‘You don't see the trauma until suddenly you do': Lockerbie bombing's lasting impact on a ‘normal little town'
At the end of a row of tidy red brick bungalows in the Scottish town of Lockerbie is an empty plot, carefully landscaped now as a memorial garden. Two red tartan ribbons, tied on a leafless branch perhaps in private remembrance, flutter in a wintry gust.
Eleven of the street's residents died when the wing section of Pan Am 103 crashed into Sherwood Crescent with the force of a meteorite on 21 December 1988, gouging a 30-foot crater on this spot. The impact was such that some bodies were never recovered.
This once anonymous street was recreated in meticulous detail for the filming of the Sky Atlantic series Lockerbie: A Search for Truth, which was first screened last month and stars Oscar winner Colin Firth as Dr Jim Swire, whose daughter Flora was killed when a bomb exploded on the Pan Am flight from London bound for New York.
Although the drama has been widely praised, some relatives of the 270 people who lost their lives in what remains the UK's deadliest terrorist atrocity have questioned the need for such graphic depictions of the immediate aftermath. A spokesperson for the Victims of Pan Am Flight 103 group described it as 'tragedy porn' to the Hollywood news site Deadline while, closer to home, a Lockerbie resident who lost her sister and brother-in-law wrote in the Annandale Herald: 'I don't need to be reminded about the terrible scene that night.'
But for a generation born after 1988, this series may be their first exposure to the tangle of legal proceedings, conspiracy theories and international controversy that has become synonymous with the name of one small town in the south of Scotland.
With a second dramatisation airing on BBC One and Netflix later this year, a new BBC Scotland documentary, and the trial of the alleged bomb-maker starting in the US in May, Lockerbie is likely to remain in the spotlight this year, willingly or otherwise.
'It's the most normal little town in the world,' says the Rev Frances Henderson, minister at Lochmaben and Lockerbie Churches, 'with a strong community, and people are just living their lives.'
'You don't see the trauma until suddenly you do. It's there, being carried and dealt with, a trauma that is part of their lives and has shaped the last decades.'
Henderson has not watched the Colin Firth series herself: 'Not because I object to it but because I feel I'd have to psyche myself up to it.
'I think most people feel it's been done respectfully but neither have I heard of many watching it because it's too real. For those who weren't there, who may be too young to remember, it's perhaps useful, but not for those who were there.'
The Sky Atlantic series was based on Swire's investigations into the bombing. He and many supporters have argued consistently for the innocence of Libyan intelligence officer, Abdelbaset al-Megrahi who was convicted in 2001 at a specially convened Scottish court in the Netherlands, of 270 counts of murder.
Swire believes al-Megrahi, who was released on compassionate grounds by the Scottish government in 2009 after a diagnosis of terminal cancer and died in 2011 in Tripoli, was framed to deflect attention from Iranian and Syrian responsibility. This is rejected as conspiracy theory by US victims' relatives, who criticised the series for misrepresenting the trial and portraying al-Megrahi as 'an innocent man that should be empathised with'.
Swire and other UK relatives continue to demand a public inquiry into the failure to take seriously or make public warnings that an attack on a Pan Am flight was imminent, while in May, another Libyan, 72-year-old Abu Agila Masud, will go on trial in Washington, accused of building the bomb that brought down the flight. He denies all charges.
'There has been so much written about the trial and various conspiracy theories, but no one has ever spoken to me about any of that as a constituent,' says Colin Smyth, Scottish Labour MSP for the region.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'People of Lockerbie didn't choose for their town to be known for this, but they took their responsibility to the victims very seriously from the first night – like the couple who found a young man in their field and didn't want to leave him so stood vigil until dawn, or the man who scooped up the body of a toddler and drove them into town so they weren't left in the cold and wet.'
'For decades they have welcomed people with open arms as the families of the victims continue to visit their loved ones' last resting place. Those relationships have sustained – you hear of relatives staying at family homes in Lockerbie even now.'
Those relationships are woven through the generations, thanks to the enduring scholarship programme between Lockerbie Academy and Syracuse University, New York, which lost 35 students in the disaster.
This Saturday Lori Carnochan, chair of Tundergarth Kirks Trust, took another group of Syracuse students around the church and memorial room to the east of the town, where the plane's nose cone came to rest.
