Inflation hope as RBA decision leaves many disappointed
Financial markets and economists were overwhelmingly tipping the central bank to deliver a 25 basis point cut on Tuesday.
But its board instead decided to wait for more evidence that inflation is easing before considering lowering the 3.85 per cent cash interest rate.
"It's fair to say there were millions of people who were hoping for more rate relief yesterday and didn't get it," Treasurer Jim Chalmers told ABC radio on Wednesday.
"(But) it should be a source of considerable pride to Australians that we've done something here that other countries haven't been able to do.
"We haven't paid for progress on inflation with much higher unemployment - that's a good thing."
Interest rates have already been cut twice this year as inflation tracked lower and the central bank's focus switched to growth prospects and job market resilience.
Reserve Bank of Australia Governor Michele Bullock acknowledged households with mortgages would have been "very keen" for another interest rate cut.
"I'm also really conscious that we don't want to end up having to fight inflation again," she said.
The Australian Retailers Association described Tuesday's decision as a "missed opportunity" to improve the outlook of a sector employing one-in-ten Australians.
"Weak consumer spending and high business costs continue to put pressure on retailers," the association's chief executive Chris Rodwell said.
Real Estate Institute of Australia president Leanne Pilkington said the July call means high borrowing costs for first home buyers.
"We understand the RBA's priority is returning inflation to its target band but this needs to be balanced against the risk of further dampening housing demand and locking first home buyers out of the market," she said.
Federal Housing Minister Clare O'Neil said while the decision was disappointing for many, the central bank was still on track for more interest rate cuts.
"The RBA told us yesterday that this is about pace, not direction," she told Seven's Sunrise program on Wednesday.
"The RBA has already cut interest rates twice this year and is kind of indicating that they want to keep moving on that, but they're being very cautious."
Speaking on Tuesday after a two-day meeting on monetary policy, Ms Bullock sympathised with young people hoping to buy homes, but said interest rates aren't the only roadblock.
"In fact, I've heard criticisms that we shouldn't lower interest rates because housing prices will go up," she said.
"So we can't win really."
The governor said the question of housing prices was largely one for governments to address.
Further insights into the interest rate decision could be revealed in a public speech by the central bank's deputy governor Andrew Hauser on Wednesday at the Australian Conference of Economists in Sydney.
Australian borrowers are rightly disappointed that they won't get an interest rate cut this month, but the treasurer says there is a silver lining in the way inflation is tracking.
Financial markets and economists were overwhelmingly tipping the central bank to deliver a 25 basis point cut on Tuesday.
But its board instead decided to wait for more evidence that inflation is easing before considering lowering the 3.85 per cent cash interest rate.
"It's fair to say there were millions of people who were hoping for more rate relief yesterday and didn't get it," Treasurer Jim Chalmers told ABC radio on Wednesday.
"(But) it should be a source of considerable pride to Australians that we've done something here that other countries haven't been able to do.
"We haven't paid for progress on inflation with much higher unemployment - that's a good thing."
Interest rates have already been cut twice this year as inflation tracked lower and the central bank's focus switched to growth prospects and job market resilience.
Reserve Bank of Australia Governor Michele Bullock acknowledged households with mortgages would have been "very keen" for another interest rate cut.
"I'm also really conscious that we don't want to end up having to fight inflation again," she said.
The Australian Retailers Association described Tuesday's decision as a "missed opportunity" to improve the outlook of a sector employing one-in-ten Australians.
"Weak consumer spending and high business costs continue to put pressure on retailers," the association's chief executive Chris Rodwell said.
Real Estate Institute of Australia president Leanne Pilkington said the July call means high borrowing costs for first home buyers.
"We understand the RBA's priority is returning inflation to its target band but this needs to be balanced against the risk of further dampening housing demand and locking first home buyers out of the market," she said.
Federal Housing Minister Clare O'Neil said while the decision was disappointing for many, the central bank was still on track for more interest rate cuts.
"The RBA told us yesterday that this is about pace, not direction," she told Seven's Sunrise program on Wednesday.
"The RBA has already cut interest rates twice this year and is kind of indicating that they want to keep moving on that, but they're being very cautious."
