assets to prevent reuse in illegal operations. Create an Administrative Oversight Committee, led by PAOCC, to implement the law. 'The measure not only bans offshore gaming but also builds safeguards for our people. We shouldn't compromise public welfare for revenue from illegal and dirty businesses,' said Gatchalian. Gatchalian said the ban helped reduce Pogo-related crimes and restored order in local communities. 'Before, there were rampant kidnappings—Chinese vs. Chinese. They were notorious for having police escorts and scaring neighbors. But now that atmosphere of fear is gone,' he said. Hontiveros agreed. 'One year after the ban, Pogo-related crimes—scamming, trafficking, kidnapping—aren't as rampant. Big syndicates, like Guo's associates, have left,' she said. 'These are welcome developments. I trust law enforcers will continue cracking down on illegal centers.' Gatchalian added that the Pogo crackdown contributed to the Philippines' removal from the Financial Action Task Force's gray list. 'This is another big achievement. It reaffirms our position that the country is better off without Pogos,' he said, adding that the gray list removal could boost foreign investments. He cautioned, however, that the government must continue addressing risks and strengthening financial regulations. The crackdown also affected the real estate market. While Pogos triggered a boom in office and residential demand, especially in Metro Manila, the ban led to a decline in occupancy and rental rates. Gatchalian said that's a good thing. 'I won't deny prices have gone down. But now it's back to the correct level,' he said. 'Before, rental rates were inflated because Pogo workers could pay triple what locals could afford. Now, locals and even government agencies can afford to rent again.' 'It's more fair for the economy. Prices have reached the fair level. If it goes below that, it's no longer good.' Both senators blamed Pagcor for the rise of illegal Pogos. 'It's a conflict of interest—both operator and regulator,' said Gatchalian. 'It's the regulator's job to prevent criminal activity. But it failed.' Hontiveros agreed. 'Pagcor poorly regulated the industry. It approved operations that became scam hubs,' she said. She also criticised the Bureau of Immigration's Visa Upon Arrival (VUA) scheme under the Duterte administration, which led to the 'Pastillas' bribery scam. 'It allowed Pogo workers, even fugitives, to enter without proper checks. There were other schemes like fake alien employment permits. That worsened the situation.' 'I trust that PAOCC, Philippine National Police, National Bureau of Investigation and Bureau of Immigration continue working together on raids and rescues,' she said. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Philippine Supreme Court rules impeachment bid against vice president is unconstitutional
MANILA, Philippines (AP): The Philippine Supreme Court has ruled that an impeachment case filed against Vice President Sara Duterte violated the country's constitution due to a key technicality, a decision that blocks her upcoming trial over a raft of criminal allegations, including her threat to have the president assassinated . The House of Representatives, which impeached Duterte in February and sent the case to the Senate for trial, violated a rule that only one impeachment case could be processed by the lower chamber against an impeachable official in a single year, court spokesperson Camille Ting said. The House received at least four separate impeachment cases against Duterte between December and February but only one was transmitted to the Senate, which would have served as an impeachment tribunal. The other three impeachment cases were placed in the House's order of business but were archived with no action and "effectively dismissed,' according to the ruling. The ruling was "immediately executory,' the court said. "It is not our duty to favor any political result,' the court said in a statement, suggesting it did not pass judgement on the array of allegations. "Ours is to ensure that politics are framed within the rule of just law.' Duterte's lawyers welcomed the decision, which they said upheld the rule of law. "We remain prepared to address the allegations at the proper time and before the appropriate forum," the attorneys in a statement. Duterte, 47, became the first vice president of the Philippines to be impeached by the House in February over an array of alleged high crimes. The accusations were led by her threat during a November online news conference to have President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., his wife and cousin, then-House Speaker Martin Romualdez, killed by an assassin if she were killed herself during her high-profile disputes with them. The daughter of Marcos' controversial predecessor, Rodrigo Duterte, she also has been accused of large-scale corruption, sedition, terrorism and failing to openly support the Philippine government's efforts to oppose and denounce China's aggressive actions against Filipino forces in the disputed South China Sea. Duterte allegedly backed her father's brutal crackdowns against illegal drugs that led to extrajudicial killings in their southern home city. Her impeachment trial was set to begin either next week or early next month by the 24-member Senate, which has convened to hear the case. If the Supreme Court ruling becomes final, the vice president's opponents could file another impeachment case after a year. Duterte ran as Marcos's running mate in 2022 on a campaign battle cry of unity in their deeply divided and poverty-stricken Southeast Asian country. Both were scions of strongmen accused of human rights violations, but their strong regional bases of political support combined to give them landslide victories. Their whirlwind political alliance, however, rapidly frayed when they took office. Duterte's father openly accused Marcos of being a weak leader and a drug addict even during the campaign, allegations the president denied. The vice president later resigned from her then-concurrent Cabinet post as educations secretary as the rifts between the two political families deepened. She later accused Marcos, his wife and Romualdez of corruption, weak leadership and attempting to muzzle her because of speculation she may seek the presidency in 2028 when Marcos's six-year term ends. Duterte made the comment about killing Marcos and his family members during a Nov. 23 news conference, a threat she warned wasn't a joke. Faced with the prospects of criminal lawsuits, Duterte later said she wasn't threatening him but was expressing concern for her own safety. Still, her statements set off a criminal investigation and national security concerns and prompted calls for her impeachment. Among the impeachment complaint signatories was the president's son, Rep. Sandro Marcos, and Romualdez. The petition urged the Senate to shift into an impeachment court to try the vice president, "render a judgement of conviction,' remove her from office and ban her from holding public office. "Duterte's conduct throughout her tenure clearly displays gross faithlessness against public trust and a tyrannical abuse of power that, taken together, showcases her gross unfitness to hold public office and her infidelity to the laws and the 1987 Constitution,' the complaint said. Last month, senators voted to send the raft of complaints back to the House due to legal questions, sparking street protests demanding Duterte's immediate trial. Then-Senate President Chiz Escudero said the move led by Duterte's allies in the Senate did not mean the impeachment complaint was being dismissed and issued a summons for Duterte to appear when the trial proceeds. - AP