'Visitors have this image in their head of Lockerbie and they're all so pleasantly surprised – it's not a sombre place. It's a thriving, vibrant community, full of positivity and life, a fantastic place to raise a family.'
Carnochan is leading plans to create a legacy museum at Tundergarth: 'Children and young people need to understand the significance of the worst terrorist attack ever to have happened in the UK and the impact it had not only here in Lockerbie but all over the world, the changes that came about in aviation security and safety because of it.'
'It's so important for them to learn about the incredible acts of loving humanity by the people of Lockerbie in the aftermath, like the women who washed and distributed 11,000 items of personal artefacts and clothing back to the families that otherwise would have been destroyed.
'It's a very difficult thing for many in the town to have to live with – it's widely known many people here have some form of PTSD because of the attack, yet they still open their hearts and homes in the way that they did 36 years ago.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Classrooms in chaos: Teachers need option of excluding pupils
Surely this was an exaggeration, dramatic licence? people asked. The notion that teachers really have no means of enforcing good behaviour seems absurd to those who are a few decades out of short trousers. But ask current teachers if they recognise the scenes and the response is not reassuring. 'There's so little you can do,' one told me, 'and the kids know it.' Disruptive, abusive and violent behaviour in schools has become a bona fide crisis in Scotland as in England since the pandemic and many teachers feel their hands are tied in dealing with it. Many Scottish schoolchildren feel safe in their schools, thankfully, but not all do and nor do their teachers, against a nationwide increase in disruptive behaviour. Read more Rebecca McQuillan Some teachers describe 'lawless' schools where pupils refuse point blank to do what they are told and square up to staff. Forty four per cent of Scottish teachers in a recent survey by the NASUWT teaching union reported experiencing physical abuse or violence in the previous year. Women report experiencing more physical assaults than men. Staff at one East Dumbartonshire school took industrial action earlier this year over 'a culture of abuse and violence from pupils'. Many teachers are at the end of their tethers. Mike Corbett of the NASUWT describes how in tackling bad behaviour, the use of restorative conversations is the norm, where children are encouraged to take accountability and repair relationships that have been damaged. But he stresses that this type of approach, while useful, just isn't enough to cope with the range of problems school staff face. Teachers need other options – right up to and including exclusion – and that is what has been lacking. Or it was until this week. The Scottish Government has now published long-awaited new guidance on behaviour. But will it help? Teachers have been crying out for a wider range of tools to deal with aggressive behaviour and for schools to have the confidence to use them. The guidance appears to offer that. It stresses the importance of schools having a culture of positive relationships and behaviour, with clear expectations of pupils, well understood consequences and consistent application of the school rules. But teaching unions, who helped design the guidance, stress that the most important part is the appendix, where a list of exemplars of poor behaviour and possible consequences are laid out. The NASUWT welcomes the description there of 'an escalating set of consequences', including things like detention and, where absolutely necessary, exclusion. Teachers need other options – right up to and including exclusion – and that is what has been lacking in recent years (Image: free) No school wants to exclude pupils, for solid reasons. Twenty years ago, ministers sought to drive down exclusions, in response to strong evidence that pupils who were excluded had significantly lower levels of attainment and were much more likely to become offenders. When the use of exclusions fell, it was rightly seen as a positive development. But some head teachers, fearful of being criticised if they excluded children, started regarding the option as prohibited altogether. That left them with limited options for dealing with instances of serious, dangerous behaviour. That has contributed to a sense of helplessness among teachers faced with a rising tide of violence. Exclusion in the new guidance is described as as 'a last resort, where this approach is proportionate and there is no appropriate alternative'. Many teachers will be glad the Scottish Government is explicitly including it in the list of options for teachers but they also know that exclusion was never and will never be the answer on its own. We've come a long way with the focus today in schools on the 'why' of pupil behaviour rather than just the 'what'. Given the profile of children who are traditionally most at risk of exclusion – those with unmet additional support needs (ASN), looked after children and those from deprived backgrounds – meeting those children's needs more effectively is clearly a huge part of the answer. It's easy for politicians to dismiss such approaches as touchy-feely and call for harsher consequences but disruptive behaviour can't be tackled in a lasting way unless its causes are addressed. Tackling the 'why' is better for the child and for the whole school. And that is demanding for any school. It requires close collaboration with educational psychology, social work and underfunded mental health services, and it also means thinking differently about the way some children are educated. Read more Particularly for children with ASN, the difficulty so many mainstream schools have meeting their needs is raising serious questions