Pro-Palestine protesters plan first-ever march across Sydney Harbour Bridge
In a statement, the Palestine Action Group said on Sunday it had filed a Form 1 notifying NSW Police of the 'March for Humanity' set to take place at 1pm on August 3.
The group called on NSW authorities to 'facilitate' the march, which is in response to the 'extraordinary situation' in Gaza, including mass civilian starvation.
'As Australia's most iconic symbol, a mass march across the Harbour Bridge will send a powerful message to the world,' the Palestine Action Group said.
That message, the group said, would be to 'Gaza, to Israel, and to our own government, that we are determined to stand up for humanity'.
Camera Icon
Pro-Palestine protestors have rallied almost weekly since October 7, 2023. NewsWire / Flavio Brancaleone
Credit: News Corp Australia
The protest is likely to face stiff opposition, with then-NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb previously applying to the Supreme Court to stop a pro-Palestine event.
The vigil, held on the one-year anniversary of the October 7 attacks, was ultimately given the green light after a court hearing and 11th-hour discussions with protesters.
In NSW, protesters do not need formal approval from police to hold a legal rally following the filing of a Form 1 – but police can oppose it through the court system.
The Harbour Bridge is a major thoroughfare in Sydney, but has been closed several times in recent years, including for the filming of the movie Fall Guy.
The bridge was also shuttered in 2023 for a World Pride Month march attended by Anthony Albanese.
Camera Icon
Sydney Harbour Bridge has been the site of several protests. NewsWire / Damian Shaw
Credit: News Corp Australia
In 2000, the bridge was the site of the Walk For Reconciliation, a rally showing support for Indigenous and non-Indigenous reconciliation attended by 250,000 people.
'It can certainly be closed to stop a genocide,'organisers said.
The Palestine Action Group said protesters planned on meeting at Lang Park, near Wynyard station, at 1pm before marching to the bridge.
The event marks almost two years of protests following Hamas' October 7 attack on Israel and the subsequent war on Gaza.
Last week, the Prime Minister accused Israel of 'clearly' breaching international law, but fell short of joining ally France in recognising a Palestinian state.
NSW Police has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
Canada will recognise Palestinian state at UN, PM says
Listen to Australian and world news, and follow trending topics with SBS News Podcasts . In a major diplomatic shift, Canada and the United Kingdom have followed France's lead, saying they'll recognise Palestine as a state at the United Nations General Assembly in September. Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney made the announcement following an emergency cabinet meeting in Ottawa, as images of starving children in Gaza continue to shock the world. Mr Carney made it clear the recognition was both a moral stand and a strategic step. "Canada has long been committed to a two-state solution – an independent, viable and sovereign Palestinian state living side by side with the state of Israel in peace and security. For decades, it was hoped that this outcome would be achieved as part of a peace process built around a negotiated settlement between the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority. Regrettably, this approach is no longer tenable." France last week became the first G-7 nation to commit unconditionally to formal recognition. However Mark Carney says Canada's decision is subject to conditions. "This intention is predicated on the Palestinian Authority's commitment to much-needed reforms, including commitments by its president, Mahmoud Abbas, to reform its governance and to hold general elections in 2026 in which Hamas can take no part. And to demilitarise the Palestinian state. Canada will increase its efforts to support strong democratic governance in Palestine and contributions of its people to a more peaceful and hopeful future." And it comes just one day after the United Kingdom unveiled a similar plan, though with different conditions attached. At the U-N in New York, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy delivered the U-K's message to world leaders, that Britain will recognise a Palestinian state, unless Israel takes steps toward a ceasefire and long-term peace. Mr Lammy condemns both Hamas for its hostage-taking and Israel for restricting aid. "We gather today at a dark moment, 660 days since the Israeli hostages were first cruelly taken by Hamas terrorists. There is no possible justification for this suffering and only a clear duty that we help to bring it to an end. The devastation in Gaza is heartbreaking. Children are starving. And Israel's drip-feeding of aid has horrified the world. These are an affront to the values of the Charter of the United Nations." He detailed the U-K's actions so far: restoring UNRWA funding, suspending arms exports to Israel, sanctioning far-right Israeli ministers and freezing trade talks with the Netanyahu government. 