logo
It's too late to tariff the globalization out of American cuisine. More chili crisp, please

It's too late to tariff the globalization out of American cuisine. More chili crisp, please

Tariff fear and loathing. The $40 Dodger dog, $100 a box for avocados and remembering Hal Frederick. I'm Laurie Ochoa, general manager of L.A. Times Food, with this week's Tasting Notes.
There's been a lot of talk lately about tariffs and the Ford F-150, the hugely popular pickup truck made with 'parts that come from over 24 different countries,' as the Wall Street Journal documented in a widely viewed video. 'No car,' says the narrator, 'not even a U.S.-built Ford F-150, is 100% U.S.-made.' The American car has been globalized.
The same could be said of the American palate, which has been shaped by far more than 24 different countries.
Let's put aside the many 'all-American' grocery store products that unknown to most consumers use ingredients from other countries, such as apple juice concentrate, Vitamin C or ascorbic acid and vanillin from China. Because even if those exports were cut off in a Trump administration executive order, you can't tariff or deport away Americans' globalized food cravings.
Consider one condiment that is becoming increasingly integral to American cuisine: chili crisp.
The star condiment in countless TikTok videos — so many chili crisp eggs! — is readily available at Walmart, Costco, Target, Kroger stores and other mainstream supermarkets. And not just in the so-called 'international' section. It's increasingly stocked in the salsa and hot sauce aisle, often right next to Huy Fong Food's sriracha sauce and its many imitators.
The rise of chili crisp follows Americans' progression from ketchup to Tabasco sauce to salsa and ever-hotter chile sauces. Back in 1991, Americans for the first time spent more on salsa — 'a retailing category that includes picante, enchilada, taco and similar chili-based sauces,' wrote Molly O'Neill in the New York Times — than they did on ketchup. 'The taste for salsa is as mainstream as apple pie these days,' the president of market research company Packaged Facts Inc. told O'Neill.
Then came sriracha sauce, which first emerged in Thailand during the 1930s and is now so popular here that periodic shortages of the sauce cause panic buying. Two different women are credited with its origin, either La-Orr Suwanprasop or Thanom Chakkapak, using a recipe from her father Gimsua Timkrajang. What is certain is that Vietnamese immigrant David Tran popularized the sauce through his rooster-emblazoned Huy Fong Foods brand founded in 1980 here in Southern California, making sriracha the true Angeleno's ketchup. (Note that Huy Fong's sambal oelek was the secret ingredient in Jonathan Gold's Hoppin' John, though he considered sriracha an acceptable substitute.)
Chili crisp, sitting right beside the sriracha in the condiment caddies of so many Chinese and Vietnamese restaurants across Southern California, wasn't far behind in gaining popularity.
As columnist Jenn Harris wrote last year during a now-settled trademark dispute over the term 'chili crunch' (the term is now free to be used by any brand), many of us came to know chili crisp in our own homes through the Lao Gan Ma or 'Old Godmother' brand started in China by Tao Huabi and prominently stocked at 99 Ranch and other Chinese grocery stores. In a 2015 taste test of hot sauces (from Tapatío to habanero) for this paper with former food editor Amy Scattergood, Gold, Harris and chef judges Roy Choi and Alvin Cailan, Lao Gan Ma's chili crisp was the winner.
'It has texture. It has sweetness, heat, fermented complexity and a deep toasted-onion flavor,' Gold wrote. 'It is like a three-course meal in a spoon.'
Since then, many L.A.-area restaurants have started making their own chili crisp — during the pandemic, I relied on the version made by Yang's Kitchen in Alhambra, picking up a jar along with fresh produce and other grocery items they were then stocking, including blocks of Meiji tofu.
But the person who is credited with bringing chili crisp into mainstream grocery aisles is Jing Gao, who started her Fly By Jing brand in 2018. Gao's sauce costs a bit more than typical Chinese brand but people noticed the quality, and she was an excellent marketer for the sauce, getting it into the hands of prominent chefs and other tastemakers who spread the word — with the purpose, she has said, of 'evolving culture through taste.'
Last year, when deputy food editor Betty Hallock persuaded Gao to create a chili crisp-inspired Thanksgiving menu — because chili crisp turns out to be a wonderful addition to the American holiday table — she reported that more than 2 million jars had been sold nationwide.
Of course, one of the things that makes Gao's chili crisp so good is the sourcing of her ingredients. And those ingredients come from China.
Which means that Fly by Jing, as Gao posted this week on Instagram, has been 'highly impacted by the trade war that's currently happening.'