Speaking on Tuesday after a two-day meeting on monetary policy, Ms Bullock sympathised with young people hoping to buy homes, but said interest rates aren't the only roadblock.
"In fact, I've heard criticisms that we shouldn't lower interest rates because housing prices will go up," she said.
"So we can't win really."
The governor said the question of housing prices was largely one for governments to address.
Further insights into the interest rate decision could be revealed in a public speech by the central bank's deputy governor Andrew Hauser on Wednesday at the Australian Conference of Economists in Sydney.
Australian borrowers are rightly disappointed that they won't get an interest rate cut this month, but the treasurer says there is a silver lining in the way inflation is tracking.
Financial markets and economists were overwhelmingly tipping the central bank to deliver a 25 basis point cut on Tuesday.
But its board instead decided to wait for more evidence that inflation is easing before considering lowering the 3.85 per cent cash interest rate.
"It's fair to say there were millions of people who were hoping for more rate relief yesterday and didn't get it," Treasurer Jim Chalmers told ABC radio on Wednesday.
"(But) it should be a source of considerable pride to Australians that we've done something here that other countries haven't been able to do.
"We haven't paid for progress on inflation with much higher unemployment - that's a good thing."
Interest rates have already been cut twice this year as inflation tracked lower and the central bank's focus switched to growth prospects and job market resilience.
Reserve Bank of Australia Governor Michele Bullock acknowledged households with mortgages would have been "very keen" for another interest rate cut.
"I'm also really conscious that we don't want to end up having to fight inflation again," she said.
The Australian Retailers Association described Tuesday's decision as a "missed opportunity" to improve the outlook of a sector employing one-in-ten Australians.
"Weak consumer spending and high business costs continue to put pressure on retailers," the association's chief executive Chris Rodwell said.
Real Estate Institute of Australia president Leanne Pilkington said the July call means high borrowing costs for first home buyers.
"We understand the RBA's priority is returning inflation to its target band but this needs to be balanced against the risk of further dampening housing demand and locking first home buyers out of the market," she said.
Federal Housing Minister Clare O'Neil said while the decision was disappointing for many, the central bank was still on track for more interest rate cuts.
"The RBA told us yesterday that this is about pace, not direction," she told Seven's Sunrise program on Wednesday.
"The RBA has already cut interest rates twice this year and is kind of indicating that they want to keep moving on that, but they're being very cautious."
Speaking on Tuesday after a two-day meeting on monetary policy, Ms Bullock sympathised with young people hoping to buy homes, but said interest rates aren't the only roadblock.
"In fact, I've heard criticisms that we shouldn't lower interest rates because housing prices will go up," she said.
"So we can't win really."
The governor said the question of housing prices was largely one for governments to address.
Further insights into the interest rate decision could be revealed in a public speech by the central bank's deputy governor Andrew Hauser on Wednesday at the Australian Conference of Economists in Sydney.
Australian borrowers are rightly disappointed that they won't get an interest rate cut this month, but the treasurer says there is a silver lining in the way inflation is tracking.
Financial markets and economists were overwhelmingly tipping the central bank to deliver a 25 basis point cut on Tuesday.
But its board instead decided to wait for more evidence that inflation is easing before considering lowering the 3.85 per cent cash interest rate.
"It's fair to say there were millions of people who were hoping for more rate relief yesterday and didn't get it," Treasurer Jim Chalmers told ABC radio on Wednesday.
"(But) it should be a source of considerable pride to Australians that we've done something here that other countries haven't been able to do.
"We haven't paid for progress on inflation with much higher unemployment - that's a good thing."
Interest rates have already been cut twice this year as inflation tracked lower and the central bank's focus switched to growth prospects and job market resilience.
Reserve Bank of Australia Governor Michele Bullock acknowledged households with mortgages would have been "very keen" for another interest rate cut.
"I'm also really conscious that we don't want to end up having to fight inflation again," she said.
The Australian Retailers Association described Tuesday's decision as a "missed opportunity" to improve the outlook of a sector employing one-in-ten Australians.
"Weak consumer spending and high business costs continue to put pressure on retailers," the association's chief executive Chris Rodwell said.
Real Estate Institute of Australia president Leanne Pilkington said the July call means high borrowing costs for first home buyers.