'Let me be clear: the Netanyahu government's rejection of a two-state solution is wrong. It's wrong morally and strategically. It harms the interests of the Israeli people closing off the only path to a just and lasting peace. ... And so, it is with the hand of history on our shoulders that His Majesty's Government intends to recognise the state of Palestine when the UN General Assembly gathers in September here in New York.' Secretary Lammy says the U-K will use the next eight weeks to push for changes on the ground in Gaza. He says the hope is that the announcement will pressure Israel to allow aid, halt its military campaign, and begin serious negotiations toward a two-state outcome. In the U-K, the response to the government's move has been sharply divided. Director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, Ben Jamal, welcomes recognition in principle but says the government's approach is too conditional. "It is framed as Britain showing its support for the Palestinian people's right of self-determination by recognising statehood, but makes that conditional upon Israel's actions. It doesn't frame it as an inalienable right. It makes it effectively a bargaining chip. And the message to the Palestinian people that Keir Starmer is delivering effectively is 'we will acknowledge your right to self-determination by recognising your state unless in the next few weeks, Israel stops starving you and stops threatening to annex your land. And if Israel does those things, then we won't.'" Meanwhile, the Jewish Leadership Council also voiced criticism, but from the opposite perspective. Their Director of Public Affairs, Russell Langer, says that premature recognition could embolden Hamas. "We have always opposed unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state. The reason being that while we support all efforts to create peace in the region, this is an unhelpful move at this time.... By creating the conditions on Israel and not being clear that a recognition cannot happen while Hamas continues to hold hostages and is in control of the Gaza Strip, what the government is doing is clearly a reward for the terrorism that's been perpetrated by Hamas and that just isn't acceptable." That fear has been echoed by former hostages themselves. Luis Har, rescued after 129 days in Hamas captivity, says global attention has turned too quickly away from what happened on the 7th of October 2023. "The problem now, in this moment, is the people (are) looking only for the Palestinian people and forget what happened on October 7 and (they) forget we have 20 civilians from Israel (still) in captivity." Emily Damari, a dual British-Israeli who spent over 470 days in captivity, posted online that the U-K's move rewards terror and sends a dangerous message. Australia has not moved to follow Canada and the U-K. Meanwhile, in Gaza, at least *48 Palestinians were killed on Wednesday [[30 July]] while waiting for food at the Zikim crossing. Shifa Hospital officials say they were among crowds seeking flour when gunfire broke out. It's unclear who opened fire. Several Palestinians were seen walking away carrying 50-kilogram bags of flour. This comes as the Deputy Spokesman for the United Nations Secretary-General, Farhan Haq, says the current aid system is unsustainable. "The Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) warns that, four days since the start of tactical pauses in Gaza declared by the Israeli authorities, we are still seeing casualties among those seeking aid and more deaths due to hunger and malnutrition. Parents continue to struggle to save their starving children." Around 220 trucks entered Gaza on Tuesday, far short of the 500 to 600 needed daily. And even that aid is often offloaded by desperate crowds with little oversight. The U-N says unless aid access improves rapidly, widespread famine is inevitable.