As of Thursday, she said that her growers and producers in China are facing tariffs of 160%. 'That's compared to about 15 percent before all of this began.'
Even so, she wanted her customers to know that she is holding firm: 'We continue to prioritize the sourcing and manufacturing of our core sauce products in my home town in Sichuan. The integrity of our ingredients, their specific provenance and the craftsmanship of our products are highly local to Sichuan and will continue to be. These ingredients — from the fermented black beans ... to the highly prized tribute peppers, the erjingtiao chilies, the cold-pressed roasted rape seed oils — cannot be grown anywhere else. They're integral to the deep and complex flavors of our products and this will not change.'
All of this comes after she lowered the price of her chili crisp so that it would be accessible to more consumers. So she's starting this tariff season with less of a cushion than she had before.
What could get Gao and others like her through this is the fact that there is a high demand for her product.
'Over the last six years, as a result of our growth and investment into a global supply chain, we've made an indelible mark on the international aisle of the grocery stores. ... We have fundamentally changed and diversified the palates of millions of Americans and we believe that these bold and complex flavors are universal. And once you expand your palate there's no going back. Bold and diverse international flavors are what Americans want. And they're here to stay.'
No matter how high the demand for bold and complex flavors, however, satisfying these cravings isn't going to be easy for the Southern California chefs and restaurateurs who helped shape those tastes.
'We are freaking out,' Billie Sayavong of the Westminster Laotian spot Nok's Kitchen told Harris in her story this week about how restaurants plan to handle the tariffs. 'In just the last week,' Harris wrote, 'the restaurant's meat and seafood invoice increase by 30%.'
Shaheen Ghazaly's Kurrypinch in Los Feliz uses Sri Lankan cinnamon sticks 'in at least 80% of the dishes on the menu,' Harris wrote. 'It's what gives Ghazaly's seeni sambol, the caramelized onion relish, a distinct, subtle, almost citrusy cinnamon flavor.' This month, his 'weekly grocery order jumped from $1,800 to $2,600.'
'Thai Nakorn in Stanton relies on a specific coconut cream from Thailand to make its curries, as well as Thai Jasmine rice and a long list of herbs. There's a unique Thai crab fat, fermented Thai crabs and Thai shrimp paste in the crab papaya salad,' said Harris.
Linda Sreewarom, 'whose aunt opened the original Thai Nakorn in Orange County in 1984,' told Harris, 'To change the recipes completely and try to find different brands of all these things made in the U.S. is impossible.'
As Caroline Petrow-Cohen and Malia Mendez reported in a broader story on how the tariffs will affect the economy of Southern California, the higher cost of produce grown in Mexico and other countries has already made things harder for small businesses. 'It's going to hurt a lot,' said Riyad Ladadwa of Diamond Fresh Farmers Market. 'I've never in my life seen avocados for $100 a box.'
'What does 'America First' mean when applied to the restaurant industry?' Harris asked in her column. 'What cuisines are considered American and who gets to decide? ... Without immigrant food culture, what is American food?'
In the introduction to 'The Gourmet Cookbook' published in 2006, editor and former L.A. and New York restaurant critic Ruth Reichl put it simply: 'The history of American cooking is the history of immigration.'
Our palates have been globalized and we're not going back.
Also: Will tariffs kill your favorite affordable wine? Patrick Comiskey talks with Lou Amdur, owner of Los Feliz' beloved Lou Wine Shop about the tariff's effects on 'comfort zone' wines.
'Wines that we are currently are selling for $30 and might be doable for a weeknight, for some people it will no longer be doable at $40,' Amdur said. 'Wines that people would grab unthinkingly at price X, now that there's a 20% tariff, suddenly it's no longer unthinkable.'
And for those who think they can escape tariffs by buying American, Amdur says not so fast: 'I love all these glib Monday morning quarterbacks who just say, you know, 'Just switch to California wine.' I do carry a fair amount of California wine, and I sometimes have New York wine, but they don't really understand the economics of the wine. It's not like there's going to be a one-to-one replacement.'
Brad Johnson, founder of the recently closed Post & Beam, wrote a lovely appreciation of Hal Frederick, the trailblazing Venice restaurateur and owner of Hal's Bar and Grill, who died April 2 at 91: 'Tall, handsome and elegant, Frederick, a former actor, maintained a nightly presence at Hal's. He moved from table to table, never overstaying, and everyone sought his greeting. There is a fine art to being a restaurateur, and Frederick fully embraced the role.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