"We understand the RBA's priority is returning inflation to its target band but this needs to be balanced against the risk of further dampening housing demand and locking first home buyers out of the market," she said.
Federal Housing Minister Clare O'Neil said while the decision was disappointing for many, the central bank was still on track for more interest rate cuts.
"The RBA told us yesterday that this is about pace, not direction," she told Seven's Sunrise program on Wednesday.
"The RBA has already cut interest rates twice this year and is kind of indicating that they want to keep moving on that, but they're being very cautious."
Speaking on Tuesday after a two-day meeting on monetary policy, Ms Bullock sympathised with young people hoping to buy homes, but said interest rates aren't the only roadblock.
"In fact, I've heard criticisms that we shouldn't lower interest rates because housing prices will go up," she said.
"So we can't win really."
The governor said the question of housing prices was largely one for governments to address.
Further insights into the interest rate decision could be revealed in a public speech by the central bank's deputy governor Andrew Hauser on Wednesday at the Australian Conference of Economists in Sydney.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
37 minutes ago
- The Age
Australia's independence and national interest
On the flipsideBeing an old Northcote boy, ex Herbert Street, I applaud the residents for refusing Macca's push for a store in their suburb. Here's a chance to boycott the US, so I hope you succeed. John Cain, McCrae Broken care systemWhen Australians outsource care to childcare, disability or aged care industries, they do so because of an initial assumed trust, based on their experience of living in Australia, that of all countries, Australia is one where what should happen does happen, and what shouldn't happen doesn't those who trustingly outsource care have to decide, in the case of childcare, which staff members to deem trustworthy enough to dispense the care, or in the case of aged care, are only able to outsource care under the condition of there being no right of enforceable visitor access to check on the care, those care systems are broken and not worthy of deregulating care sectors, the Australian government has caused twofold harm. It has not only eroded public trust in deregulated care sectors, but eroded the confidence of citizens in their country and its government. Ruth Farr, Blackburn South Tiers of joyThere has been plenty written about a compromised AFL draw, and ″A Radical Fixture Change″ (9/7). But nothing about the introduction of a two-tiered system which would allow for promotion and the imminent introduction of the Tasmanian Devils and potentially a Darwin-NT team, two tiers of 10 teams would solve all our current as a bonus, more supporters from more clubs would have a better chance of supporting a winner as they cheer on their favourite team, and two of those clubs each year, a is this not being discussed in public? Surely two tiers of 10 makes good sense. Peter Hayne, The Patch Deregulation failureIn the early 1990s the Labor government, and subsequently the Coalition, became captured by public policy that the solution to economic and productivity growth was market-oriented government characterised by deregulation, privatisation and contracting out. And where did that get us? Major regulatory and performance failures in childcare, aged care, housing and vocational training, and a decline in productivity. And here we go again. Again we find the treasurer, prime minister and the productivity commissioner promoting the idea of getting rid of redtape or freeing up the private it ever occurred to policy officials that the mediocre performance of recent decades might be because of the deregulation and related market-oriented reforms and the so-called solution may be part of the problem? We should be looking at more effective and nuanced regulation than just more deregulation. The risk is that other muted productivity reforms, such as taxation, will be successfully blocked by vested interests while the low-hanging fruit of further deregulation will become ″the reform″. Terry Burke, Paterson A drive for lifeAs retiring Baby Boomers practise the art of golf, conversation often settles on various ailments and what remains on your 'bucket list'. I try to combine the week, I seek perfection in every drive, chip, and putt. It never happens and I thought would never happen until the other day when I got a hole-in-one, the holy grail of most golfers. I was ecstatic. A friend, trying to keep matters in perspective, produced some statistics that suggest it is not as rare as you would think. But how many of them have had Parkinson's disease for nearly 20 years, I protested.I'm a bit slower around the course nowadays and my golfing friends fetch a lot of my wayward shots but it's one thing I can cross off my bucket list. A diagnosis of Parkinson's is not the end of the world. Put whatever you want on your bucket list and go for it. You, too, might get a hole-in-one. Phillip Hoysted, South Hobart, Tas Trump, call PutinI would suggest