about the inflexibility of the system. Some schools, though not all, now have 'wellbeing hubs' or 'nurture spaces' where such children can spend time productively in a supportive environment; we'll need a lot more focus on developing these spaces and staffing them properly in future. At the same time, and separately from these issues, teachers report a trend for parents and children to value school less. In a survey last year by the NASUWT, one teacher commented that 'it has become more common for learners to see school as optional'. Pity our head teachers: they now face a whole new challenge in persuading those parents to value their children's education more. Will it work? Will the tide go out on classroom violence and abuse? It could, provided these principles are shared with teachers and embedded in schools, and schools have the staff and resources to better support all children in their care. But the positive headlines may be some time coming. Rebecca McQuillan is a journalist specialising in politics and Scottish affairs. She can be found on Bluesky at @ and on X at @BecMcQ
Sunday Post
10 hours ago
- Sunday Post
Failure over domestic abuse law is leaving women at risk
Get a weekly round-up of stories from The Sunday Post: Thank you for signing up to our Sunday Post newsletter. Something went wrong - please try again later. Sign Up Key new powers to protect domestic abuse victims are still gathering dust four years after MSPs voted for them – and all ministers have done in the past 12 months is hold a workshop. Holyrood unanimously backed the new law in 2021 to help police, courts and landlords deal with emergencies where women are in acute danger. But John Swinney is now the third first minister who has failed to activate the powers. The same Domestic Abuse Prevention Orders and Notices (DAPOs and DAPNs) promised for Scotland are now up and running in a series of pilot schemes in England and Wales. In Greater Manchester alone, DAPOs were used more than 200 times in the first few months with at least six brutes ending up behind bars for breaching them. But while those abusers were being rounded up down south, the Scottish Government convened a workshop on the logjam last March. Now ministers have revealed that the measures are being shelved indefinitely while they set up a new working group to talk about the issue further. Sophie Berry, a solicitor for the Women's Rights Project at Glasgow's Govan Law Centre, said: 'The failure to implement this legislation is an unforgivable missed opportunity to help vulnerable women and children escape domestic violence and abuse in Scotland. 'It took many years of consultation and careful drafting to get the Domestic Abuse (Protection) (Scotland) Act 2021 on to the statute book, and it received overwhelming support. 'I see no credible argument for why England and Wales are able to achieve what we apparently cannot, four years after our own legislation was passed.' Scottish Conservative MSP Pam Gosal has lodged her own Bill at Holyrood, calling for a register of domestic abusers. She said: 'Given that domestic abuse cases remain shamefully high, the SNP government's haphazardness when it comes to delivering legislation on this issue is deeply alarming. 'Even by their standards, this failure to pass competent legislation and get it implemented is beyond unacceptable and shamefully betrays victims. 'DAPOs are supposed to protect the most vulnerable, but now it could be years before we get them implemented. 'If the SNP Government are serious about tackling the scourge of domestic abuse, they must start putting victims first. A good place to start is by giving their backing for my Prevention of Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Bill that is going through parliament.' Scottish Labour justice spokeswoman Pauline McNeill said: 'The SNP promised to protect vulnerable women and children, but after four years, three first ministers and countless delays, all they've delivered is a workshop. 'While England and Wales are jailing abusers under DAPOs, SNP ministers have shelved the same powers in Scotland and are now blaming their own legislation. 'This is a shameful failure – and it lies squarely at the feet of the SNP and John Swinney. 'We need action, not warm words. Vulnerable women and children are being let down because of their incompetence and inaction.' The Domestic Abuse (Protection) (Scotland) Act was passed by MSPs of all parties in March 2021 – by 118 votes to 0. Then Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf hailed it as 'transformational legislation', predicting it would help between 600 and 3,000 families a year. He told Holyrood: 'We collectively have a duty to ensure that our law and law-enforcement agencies have the tools to (protect) victims… 'We should never again have that stain on our collective conscience that victims of domestic abuse – predominantly women – must flee their homes in order to protect themselves.' The Act targets perpetrators in two ways. Firstly, it would allow a council or housing association landlord to evict a convicted domestic abuser if the victim wishes to carry on living in the property. But even before a case goes to court, the police would be able to issue a suspect with a DAPN, ordering him or her out of the shared home if there is a risk of physical violence or psychological trauma escalating. Courts can then follow up with a DAPO to cement the protection for three months and impose a vast range of conditions on suspects that can include being fitted with a GPS tracker or attending drug or drink rehab. Police in England and Wales already had more powers than Scottish officers, and now the enhanced notices and orders have been running for several months in Greater Manchester, London, Cleveland and north Wales. But they still cannot be used in Scotland because SNP ministers have failed to table the secondary legislation needed to bring them to life. Last summer, The Sunday Post highlighted fears that victims are being left at risk because of the delay, with then Housing Minister Paul McLennan admitting in an excruciating podcast interview that he was totally confused. He said: 'I think obviously there was legislation, you know, there shouldn't have been, and to be honest, I don't know how that would actually work.' Since then, three Holyrood committees have put pressure on the government to come up with a solid date for implementation. But this week, Victims and Community Safety Minister Siobhian Brown wrote to the equalities committee: 'The consensus from those who participated in the workshop was that fundamental changes were needed to the legislation. 