6 months in, Trump's unorthodox foreign policy is rewriting the rules
6 months in, Trump's unorthodox foreign policy is rewriting the rules

The Hill

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hill

6 months in, Trump's unorthodox foreign policy is rewriting the rules

President Trump's return to office has marked a fundamental departure from conventional foreign policy approaches that have dominated Washington for decades. His first six months demonstrate how unorthodox methods — transactional negotiations, direct pressure and strategic leverage — can achieve breakthroughs that traditional diplomatic playbooks consistently failed to deliver. The results challenge long-held assumptions about international relations. Where successive administrations have relied on multilateral consensus-building and careful diplomatic protocol, Trump has moved decisively to address longstanding challenges through direct engagement and clear incentives. The outcomes speak for themselves: concrete achievements that decades of conventional wisdom could not produce. The June NATO summit in Brussels exemplifies this transformation. Trump secured an unprecedented agreement from member nations to increase defense spending to 3.5 percent of GDP by 2035, with Poland, Estonia, and Lithuania committing to reach 5 percent within the decade. This represents the largest collective defense spending increase since the alliance's founding. For decades, American presidents from both parties have struggled to convince NATO allies to shoulder more of the defense burden. George W. Bush, Barack Obama and others made passionate appeals with minimal results. Trump's direct pressure on individual leaders — including frank conversations about the consequences of continued free-riding — achieved what 20 years of diplomatic consensus-building could not. The breakthrough reveals how Trump's willingness to challenge diplomatic norms can produce substantive results. When allies understand that America's patience with free-riding has limits, they respond accordingly. Perhaps nowhere is Trump's departure from conventional wisdom more evident than in Iran policy. His coordination with Israel on strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities in July set back Tehran's nuclear program by up to two years according to Pentagon officials cited by Reuters — a more concrete achievement than decades of sanctions and diplomatic engagement that was slow-walking Tehran to having a nuclear bomb. This wasn't reckless escalation — it was calculated deterrence after years of failed accommodation strategies that spanned multiple administrations. Iran's subsequent diplomatic overtures to European partners suggest the strikes achieved their intended effect. Where traditional approaches allowed Iran's regional influence to grow unchecked, Trump's decisive action has forced Tehran to recalculate its strategic position. The success challenges the foreign policy establishment's preference for extended diplomatic processes over direct action. Sometimes, as Trump demonstrates, credible threats require credible follow-through. Immigration policy demonstrates another area where Trump's approach has succeeded. New agreements with Mexico and Central American nations include enhanced enforcement provisions and expanded return protocols, contributing to a more than 90 percent reduction in detected border crossings in May compared to the previous year, according to Department of Homeland Security data. The key difference lies in leverage. Trump used trade access and visa negotiations to secure these commitments, demonstrating that America's economic power can be an effective diplomatic tool. Mexico agreed to deploy additional forces along its southern border in exchange for streamlined trade procedures — a classic win-win arrangement that Biden's team never successfully negotiated. This success highlights a broader truth about international relations: Countries respond to clear incentives and consequences. When America articulates its interests clearly and backs them with appropriate leverage, even reluctant partners find ways to cooperate. Trump's approach to Africa represents a fundamental departure from the aid-focused diplomacy that characterized previous administrations. Rather than continental tours filled with promises of development assistance, Trump has hosted five African leaders at the White House in recent months, emphasizing trade and investment opportunities. This shift addresses a critical gap in American foreign policy. While recent presidents maintained traditional approaches that often created dependency relationships, Trump is building partnerships based on mutual economic interest. Early agreements with Liberia and Senegal focus on critical mineral extraction and energy partnerships — arrangements that benefit both American businesses and African development. The message is clear: America seeks partners, not dependents. By reframing relationships around mutual economic interest rather than charity, Trump is building more sustainable and dignified partnerships. Perhaps most surprisingly, Trump's tough approach has yielded diplomatic breakthroughs that eluded his predecessor. In late June, he hosted talks between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo that produced a cease-fire agreement including troop withdrawals and commitments to joint economic development. The success came from Trump's willingness to use America's full diplomatic and economic weight — not to lecture, but to incentivize. This contrasts sharply with Biden's reactive approach to international crises, which often left the U.S. struggling to respond effectively to fast-moving global events. As we assess these first six months, the question isn't whether Trump's methods conform to diplomatic norms — it's whether they work. The evidence suggests they do. In a world where traditional institutions struggle to address complex challenges, Trump's transactional approach offers a compelling alternative. His first six months suggest that sometimes bold action succeeds where diplomatic convention fails. Kurt Davis Jr. is a Millennium Fellow at the Atlantic Council and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He is also an advisor to private, public, and state-owned companies and their boards as well as creditors across the globe on a range of transactions.