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Harvard to comply with Trump demand on employment forms
Harvard University says it will comply with the demands of President Donald Trump's administration to turn over employment forms for thousands of university staff. In an email to university employees sent on Tuesday, Harvard said earlier this month it received a notice of inspection and a related subpoena from the Department of Homeland Security, seeking to inspect the I-9, or Employment Eligibility Verification, forms and supporting documentation for university employees. The I-9 forms, from US Citizenship and Immigration Services, are used to verify the identity and employment authorisation of individuals hired for work in the US, according to the agency's website. Harvard said federal regulations entitle the government to access a US employer's paperwork, including information on employment eligibility. Harvard has been embroiled in a legal fight with the Trump administration to have its billions of dollars of frozen federal funds restored. It sued the Trump administration earlier this year. The US president has threatened universities with federal funding cuts over pro-Palestinian protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza, climate initiatives, transgender policies and diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Rights advocates have raised concerns over free speech, due process and academic freedom. Harvard said, for now, it was not sharing records with the government for people employed in roles only available to students as it was determining if such a request complied with privacy protection requirements. The New York Times reported that Harvard was open to spending up to $US500 million to end its dispute with the government. That amount was more than twice what Columbia University agreed to pay last week to resolve federal probes. The newspaper said negotiators were still discussing the financial details of the Harvard deal and that the university opposed allowing an outside monitor to oversee the deal. On Monday, the government initiated a probe into Duke University and the Duke Law Journal to determine if the journal's selection of its editors gave preferences to candidates from minority communities. On Tuesday, the government said it notified Duke of a freeze of $US109 million in federal funds. Separately it alleged that the University of California, Los Angeles violated federal civil rights law. Both Duke and UCLA had no immediate comment. Harvard University says it will comply with the demands of President Donald Trump's administration to turn over employment forms for thousands of university staff. In an email to university employees sent on Tuesday, Harvard said earlier this month it received a notice of inspection and a related subpoena from the Department of Homeland Security, seeking to inspect the I-9, or Employment Eligibility Verification, forms and supporting documentation for university employees. The I-9 forms, from US Citizenship and Immigration Services, are used to verify the identity and employment authorisation of individuals hired for work in the US, according to the agency's website. Harvard said federal regulations entitle the government to access a US employer's paperwork, including information on employment eligibility. Harvard has been embroiled in a legal fight with the Trump administration to have its billions of dollars of frozen federal funds restored. It sued the Trump administration earlier this year. The US president has threatened universities with federal funding cuts over pro-Palestinian protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza, climate initiatives, transgender policies and diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Rights advocates have raised concerns over free speech, due process and academic freedom. Harvard said, for now, it was not sharing records with the government for people employed in roles only available to students as it was determining if such a request complied with privacy protection requirements. The New York Times reported that Harvard was open to spending up to $US500 million to end its dispute with the government. That amount was more than twice what Columbia University agreed to pay last week to resolve federal probes. The newspaper said negotiators were still discussing the financial details of the Harvard deal and that the university opposed allowing an outside monitor to oversee the deal. On Monday, the government initiated a probe into Duke University and the Duke Law Journal to determine if the journal's selection of its editors gave preferences to candidates from minority communities. On Tuesday, the government said it notified Duke of a freeze of $US109 million in federal funds. Separately it alleged that the University of California, Los Angeles violated federal civil rights law. Both Duke and UCLA had no immediate comment. Harvard University says it will comply with the demands of President Donald Trump's administration to turn over employment forms for thousands of university staff. In an email to university employees sent on Tuesday, Harvard said earlier this month it received a notice of inspection and a related subpoena from the Department of Homeland Security, seeking to inspect the I-9, or Employment Eligibility Verification, forms and supporting documentation for university employees. The I-9 forms, from US Citizenship and Immigration Services, are used to verify the identity and employment authorisation of individuals hired for work in the US, according to the agency's website. Harvard said federal regulations entitle the government to access a US employer's paperwork, including information on employment eligibility. Harvard has been embroiled in a legal fight with the Trump administration to have its billions of dollars of frozen federal funds restored. It sued the Trump administration earlier this year. The US president has threatened universities with federal funding cuts over pro-Palestinian protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza, climate initiatives, transgender policies and diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Rights advocates have raised concerns over free speech, due process and academic freedom. Harvard said, for now, it was not sharing records with the government for people employed in roles only available to students as it was determining if such a request complied with privacy protection requirements. The New York Times reported that Harvard was open to spending up to $US500 million to end its dispute with the government. That amount was more than twice what Columbia University agreed to pay last week to resolve federal probes. The newspaper said negotiators were still discussing the financial details of the Harvard deal and that the university opposed allowing an outside monitor to oversee the deal. On Monday, the government initiated a probe into Duke University and the Duke Law Journal to determine if the journal's selection of its editors gave preferences to candidates from minority communities. On Tuesday, the government said it notified Duke of a freeze of $US109 million in federal funds. Separately it alleged that the University of California, Los Angeles violated federal civil rights law. Both Duke and UCLA had no immediate comment. Harvard University says it will comply with the demands of President Donald Trump's administration to turn over employment forms for thousands of university staff. In an email to university employees sent on Tuesday, Harvard said earlier this month it received a notice of inspection and a related subpoena from the Department of Homeland Security, seeking to inspect the I-9, or Employment Eligibility Verification, forms and supporting documentation for university employees. The I-9 forms, from US Citizenship and Immigration Services, are used to verify the identity and employment authorisation of individuals hired for work in the US, according to the agency's website. Harvard said federal regulations entitle the government to access a US employer's paperwork, including information on employment eligibility. Harvard has been embroiled in a legal fight with the Trump administration to have its billions of dollars of frozen federal funds restored. It sued the Trump administration earlier this year. The US president has threatened universities with federal funding cuts over pro-Palestinian protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza, climate initiatives, transgender policies and diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Rights advocates have raised concerns over free speech, due process and academic freedom. Harvard said, for now, it was not sharing records with the government for people employed in roles only available to students as it was determining if such a request complied with privacy protection requirements. The New York Times reported that Harvard was open to spending up to $US500 million to end its dispute with the government. That amount was more than twice what Columbia University agreed to pay last week to resolve federal probes. The newspaper said negotiators were still discussing the financial details of the Harvard deal and that the university opposed allowing an outside monitor to oversee the deal. On Monday, the government initiated a probe into Duke University and the Duke Law Journal to determine if the journal's selection of its editors gave preferences to candidates from minority communities. On Tuesday, the government said it notified Duke of a freeze of $US109 million in federal funds. Separately it alleged that the University of California, Los Angeles violated federal civil rights law. Both Duke and UCLA had no immediate comment.
9 News
3 hours ago
- 9 News
Police take pro-Palestine group to court over 'significant risk' of Harbour Bridge protest
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here NSW Police is taking a planned pro-Palestine protest across the Sydney Harbour Bridge to the Supreme Court, citing a "significant risk" to public safety. The Palestine Action Group lodged an application for 10,000 people to walk on Sunday, sparking concerns among authorities. Premier Chris Minns has refused to grant the group permission on advice from police, saying they were not given enough time to safely organise resources for the protest. NSW Police is taking a planned pro-Palestine protest across the Sydney Harbour Bridge to the Supreme Court (Steven Siewert) In a last-ditch attempt to block the protest, NSW Police has filed a summons seeking an order to block the protest in the Supreme Court. The matter will be heard at 12.30pm tomorrow. The Palestine Action Group said it will fight police in court. "Shame on Chris Minns for trying to stop this inspiring mass movement to stop the genocide in Gaza," the group said in a statement. "If Minns had his way, there would not have been a single protest against this genocide in the past two years. "The people of Gaza would be exterminated in silence, forgotten and ignored by the world. "Whether or not we win will depend in large part on the incredible and unprecedented support we have received over recent days." NSW Premier Chris Minns said he would support the protest if it were held at another location or time. (Sitthixay Ditthavong) NSW Police recognised the right to free speech and protest, but said the demonstration posed a risk to protesters, the general public and authorities. "The NSW Police Force acknowledges the right to free speech and political demonstration and has facilitated more than 100 public assemblies organised by the Palestine Action Group since October 7, 2023," NSW Police said in a statement. "Following an assessment of the Form 1 submitted by the Palestine Action Group, including the proposed route and large numbers expected to participate in the public assembly, a decision has been reached that the event would pose a significant risk to the safety of the participants, public and police. "As the matter will be before the court shortly, the NSW Police Force won't be making further comment at this stage." The Palestine Action Group invited protesters to the Supreme Court tomorrow, telling them to show their "support for the unstoppable march for humanity". It has also started an online petition to allow them to march across the Harbour Bridge, which has gained more than 7200 signatures at the time of publication. A previous march across the Harbour Bridge. (Reddit) The Harbour Bridge has previously been closed to host a march for reconciliation, marathons, World Pride and to allow Hollywood actor Ryan Gosling to shoot part of his film The Fall Guy . Minns and police have said they would support the protest if it were held at another location or time. Organisers have offered to push it back another week. If the protest goes ahead this weekend, it will be the first time pro-Palestine protesters bring their weekly march to the Harbour Bridge in almost two years since the October 7 attacks. Sydney New South Wales national Australia police Protests Palestine Gaza Israel CONTACT US