a rapid call to Vladimir Putin if Donald Trump expects to raise the Nobel Peace Prize above his head if the recent drone and missile strikes on Ukraine over the past 24 hours are any indication of his ability to bring peace comparable with Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela. David West, Essendon Education for allThe recommendation in the Special Envoy's Plan to Combat Antisemitism to introduce a school program on how to deal with antisemitism is a positive one.I hope it can be matched with a school program on how to deal with the grief of witnessing starvation, maiming and killing of thousands of children in is devastating to see no punitive sanctions against Israel from our government. Colleen Coghlan, Prahran Tragedy's reachRather than the demonisation of Israel being the biggest tragedy of the conflict in Palestine (Letters, 9/7) might one suggest that the killing of tens of thousands of people and the near total destruction of their homeland is a far greater tragedy on every level. Further, might one also suggest that if the public image of Israel is such an issue, then Israel itself may want to consider the actions that create that perception and maybe even cease them. Graeme Gardner, Reservoir Unpeaceful marchesUnfortunately, the regular anti-Israel protests in the city are not peaceful, as your correspondent claims (Letters, 9/7). How can they be when they regularly feature calls for the destruction of Israel, chants demonising all Zionists as terrorists, flags and photos of terrorist groups and their leaders, and now chants calling for death to Israel's defence force?Your correspondent claims the marchers are demonised for what others do around them, but it's hard to believe that the incitement from these marches doesn't directly lead to antisemitic attacks. Why does the correspondent not arrange for her own peaceful demonstrations just like the peaceful protests in support of Israel do?These demonstrations are not genuinely about peace, or they would also condemn Hamas, which started this war, perpetuates this war, and sacrifices its people for PR purposes. Stephen Lazar, Elwood The human tollI wonder whether anyone else feels just deeply saddened by the story of a woman who lured three people to their deaths, and another to illness and deep grief?It is an extraordinary story: idyllic town, religious community, marriage breakdown, and a very exotic choice of murder weapon. Indeed, all true crime storytellers must be eager to bring their version to an audience: those who travelled to the court or breathlessly awaited media yet, despite the fascinating details of this case, this is just a deeply sad story. I do not know – as was 'diagnosed' by a columnist in The Age this week – whether Erin Patterson has narcissistic personality disorder, but I do know she has her own sad story that led her to do something truly terrible. I know there are confused and hurting children, a devastated new widower, a haunted ex-husband/son and an aching story is not salacious, it is just very sad. I hope that we can remember the human toll of our curiosity in our rush to gobble up the latest details of this awful case. Nickie Gyomber, Alphington Interlocking logicThe wearing of seatbelts became mandatory in Victoria in 1970. We were the first in the world to do so. Initially, there was some resistance based on the removal of freedom of choice. The impact on the road toll was instant, and continues to be significant 'interlock device″ prevents anyone with a blood alcohol level of above the maximum allowable level from starting their vehicle. This is a case of after-the-fact protection of the community and the if we were to again be trailblazers of road safety? What if it every vehicle was fitted with this device and was mandatory as were seatbelts? Would the additional cost not be worth the guarantee of no drunk drivers on the road? What if it became as accepted and automatic as clicking seatbelts? Ray Way, Blackburn South Relief from miseryOn a miserable day with miserable news reports and miserable weather, thank you John Silvester for in-depth analysis of the world and local events surrounding the, but not of, the Morwell trial (″The butcher, the fashion choice and the old job: The red flags in killer's claims″, 10/7). I am still giggling while I am writing this and will probably do so throughout the day. Veronica Padkins, Somers Credit: Matt Golding AND ANOTHER THING QantasQantas should introduce a frequent hacker account, where you earn points every time your personal information is used. Paul Custance, Highett I am finally in an exclusive club. My Qantas data has been hacked just the same as the members of The Chairman's Lounge. Marie Nash, Balwyn TrumpDonald Trump thinks he rules the world. If only we'd stayed with the French nuclear submarine deal. Katriona Fahey, Alphington After seeing Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu at their formal dinner, I feel moved to nominate both for the Nobel Comb Over of the Year Prize. Their follicular excellence deserves international recognition, while their leadership and humanity do not. Mick Hussey, Beaconsfield If Donald Trump