US applications for jobless benefits fall for sixth straight week, remain at historically low level

time38 minutes ago

US applications for jobless benefits fall for sixth straight week, remain at historically low level

WASHINGTON -- The number of Americans filing for jobless aid fell for the sixth straight week, hitting the lowest level since mid-April. The Labor Department reported Thursday that jobless claims for the week ending July 19 fell by 4,000 to 217,000. That's fewer than the 227,000 new applications analysts were expecting. Applications for unemployment aid are viewed as representative of layoffs. Earlier in July, the Labor Department reported that U.S. employers added a surprising 147,000 jobs in June, adding to evidence that the American labor market continues to show resilience despite uncertainty over President Donald Trump's economic policies. The job gains were much more than expected and the unemployment rate ticked down 4.1% from 4.2% in May. Though the job market is broadly healthy by historical standards, some weakness has surfaced as employers contend with fallout from Trump's policies, especially his aggressive tariffs, which raise prices for businesses and consumers. Most economists believe the import duties make the economy less efficient by reducing competition. They also invite retaliatory tariffs from other countries, hurting U.S. exporters and potentially driving businesses to freeze hiring or cut staff. The deadline on most of Trump's stiff proposed taxes on imports were extended again until Aug. 1. Unless Trump reaches deals with countries to lower the tariffs, economists fear they could act as a drag on the economy and trigger another bout of inflation. Companies that have announced job cuts this year include Procter & Gamble, Workday, Dow, CNN, Starbucks, Southwest Airlines, Microsoft, Google and Facebook parent company Meta. The Labor Department's report Thursday showed that the four-week average of claims, which evens out some of the weekly volatility, declined by 5,000 to 224,500. The total number of Americans collecting unemployment benefits for the week of July 12 remained stable, rising by just 4,000 to 1.96 million.

Domino's Pizza, (DPZ): 'Be Prepared To Be steamrolled,' Says Jim Cramer
Domino's Pizza, (DPZ): 'Be Prepared To Be steamrolled,' Says Jim Cramer

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Domino's Pizza, (DPZ): 'Be Prepared To Be steamrolled,' Says Jim Cramer

We recently published . Domino's Pizza, Inc. (NASDAQ:DPZ) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Domino's Pizza, Inc. (NASDAQ:DPZ) is a well-known American pizza chain. The shares have gained 11% year-to-date, helped partly by a 4% jump in July. Domino's Pizza, Inc. (NASDAQ:DPZ)'s stock was helped by a strong earnings report, which saw its US same-store sales jump by 3%. Cramer discussed the firm's partnership with DoorDash: 'I remember when Russell Weiner called me. Russell Weiner's fantastic, the CEO's fantastic. And he said, the street's underestimating this partnership [with DoorDash]. And I said well I'm not gonna underestimate it, cause he's been wanting to go with me the whole lot time. . .But Russell is a hitter. And he said this would happen. People just said, well what does it mean? And the answer it that it means there is another channel. And historically there hasn't been another channel, because the owners, the franchisees, always want to be the only channel. But I just think he's fabulous. That was really good numbers. People who don't like him, be prepared to be steamrolled.' Previously, the CNBC TV host discussed Berkshire Hathaway's stake in Domino's Pizza, Inc. (NASDAQ:DPZ): 'Russell Weiner said do you know that Warren Buffett is now my second largest shareholder? And that's Dominos. And he said I don't speak to him but it is, and I said well I don't know, maybe it's possible that he's not, that he, but I went to Becky Quick, because Becky can ask him. But what an informator if you find out that he is your second-largest shareholder.' While we acknowledge the potential of DPZ as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store