
Plans to lower some speed limits to 20mph approved by Tynwald
That commitment was cemented by an amendment by Ann Corlett, which included local consultation, the prioritisation of the lower speed limit around schools and clearer maps of the plans.Tynwald members also approved the monitoring of the new speed limits, with a review of the measures being published once implemented.
'Divisive'
Haywood previously confirmed the implementation would be phased by region following local consultation.However Rob Callister MHK said the minister had £400,000 to spend on implementing the zones in the "wrong places".He said although there were areas in Onchan that "might benefit" from lower speed limits or traffic-calming measures, those changes "should only occur through full engagement with the community, local authorities, and local MHKs.Julie Edge MHK said there was "still a lot of confusion" about what was going to happen. But MLC Gary Clueitt said it was an "operational plan" which seemed "reasonable".Corlett said that the principle of reduced speed limits around schools and in residential areas had been unanimously approved by members twice, but the "difficulty was in the where and the how", which had remained "divisive".Haywood told Tynwald final decisions would "only be made after local engagement" and mapping had been updated to make the proposals "clearer".She said the measure would enable residents to "enjoy the streets in which they live more" and reduce the risk of serious pedestrian injury.The infrastructure department's approach was "proportionate, evidence-led, and reflects the financial and operational realities we face", she added.
Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
25-07-2025
- BBC News
Coventry residents lose petition to lower 20mph speed limit
Residents who campaigned for the speeding limit on their estate to be reduced to 20mph on their estate have been told it cannot be than 50 people signed a petition to cut the current limit of 30mph that vehicles can travel at in Bannerbrook Park in at a city council cabinet meeting this week, it was announced the move would not be possible because the roads have not yet been adopted by the local authority. It was agreed that extra traffic calming measures on the estate would be brought forward into the current financial year. Conservative group leader Gary Ridley, who represents the Woodlands ward, said the issues of road safety and speeding motorists evoked passions within the community."I know that 50 people near enough have felt motivated to sign this petition, so I thought it important to air some of these things in public," he explained. "I certainly welcome the commitment to bring forward potential traffic calming measures but would appreciate some clarity about what they look like and perhaps a bit more of a timescale." John Seddon, the city council's strategic lead on transport and innovation, said: "My starting position is that where we have estates like this, then we should aim to get them adopted as quickly as possible, but one of the issues is to ensure that Severn Trent has adopted the drainage system before we go ahead and adopt the roads, which are built on the drains so we don't inherit a problem."In the long term, I don't see it [20mph speed limit] being a problem once the roads are adopted."Once adopted, the city council would become responsible for maintaining and repairing the roads on the estate. Until then, they remain private and the responsibility of the developer or landowner. This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations. Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


The Guardian
14-07-2025
- The Guardian
The right wants us to think Britain is on the verge of ethnic conflict. The truth is worse than that
June 2025 was a now typical month for the British press. It began when, on Tuesday 3 June, the Telegraph's Sam Ashworth-Hayes and Charles Hymas worried that white Britons, according to new data published by Matt Goodwin and trailed earlier that day in his column in the Daily Mail, will 'become a minority in the UK population within the next 40 years'. There followed a brief calm, interrupted only by the odd article informing us that 'London's decline is now irreversible', or that 'Starmer and Farage have doomed Britain to an endless spiral of decline'. By Friday 13 June, however, things reached a new pitch. That day, former Tory MP Douglas Carswell used his Telegraph column to complain that 'low-skilled, non-western immigrants' are a 'burden' on the country. We need, he wrote, 'a detailed plan to take foreign nationals off the benefit system and remove them from the country'. A day later, the Sun followed up with a report noting that the 'majority of Brits say UK 'is in decline' and fear civil unrest'. Later, the Telegraph warned the nation of a coming 'revolution', one born from the effects of immigration, state failure and economic stagnation. Here, in full flow, was a new chorus of 'declinism', the fear that the country's relative global decline is the result of the pathological failings of the British state and society. This is not, of course, the first time that declinism has lodged itself in the national consciousness. As historians such as Jim Tomlinson and David Edgerton have noted, it is a recurring feature of British politics, a near ever-present national neurosis in which failure in the present is traced to some corruption in the past. During the last great declinist wave, in the 1970s and early 1980s, Britain's failing industry was blamed on a pincer movement of overmighty unions and a state dominated by an inept upper class who ruled over more qualified recruits. For Margaret Thatcher and her acolytes, these where the 'enemy within'. There has often been a racialised element to declinism. In the late 1970s, the cultural theorist Stuart Hall and his co-authors saw the racial panic around 'mugging' as one aspect of the declinist narrative that led to the later dominance of Thatcherism. Thatcher herself, in 1978, famously spoke of the fear that 'that this country might be swamped by people with a different culture'. What seems new this time is the degree to which the two are fused. The problem for today's declinists is not so much Britain's stagnant economy and eviscerated state but the country's racial demographics, of which economic decline and political crisis are merely symptoms. On 19 June, for example, the Tory peer David Frost warned that under the twin evils of immigration and 'aggressive wokeism', Britain had undergone an 'unprecedented break in national continuity' – gone was the 'Britain of Christianity and the church', of the Romans and the Tudors, Churchill and the all-conquering Victorians, replaced by the ugly online neologism, 'the Yookay'. A day later, David Goodhart, writing in the Evening Standard, pondered the fate of the capital 'when London's white British population falls below 20 per cent in 10 years time'. 