'A short-life working group will be established to consider recommendations for possible legislative change to ensure that domestic abuse protection orders can be implemented operationally and sustainably. 'Once determined and agreed, we will look to consult more widely in 2026 and thereafter consider the need for legislation.' The Scottish Government said it is handing £21.6 million this year to more than 100 organisations working to prevent violence against women and girls and support survivors. It said: 'We are committed to fully implementing the Act 2021. This is a complex piece of legislation, and through extensive and close working with stakeholders several unexpected operational challenges have been raised. 'A short-life working group is being established to consider possible legislative changes to ensure the Act can be implemented as intended and so it works for people. We will then consult on any proposed changes.' A catalogue of ministers have played their part in the failure to implement the Act. Nicola Sturgeon used the 2019 SNP party conference to announce the coming of DAPOs – and repeated the pledge in her Programme for Government speech of 2020. Her successor, Humza Yousaf, was justice secretary when the law was passed. Both are set to leave Holyrood at the election next year with golden goodbye resettlement grants in excess of £100,000 without having seen through their promises to domestic abuse victims. Among other justice secretaries, Michael Matheson – another about to stand down as an MSP – first touted the orders in 2017 while Keith Brown claimed Part 2 would go live in 2022. Current incumbent Angela Constance insisted those landlord powers would be up and running by spring 2024. So too did Deputy First Minister Shona Robison, when she was social justice secretary, and ex-housing minister McLennan. Minister for parliamentary business Jamie Hepburn and equalities minister Kaukab Stewart have been liaising with committees about the delays. It was Brown, the victims and community safety minister , who wrote to MSPs on Holyrood's equalities committee last week to reveal that DAPOs have been put on the back-burner. She said: 'We will look to consult more widely in 2026 and thereafter consider the need for legislation.' Timeline How progress stalled after government promises nearly eight years ago. Nov 2017 Justice secretary Michael Matheson reveals plan for new orders. Oct 2019 Sturgeon to SNP conference: 'Within this parliamentary term, we will introduce a new law to establish emergency protective orders.' Sept 2020 Programme for Government: 'The experience of lockdown reiterated the importance of protecting women and girls…facing domestic abuse.' Oct 2020 The Bill is introduced along with consultation. Jan 2021 Justice committee backs the Bill but says more work needed to make it practical. Mar 2021 The Bill becomes law after MSPs vote. Apr 2021 Westminster passes its own Domestic Abuse Act for DAPOs/DAPNs in England and Wales. Winter 2022 Deadline missed to implement Part 2, which gives powers to landlords to eject abusers. Sept 2023 Justice Secretary Angela Constance: 'Detail being worked through.' Working group set up to discuss Part 1. Spring 2024 Another deadline to implement Part 2 of the Bill is missed. Jun 2024 Housing minister Paul McLennan: 'I don't know how that would actually work.' Nov 2024 Pilot schemes activated across England and Wales. Police begin using the orders. Mar 2025 Workshop held to discuss Part 1. Jun 2025 Part 1 shelved indefinitely with new working group and consultation to be set up in 2026. Dec 2025 New deadline for Part 2, but warning that it may be delayed yet again. OPINION: Survivors affected by lack of urgency By Sophie Berry, Solicitor at the Govan Law Centre, Glasgow It really is incredible that here we are, yet another year down the line, and still there's no sign of the key parts of this legislation being implemented, just endless delays and excuses. Deadlines missed and promises broken, but plenty of time for a workshop, consultations and working groups. It's unbelievably frustrating for all of Scotland's domestic abuse organisations that have contributed significant time and resources to bringing this legislation into existence. Far more importantly, though, these are potentially life-and-death measures for survivors who continue to be affected by the lack of urgency with still no end in sight. Almost 64,000 domestic abuse cases were reported to Police Scotland in 2023/24, with 81% involving a male perpetrator and a female victim. Every day at Govan Law Centre's Women's Rights Project, we see women and children suffering the consequences of the failure to put these protections in place. Yet, at the same time, we hear that significant progress is being made in England and Wales, with pilot schemes which appear to be making a real difference to the lives of survivors. It makes no sense. Women are most at risk just when they are trying to leave an abusive partner. Giving the police the power to intervene on behalf of a person at imminent risk could make a vital difference at the most critical time. And that's as true today as it was in 2021, so any further delay would be unforgivable.