doesn't win the Nobel Peace Prize he will no doubt claim he was robbed and threaten to annex Norway. Bernd Rieve, Brighton ″Netanyahu nominates Trump for peace prize″ (9/7). Was that part of the deal? Martin Shaw, Mirboo North I would, formally, like to nominate Donald Trump for the 'nobble' prize. Robert Juozas, Eaglemont FurthermoreDump AUKUS. War has changed. What can a submarine, even a wiz-bang nuclear one, do to stop a drone, or an explosive device in a mobile phone? Wendy Brennan, Bendigo It is apparent at least six RBA members have never experienced family living in the outer suburbs while trying to pay down a mortgage. Arthur Pritchard, Ascot Vale The people of Gaza aren't responsible for the crimes of Hamas. Neither should our Jewish citizens be blamed for the crimes of Israel. Malcolm McDonald, Burwood
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Personal information of McDonald's job applicants exposed online due to a security vulnerability in an AI chatbot
Thousands of Australian prospective McDonald's workers have had their personal information exposed online due to a security vulnerability in an AI chatbot used by the fast-food giant. The chatbot, 'Olivia', handles job applications for McDonald's franchisees globally, including in Australia, screening candidates and asking for information including their resumes and contact information, then conducting a personality test. McDonald's Australia hires more than 11,000 workers every year and is one of the nation's largest employers, with more than 100,000 employees across its restaurants and management offices. Credit: Eamon Gallagher Olivia, built by US-based software firm Paradox, suffered from poor security, however, with researchers last week able to access the chatbot's 64 million chat records using the username and password, '123456'. The security researchers, Ian Carroll and Sam Curry, verified that the chat records were legitimate and included applicants' names, email addresses and phone numbers. Their research was first reported by US tech news publication Wired . When The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald applied for a job at McDonald's, Olivia sought a 60-second video, asking why we wanted to work at McDonald's, as well as our email address and phone information. Olivia also asks candidates whether several personal traits are 'me' or 'not me', including 'open to feedback', 'traditional', 'calm in the storm', and 'do it yourself'. A screenshot of the McDonald's Australia chatbot Olivia. Credit: Nine 'I just thought it was pretty uniquely dystopian compared to a normal hiring process, right? And that's what made me want to look into it more,' security researcher Ian Carroll told Wired . 'So I started applying for a job, and then after 30 minutes, we had full access to virtually every application that's ever been made to McDonald's going back years.' McDonald's Australia hires more than 11,000 workers every year and is one of the nation's largest employers, with more than 100,000 employees across its restaurants and management offices. According to McDonald's, more than 5 per cent of the Australian population has at some point worked for the golden arches.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
There's a change coming to the number that guides the Reserve Bank on interest rates
The key number used by the Reserve Bank to set interest rates will change by year's end, possibly preventing a repeat of its surprise decision not to deliver financial relief to millions of home borrowers this week. The Australian Bureau of Statistics is close to finalising an upgrade to its monthly measure of inflation that should give the Reserve Bank the confidence to use this rather than quarterly inflation reports when it sets monetary policy. The difference between monthly and quarterly inflation was a substantial factor in this week's surprise decision by the Reserve's monetary policy board to hold official interest rates steady. May's monthly inflation report showed annual inflation falling to 2.1 per cent. It has been within the RBA's 2-3 per cent target band since August last year. But the March quarterly inflation report showed prices up by 2.4 per cent, with underlying inflation just slipping within the RBA's target band. Bank governor Michele Bullock on Tuesday noted issues around the monthly inflation report as one of the reasons for the bank's decision to keep interest rates unchanged at 3.85 per cent. Loading 'To the point about the recent CPI data that we saw, a lot of the focus was on the monthly data and we think that's a little too volatile and not quite representative of what's really going on with inflation,' she said. At present, the monthly information report updates prices for between two-thirds and 77 per cent of goods and services in any given month, rather than the comprehensive quarterly report. An extra $156.7 million in the 2023-24 federal budget was given to the bureau to modernise its IT systems, including an expansion of the monthly CPI. That expansion, which includes collecting prices from businesses more often and ramping up its web-scraping processes, is now almost complete.