'Is there some minimum number of natives that a capital requires before it ceases to be the capital?' he asks, after quoting dubious statistics on the national costs of social housing first published on an obscure, anonymous rightwing blog. Come the end of the month, things had reached such a pitch of wailing hysteria and moral panic that it was difficult to discern fact from wild-eyed projection. The cover story in the summer edition of the Critic, for instance, warned of a soon-to-be-realised Britain of gated compounds and armoured trucks protecting British citizens from ethnic guerrilla conflict, thick with lurid depictions 'of gunfire, off in the distance; you're getting used to it now'. 'Fiction, perhaps,' wrote its author, a Conservative councillor for bucolic Scotton and Lower Wensleydale. 'But for how long?' Much of this can be explained as a form of circular reasoning. The same sources are endlessly recycled, with Goodwin's predictions of demographic collapse and various rightwing memes quoted and requoted in each succeeding piece, in turn justifying the next ratcheting up of racialised panic. Conversely, it is hard to deny that Britain is experiencing something like decline: productivity is stagnant, as are wages for the majority of people; inequality runs rampant, with the country looking increasingly like post-crash Greece without the climate; while faith in the political system and in our politicians and ruling elite reaches record lows. This is a febrile mix, although one only heightened by predictions of state collapse and race war. What we're now witnessing in the rightwing press is the real-time creation of a new political myth. By calling forth the nightmare of state collapse under the ever-increasing pressure of ethnic conflict and white replacement, the right has managed to cast itself as saviours. The nightmare serves as both a rallying cry and a legitimation: a call to a middle-class base which is feeling the pain of a stagnant economy, that those at fault are the racialised outsiders who bring disorder and drain the state of its already squeezed resources; and a justification for the tough actions needed to stem the tide of immigrants from across the border. No mention is made of the policies that might actually help to stem the sense of economic decline that many British people feel, such as wealth redistribution. Nor do today's declinists have anything to say about the role that austerity played in dismantling the state. In this sense, blaming decline on racial demographics is an opportunity to avoid changes that would be anathema to the right. As Labour increasingly apes Conservative rhetoric about fiscal rectitude, tanking ever further in opinion polls as it tails the right, space is opening for a new narrative in British politics. It doesn't matter that the predictions about a racialised apocalypse may never come true, since conjuring these fears opens up new political possibilities. If inter-ethnic conflict is the symptom of decline, then hardened borders and mass deportations can be offered as the solution. This, not ethnic conflict, should be our greatest fear. John Merrick is the deputy editor of the Break–Down

Leader Live
08-07-2025
- Leader Live
Michael Douglas ‘no real intentions' of going back to acting
The 80-year old actor and producer was speaking during a press conference at Karlovy Vary International Film Festival in the Czech Republic for the 50th anniversary of One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest, which he co-produced. Douglas most recently starred as Benjamin Franklin in the Apple TV+ series Franklin in 2022 and said that unless something 'special' came along, it was time for him 'to stop'. The actor, who is married to Welsh actress Catherine Zeta Jones, also spoke about how 'lucky' he was to have made a recovery from stage four cancer after undergoing chemotherapy and radiation treatment and avoiding surgery that would have impacted his speech and removed parts of his jaw. He said: 'I've had a very busy career. I have not worked since 2022, purposefully, because I realised I had to stop. I had been working pretty hard for almost 60 years, and I did not want to be one of those people who dropped dead on the set. 'I'm very happy with taking the time off. I have no real intentions of going back. 'I say I'm not retired, because if something special came up, I'd go back, but otherwise, I'm quite happy. Just like to watch my wife work.' Douglas co-produced the film adaptation to Ken Kesey's novel, which explores themes of power and resistance as a rebellious convict arrives at a psychiatric hospital in 1963 where he encourages his fellow patients to take control of their lives and defy the tyrannical head nurse. Starring Jack Nicholson and Louise Fletcher, the film was nominated for nine Oscars and took home five including the 1975 award for best picture. When asked about the parallels between the film and current political environment in the US, Douglas said: 'I think our president's name has been mentioned enough in the short time that he's been president. 'And I look at it generally as the fact of how precious, how precious democracy is, how vulnerable it is, and how it always has to be protected, and we have to be reminded. 'Right now, our country is flirting with autocracy as some other democracies in this world. 'Democracy is not to be taken for granted, and I think it reminds us that we all need to make our efforts. It's not the job of somebody else. 'And of course, the disappointing thing is, politics now seem to be for profit. 'I myself am worried, I'm nervous, and I just think it's all of our responsibilities, not for somebody else to look out for us, but for us to each look out for ourselves.'