Scottish Sun
10 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Freeing criminals early from Scots prisons will ‘erode trust' in justice, charity warns
SNP ministers sneaked through the move unannounced before parly broke up for the summer, with the new home detention curfew rules kicking in from October 'SHAMEFUL' Freeing criminals early from Scots prisons will 'erode trust' in justice, charity warns FREEING criminals from jail after just 15 per cent of their sentence will 'erode trust' in justice, a charity has warned. Victim Support Scotland has hit out at a new law allowing cons to be freed from prison after just 15 per cent of their sentence would 'erode trust' in the justice system. Advertisement 2 Victim Support Scotland has raised concerns over the impact on trust in the justice system due to releasing prisoners early Credit: Getty 2 Scottish Tory MSP Liam Kerr said inmates will be "rubbing their hands with glee" Credit: Alamy We told earlier how SNP ministers sneaked through the move unannounced before parly broke up for the summer, with the new home detention curfew rules kicking in from October. It means inmates, including violent offenders, could be freed on an electronic tag after 15 per cent of their sentence, down from the current 25 per cent. Victim Support Scotland said the move was 'concerning', especially given 'the current lack of capacity for prisoner rehabilitation' in Scotland's jails. A spokeswoman said: 'The recent Scottish Crime and Justice Survey shows decreasing confidence in the criminal justice system - this has been a repeated trend for the last five years. Advertisement 'Measures like these early release measures contribute to this erosion of trust.' There were almost 6,000 criminals fitted with tags in 2023/24, with an increase of 14 per cent on the previous year. Tragic cases involving criminals on home detention curfew include the 2017 murder of Paisley dad Craig McClelland by killer James Wright, who'd sabotaged his tag and dodged cops for six months. The SNP, Labour, Liberal Democrats and Greens voted for the move this week, but the Scottish Tories opposed it. Advertisement Tory shadow justice secretary Liam Kerr said prisoners across Scotland 'will be rubbing their hands with glee at the SNP's shameful capitulation to criminals'. Victim Support Scotland, headed by chief exec , said its primary concern was 'the safety and wellbeing of people impacted by crime' and said victims must be informed of any early releases so they can 'plan for their safety and even risk meeting perpetrators unexpectedly in their community'. Heartbreaking Old Firm march Grieving parents call for knife crime action in Scotland The spokeswoman added: 'We fear further Emergency Early Release programmes alongside Prisoner Early Release and revised Home Detention Curfew regulations, begging the question of any meaningful prison sentence or rehabilitation for offenders.' A Scottish Government research report this month said offenders released under electronic monitoring - or EM - 'may be less likely to reoffend than those released without monitoring', but admitted: 'Some studies found no difference in offending behaviour between those released with EM and those without.' Advertisement The change comes after separate laws giving short-term prisoners automatic early release after serving 40 per cent of their sentence, rather than 50 per cent, amid efforts to cut prison populations. Justice Secretary Angela Constance said tagging was a 'well-established part of our justice system which provides structured and managed transition for individuals being released back into the community'. She added: "There is no automatic right to home detention curfew. "Decisions on home detention release are made by the Scottish Prison Service following careful consideration of each case.'
